Objective To compare the differences in evaluating readiness for hospital discharge between nurses and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patient-reported Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) and nurse-reported RHDS were delivered to 130 CRC patients and 40 nurses respectively. All patients were followed ERAS pathway during perioperative periods. The differences were compared in evaluating readiness for hospital discharge between nurses and CRC patients. Results This study investigated 130 CRC patients and 40 responsible nurses. The scores of RHDS from nurses and patients were 162.86±27.95 and 149.86±33.65 respectively. When evaluating whether patients were ready to go home after discharge, the consistency between nurses’ results and patients’ results was weak（κ=0.365, P<0.001）. Items in patients’ RHDS scoring ranking from high to low were expected support, coping ability, knowledge, and personal status. Items in nurses’ RHDS scoring ranking from high to low were expected support, knowledge, coping ability, and personal status. Besides the " social support” dimension, the scores of other 3 dimensions from nurses were significantly higher than those from patients (P<0.05). Conclusion There is a gap between the assessment of RHDS from nurses and patients, nurses overestimated patients’ discharge readiness level.
Objective To study the effect of indirect calorimetry-guided nutritional support on energy metabolism, cellular immunity and oxidative stress in patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopic surgery. Methods A total of 96 patients with colorectal cancer after laparoscopic surgery in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the control group (used the formula prediction method to guide enteral nutrition support, n=48) and the observation group (used indirect calorimetry to guide enteral nutrition support, n=48). The target resting energy expenditure (REE) value and nutritional support energy intake were compared between the two groups. The cellular immune indexes (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+) and oxidative stress indexes [serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), the changes of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px)], and the changes of REE at different time points (1 day before operation and 1, 2 and 3 days after operation) of the two groups were compared. The incidence of complications in the two groups were observed. Results The target REE value of the observation group was lower than that of the control group (P＜0.05), and there was no significant difference in the enteral energy intake and parenteral energy intake compared with the control group (P＞0.05). After treatment, CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the two groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and CD8+ was higher than before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ in the observation group after treatment were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05) , while the level of CD8+ in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of SOD and GSH-Px in the two groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the levels of MDA were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of GSH-Px and SOD in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), while the level of MDA in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the REE value between the two groups at 1 day before operation (P>0.05); compared with the 1 day before operation, the REE values of the two groups at 1, 2, and 3 days after operation were significantly increased, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at each time point (P<0.05), but the REE value at 3 days after operation was significantly lower than that at 1 and 2 days after operation (P<0.05). The REE values in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1, 2 and 3 days after operation (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 6.25%, which was lower than 20.83% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Enteral nutrition support guided by indirect calorimetry in colorectal cancer patients after laparoscopic surgery can help reduce postoperative energy consumption, improve cellular immune function and oxidative stress response, and reduce the risk of postoperative complications, which is worthy of promotion.
ObjectiveTo explore the correlation between readiness for hospital discharge and short-term quality of life among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) mode.MethodsSurveys of 127 CRC patients following ERAS mode were conducted in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale and EORTC QLQ-C30 Scale were issued at the discharge and 1 month after the operation, respectively.ResultsThe total score of RHDS was 149.43±33.25. The score of global quality of life was 66.80±18.84. Correlation analysis showed that the total score of RHDS was positively correlated with the score of global quality of life (r=0.220, P=0.013), and negatively correlated with the scores of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, loss of appetite (r=–0.304, P=0.001; r=–0.189, P=0.033; r=–0.257, P=0.004; r=–0.254, P=0.004). The score of personal status dimension were positively correlated with the score of global quality of life and emotional function (r=0.213, P=0.016; r=0.197, P=0.027), and negatively correlated with scores of fatigue, pain and insomnia (r=–0.311, P=0.000; r=–0.264, P=0.003; r=–0.257, P=0.004). The score of knowledge dimension was negatively correlated with nausea and vomiting, pain and loss of appetite (r=–0.212, P=0.017; r=–0.182, P=0.040; r=–0.239, P=0.007). The score of coping ability dimension was positively correlated with the score of global quality of life and physical function (r=0.204, P=0.021; r=0.204, P=0.021), while negatively correlated with scores of fatigue, pain, insomnia and loss of appetite (r=–0.349, P=0.000; r=–0.240, P=0.007; r=–0.202, P=0.022; r=–0.201, P=0.024). The score of expected support was positively correlated with the score of global quality of life (r=0.220, P=0.013), and negatively correlated with scores of fatigue and loss of appetite (r=–0.249, P=0.005; r=–0.227, P=0.010).ConclusionsThe short term quality of life among CRC patients following ERAS keeps at upper middle level, and positively correlated with the readiness for hospital discharge. It is suggested that discharge preparation service is of great significance to improve the quality of life of patients.
ObjectiveTo summarize research progress of quality of life in patients after colorectal cancer surgery.MethodsThe literatures about quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer surgery in recent years are reviewed.ResultsQuality of life had became an important criterion for evaluating the therapeutic effect and prognosis of cancer. At present, the assessment tools for the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients mainly included the universal scale [such as Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)], the applicable scales for cancer patients [such as European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: quality of life questionaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: quality of life questionaire-CR38 (EORTC QLQ-CR38)], and the special scales for stoma patients represented by City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire (COH-QOL-OQ), Stoma Quality Of Life (Stoma-QOL), Stoma Quality Of Life Scale (SQOLS), and so on. The short-term quality of life of colorectal cancer patients was lower at 1 month after operation and recovered at 3 months after operation. Five years after surgery, attention should also be paid to the long-term quality of life. Besides, postoperative quality of life of colorectal cancer patients was affected by age, occupational status, economy, preoperative physical activity level, psychological and social factor, personality, surgical method, co-morbidity, complication, stoma, and so on.ConclusionsUnderstand the longitudinal changes and influencing factors of patients’ quality of life after operation, grasp the time point of effective intervention, and select appropriate assessment tools are necessary for medical staff. It is of great significance to further optimize the clinical management pathway and improve the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer after operation.
ObjectiveTo understand the current situation and factors affecting tube blockage (non-mechanical) during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients with malignant tumors who underwent HIPEC in the Department of Gastroenterology of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from May 2019 to May 2021 were retrospectively gathered. The information about the patient and the occurrence of occlusion during HIPEC were obtained by consulting electronic medical records and perfusion records. The logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors influencing non-mechanical tube blockage during HIPEC. ResultsA total of 240 patients with malignant tumors were gathered. During HIPEC, the non-mechanical tube blockage occurred in 88 patients with malignant tumors, with the incidence of 36.7%. The multivariate analysis results by logistic regression showed that the probabilities of non-mechanical tube blockage during HIPEC were higher in the patients with age≥65 years (OR=2.142, P=0.016), diabetes mellitus (OR=2.326, P=0.007), perfusion speed of 300–450 mL/min (OR=2.778, P=0.001), ascites (OR=2.192, P=0.020), and PCI ≥20 points (OR=4.380, P<0.001). ConclusionsPatients with malignant tumors treated with HIPEC are prone to non-mechanical tube blockage. The patients with middle-aged and elderly, diabetes, low perfusion speed, ascites, and high PCI score need to be of great concern, so as to prevent and deal with tube blockage in time.
Objective To explore the related factors of postoperative pulmonary infection (PPI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, and analyze the perioperative management strategy of pulmonary infection combined with the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). Methods Total of 687 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the colorectal cancer professional treatment group of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2017 to May 2019 were retrospectively included. According to the occurrence of PPI, all the included cases were divided into infection group (n=97) and non-infection group (n=590). The related factors and prevention strategies of PPI were analyzed. Results The rate of PPI among patients underwent laparoscopic resection in our study was 14.1% (97/687). Compared with the non-infection group, the proportions of patients with preoperative complications other than cardiopulmonary, receiving preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 1–2, preoperative Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) score 1–3, tumor located in the left colon and rectum, combined organ resection, operative time >3 h and postoperative TNM stage Ⅱ patients in the infection group were higher (P<0.05). However, the proportions of patients who used intraoperative lung protective ventilation strategy and incision infiltration anesthesia in the infection group were lower than those in the non-infection group (P<0.05). In the infection group, the proportions of patients who received regular sputum excretion, atomization therapy, balloon blowing/breathing training, stomatology nursing after operation and postoperative analgesia were all significantly lower than those of the non-infection group (P<0.05), whereas the proportions of patients receiving antibiotics and intravenous nutrition after operation were significantly higher than those in the non-infection group (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that low preoperative NRS2002 score, intraoperative protective ventilation strategy, postoperative respiratory training, and postoperative regular sputum excretion were the protective factors of PPI, while preoperative cardiopulmonary complications, preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor located in the left colon and rectum, late TNM staging and postoperative antibiotics were risk factors for pulmonary infection.Conclusions Preoperative cardiopulmonary complications, preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor location in the left colon and rectum, late TNM staging and postoperative antibiotics are risk factors for pulmonary infection in patients with laparoscopic colorectal cancer. Preoperative good nutritional status, intraoperative protective ventilation strategy, postoperative respiratory training and regular sputum excretion may reduce the incidence of PPI to a certain extent.