Epigenetics refers to the changes in gene expression level and function caused by non-genetic sequence changes. It can provide the time, location and mode of the genetic information for the execution of DNA sequences, including DNA methylation, histone modification, non-coding RNA and chromatin remodeling. Studies had shown that epigenetics plays an important role in the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR), and it had been found that epigenetic-related treatment regimens had a certain effect on the treatment of DR through animal experiments and in vitro experiments. It was benefit to regulate the development of diabetes and its complications by depth study of DNA methylation, histone modification, miRNA and metabolic memory. An understanding of changes in gene transcriptional mechanisms at the epigenetic level could help us to further study the prevention and control of diabetes and its complications, and to provide new ideas for treatment.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the causative agent of human tuberculosis. Through the genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, we can find the epidemic situation and characteristics of tuberculosis in time, analyze the transmission chain between patients in different jurisdictions, and formulate effective intervention measures in time, to provide a strong basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment. At present, several genotyping techniques for Mycobacterium tuberculosis have their advantages and disadvantages in application. This article reviews the genotyping technology, population genetics and genotyping naming rules of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) is a rare X-linked inherited retinal disorder, caused by mutations in retinoschisin 1 (RS1) gene. Three XLRS mice were established, providing ideal systems to study the mechanism and treatment methods for XLRS. RS1 gene mutations can induce abnormal secretion or adhesion function of RS1 protein. In the past year, phase I clinical trials for XLRS has begun in USA, using adeno associated virus (AAV, AAV8 or AAV2)-mediated gene delivery. With the rapid development of new generation of AAV vector that can transduce more retinal cells through intravitreous delivery, gene therapy for XLRS will have a brighter future.
OBJECTIVE:The hereditary form of retinoblastoma(RB)is a monogenic disorder which is due to germinal mutation of RB susceptibility gene located on 13q14.The majority of hereditary RB cases transmit as a Mendelian autosomal dominant inheritance that 50% of the offspring of a carrier will inherit the disorder susceptibility gene and all carriers will develop the disorder.The authors report 3 hereditary RB families with incompleted penetrance and irregular transmission of RB phenotype. METHOD:RFLPsamp;VNTRs for analysis of haplotype and SSCPamp;direct DNA sequencing for determination of RB point mutation. RESULTS:The mosaicism of Rb gene point mutation resulted in the incompleted penetrance and irregular transmission of RB phentype. CONCLUSION:DAN-based diagnosis can be used to differentiate the hereditary and nonhereditary forms of retinblastoma but only is the direct detection of disease-causing mutation reliable for determnation of carrier and estimation of th e risk for retinoblastoma. （Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,1996,12: 37- 40）
Objective To analyze the BEST1 gene mutations and clinical features in patients with multifocal vitelliform retinopathy (MVR). Methods This is a retrospective case series study. Five MVR families with MVR, including 9 patients and 10 healthy family members were recruited. Clinical evaluations were performed in all MVR patients and their family members, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), refraction, slit-lamp examination, 90 D preset lens examination, gonioscopy, color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence (AF), ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and axial length measurement. Electro-oculogram (EOG) was performed in 12 eyes and visual field were performed in 13 eyes. Peripheral blood samples were collected in all subjects to extract genomic DNA. Coding exons and flanking intronic regions of BEST1 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Results Among the 5 MVR families, 3 probands from three families had family history, including 1 family had autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. Two patients from 2 families were sporadic cases. Screening of BEST1 gene identified four mutations, including three missense mutations (c.140G>T, p.R47L; c.232A>T, p.I78F; c.698C>T, p.P233L) and 1 deletion mutation (c.910_912del, p.D304del). Two mutations (p.R47L and p.I78F) were novel. The BCVA of affected eyes ranged from hand motion to 1.0. The mean IOP was (30.39±11.86) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The mean refractive diopter was (-0.33±1.68) D. Twelve eyes had angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) and 4 eyes had angle closure (AC). EOG Arden ratio was below 1.55 in all patients. The mean anterior chamber depth was (2.17±0.29) mm. Visual field showed defects varied from paracentral scotoma to diffuse defects. The mean axial length was (21.87±0.63) mm. All MVR patients had multifocal vitelliform lesions in the posterior poles of retina. ACG eyes demonstrated pale optic disc with increased cup-to-disc ratio. OCT showed retinal edema, extensive serous retinal detachment and subretinal hyper-reflective deposits which had high autofluorescence in AF. The genetic testing and clinical examination were normal in 10 family members. Conclusions MVR patients harbored heterozygous mutation in the BEST1 gene. Two novel mutations (p.R47L and p.I78F) were identified. These patients had clinical features of multifocal vitelliform retinopathy and abnormal EOG. Most patients suffered from AC/ACG.