ObjectiveTo explore the progresses of diagnosis and treatment for endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). MethodsThe literatures on studying the classification, diagnosis and management, risk factor, and treatment for the endoleaks after EVAR were reviewed and analyzed. ResultsEndoleak was a common and particular complication after EVAR and its represented persistence meant failure of the EVAR treatment. Accurate detection and classification were essential for the proper management and the treatment method for the endoleak was determined by the different source. Type Ⅰ and type Ⅲ endoleak required urgent treatment， type Ⅱ and type Ⅴ were considered less urgently but may be observed continuously. A variety of techniques including extension endografts or cuff, balloon angioplasty, bare stents, and a combination of transvascular and direct sac puncture embolization techniques were allowed to treat the vast majority of these endoleaks. ConclusionsEndoleak after EVAR is still the main clinical problem to be solved. The characters of endoleak still are not fully revealed. The diagnosis and treatment remained equivocal, which requires further study.
Objective To summarize selection of therapeutic method for isolated iliac aneurysms and analyze its advantages and disadvantages. Method The clinical data of 21 patients with isolated iliac aneurysms from January 2006 to January 2017 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Results Four patients were treated with an open surgery such as the unilateral iliac prosthetic graft interposition, aorto-biiliac or aorto-bifemoral arterial bypass graft, ligation of internal iliac artery, etc.. Seventeen patients were treated with an endovascular treatment such as the unilateral iliac stent-grafts, bifurcated aortic stent-grafts, or coil embolization alone, etc.. One patient with ruptured isolated iliac aneurysms died during the endovascular repair, and the rest patients were cured after the operation. The average operative time was 2.83 h and 1.58 h, the average hospital stay was 17.5 d and 7.7 d respectively for the patients with the open surgery and the endovascular treatment. Except 1 case of type Ⅰ and 1 case of type Ⅱ endoleaks were found in the patients with the endovascular treatment, no complications such as the ureteral and intestinal injuries, the gluteal muscle claudication, and the sigmoid ischemia were found in all the patients. Seventeen cases were followed-up. The following-up rate was 85%. The following-up time was 1–60 months with an average of 22 months. During the following-up period, the grafts and stent grafts were patent and the aneurysm sac diameter was unchanged. The abscess of the iliac fossa occurred in 1 patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and improved after the symptomatic treatment. Two patients died of other diseases during the following-up period, and the rest had no obvious clinical symptoms. Conclusions Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that endovascular repair and open surgery in treatment of appropriately selected patients with isolated iliac artery aneurysms is safe and effective. But in special situation, technical controllability of open surgery might be better than endovascular repair, treatment should be selected according to patient’s general condition and anatomy of aneurysm.
Aortic dissection is a disease with high mortality rates. Due to the urgency of time, the diagnosis, treatment processes, and strategies of acute aortic dissection follow specific guidelines. However, patients with chronic aortic dissection are often neglected. Choosing the best medication therapy and surgical interventions remains challenging, and there is still a lack of guideline recommendations. With the improvement of imaging diagnostic methods for aortic diseases, the progress of endovascular surgical techniques, and the development of new endovascular graft devices in recent years, clinical data of the treatment of chronic aortic dissection is also gradually increasing. This article summarized the current new technologies and clinical research results for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic aortic dissection, aiming to provide new suggestions for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic aortic dissection.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of treating type Ⅱ endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms with coil embolization. Methods A retrospective review of patients with type Ⅱ endoleaks treated with coil embolization was performed. Data regarding the technical, clinical, and imaging outcomes during perioperation and followed-up were collected. Results The technical success rate and the initial clinical success rate of treating type Ⅱ endoleaks with coil embolization were 100% (14/14). The mean operating time was (124.3±11) min, a mean of (127±15) mL contrast agent and a mean of (7±2) coils were used. During perioperation, one patient suffered left limb paralysis, all the patients were discharged with no perioperative mortality. Twelve patients were followed-up. During the period of 3 to 57 months of followed-up (average: 17.3 months), Type Ⅱ endoleaks reoccurred in one patient with coil embolization of the feeding vessels alone and two patients with coil embolization of the aneurysm sac alone. Since the aneurysms did not enlarge during the followed-up, these 3 patients continued followed-up without reinterventions. Conclusion Treating type Ⅱ endoleaks with coil embolization appears to be safe, and it can prevent aneurysm sac enlargement effectively. Because of the high risk of reoccurrence, follow-up after embolization is important.
Objective To summarize the clinical experience of capture technology in the large diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm(EVAR). Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 6 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (maximum diameter of 6.0 cm or bigger) in our hospital between July 2013 and May 2014.There were 3 males and 3 females at age of 76.2(73–81) years. Two patients of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, in EVAR, established orbit using the capture technology successfully. Results The capture technology made the thread through the proximal tumor neck smoothly, successful repaired. One patient of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm was dead after 10 hours. One patient was lost to follow-up. Four patients were followed up for 3 to 11 months. The four patients had not occurred bracket displacement, internal leakage, thrombosis, or other serious complications. Conclusion For the patients with larger abdominal aortic aneurysm, capture technology may be used to the thread through the proximal tumor neck, to build a convey or track easily, to shorten the operation time, to improve the success rate of surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of in situ fenestration combined with chimney technique in the treatment of aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery.MethodsFrom January 2012 to June 2019, 53 patients with aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery were selected. There were 21 patients in the test group, including 14 males and 7 females, with an average age of 57.2±11.2 years; there were 32 patients in the control group, including 20 males and 12 females, with an average age of 56.7±12.1 years. In the test group, the left subclavian branch was reconstructed by in situ fenestration and the left common carotid artery was reconstructed by chimney technique. In the control group, the left common carotid artery was reconstructed by hybrid operation. The clinical data of the patients were compared.ResultsThe operation time of the test group was significantly longer than that of the control group (151.8±35.2 min vs. 101.3±29.6 min, P=0.00). The patients in the two groups were followed up for 6-20 months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of pulmonary infection, stroke, steal blood syndrome, false lumen thrombosis or internal leakage between the two groups (P>0.05). The diameters of the distal and proximal ends of the true cavity in the test group increased significantly compared with those in the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionIn situ fenestration combined with chimney technique is an effective method for the treatment of aortic dissection involving left common carotid artery, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
ObjectiveTo discuss the risk factors of type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair(EVAR). MethodsThe clinical data of 197 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent EVAR in our hospital from Jan. 2006 to Mar. 2011 were analyzed retrospectively, and risk factors of type Ⅱ endoleak were explored by logistic regression. ResultsOf the 197 cases, 18 cases suffered from type Ⅱ endoleak. Result of logistic regression showed that the risk of type Ⅱ endoleak increased per 1 of the increase of lumbar artery number(OR=1.822, P=0.010) and per 1 mm of the increase of lumbar artery diameter(OR=1.256, P=0.040). All of the cases were followed up for 1-36 months(median value of 16.8 months). Only 1 case was intervened by inferior mesenteric artery embolism for the growth rate larger than 5 mm during half a year, who was not found growth of diameter after the embolism. The type Ⅱ endoleaks of other 17 cases closed ultimately or keeping stable. ConclusionsType Ⅱ endoleak after EVAR is affected by the number and diameter of lumbar artery. Persistent type Ⅱ endoleak without enlargement of diameter of aneurysm sac needs to beclosely followed-up instead of re-intervention.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and endovascular abdominal aortic repair have now become the first-line treatment options for aortic stenosis and abdominal aortic disease, respectively. For patients with both diseases, combined procedures have been reported in a few domestic and foreign publications. However, all the procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Here, we reported a case of simultaneous minimalist transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement and endovascular repair of the abdominal aorta for a 78-year-old male patient with aortic stenosis and abdominal aortic ulcer, and the surgical results were satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo determine the influence of proximal aneurysm neck anatomy on typeⅠA endoleak follo-wing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. MethodsFrom September 2007 to February 2014, 111 consecutive patients with non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were treated with EVAR. The preoperative CTA of abdominal aortic was obtained by every patient, and the three-dimensional imaging was reconstructed and measured by software of Osorix. Then, the relation between the recurrence of typeⅠA endoleak and the concerned data measured by Osorix was analyzed by the statistical software. ResultsThe recurrence of typeⅠA endo-leak was related to the proximal neck angle of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, which weren't related to the proximal neck diameter and variation rates, the mural thrombas and calcification rate, and the maximum diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm by multivariate analysis. ConclusionsThe complicated proximal aneurysm neck anatomy is a major cause for the typeⅠA endoleak, the proximal neck angle of the abdominal aortic aneurysm is the independent factor. The applica-tion of EVAR depends largely on the shape of the proximal aneurysm neck.