ObjectiveTo observe the clinical efficacy of intravitreal Conbercept on idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (ICNV). MethodsThis is an open and prospective study without control trial. Twelve eyes from 11 patients (7 females and 4 males) with ICNV diagnosed by best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), non-contact tonometer, ophthalmoscope, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were enrolled in this study. All affected eyes were treated with intravitreal Conbercept 0.05 ml (10 mg/ml) and received an average of (1.91±1.04) injections. The initial average letters of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart acuity were 61.73±14.58, range from 25 to 77. The patients were followed up for 6 to 9 months.The initial average central retinal thickness (CRT) was (330.73±47.79)μm, range from 290 to 467 μm. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), OCT and ophthalmoscope examination were assessed monthly. ResultsDuring the 1, 3, 6 months after treatment, themean BCVA were all improved with statistically significant difference (t=2.68, 3.80, 3.65; P < 0.05). At 1 month later after treatment, the mean BCVA was obviously improved in 1 eye (9.09%), improved in 8 eyes (72.73%), stable in 1 eye (9.09%), decreased in 1 eye (9.09%). At 6 month later after treatment, the mean BCVA was obviously improved in 3 eyes (27.27%), improved in 6 eyes (54.55%), stable in 1 eye (9.09%), decreased in 1 eye (9.09%).During the 1, 3, 6 months after treatment, the mean CRT were all decreased with statistically significant difference(t=2.44, 3.78, 4.12; P < 0.05).At latest follow up, the leakage in macula lutea disappeared in 6 eyes(58.33%), decreased in 11 eyes (25%)and increased in 3 eyes (16.67%). There were no systemic or ocular serious side effects during the follow up. ConclusionIntravitreal Conbercept for ICNV showed CNV regression, retinal thickness reduction, visual acuity improvement and safety.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP). MethodsA total of 57 eyes of 29 premature infants with diagnosis of high-risk pre-threshold, threshold ROP, or aggressive posterior ROP were reviewed and analyzed in the study. The lesions of 18 eyes were located in zoneⅠ, 39 eyes were located in zoneⅡ. All infants in the study received IVR (10 mg/ml, 0.025 ml) as the initial treatment within 24 hours after diagnosis. Follow-up examinations were performed after treatment, every week at the first month, every 2 weeks at the second and third month, every month afterward, until vascularization of zoneⅢwas observed. Follow-up ranged from 16 weeks to 52 weeks, and the average follow-up time was (28.1±11.7) weeks. If the infants didn't respond positively to the treatment or the disease recurred, the additional treatments were applied. 36 eyes (63.2%) received a single injection, whereas 21 eyes (36.8%) received additional treatments. The follow-up examinations included the development of retinal vessels, the ocular or systemic adverse events. ResultsAmong the eyes, the development of peripheral retinal vessels could be observed in 36 eyes (63.2%) which received a single injection; clinical improvement in 11 eye (19.3%) which received repeat injection; stable disease in 10 eyes (17.5%) which received laser therapy. Among the eyes, 18 eyes (31.6%) recurred, including ggressive posterior ROP (14 eyes), threshold ROP (2 eyes) and high-risk pre-threshold ROP (2 eyes). The mean time of recurrence was (5.7±2.1) weeks (range 2.0-8.0 weeks). Three eyes (5.3%) of high-risk pre-threshold, threshold ROP lacked a positive response to the treatment. The lesions were controlled after additional laser given in these eyes. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events associated with the drug or the injection was observed during the follow-up period. ConclusionIVR is safe and effective for most ROP infants. In cases of recurrence or no response, conventional laser treatment or an additional IVR injection were needed.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of repeated intravitreal conbercept injection in patients with macular edema (ME) of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), guided by optic coherence tomography (OCT). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Forty patients (40 eyes) diagnosed as ME secondary to RVO were enrolled in this study. There were 19 males (19 eyes) and 21 females (21 eyes), with the mean age of (53.58±13.19) years and the mean course of 1.5 months. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and OCT were performed. The mean baseline of BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT) were 0.25±0.18 and (509.48±170.13) μm respectively. All the patients were treated with 10.00 mg/ml conbercept 0.05 ml (including conbercept 0.5 mg). Follow-up of these patients was 1 to 6 months after treatments, the BCVA, fundus manifestations, OCT were retrospectively observed by every month, the FFA was retrospectively observed by every 3 months. When there was retinal edema or CMT ≥50 μm by OCT during follow-up, those patients were retreated with intravitreal conbercept injection. The changes of the BCVA, CMT were evaluated before and after treatment. Meanwhile, complications in eyes related to medicine and treatment methods were evaluated too. Results At the 6 months, the BCVA was improved (increase≥2 lines) in 25 eyes (62.50%), stabilized (±1 line) in 13 eyes (32.50%) and decreased 2 lines in 2 eyes (5.00%). Retinal hemorrhage and exudates were absorbed in most patients. FFA showed no fluorescein leakage in 11 eyes (27.50%), minor fluorescein leakage in 26 eyes (65.00%), and retinal capillary non-perfusion in 3 eyes (7.50%). OCT showed absorption of the subretinal fluid. The mean CMT were (235.20±100.44) μm at 6 months. Intravitreal injection of conbercept was applied for 4 times in 8 eyes (20.00%), 3 times for 18 eyes (45.00%), and 2 times for 14 eyes (35.00%). The mean number of intravitreal injection was 2.85 times. There were no ocular or systemic adverse events observed in all patients. Conclusion Intravitreal conbercept injection is an efficacy and safe treatment for the patients with ME of RVO guided by OCT. It can stabilize and improve the visual acuity.
In the expert consensus published by the Pediatrics in 2013, it was first proposed that anti-VEGF drugs can be considered for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with stage 3, zone Ⅰ with plus disease. However, there are many problems worth the attention of ophthalmologists, including the advantages and disadvantages of anti-VEGF therapy compared with traditional laser therapy, systemic and ocular complications after anti-VEGF therapy, and what indicators are the end points of anti-VEGF therapy. Combined with this consensus and numerous research findings, we recommend that the first treatment for anti-VEGF or laser therapy should be considered from disease control effects. For the threshold and pre-threshold lesions, the effect of anti-VEGF therapy for zoneⅡ lesions is better than that for zone Ⅰ lesions and the single-time effective rate is high. So, it is suggested that anti-VEGF therapy should be preferred for the first treatment. The choice of repeat treatment should be considered from the final retinal structure and functional prognosis. Laser therapy is advisable for the abnormal vascular regression slower and abnormalities in the posterior pole. It can reduce the number of reexaminations and prolong the interval between re-examinations. However, the premature use of laser has an inevitable effect on peripheral vision field. Excluding the above problems, supplemental therapy can still choose anti-VEGF therapy again. Most of the children with twice anti-VEGF therapy are sufficient to control the disease. Anti-VEGF therapy should be terminated when there are signs such as plus regression, threshold or pre-threshold lesions controlled without recurrence, peripheral vascularization, etc.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) alone or in combined with ranibizumab versus ranibizumab monotherapy (intravitreal injection, IVR) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods80 eyes of 72 patients with PCV were enrolled into this retrospective and comparative study according to their therapeutic plan. 30 eyes of 28 patients, 28 eyes of 30 patients and 22 eyes of 21 patients were divided into PDT group, ranibizumab 0.5 mg group (IVR group) or the combination group, respectively. The patients with PCV were diagnosed according to clinical symptoms, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescent indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). The baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before treatment was more than 0.05, and there was no retinal fibrosis and scar for all patients. There was no statistical difference of age (F=0.187), gender (χ2=0.423), average BCVA (F=1.120) and central retinal thickness (CRT) (F=0.431) among three groups (P > 0.05). They had not received any treatment before. Patients received verteporfin PDT in PDT group, 3 consecutive monthly IVRs starting day 1 in IVR group, and 3 IVRs after 3 days, 1 month, 2 months of PDT starting day 1 in combination group. Re-treatment was considered 3 months later if the follow up shown no changes in fundus photography, OCT and ICGA. The average follow-up time was 19 months. BCVA at baseline and follow-up visit at 1, 3, 6, 12 months was measured, and the proportion of patients with ICGA-assessed complete regression of polyps at month 6 was recorded as primary outcome. The CRT was measured at baseline and 6 months as secondary outcome. ResultsThere were significant difference of BCVA at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months among three groups(F=5.480, 5.249, 3.222, 4.711; P < 0.05). The average BCVA was significantly better at 1, 3, 6, 12 month than that at baseline(t=-6.632, -4.127, -3.904, -4.494; P < 0.05) in combination group, and was significantly better at 3, 6, 12 months than that at baseline (t=-5.636, -3.039, -3.833; P < 0.05) in IVR group. However there was no significant difference of the average BCVA in PDT group between follow-up at 1, 3, 6, l 2 months and baseline (t=1.973, 0.102, -0.100, -0.761; P > 0.05). The proportion of patients with complete regression of polyps at 6 months was higher in PDT (76.7%) or combination group (68.2%) than IVR group (35.7%) (χ2=0.003, 0.025; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference of CRT among 3 groups at baseline (P=0.651). The mean CRT decreased in all 3 treatment groups over 6 months (t=5.120, 3.635, 5.253; P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference of CRT among 3 groups (F=1.293, P > 0.05). ConclusionsThree therapies could effectively decrease CRT. IVR or IVR combined with PDT are both more effective than PDT therapy to improve vision of PCV patients. PDT or PDT combined with IVR was superior to IVR pnly in achieving complete regression of polyps in 6 months in PCV patients.
ObjectiveTo observe the concentration of the inflammatory cytokines in vitreous of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) after intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR). MethodsA total of 80 PDR patients (80 eyes) were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into vitrectomy group (group A) and IVR combined with vitrectomy group (group B), 40 eyes in each group. The differences of sex (χ2=0.05), age (t=0.59), duration of diabetes (t=0.36), HbA1c (t=0.13) and intraocular pressure (F=0.81) between two groups were not significant (P>0.05). The eyes in group B received 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab injection at 7 days before operation. The vitreous samples (0.4 ml) were obtained before operation. The concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. ResultsThe concentration of VEGF and ICAM-1 were (10.70±3.60), (224.64±90.32) pg/L in group B and (72.38±23.59), (665.61±203.34) pg/L in group A. The differences of VEGF and ICAM-1 concentration between two groups was significant (t=16.34, 12.53; P<0.001). The concentration of IL-6 and IL-8 were (210.64±80.27), (156.00±57.74) pg/L in group B and (45.78±33.82), (41.07±13.82) pg/L in group A. The differences of IL-6 and IL-8 concentration between two groups was significant (t=11.97, 12.24; P<0.001). There was no difference of CTGF concentration between two groups (t=1.39, P=0.17). The CTGF/VEGF in group B was higher than that in group A (t=14.75, P<0.001). ConclusionsOne week after IVR, the concentration of VEGF and ICAM-1 are decreased, while IL-6 and IL-8 increased. There is no obvious change in CTGF, but CTGF/VEGF is increased.
Objective To observe the inhibitory effects and characteristics of intravitreal injection with bevacizumab on laser induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV).Methods Twelve male brown norway（BN）rats were divided into the bevacizumab group and control group with six rats in each group. One eye of rats were received a series of 8 diode laser esions around optic disc to induce CNV,then the rats in bevacizumab group and control group underwent intravitreal injection with 2 mu;l bevacizumab and ringer's lactate.On days 7,14,and 21，the morphology and leakage of CNV were observed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).On day 21 after photocoagulation,the photocoagulated eyes were enucleated and processed for histopathologic examination, including hematoxylin and eosin (Hamp;E) staining and immunohistochemistry staining for vascular endothelial growth factor（VEGF）.Results On day 7 after photocoagulation,ICGA showed that CNV developed in the bevacizumab group and the control group. FFA showed that leakage intensity in the bevacizumab group was significantly lower than that in the control group，but the bevacizumab group gradually increased over time. The mean thickness of CNV significantly decreased in the bevacizumab group.The CNV in the bevacizumab group were negative for VEGF according to the result of immmuohistochemistry staining.Conclusions Early intravitreal injection with 2 mu;l bevacizumab can reduce the thickness of CNV and inhibit the leakage of CNV. However, bevacizumab could neither block the formation of CNV, nor suppress the permeability permanently. Combined other therapies with bevacizumab may be more potential to treat CNV effectively.
ObjectiveTo compare the one year efficacy of intravitreal injection with ranibizumb for macular edema (ME) secondary to ischemic and non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).MethodsA total of 88 patients (88 eyes) with ME secondary to CRVO were enrolled in this retrospective study. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was detected by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Chart. The optical coherence tomography was used to measure the foveal retinal thickness (CRT) and macular edema volume. The patients were divided into non-ischemic group and ischemic group, 44 eyes of 44 patients in each group. There was no significant differences in age (t=0.650, P=0.517) and gender (χ2=0.436, P=0.509) between the two groups. Compared with the ischemic group, the CRT was significantly decreased in the non-ischemic group (t=−2.291, P=0.024), and the edema volume in the macular area was significantly reduced (t=−2.342, P=0.022). All eyes were treated with continuous intravitreal injection of ranibizumab three times, and repeated injections were performed as needed. The patients without obvious ME regression after treatment were combined with triamcinolone acetonide injection. The patients with peripheral retinal non-perfusion area were combined with peripheral retinal laser photocoagulation. The follow-up was 1 year. The number of injections was counted. The changes of BCVA, CRT and edema volume in the macular area were compared between the two groups.ResultsDuring the 1-year follow-up period, 88 eyes were injected 1 to 10 times, with the mean of 4.51±2.33. The number of injections in the ischemic group and non-ischemic group were 4.55±1.59 and 4.48±2.91, respectively. There was no significant difference in the average number of injections between the two groups (t=0.136, P=0.892). The number of acetonide injections and laser treatment in the ischemic group was significantly higher than that in the non-ischemic group (t=3.729, 9.512; P＜0.001). At the last follow-up, compared with the ischemic group, the BCVA was increased (t=8.128), the CRT was decreased (t=−7.029) and the edema volume in the macular area was decreased (t=−7.213) in the non-ischemic group (P＜0.001).ConclusionCompared with ME secondary to ischemic CRVO, intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for ME secondary to non-ischemic CRVO has the better outcome of vision improvement and edema regression as well as less frequent of acetonide injections and laser treatment.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) compared with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of Chinese patients with predominantly classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).MethodsA randomized, double-blind, multi-center phase-3 clinical trial lasting for 52 weeks (from December 2011 to August 2014). Subjects were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to either IAI group or PDT-to-IAI group. Subjects in the IAI group received 2 mg IAI at baseline and at week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, with sham injection at week 28, 36. Subjects in the PDT-to-IAI group were forced to receive PDT once at baseline and more time at week 12, 24 if PDT retreatment conditions were met. Sham injections were given in PDT-to-IAI group at baseline and at week 4, 8, 16 and 24, followed by 2 mg IAI at week 28, 32, 36, 40, 48. The primary outcome of efficacy were the change in mean Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 28, and that of week 52. Safety evaluation included the percentage of subjects who suffered treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).ResultsAmong the 304 subjects enrolled, there were 228 and 76 cases in IAI group and PDT-to-IAI group respectively. At week 28, the changes of mean BCVA in IAI group, PDT-to-IAI group compared to baseline were +14.0, +3.9 letters, respectively. At week 52, the changes of mean BCVA in two groups were +15.2, +8.9 letters respectively with the difference of +6.2 letters (95%CI 2.6−9.9, P=0.000 9). At week 52, the mean foveal retinal thickness in the two groups decreased by −189.6, −170.0 μm, respectively. Subjects with the most BCVA increase in IAI group were those aged ＜65, and those with active CNV lesion area ＜50% of total lesion area. The most common TEAEs in IAI group and PDT-to-IAI group are macular fibrosis [11.8% (27/228), 6.6% (5/76)] and BCVA decline [6.6% (15/228), 21.1% (16/76)]. There were 3 cases of arterial thromboembolic events defined in the antiplatelet experimental collaboration group, but all were considered unrelated to interventions.ConclusionsThe efficacy of aflibercept is superior to that of PDT in nAMD patients in China. The therapeutic effect of aflibercept persisted to week 52 in all subjects. The rate of adverse events was consistent with the safety data of aflibercept known before.
ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy of intravitreal injection of conbercept (IVC) in the treatment of type 1 macular neovascularization (MNV) with different types of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From June 2018 to June 2021, 42 patients with 42 eyes of nAMD type 1 MNV patients with different types of PED diagnosed in the ophthalmological examination of the Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command were included in the study. All eyes underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The OCT examination was performed with a 3D-OCT 2000 instrument from Topcon Company in Japan. The fovea was scanned, and the PED height (PEDH), PED area (PEDA), PED volume (PEDV), and central foveal thickness (CFT) were measured. According to the OCT image features of PED, the affected eyes were divided into serous PED (sPED), fibrovascular PED (fPED), and hemorrhagic PED (hPED), and were grouped accordingly. Among the 42 eyes, 16 (38.1%, 16/42), 14 (33.3%, 14/42), and 12 (28.6%, 12/42) eyes were in the sPED group, fPED group, and hPED group, respectively. All patients received IVC treatment once a month for 3 consecutive months, and then on-demand treatment after assessment. BCVA and OCT were re-examined 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, and the changes of BCVA, PEDH, PEDA, PEDV, and CFT in the affected eyes before and after treatment were compared, and repeated measures analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. ResultsAt 12 months after treatment, the PEDH, PEDA and PEDV of the affected eyes in the sPED group, fPED group and hPED group were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The difference in the degree of improvement was －318.67±258.09 μm, －6.50±6.33 μm2, －1.95±1.78 μm3 in the hPED group; －119.31±224.13 μm, －0.86 ±5.00 μm2, －0.56±1.64 μm3 in the sPED group; fPED group were －53.93±92.51 μm, －0.76±2.54 μm2, －0.19±0.46 μm3. The improvement degree of the affected eyes in hPED group was significantly greater than that in sPED group and fPED group, and the difference was statistically significant (F=5.918, 6.029, 5.494; P＜0.05). Compared with the BCVA and CFT before treatment, 12 months after treatment, the difference was statistically significant in the fPED group and the hPED group (P＜0.05); there was no significant improvement in the sPED group (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in the BCVA of the affected eyes in the three groups compared with those before treatment (F=0.817, 0.741, 0.848; P＞0.05). ConclusionConbercept can effectively improve or stabilize the visual function and anatomical morphology of eyes with type 1 MNV in nAMD with sPED, fPED and hPED, among which the anatomical effect is better for hPED.