A 71-year-old male presented with esophageal cancer and severe aortic valve regurgitation. Treatment strategies for such patients are controversial. Considering the risks of cardiopulmonary bypass and potential esophageal cancer metastasis, we successfully performed transcatheter aortic valve implantation and minimally invasive three-incision thoracolaparoscopy combined with radical resection of esophageal cancer (McKeown) simultaneously in the elderly patient who did not require neoadjuvant treatment. This dual minimally invasive procedure took 6 hours and the patient recovered smoothly without any surgical complications.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect on complication after esophagectomy by comparing the different methods of anastomosis (cervical versus thoracic anastomosis). MethodsWe searched the following databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang database to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cervical versus thoracic anastomosis for esophagectomy patients from establishment of each database to October 30, 2014. Quality of the included RCT was evaluated. Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsWe finally identified 4 RCTs involving 267 patients. In terms of the postoperative complication, the incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR=3.83, 95%CI 1.70 to 8.63, P=0.001) with cervical anastomosis was significantly higher than that of the patients with thoracic anastomosis. However, there was no statistical difference in incidence of anastomotic stricture (RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.62 to 1.76, P=0.87), pulmonary complication (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.27 to 1.91, P=0.52), and mortality (RR=0.89, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.97, P=0.77) between cervical and thoracic anastomosis. ConclusionCompared with thoracic anastomosis, the method of cervical anastomosis is associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic leakage. But there are many unclear factors about anastomotic stricture, pulmonary complication and mortality, further measurement should be taken.
Abstract: Objective To investigate the expression of inhibitor of apoptosis gene Livin and its relationship with expression of P53,Bcl-2 in esophageal carcinoma tissues. Methods The expression of Livin messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) in 36 esophageal carcinoma tissues and 18 paracancerous tissues were measured by reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) combined with silver staining technique. The expression of Livin, P53 and Bcl-2 proteins were detected by immunohistochemical method (streptavidin-peroxidase). Results RT-PCR results: Livin mRNA positive expression of esophageal carcinoma tissues was more evident than that of paracancerous tissues, the expression of both variants was simultaneous basically. Immunohistochemical results: the Livin protein positive expression rate of esophageal carcinoma tissues was higher evidently than that of paracancerous tissues(Plt;0.01). Livin protein positive expression rate of external coat of esophagus invaded by carcinoma was higher than that of tunica muscularis esophagi invaded by carcinoma(Plt;0.05); Livin protein positive expression rate of lymph node metastasis was higher than that of normal lymph node (Plt;0.05). The expression of Livin protein was not related to the expression of P53 protein（χ2=1.00,P=0.505）,but it was positively related to the expression of Bcl-2 protein（χ2=10.60，P=0.003）. Conclusion Aberrant expression of Livin may be a new target for diagnosis and gene treatment of esophageal carcinoma.The aberrant expression of Livinand apoptosis related gene Bcl-2 may play synergetic roles in process of carcinogenesis of esophageal carcinoma.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of lymphadenectomy in different regions for esophageal squamous cell carcinomas located differently according to the lymph node grouping by Chinese expert consensus. MethodsThe medical records of 1 061 patients (886 males and 175 females with a median age of 60 (54, 65) years with esophageal cancer from March 2011 to December 2017 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the pathological report, the lymph nodes were regrouped according to the Chinese lymph nodes grouping standard of esophageal cancer. The metastasis rate of each group of lymph nodes, the 5-year survival rate of metastatic patients and efficacy index (EI) were calculated. ResultsThe upper thoracic esophageal cancer mainly metastasized to the lymph nodes of C201-203 groups. The middle and lower thoracic tumors mainly metastasized to the lymph nodes of C205-207 groups. The lower thoracic tumor had a higher rate of metastasis to the abdominal lymph nodes. According to the metastasis rate, the mediastinal lymph nodes were divided into three regions: an upper mediastinum (C201-204), a middle mediastinum (C205-206), and a lower mediastinum (C207-209). The EIs of lymph nodes of C201-203 and C205-207 groups were higher. For patients with C201-207 groups metastasis, the 5-year survival rates ranged from 13.39% to 21.60%. For patients with positive lymph nodes in each region, tumors at different primary locations had no statistical difference in long-term survival (P>0.05). Patients with lymph nodes of C205 group in the upper thoracic tumors had lower EI and those in the middle and lower thoracic tumors had higher EIs. ConclusionThe effect of lymph node dissection in each area varies with the location of the tumor. No matter where the tumor is, it is necessary to dissect the upper mediastinal lymph nodes, especially the lymph nodes adjacent to the left and right recurrent laryngeal nerves. Group C205 should be classified into the lower mediastinal lymph nodes.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical features and the prognostic factors of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 41 cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between March 2008 and March 2014. There were 37 males and 4 females at a mean age of 61.1±7.9 years (ranged from 40 to 79 years). All patients underwent surgical resection and lymph node dissection. ResultsNo severe complications occurred during the perioperative period, and no death occurred during the period of hospitalization.Thirteen patients received postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Eleven patients received simple postoperative chemotherapy. One patient received postoperative radiotherapy. The remaining 16 patients did not receive any special treatment. The patients were followed up for 6 to 61 (24.0±13.6)months. Twenty-two patients survived, the other 19 patients died. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, and 5-year survival rate was 80.49%, 39.02%, 21.95%, 7.32%, and 4.88%, respectively. The median survival of single surgical treatment and postoperative comprehensive treatment was 12.0 months and 25.0 months, respectively. The median survival of T2-T4 and T1 was 20.0 months and 37.5 months, respectively. The difference was statistically different (P<0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that the depth of tumor invasion, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were independent factors of prognosis (P<0.05). ConclusionsNeuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus is rare and with a high degree of malignancy. It is expected to increase the long-term survival rate after surgical and postoperative comprehensive treatment.
Objective To study the manageable methods, effect of early use of enteral nutrition after operations on esophageal cancer patients. Methods By different way of nutritional support after operation, 209 cases of esophageal cancer were divided into two groups in which enteral nutrition（EN） group,146 cases, were managed with early use of nutritional support through intestine and parenteral nutrition（PN） group, 63 cases, were given nutrition by way of veins. Complications, general recovery and blood biochemical criteria after operation between those two groups were compared. Results No cases of anastomotic fistula occurred in the two groups. The incidence of complications in EN group was significantly lower than that in PN group（P〈0.01）, and the occurrence of diarrhea was higher in EN group （P=0. 000）. The time needed for recovery of bowel sounds, anal exsufflation, defecation and hospital stay was shorter and hospital fee lower in EN group than those in PN group（P=0. 000）. The total amount of gastrointestinal and closed thoracic drainages decreased more significantly in EN group （P= 0. 000） and the value of albumin, globulin and total protein was significantly higher also in EN group （P = 0. 000）. But the amount of BUN, creatinine and neutrophil was significantly lower in EN group （P = 0. 000）. Conclusion Early use of enteral nutrition after operation on esophageal cancer is safe, effective and practical, with more significant advantages than those of parenteral nutrition.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk factors for postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with esophageal cancer. MethodsCNKI, Wangfang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2021 to collect case-control studies, cohort studies and cross-sectional studies about risk factors for postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with esophageal cancer. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment. RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 15.0 software were used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 20 articles were included, covering 5 409 patients of esophageal cancer. The quality score of included studies was 6-8 points. Meta-analysis results showed that age (MD=1.99, 95%CI 0.10 to 3.88, P=0.04), age≥60 years (OR=2.68, 95%CI 1.46 to 4.91, P=0.001), smoking history (OR=2.41, 95%CI 1.77 to 3.28, P<0.001), diabetes (OR=2.30, 95%CI 1.90 to 2.77, P<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR=3.69, 95%CI 2.09 to 6.52, P<0.001), pulmonary disease (OR=2.22, 95%CI 1.16 to 4.26, P=0.02), thoracotomy (OR=1.77, 95%CI 1.32 to 2.37, P<0.001), operation time (MD=14.08, 95%CI 9.64 to 18.52, P<0.001), operation time>4 h (OR=3.09, 95%CI 1.46 to 6.55, P=0.003), single lung ventilation (OR=3.46, 95%CI 1.61 to 7.44, P=0.001), recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (OR=5.66, 95%CI 1.63 to 19.71, P=0.006), and no use of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) (OR=2.81, 95%CI 1.71 to 4.61, P<0.001) were risk factors for postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with esophageal cancer. ConclusionThe existing evidence shows that age, age≥60 years, smoking history, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary disease, thoracotomy, operation time, operation time>4 h, single lung ventilation, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and no use of PCEA are risk factors for postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with esophageal cancer. Due to the limitation of the quantity and quality of included literature, the conclusion of this study still needs to be confirmed by more high-quality studies.