Objective To explore the vascular access infection (VAI) incidence of hemodialysis patients during the the maximum spread of the COVID-19 epidemic (epidemic period) compared with the corresponding period with no local cases of COVID-19 (control period). Methods A single-center, retrospective study was carried out. Adult patients who underwent hemodialysis at the Department of Blood Purification Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University during the epidemic period between December 7, 2022 and February 23, 2023 and the control period between December 7, 2020 and February 23, 2021 were selected. The incidence of local access site infection (LASI) and access related bloodstream infection (ARBSI) in included patients were observed and compared. ResultsA total of 1 401 patients were included. Among them, there were 737 cases during the epidemic period and 664 cases during the control period. There was no statistically significant difference in the age, gender, and duration of catheterization among patients of different periods and pathway types (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of LASI between the epidemic period and the control period (χ2=1.800, P=1.180). There was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of ARBSI between the epidemic period and the control period [χ2=4.610, relative risk (RR)=2.575, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.053, 6.298), P=0.032]. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of LASI and ARBSI at different stages in patients with arteriovenous fistula and unnel-cuffed catheters (TCC) (P＞0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the incidence of LASI [χ2=4.898, RR=3.832, 95%CI (1.058, 13.885), P=0.027] and ARBSI [χ2=7.150, RR=4.684, 95%CI (1.333, 16.460), P=0.005] among non cuffed catheters (NCC) patients at different stages. TCC patients might experience LASI (P<0.05) during the epidemic period and ARBSI (P<0.05) during the control period compared with the arteriovenous fistula patients; both central venous catheterization and NCC patients might experience LASI and ARBSI during the control period (P<0.05). Conclusion Targeting COVID-19 prevention may be associated with the reduction of vascular access infection in hemodialysis patients, in particular in NCC patients.
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria in patients with blood stream infections (BSI) after orthopedic surgery, so as to provide reference and basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 6 348 orthopedic patients admitted for surgery between January 2017 and December 2019. There were 3 598 males and 2 750 females. Their age ranged from 18 to 98 years, with an average of 66 years. The data of patients were collected, and the risk factors of BSI were analyzed by univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis. The distribution of BSI pathogenic bacteria, the results of drug sensitivity test, the incidence of BSI in patients after orthopedic surgery in different years, and the common sites of BSI secondary infection were summarized.ResultsBSI occurred in 106 (1.67%) of 6 348 patients after orthopedic surgery. There were 71 cases (66.98%) of secondary infection. The mortality of postoperative BSI patients was 1.89%, and the difference was significant when compared with that of non-postoperative BSI patients (0.24%) (χ2=5.313, P=0.021). The incidences of BSI in 2017, 2018, and 2019 were 1.18%, 1.53%, and 2.17%, respectively, showing an increasing trend year by year (trend χ2=6.610, P=0.037). Statistical analysis showed that the independent risk factors for BSI after orthopedic surgery (P<0.05) included the trauma, length of hospital stay≥14 days, emergency surgery, postoperative leukocyte counting<4×109/L, level of hemoglobin≤90 g/L, albumin≤30 g/L, the time of indwelling ureter>24 hours, use of deep vein catheter insertion, and merging other site infection. Blood culture showed 56 strains (52.83%) of Gram-positive bacteria, 47 strains (44.34%) of Gram-negative bacteria, and 3 strains (2.83%) of fungi. The top three pathogenic bacteria were coagulase negative Staphylococci (CNS; 36 strains, 33.96%), Escherichia coli (16 strains, 15.09%), and Staphylococcus aureus (15 strains, 14.15%). The detection rates of extended-spectum β-lactamases producing strains of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were 56.25% (9/16) and 44.44% (4/9), respectively. The detection rates of methicillin-resistant strains in Staphylococcus aureus and CNS were 46.67% (7/15) and 72.22% (26/36), respectively.ConclusionPostoperative BSI in orthopedic patients is caused by multiple factors. Preventive measures should be taken according to related risk factors and perioperative risk assessment should be strengthened. Staphylococcus and Escherichia coli are the most common pathogenic bacteria in BSI after orthopedic surgery. The infection rate and drug-resistant bacteria are increasing year by year. Therefore, drug resistance monitoring should be strengthened.
Objective To analyze the characteristics of pathogens causing bloodstream infection (BSI) after cardiovascular surgery, and provide instructions for prevention and treatment of such kind of disease. Methods A retrospective investigation of clinical and pathogenic data of the patients suffering from BSI after cardiovascular surgery in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2015 to December 2016 was performed. There were 61 patients with 36 males and 25 females at average age of 48.2±17.1 years. A percentage of 65.6% (40/61) of the underlying diseases was rheumatic heart disease. Results Sixty-five strains were isolated from the blood culture specimens of the 61 patients. Gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria and fungi isolates accounted for 56.9% (37/65), 35.4% (23/65), and 7.7% (5/65), respectively. Among these isolates, Streptococcus spp. was predominant (19/65, 29.2%), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (8/65, 12.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (6/65, 9.2%), Acinetobacter calcoaceticus- A. baumannii (5/65, 7.7%) and Escherichia coli (5/65, 7.7%). The resistance rate of Streptococcus spp. to erythromycin and clindamycin was 73.4% (14/19) and 63.2% (12/19), while its resistance to cefepime, vancomycin or linezolid was not observed. Staphylococcus spp. showed the resistance rate of 71.4% (10/14) to oxacillin. All of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolates were multidrug resistant (5/5, 100.0%), and 80.0% (4/5) of them were resistant to imipenem. The isolates producing extended spectrum beta-lactamase accounted for 80.0% (4/5) of E. coli. Conclusion Streptococcus spp. was the common pathogen causing BSI after cardiovascular surgery. Staphylococcus spp. and gram-negative bacilli show high resistance.
Objective To explore the risk factors of catheter-associated bloodstream infections ( CRBSI) in intensive care unit ( ICU) of primary hospital. Methods A total of 623 patients with central venous catheters were recruited in the study. 60 of themsuffered fromCRBSI served as an observation group and other 563 cases without CRBSI served as control. Univariate analysis was used to scan possible risk factors. Then logistic regression analysis was used to exclude the confounding factors. Results The overall incidence rate of CRBSI was 9. 63% ( 60 /623) . There were significant differences in APACHE score, type of catheter, location of catheter, duration of central venous catheter, intravenous nutrition, use of steroid, times of intubation, urgent intubations, nutritional status, diabetes, and MODS between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher APACHE score, double-lumen catheter, femoral vein catheter, catheter indwelling more than two weeks, intravenous nutrition, intubation more than 2 times, and emergency intubation were risk factors of CRBSI. Conclusions Higher APACHE score, double-lumen catheter, femoral vein catheter, catheter indwelling more than two weeks, intravenous nutrition, intubation more than 2 times, and emergency intubation were major risk factors of CRBSI in ICU of primary hospital.
ObjectiveTo explore the prognostic risk factors of bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii in the hospital, to provide a basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of patients diagnosed with Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region People’s Hospital between January 2013 and December 2018. The patients were divided into survival group and non-survival group according to the outcome within 30 days after blood culture was collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify the risk factors of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections.ResultsA total of 123 patients were included, including 48 in the survival group and 75 in the non-survival group. Third generation cephalosporins [odds ratio (OR)=2.492, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.125, 2.924), P<0.001], carbapenems [OR=1.721, 95%CI (1.505, 1.969), P<0.001], multidrug resistant-Acinetobacter baumannii infection [OR=1.240, 95%CI (1.063, 1.446), P=0.006], post-operation [OR=0.515, 95%CI (0.449, 0.590), P<0.001], mechanical ventilation [OR=1.182, 95%CI (1.005, 1.388), P=0.043], indwelling central venous catheter [OR=0.116, 95%CI (0.080, 0.169), P<0.001], mixed infection or septic shock [OR=3.935, 95%CI (2.740, 5.650), P<0.001], APACHE Ⅱ score (≥15) [OR=5.939, 95%CI (5.029, 7.013), P<0.001], chronic kidney disease [OR=1.440, 95%CI (1.247, 1.662), P<0.001], immune system disease [OR=28.620, 95%CI (17.087, 47.937), P<0.001], use of corticosteroids [OR=0.520, 95%CI (0.427, 0.635), P<0.001], and combined antifungal agents [OR=0.814, 95%CI (0.668, 0.992), P=0.041] were independent factors for predicting the prognosis of patients with bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii.ConclusionsThe third generation cephalosporins, carbapenem, MDR-Acinetobacter baumannii infection, post-operation, mechanical ventilation, indwelling central venous catheter, mixed infection or septic shock, APACHE Ⅱ score (≥15), chronic kidney disease, immune system disease, use of corticosteroids, and combined antifungal agents were independent factors for predicting the prognosis of patients with bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii. In the clinical work, it is needed to carry out timely detection of microbial etiology, timely report, and reasonable treatment.
Objective To evaluate the basic performance and clinical application value of nanopore sequencing, in order to provide new ideas for the rapid detection of clinical etiology. Methods From December 2021 to May 2022, blood samples from inpatients suspected of bloodstream infection in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were collected, and the nanopore sequencing platform and blood culture method were used to simultaneously identify the pathogenic bacteria in the blood samples of the selected patients, and identify the pathogenic bacteria in the blood samples of the selected patients. The basic performance and clinical utility of nanopore sequencing were evaluated. Results A total of 251 patients were included, and 119 patients (47.4%) were found to have pathogens by nanopore sequencing, which was higher than that of 23 patients (9.2%) by blood culture (χ2=79.167, P<0.001). The results of the two methods are not consistent (kappa=0.052, P=0.175). Nanopore sequencing has a certain missed detection rate. In terms of the types of pathogenic bacteria detected, 47 bacteria and 15 fungi were detected by nanopore sequencing. Conclusion Compared with blood culture, nanopore sequencing has a higher detection rate and more types of pathogens. This technology has obvious advantages in the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infection pathogens.
中心静脉置管是现代重症医学救治危重患者的常用方法, 目前应用十分广泛。尽管这些导管提供了必要的血管通路, 但也将患者置于局部和全身性感染并发症的危险之中, 增加了感染的发生率, 并使导管相关性血流感染( catheter-related bloodstream infections, CRBSI) 更为常见, 明显延长了ICU 住院时间并增加了医疗费用。本文就近年来CRBSI 的发病机制、微生物学、诊断及治疗, 尤其是如何根据病原体对CRBSI 进行治疗做一概述。