Objective To assess the methodological quality of clinical guidelines and consensus of lupus nephritis, to collect the recommendations of each guideline, and to provide references for clinical decision-making. Methods PubMed, CNKI, and CBM databases and related websites such as NGC, NICE, GIN, SIGN, and Medive were electronically searched from January 2012 to December 2020 to collect the clinical guidelines and expert consensus for lupus nephritis. After consistency evaluation by four evaluators, the methodological quality of the included guidelines or expert consensus was evaluated using AGREE Ⅱ. The relevant recommendations, evidence level, and recommended strength of each guideline in treating lupus nephritis were summarized. Results A total of eight guidelines and two consensus statements were included. Among them, eight guidelines or consensus statements were level B (generally recommended guidelines), and two were level C (non-recommended guidelines). Relevant recommendations mainly gave the corresponding treatment scheme according to the pathological type of lupus nephritis. Conclusion The methodological quality of lupus nephritis guideline formulation in China needs to be improved. The included guidelines and consensus can provide reference for clinical decision-makers. However, higher-quality clinical practice guidelines for the Chinese population are needed to be developed in the future.
Objectives To evaluate the quality of ophthalmic clinical practice guidelines in China by using the AGREE Ⅱ instrument. Methods CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect Chinese guidelines for ophthalmology from inception to December 2017. Three reviewers independently evaluated the included guidelines using the AGREE Ⅱ instrument. Results A total of 60 Chinese clinical guidelines for ophthalmology were included. The average scores of the six domains including scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigorism of development, clarity of presentation, applicability and editorial independence were 66.4%, 24.6%, 13.5%, 67.4%, 14.5%, and 19.3%, respectively. The guidelines published from 2013 to 2017 scored higher than those published previously in all areas except for domain 4 clarity of presentation. Conclusions The quality of current ophthalmic clinical practice guidelines in China is low, and there is still a big gap between them and the international guidelines. Guidelines developers should place more emphasis on developing regulations to improve stakeholder involvement, rigorism of development, applicability and editorial independence.
Objectives To evaluate the methodological quality of published clinical practice guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases, website of Yimaitong, and international authoritative guide platforms were electronically searched to collect the relevant clinical practice guidelines or consensus for benign prostate hyperplasia. The retrieval covered the time up to December 13th, 2016. Literatures were independently screened by 2 reviewers. After data extraction, the methodological quality of included guidelines was evaluated by 4 reviewers using the AGREE Ⅱ. Each domain score was calculated and the intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the consistency among the reviewers. Results A total of 15 clinical practice guidelines were included. The mean scores for the six domains in AGREE Ⅱ were: 72%, 38%, 30%, 58%, 16%, and 40%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was larger than 0.87, which indicated the total consistency was well. Conclusions The quality of clinical practice guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia is not satisfactory as expected. They are heterogeneous in quality and some requires improvement. Guidelines are required to be further developed in methodology in future, especially in three domains, including participants, preciseness and applicability of the design.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of guidelines for the management of delirium in adult patients in the last ten years, so as to provide references for updating, selection, implementation guidelines and delirium management optimization.MethodsWe searched guidelines from databases including PubMed, EMbase, WanFang Data and CNKI, and websites of guidelines from January 1st 2010 to September 1st 2019. Guidelines were comprehensively screened, evaluated based on AGREE Ⅱ and data was independently extracted by two researchers.ResultsGuidelines of NICE, RNAO and SIGN had higher scores, while CSCCM’s and IPS’s gained lower. Among domains of AGREE Ⅱ, Domain I (scope and purpose) and IV (clarity of presentation) scored the highest, with a minimum of Domain Ⅱ (stakeholder involvement) and V (applicability). Delirium management focused on screening, prediction, prevention and treatment both pharmacologically and non-pharmacologically, and information support.ConclusionsFuture development of delirium guidelines should follow the methodology of guideline development, update or adjustment, and dedicate to every domain, especially domain of application. Medical staffs can establish our own domestic guidelines based on high quality guidelines, to promote knowledge translation and delirium management.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the methodological quality of guidelines on the management of bronchiolitis in children, then to compare the recommendations and to provide a reference for clinical use. MethodsGuidelines concerning bronchiolitis were electronically retrieved in CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, CBM, PubMed, EMbase, Medlive, GIN (Guidelines International Network), CGC (China Guideline Chearinghouse), NGC (National Guideline Clearinghouse), AAP (American Academy of Pediatrics), NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) and WHO (World Health Organization) from inception to December 2015. The methodological quality of included guidelines were evaluated according to the AGREE II instrument, and the differences between recommendations were compared. ResultsEight guidelines on bronchiolitis were included, Among them, one guideline was developed by UK, two by US, one by Spain, two by Australia, one by Scottish and one by South Africa. Five of them were evidence-based (EB) guidelines, and 3 were non-EB guidelines. Domain 4 (clarity of presentation) showed the highest scores (81%), then scope and purpose (74%), stakeholder involvement (56%), rigor of development (52%), editorial independence (43%), and scores (42%) were the lowest in domain 3 (applicability). The recommendations of managements and medicines for bronchiolitis were basically consistent, but there were individual differences suggested. ConclusionIn these guidelines, the domain score better is "clarity of presentation" and "scope and purpose ", but the other areas should need to improve. Current our country only has an expert consensus of bronchiolitis, which should be further improved. It's urgent to develop evidence-based guidelines which conforms to the situation of our country, in order to make evidence-based medicine implementation in clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the management of acute gastroenteritis/diarrhea in children, then to compare differences and similarities of drug recommendations, in order to provide references for clinical practice. MethodsGuidelines concerning acute gastroenteritis/diarrhea in children were searched in CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, CBM, PubMed and EMbase databases from inception to April 2015. The websites of GIN (Guidelines International Network), CGC (China Guideline Clearinghouse), NGC (National Guideline Clearinghouse), APP (American Academy of Pediatrics), NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) and the WHO (World Health Organization) were also searched for additional guidelines. The methodological quality of included guidelines were evaluated according to the AGREE Ⅱ instrument, and the differences between recommendations of included guidelines were compared. ResultsA total of 9 guidelines on acute gastroenteritis/diarrhea in children were included. Among them, 3 guidelines were developed by USA, 1 by Malaysia, 1 by EU, 1 by UK, 1 by South Wales, 1 by Australia and 1 by South Africa. Five guidelines were evidence-based guidelines, and the other 4 were non-evidence-based guidelines. The average scores of guidelines in six domains of AGREE Ⅱ were 79% (clarity of presentations), 74% (scope and purpose), 44% (stakeholder involvement), 35% (rigor of development), 32% (applicability), and 30% (editorial independence), respectively. The recommendations of management and treatment were almost consistent. ConclusionThe overall quality of included guidelines was not high. The domain scores of "clarity of presentations" and "scope and purpose" were higher, but the domain scores of "stakeholder involvement", "rigor of development", "applicability" and "editorial independence" needed to be improved. There is still no local guideline of acute gastroenteritis/diarrhea in children in China, so it's urgent to develop guideline that should be suite able for Chinese condition.
Objectives To assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines for primary hepatic carcinoma published in 2016 and 2017 in China. Methods CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and VIP databases were searched for clinical practice guidelines for primary hepatic carcinoma in China. The search date was from Jan. 1st, 2016 to Jan. 1st, 2018. Four researchers independently selected literatures and extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ (AGREE Ⅱ) was utilized to assess the methodological quality of the guidelines. Results A total of 7 guidelines were included. The average scores of six domains for these guidelines were: 65.1% for scope and purpose, 39.4% for stakeholders’ involvement, 64.3% for rigor of development, 55.6% for clarity of presentation, 61.8% for applicability and 6.1% for editorial independence. Conclusions The quality of clinical practice guidelines for primary hepatic carcinoma in China is relative high, of which the recommendations are of great value in clinical practice, yet still required to be improved in some ways.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of pancreatic cancer guidelines using evidence-based methods based on the global burden of pancreatic cancer, so as to explore its status, region distribution, characteristics of coverage themes, and difference of therapies recommended by the guidelines of various quality, and to provide references for clinical decisionmaking. MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2013), CBM, CNKI, and VIP, as well as the website of National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), and National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) were systematically searched for pancreatic cancer treatment guidelines. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE Ⅲ) was applied to assess methodological quality of included guidelines. ResultsA total of 14 relevant guidelines (including five evidence-based guidelines) were included involving seven countries of four continents (Asia, Europe, North America and Oceania) and four international academic organizations. There were only two domains, namely "scope and purpose" and "clarity of presentations" which got high average scores (more than 60%) among all 14 guidelines. The mean AGREE domain scores in guidelines varied with areas, and the quality of five evidence-based guidelines was superior to that established by consensus. According to the outcomes of AGREE Ⅲ, 11 guidelines were weakly recommended, while 3 were not recommended due to poor methodological quality. The subjects of 14 guidelines covered six treatment categories, including chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, support therapy, radiotherapy, and interventional therapy. ConclusionThe overall methodological quality of pancreatic cancer guidelines is not high among different countries or regions. The quality of evidence-based guidelines is superior to that established by consensus. Chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy and support therapy were reccommended as predominant choice by these guidelines.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the quality of guidelines concerning management of helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, so as to improve the guidelines of low quality and promote the clinical practice of high quality guidelines. MethodDatabases including PubMed, CNKI, Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and Google search engine were searched from January 2005 to April 2015 to collect guidelines concerning H. pylori management about recent ten years. The methodological quality of included guidelines was evaluated according to the AGREE Ⅱ instrument, and the difference in indications and recommended first-line therapy of H. pylori eradication among different guidelines were compared. ResultsA total of 13 guidelines were included. According to the AGREE Ⅱ instrument, the highest scores were for clarity and presentation 92.6% (78%-100%) and the lowest were for editorial independence 35.7% (0%-92%). The mean scores for rest domains were: scope and purpose 70.2% (39%-100%), stakeholder involvement 41.4% (22%-75%), rigor of development 41.7% (11%-82%), applicability 58.1% (35%-85%). ConclusionThe quality of guidelines for management of H. pylori infection is not high. Great efforts are needed to provide reliable and high quality guidelines, especially for the domains of stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, and editorial independence.
ObjectivesTo investigate the current situation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) of gastric cancer in China, and to assess the quality of these CPGs, so as to provide reference for developing the CPGs of gastric cancer normatively in the future.MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect the CPGs of gastric cancer in China from inception to January 31st, 2018. Four reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of these CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ(AGREE Ⅱ).ResultsA total of 12 guidelines published from 2007 to 2017 were included. Only 1 guideline was evidence-based guideline. The average scores of guidelines in six domains of AGREE Ⅱ were 83.3%, 42.2%, 16.3%, 80.2%, 37.3% and 0% respectively.ConclusionsThe overall quality of included CPGs is insufficient. There is a lack of evidence-based guidelines in China. More attention should be paid to rigor of development and applicability during the development of CPGs in the future, and a timely upgrade is also required.