ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of unexposed ulnar nerve medial elbow incision, open reduction and internal fixation of anatomical locking compression plate (LCP) for distal humerus fractures.MethodsFourteen patients with distal humerus fracture were treated between January 2014 and June 2017. There were 5 males and 9 females, aged 18-85 years (mean, 65.5 years). The causes of injury included falling from height in 12 cases and traffic accident in 2 cases, all were closed fractures. Fractures were classified according to the AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF): 3 cases of type A2, 2 cases of type A3, 4 cases of type B2, 2 cases of type C1, 2 cases of type C2, and 1 case of type C3; without ulnar nerve damage. The time from injury to operation was 4-15 days, with an average of 7 days. The type B2 fractures were treated with unexposed ulnar nerve elbow medial incision and anatomic LCP internal fixation, the rest patients were all treated with unexposed ulnar nerve medial plus conventional lateral approach and bilateral LCP internal fixation.ResultsThe operation time was 50-140 minutes (mean, 80 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss was 20-200 mL (mean, 70 mL). There was no blood vessels or nerve damage during operation. All incisions healed by first intension, and no incision infection occurred. All the 14 cases were followed up 9-24 months (mean, 13 months). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed within 4 months without complications such as nonunion and osteomyelitis. No ulnar nerve injury, cubitus varus deformity, and ossifying myositis occurred during follow-up. At last follow-up, the elbow function was assessed by Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS), the results were excellent in 8 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case (type C3 fracture), with the excellent and good rate of 85.7%.ConclusionThe unexposed ulnar nerve medial elbow incision can be used effectively to reduct the fracture, and it is not prone to ulnar nerve injury. Combined with the lateral approach to treat the distal humerus fracture, which has the advantages of short operation time, few trauma, little bleeding, and reliable effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of external fixation and volar locking compression plate in the treatment of distal radius fractures of type C. MethodsBetween March 2012 and March 2013, 122 patients with distal radius fractures of type C were enrolled in the prospective randomized study. Fractures were treated by external fixation in 61 patients (external fixation group) and by open reduction and internal fixation using a volar locking compression plate in 61 patients (plate group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, fracture side, weight, height, body mass index, fracture type, and interval of injury and operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The blood loss, operation time, hospitalization days, fracture union time, wrist function, and complications were compared between 2 groups. And the quality of reduction was observed, including volar tilting angle, ulnar deviation, radial height, and articular reduction. ResultsThe blood loss, operation time, and hospitalization days in plate group were significantly higher than those in external fixation group (P<0.05). All of the patients in both groups were followed up 12-28 months. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients (6.6%) of external fixation group (pin tract infection in 2 cases and radial nerve neuritis in 2 cases) and in 5 patients (8.2%) of plate group (wound infection in 1 case, carpal tunnel syndrome in 2 cases, and tendon rupture in 2 cases), showing no significant difference between 2 groups (P=0.500). The X-ray films showed fracture healing in all patients of 2 groups; the union time of plate group was significantly longer than that of external fixation group (P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in ulnar deviation and radial height between 2 groups (P>0.05), but the volar tilting angle of plate group was significantly larger than that of external fixation group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in wrist function and articular reduction between 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor distal radius fractures of type C, the use of external fixation or volar locking compression plate can obtain satisfactory clinical outcomes, but the external fixation has the advantages of less invasion, shorter hospitalization days, minor complications, and faster fracture union.
Objective To investigate the effect of functional exercises at different time and different immobilization positions on the functional recovery of elbow joint with type C distal humeral fractures. Methods A total of 120 patients with type C distal humeral fractures admitted to the hospital between June 2013 and July 2015 were included in the study. They were randomly allocated to 3 groups, 40 patients in each group. Group A: functional exercises began immediately after the operation; Group B: the affected elbow was fixed at 90° flexion for 1 week and then began functional exercises after 1 week of immobilization; Group C: the affected elbow was fixed at 30° extension for 1 week and then began functional exercises after 1 week of immobilization. There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture pattern, fracture side, injury time, and surgical approach between groups (P>0.05). Results In groups A and B, 1 case had incision redness and swelling respectively, and the other incisions healed by first intention. Five patients occurred myositis ossificans in group A, 4 cases in group B, and 5 cases in group C. The incidence of complications in groups A, B, and C was 15.0% (6/40), 12.5% (5/40), and 12.5% (5/40), respectively. There was no significant difference between groups (χ2=0.144, P=0.930). All patients were followed up 6-25 months, with an average of 9.8 months. At 2 weeks after operation, the Mayo elbow joint function score of group A was significantly higher than those of groups B and C (P<0.05), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of group A was significantly lower than those of groups B and C (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups B and C (P>0.05). At 6 months after operation, there was no significant difference in Mayo elbow joint function score and VAS score between groups (P>0.05). At 2 weeks and 6 months after operation, the flexion and extension activities of elbow joint in groups A and C were better than that in group B (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between groups A and C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in forearm rotation between groups (P>0.05). All fractures of 3 groups achieved clinical healing, and there was no significant difference in healing time between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Early functional exercises can relieve pain and obtain better elbow flexion and extesion activities after operation. The elbow joint fixed at 30° extension is better than at 90° flexion in elbow flexion and extension activitis.
Objective To discuss the relationship between recovery of anatomical integrity and functional outcome in elderly patients with distal radius fractures by comparing the effects of open reduction and closed reduction. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analyzed from 78 elderly patients with distal radius fractures treating with nonoperation andoperation from February 2005 to March 2009. Thirty-seven patients underwent closed reduction and spl intlet fixation or cast appl ication (non-operation group), and forty-one patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (operation group). In non-operation group, there were 15 males and 22 females with an average age of 73 years (60-83 years). According to the AO classification system for fracture, there were 8 cases of type A2, 7 cases of type A3, 7 cases of type B1, 4 cases of type B2, 2 cases of type B3, 4 cases of type C1, 2 cases of type C2, and 3 cases of type C3. The time from injury to admission was between 30 minutes and 3 days with a mean time of 1 day. In operation group, there were 18 males and 23 females with an average age of 71 years (62-80 years). According to the AO classification system for fracture, there were 5 cases of type A2, 7 cases of type A3, 7 cases of type B1, 6 cases of type B2, 3 cases of type B3, 4 cases of type C1, 5 cases of type C2, and 4 cases of type C3. The time from injury to admission was between 30 minutes and 7 days with a mean time of 1 day. There were no significant differences (P gt; 0.05) in sex, age, disease course and fracture classification between two groups. Results All incisions obtained heal ing by first intention after operation in operation group. All patients were followed up for 9-36 months (20 months on average). Fracture heal ing was achieved within 8 to 15 weeks, with an average of 11 weeks. There were no significant differences (P gt; 0.05) in fracture heal ing time between non-operation group [(10.8 ± 2.0) weeks] and operation group [(11.7 ± 2.5) weeks]. At last follow-up, thepalmar tilt angle was (5.6 ± 2.0)° and (8.6 ± 3.0)°, the radial incl ination angle was (19.1 ± 4.9)° and (21.8 ± 2.0)°, and the radial length was (8.3 ± 1.3) mm and (10.4 ± 1.4) mm in non-operation group and operation group, respectively; showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05) between two groups. According to the Gartland-Werley score, the results were excellent in 9 cases, good in 21 cases, fair in 5 cases, and poor in 2 cases in non-operation group, the excellent and good rate was 81.1%; in operation group, the results were excellent in 13 cases, good in 25 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, the excellent and good rate was 92.7%, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) between two groups. There were no significant differences (P gt; 0.05) in flexion and extension activity of wrist, radioulnar partial activity, pronation-supination activity, grip and pinch strength between two groups. Conclusion Open reduction and closed reduction can achieve satisfactory functional outcomes, but closed reduction was inferior to open reduction in anatomic reduction for treating distal radius fractures in elderly patients.