1The surgical treatment for the recurrent groin herniasEver since the advent of elective surgical intervention for inguinal hernia recurrences have been observed. Indeed, many of the modern surgical techniques for herniorrhaphy were devised specifically to minimize recurrence rates. For many reasons it has been difficult to actually quantify a true recurrence rate for inguinal hernia repair. Surgeons use a variety of anatomic and “tension free” mesh repairs when fixing a symptomatic groin heria. In general the recurrence rates for each type of repair have been reported and vary from 0.5% to 10% in the current literature. One factor contributing to the broad range of recurrence is the duration 0 follow up. While most recurrences are noted within 2 to 5 years of the original repair, patients often do not seek repair of the recurrence for some 10 to 15 years following the original operation. Longterm follow up is necessary to appreciate the outcome of hernia repair.In the early 1970’s Dr L M Nyhus taught me the preperitoneal approach to the repair of groin hernia. Introduced it into my practice at the time initially restriction its use to to the repair of recurrent groin hernia but eventually enlarged the indications to include high risk patients, patients with incarcerated hernia, femoral hernia and when I felt the surgical resident needed instruction in the anatomy of the groin. I have used the preperitoneal approach for the repair of groin hernia over 3 000 times in general and specifically for the repair of recurrent groin hernia in over 750 patients. The results have been most ratifying. For first time recurrent groin hernia repair the recurrence rate for over 90% of patients followed five years was 1.6%.
Objective To compare the effect of small intestinal submucosa(SIS)and polypropylene mesh(PPM) on repairing abdominal wall defects in rats, and toprobe into the feasibility of using SIS to repair the abdominal wall defects. Methods 100 SD rats(50 males and 50 females)were randomly divided into 2 groups(n=50). Their weight ranged from 200 to 250 g.Full thickness abdominal wall defects (2 cm×2 cm) were created by surgery and were repaired with SIS and PPM respectively. At different postoperative time (1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th and 12th week), animals were sacrificed to make histological observation. The tensile strengthand the development of adhesions were measured and observed. Results 95 animals survived and were healthy after surgery. No inflammatory response and obvious immunoreaction were observed in both groups. One week after operation, the tensile strengthof abdominal wall in SIS group (204.30±5.13 mmHg) was lower than that in PPMgroup(240.0±10.0 mmHg) at 1st week(P＜0.05),and there were no difference at 4th, 8th, 12th week. Adhesions were more marked in PPM group thanthat in SIS group(P＜0.05). Conclusion Both SIS and PPM are histologically compatible when used in rats and can maintain sufficient tensile strength. SIS is superior to PPM in regards to tissue compatibility and adhesion formation.
Objective To summarize the cl inical effect of allogenic acellular dermal matrix in repair of abdominal wall hernia and defect. Methods The cl inical data were analyzed retrospectively from 31 patients with abdominal wall hernia and defect repaired by allogenic acellular dermal matrix between March 2007 and November 2009. There were 19 males and 12females with an age range of 10-70 years (median, 42 years), including 6 abdominal wall defects caused by abdominal wall tumor resection, 4 patchs infection after abdominal wall hernia repair using prosthetic mesh, 2 incisional hernia, 1 parastomal hernia, 1 recurrent parastomal hernia receiving mesh repair, 1 mesh infection caused by parastomal hernia repair using prosthetic patch, 3 mesh infection caused by tension free inguina after hernia repair, and 13 inguinal hernia. There were 12 patients with contaminated or infectious wound. The disease duration was from 1 to 34 months (6 months on average). The defect size of abdominal wall ranged from 6 cm × 4 cm to 19 cm × 10 cm. Abdominal wall hernia or defect underwent repair using allogenic acelluar demall matrix. Results Of the 31 patients, 29 patients recovered with primary wound heal ing. Chronic sinus tract occurred in 1 patient and the wound was cured by change dressing. Wound dehiscence and patch exposure occurred in 1 patient, and second heal ing was achieved after change dressing. All the 31 patients were followed up 6-36 months, no abdominal wall hernia or hernia recurrence occurred in other patients except 1 patient who had abdominal bulge. And no foreign body sensation or chronic pain in wound area occurred. Conclusion It is feasible and safe to use allergenic acellular dermal matrix patch for repair of abdominal wall hernia or soft tissue defect, especially in contaminated or infectious wound.
Objective To summarize the therapeutic experiences of abdominal wall bulge repair with compound patch intraperitoneal placement. Methods From October 2005 to October 2008, intraperitoneal onlay mesh with compound patch applied in 7 patients with abdominal wall bulge, whose clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Results All the procedures were performed successfully, including 5 open operation and 2 laparoscopic repair. The mean operation time was 85 min (ranged 68 to 130 min). After operation, 1 seroma formation and 1 hemorrhage in the thoracic cavity developed and were cured with the conservative therapy. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 9.5 d (ranged 8 to 16 d). There was no recurrence, infection, or prolonged pain during 1－4 years follow-up. Conclusion Abdominal wall bulge is caused by the weakness of abdominal wall muscle, and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair with compound patch is an appropriate therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To explore an effective method to repair the abdominal wall defect. METHODS: From July 1996 to December 2000, 7 cases with abdominal wall defect were repaired by pedicle graft of intestine seromuscular layer and skin graft, among them, intestinal fistula caused by previous injury during operation in 4 cases, abdominal wall defect caused by infection after primary fistulization of colon tumor in 2 cases, abdominal wall invaded by intestinal tumor in 1 case. Exploratory laparotomy was performed under general anesthesia, the infective and edematous tissue around abdominal wall defect was gotten rid off, and the pathologic intestine was removed. A segment of intestine with mesentery was intercepted, and the intestine along the longitudinal axis offside mesentery was cutted, the mucous layer of intestine was scraped. The intestine seromuscular layer was sutured to the margin of abdominal wall defect, and grafted by intermediate split thickness skin. RESULTS: The abdominal wall wound in 6 cases were healed by first intention, but part of grafted skin was necrosed, and it was healed by second skin graft. No intestinal anastomotic leakage was observed in all cases. Followed up 1 to 2 years, there were no abdominal hernia or abdominal internal hernia. All the cases could normally defecate. The nutriture of all cases were improved remarkably. CONCLUSION: Pedicle graft of intestine seromuscular layer is a reliable method to repair abdominal wall defect with low regional tension, abundant blood supply and high successful rate.
Objective To analyze the cl inical therapeutic effect of extended Sublay technique via previous incision for repairing flank hernias in comparison with routine Sublay technique. Methods Between May 2004 and May 2009, 41 patients with flank hernia were treated by extended Sublay repair via previous incision (extended Sublay repair group, n=18) and by routine Sublay repair (rountine Sublay repair group, n=23). In extended Sublay repair group, there were 11 males and 7 females with an average age of 45.2 years (range, 32-61 years); flank hernia was cuased by flank incision operation (12 patientswith surgery history of nephrectomy, adrenalectomy, and vascular procedure) and traffic accident (6 patients) with an average disease duration of 14.5 months (range, 8-23 months); and the locations were the left flank region in 11 patients (7 affected superior lumbar triangles and 4 affected inferior lumbar triangles) and the right flank region in 7 patients (5 affected superior lumbar triangles and 2 affected inferior lumbar triangles). In routine Sublay repair group, there were 14 males and 9 females with an average age of 48.7 years (range, 33-64 years); flank hernia was cuased by flank incision operation (15 patients with surgery history of nephrectomy, adrenalectomy, and vascular procedure), traffic accident (6 patients), and fall ing (2 patients) with an average disease duration of 18.2 months (range, 11-27 months); and the locations were the left flank region in 10 patients (5 affected superior lumbar triangles and 5 affected inferior lumbar triangles) and the right flank region in 13 patients (9 affected superior lumbar triangles and 4 affected inferior lumbar triangles). There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The mesh size in extended Sublay repair group was significantly larger than that in routine Sublay repair group [(618.2 ± 40.6) cm2 vs. (512.2 ± 36.5) cm2, P lt; 0.05 ]. There was no significant difference in hernia ring size, operation time, and hospital ization day between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). In extended Sublay repair group, the patients were followed up 17 to 35 months (26.2 months on average) with an early compl ication incidence of 27.8% (hematomas in 2 cases, seroma in 1 case, and chronic pain in 2 cases within 1 month) and a late compl ication incidence of 0 (no hernia recurrence and abdominalwall bulge during follow-up). In routine Sublay repair group, the patients were followed up 14-35 months (24.5 months onaverage) with an early compl ication incidence of 13.0% (seroma in 1 case and chronic pains in 2 cases within 1 month) and a late compl ication incidence of 30.4% (hernia recurrence in 3 cases and abdominal wall bulge in 4 cases at 1-3 months). There was significant difference in the late compl ication incidence between 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Extended Sublay technique is a safe and effective approach for flank hernia repair. Making clear the anatomy of lumbar region, harvesting adequate space for mesh overlap, and effectively-fixing are critical to ideal cl inical outcomes.
Objective Surgical repair for giant lower ventral hernia is facing challenge owing to enormous tissue defect and the critical structures of pubis and il iac vessels. To investigate the method and curative effect of intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) combined with Sublay for compound repair of giant lower ventral hernia. Methods Between November 2008 and August 2010, 26 patients with giant lower ventral hernia were treated. There were 15 males and 11 females with an averageage of 61 years (range, 36-85 years), including 11 cases of lower midl ine incisional hernia due to radical rectal procedures, 6 cases of Pfannenstiel incisional hernia due to radical uterectomy, and 9 cases of lower midl ine incisional hernia due to radical cystectomy. Of them, 11 patients underwent previous repair procedures. The mean time from hernia to admission was 8.5 years (range, 1-15 years). All hernias were defined as M3-4-5W3 according to classification criteria of Europe Hernia Society. The mean longest diameter was 17.5 cm (range, 13-21 cm) preoperatively. Before 2 weeks of operation, abdominal binder was tightened gradually until the contents of hernia sac were reduced totally, and then reconstruction of abdominal wall was performed with compound repair of IPOM and Sublay technique. Results All of compound repair procedures were performed successfully. The mean hernia size was 112.5 cm2 (range, 76.2-160.6 cm2); the mean polypropylene mesh size was 120.4 cm2 (range, 75.3-170.5 cm2); and the mean compound mesh size was 220.0 cm2 (range, 130.4-305.3 cm2). The mean operative time was 155.5 minutes (range, 105.0-195.0 minutes) and the mean postoperative hospital ization time were 12 days (range, 7-16 days). Incisions healed by first intention; 4 seromas (15.4%) and 3 chronic pains (11.5%) occurred and were cured after symptomatic treatment. All patients were followed up 3-24 months (mean, 14.5 months). No recurrence and any other discomforts related to repair procedure occurred. Conclusion Compound repair of IPOM and Sublay is a safe and efficient surgical procedure for giant lower ventral hernia, owing to its characteristics of adequate patch overlap and low recurrence rate. Perioperative management and operative technology play the key role in the success of repair procedure.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of surgical technique and immunosuppressive regimen of abdominal wall vascularized composite allograft transplantation in animals and clinical practice. MethodsThe literature on abdominal wall transplantation at home and abroad in recent years was extensively reviewed and analyzed. ResultsThis review includes animal and clinical studies. In animal studies, partial or total full-thickness abdominal wall transplantation models have been successfully established by researchers. Also, the use of thoracolumbar nerves has been described as an important method for functional reconstruction and prevention of long-term muscle atrophy in allogeneic abdominal wall transplantation. In clinical studies, researchers have utilized four revascularization techniques to perform abdominal wall transplantation, which has a high survival rate and a low incidence of complications. ConclusionAbdominal wall allotransplantation is a critical reconstructive option for the difficulty closure of complex abdominal wall defects. Realizing the recanalization of the nerve in transplanted abdominal wall to the recipient is very important for the functional recovery of the allograft. The developments of similar research are beneficial for the progress of abdominal wall allotransplantation.
Objective To investigate the reconstructive methods and effectiveness of modified pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) myocutaneous flap for large full-thickness abdominal defect reconstruction. Methods Between January 2016 and June 2018, 5 patients of large full-thickness abdominal defects were reconstructed with modified pedicled ALT myocutaneous flaps. There were 3 males and 2 females with an average age of 43.7 years (range, 32-65 years). Histologic diagnosis included desmoid tumor in 3 cases and sarcoma in 2 cases. The size of abdominal wall defect ranged from 20 cm×12 cm to 23 cm×16 cm. Peritoneum continuity was reconstructed with mesh; lateral vastus muscular flap was used to fill the dead space and rebuild the abdominal wall strength; skin grafting was applied on the muscular flap, the rest abdominal wall soft tissue defects were repaired with pedicled ALT flap. The size of lateral vastus muscular flap ranged from 20 cm×12 cm to 23 cm×16 cm, the size of ALT flap ranged from 20 cm×8 cm to 23 cm×10 cm. The donor site was closed directly. Results All flaps and skin grafts survived totally, and incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 6-36 months (mean, 14.7 months). No tumor recurrence occurred, and abdominal function and appearance were satisfying. No abdominal hernia was noted. Only linear scar left in the donor sites, and the function and appearance were satisfying. Conclusion Modified pedicled ALT myocutaneous flap is efficient for large full-thickness abdominal defect reconstruction, decrease the donor site morbidity, and improve the donor site and recipient site appearance.
ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical characteristics, treatment and prevention of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE). MethodsA retrospective analysis of 295 cases of AWE from February 2007 to August 2011 in our hospital was performed. ResultsAll of the patients had abdominal operations before and 99% of them had a history of caesarean section. The mean age of the patients was (31.55±4.52) years old. The average size of the mass was (2.66±1.12) cm, significantly larger than the estimation of ultrasonography before operation which was (1.91±0.83) cm (P<0.001). No relapse was discovered five months to three years after the operation. ConclusionIt is easy to diagnose abdominal wall endometriosis through medical history, clinical characteristics, physical signs and ultrasonic assessment. The prevention of AWE is very important. Operation is still the best treatment for AWE.