ObjectiveTo compare the incidence of chondral injury using Rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial approach and the tibial tunnel approach during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MethodsEighteen adult cadaver knees were divided randomly into 2 groups, 9 knees in each group. Femoral tunnel drilling and cross-pin guide insertions were performed using the Rigidfix femoral fixation device through the anteromedial approach (group A) and the tibial tunnel approach (group B). ACL reconstruction simulation was performed at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 70, 80, and 90°in the horizontal position. The correlation between incidence of chondral injury and slope angles was analyzed, and then the incidence was compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe correlation analysis indicated that the chondral injury incidence increased with the increasing of the slope angle (r=0.611, P=0.000; r=0.852, P=0.000). The incidence of chondral injury was 69.1% (56/81) and 48.1% (39/81) in groups A and B respectively, showing significant difference (χ2=7.356, P=0.007). The sublevel analysis showed that the chondral injury incidence of group A (36.1%, 13/36) was significantly higher than that of group B (0) at 0-30°(χ2=15.864, P=0.000), but no significant difference was found between group A (95.6%, 43/45) and group B (86.7%, 39/45) at 45-90°(P=0.267). ConclusionIt has more risk of chondral injury to use Rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial approach than the tibial tunnel approach to reconstruct ACL.
Objective To summarize the evaluation methods of return to sports (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in recent years, in order to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods The literature related to the RTS after ACLR was searched from CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, and Foreign Medical Information Resources Retrieval Platform (FMRS) databases. The retrieval range was from 2010 to 2023, and 66 papers were finally included for review. The relevant literature was summarized and analyzed from the aspects of RTS time, objective evaluation indicators, and psychological evaluation. Results RTS is the common desire of patients with ACL injury and doctors, as well as the initial intention of selecting surgery. A reasonable and perfect evaluation method of RTS can not only help patients recover to preoperative exercise level, but also protect patients from re-injury. At present, the main criterion for clinical judgement of RTS is time. It is basically agreed that RTS after 9 months can reduce the re-injury. In addition to time, it is also necessary to test the lower limb muscle strength, jumping, balance, and other aspects of the patient, comprehensively assess the degree of functional recovery and determine the different time of RTS according to the type of exercise. Psychological assessment plays an important role in RTS and has a good clinical predictive effect. ConclusionRTS is one of the research hotspots after ACLR. At present, there are many related evaluation methods, which need to be further optimized by more research to build a comprehensive and standardized evaluation system.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of portable bracket of lower limb in the reconstruction of anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) by the long fibular muscle tendon under arthroscopy. Methods Between March 2008 and September 2010, 22 patients with ACL injury were treated. The limb position was maintained by portable bracket of lower limb and ACL was reconstructed with the long fibular muscle tendon under arthroscopy. There were 15 males and 7 females with an average age of 33.8 years (range, 19-64 years). The causes of ACL injury were traffic accident injury in 14 cases, sport trauma in 5 cases, and fall ing injury in 3 cases. The locations were the left knee in 10 cases and the right knee in12 cases, including 12 fresh injuries and 10 old injuries. Of 22 patients, 17 had positive anterior drawer test, 19 had positive pivot shift test, and 20 had positive Lachman test. According to International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) criteria, there were 6 abnormal and 16 severely abnormal. The subjective IKDC score was 57.64 ± 6.11. The Lysholm score was 55.45 ± 4.37. Results All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication was found. All patients were followed up 9-38 months (mean, 15 months). At last follow-up, the flexion of the knee ranged from 120 to 135° (mean, 127°). One patient had positive anterior drawer test, 1 patient had positive pivot shift test, and 2 patients had positive Lachman test. No ligament loosening and breakage occurred. According to the IKDC criteria, 10 patients rated as normal, 11 patients as nearly normal, and 1 patient as abnormal. The subjective IKDC score was 90.44 ± 6.11, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative one (t=4.653, P=0.021). The Lysholm score was 90.12 ± 5.78, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative one (t=4.231, P=0.028). Conclusion Portable bracket of lower limb in the reconstruction of ACL has the advantages of saving manpower and easy operation. The long fibular muscle tendon is enough long and b to reconstruct the ACL, which can increase the contact surface between the tendon and bone and is beneficial to tendon-bone heal ing.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of the femoral tunnel angle on the femoral tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in rabbits. MethodsFifty-four healthy 4-5 months old rabbits (weighing, 1.8-2.3 kg, male or female) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=18). The ACL reconstruction models of the right knee were established in 3 experimental groups using its Achilles tendons, and the left knee served as the control group. On the coronal position, the angle between the femoral tunnel and the femoral shaft axis was 30°, 45°, and 60°. The level of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) in the synovial fluid at 1, 2, and 4 weeks, the maximum load of the ligament and the rate of bone tunnel enlargement at 4, 8, and 12 weeks were detected. ResultsThe level of TNF-α significantly increased, and the maximum load of the ligament significantly decreased in the 3 experimental groups when compared with ones in the control group (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found among 3 experimental groups (P>0.05). The bone tunnel enlargement was observed in 3 experimental groups at each time point and reached the peak at 4 weeks, but no significant difference was shown among 3 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe 30-60° angle between the femoral tunnel and the femoral shaft axis in the coronal position has no significant effect on the femoral tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction in rabbits.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bidirectional barbed suture.MethodsBetween February 2014 and January 2016, 96 patients (96 knees) with ACL injury who met the inclusion criteria were recruited and randomly divided into 2 groups (n=48). All patients underwent ACL reconstruction with autologous tendon. The tibial remnant was fixed with PDS-Ⅱ suture (control group) and bidirectional barbed suture (trial group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, injury side, the interval from injury to operation, and preoperative knee stability (KT-1000 test), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Lysholm score (P>0.05). The knee stability (KT-1000 test), IKDC score, Lysholm score, proprioception, and Cyclops lesion after operation were recorded.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention in both groups. Forty-four patients in control group were followed up 26-47 months (mean, 36.6 months), and 45 patients in trial group were followed up 26-48 months (mean, 35.6 months). At last follow-up, the IKDC score, Lysholm score, and KT-1000 test were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in both groups (P<0.05); but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in proprioception between 2 groups at 1 and 2 years after operation, and between 1 year after operation and 2 years after operation (P>0.05) in the same group. The incidences of Cyclops lesion at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after operation were 0, 4.44% (2/45), and 4.44% (2/45) in trial group, and 13.6% (6/44), 13.6% (6/44), 20.5% (9/44) in control group, showing significant differences between 2 groups at 6 months and at 2 years after operation (P=0.012; P=0.022) and no significant difference at 1 year after operation (P=0.157).ConclusionThe remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction with bidirectional barbed suture can decrease the incidence of Cyclops lesions. However, this technique can not improve the effectiveness in terms of the clinical function and stability compared with the traditional technique.
Objective To explore the clinical significance of systemic rehabilitation training on knee functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Patients who underwent arthroscopic knee ACL reconstruction and met the inclusion criteria were included from January 2015 to October 2016. A 4-phase, 16-week systemic rehabilitation training was given individually according to surgical conditions, sports and other factors. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), knee range of motion (ROM), knee circumference, and 10-meter walking time were measured before surgery, and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. At the same time, the function and stability of the knee joint were graded by Lysholm score, Holden walking score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and KT-1000 test. The postoperative one-year scores were compared with the other side, and the patient satisfaction was evaluated one year after surgery. Results All patients were followed up for at least one year. The VAS pain score, ROM, knee circumference, 10-meter walking time, Lysholm score, Holden score, IKDC score, and KT-1000 of all patients were significantly better than their preoperative levels (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in joint function from the contralateral side (P>0.05). No serious complications such as infection occurred. Conclusion Systemic rehabilitation exercises can help patients with well-restored knee joint function after ACL reconstruction.
ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure and medial meniscus injury and decide whether medial meniscus injury could be the judgment index for ACL reconstruction failure without trauma history. MethodsBetween March 2011 and December 2015, 117 patients underwent ACL reconstruction, and the clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had no trauma history after ACL resconstruction. MRI examination showed medial meniscus injury in 56 cases (observation group) and no medial meniscus injury in 61 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, side, reconstructive surgery, and follow-up time between 2 groups (P>0.05). The KT-2000 arthrometer was used to measure the difference value of tibial anterior displacement between two knees in 30° knee flexion. Then wether the ACL reconsruction failure was judged according to the evaluation criteria proposed by Rijke et al. ResultsIn observation group, the difference value of tibial anterior displacement was <3 mm in 7 patients, 3-5 mm in 11 patients, and >5 mm in 38 patients. In control group, the difference value of tibial anterior displacement was <3 mm in 31 patients, 3-5 mm in 18 patients, and >5 mm in 12 patients. The ACL reconstruction failure rate of observation group (67.9%) was significantly higher than that of control group (19.7%) (χ2=27.700, P=0.000). ConclusionAfter ACL reconstruction, medial meniscus injury occurs under no trauma history circumstances, indicating ACL reconstruction failure.
Objective To explore the early effectiveness and influence on cartilage of local injection of multimodal drug cocktail (MDC) during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods Between February 2022 and August 2023, patients undergone arthroscopic ACLR using autologous hamstring tendons were selected as the study subjects. Among them, 90 patients met the selection criteria and were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=30) according to the different injection drugs after ligament reconstruction. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, body mass index, surgical side, disease duration, preoperative thigh circumference, and preoperative levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-1, matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3), MMP-13, and aggrecan (ACAN) in synovial fluid between groups (P>0.05). After the ligament reconstruction during operation, corresponding MDC (consisting of ropivacaine, tranexamic acid, and betamethasone in group A, and ropivacaine, betamethasone, and saline in group B) or saline (group C) were injected into the joint and tendon site, respectively. The length of hospital stay, postoperative tramadol injection volume, incidence of complications, degree of knee joint swelling and range of motion, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lyshlom score, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score were recorded and compared between groups. The T2* values in different cartilage regions were detected by MRI examination and the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1, MMP-3, MMP-13, and ACAN in synovial fluid were detected by ELISA method. Results The patients in group A, B, and C were followed up (12.53±3.24), (13.14±2.87), and (12.82±3.32) months, respectively. All incisions healed by first intention. Compared with group C, group A and group B had shorter length of hospital stay, less tramadol injection volume, and lower incidence of complications, showing significant differences (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between group A and group B (P>0.05). The degree of knee swelling in group A was significantly less than that in group B and group C (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between group B and group C (P>0.05). At 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation, VAS scores of group A and group B were significantly lower than those of group C (P<0.05); at 72 hours after operation, there was no significant difference among the three groups (P>0.05). At 3 days, 14 days, and 1 month after operation, the range of motion of knee joint in group A were significantly better than those in group C (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the other groups (P>0.05). At 1 month after operation, the IKDC score of group A and group B was significantly higher than that of group C (P<0.05); there was no significant difference among the three groups at other time points (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in Lyshlom score and HSS score among the three groups at each time point (P>0.05). At 14 days after operation, the levels of IL-1 and IL-6 in the synovial fluid in groups A and B were significantly lower than those in group C (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of TNF-α, MMP-3, MMP-13, and ACAN between groups A and B (P>0.05). At 1 month after operation, there was no significant difference in the above indicators among the three groups (P>0.05). At 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, there was no significant difference in the T2* values of different cartilage regions among the three groups (P>0.05). ConclusionInjecting MDC (ropivacaine, tranexamic acid, betamethasone) into the joint and tendon site during ACLR can achieve good early effectiveness without significant impact on cartilage.
ObjectiveTo investigate the best knee flexion angle by analyzing the length and orientation of the femoral tunnel through anteromedial portal (AM) at different flexion angles during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MethodsTwelve fresh cadaveric knees were selected to locate the center of ACL femoral footprint through AM using the improved hook slot vernier caliper, and to locate the posterior bone cortex using a diameter 3 mm ball at flexion of 90, 100, 110, 120, and 130°. The femoral tunnel length, standard coronal and sagittal plane angles, and the position relation between exit point and the lateral epicondyle were measured; the tunnel orientation on the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films was also measured. ResultsWith increasing flexion of the knee, the femoral tunnel length showed a first increasing and then stable tendency; significant difference was found between at flexion of 90°and at flexions of 100, 110, 120, and 130°, and between flexions of 100°and 120°(P<0.05). The femoral tunnel showed a trend of decreasing with coronal angle, whereas gradually increasing with sagittal angle. The knee flexion angle had significant difference either among flexions of 90, 110, and 130°or between flexions of 100°and 120°(P<0.05). The exit point of the femoral tunnel located at the lateral epicondyle of the femur proximal to posterior region at flexion of 90°in all knees, and at flexion of 100°in 7 knees, but it located at the lateral epicondyle of the femur proximal to anterior region at flexion of 110, 120, and 130°in all knees. As the knee flexion angle increasing, the angle between femoral tunnel with the tangent of internal-external femoral condyle on anteroposterior X-ray films showed a trend of decreasing gradually, but a trend of increasing gradually on lateral X-ray films. On the anteroposterior X-ray films, significant differences were found in the angle either among flexions of 90, 110, and 130°or between flexions of 100°and 120°(P<0.05). On the lateral X-ray films, there were significant differences in the angle among flexions of 90, 100, 110, 120, and 130°(P<0.05). ConclusionDuring ACL reconstruction by AM, 110°is the best flexion angle, which can get the ideal femoral tunnel.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of exercise therapy on functional and activity recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of exercise therapy on functional and activity recovery after ACL from inception to May 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 602 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: 1 week (MD=3.07, 95%CI 1.37 to 4.77, P=0.000 4) and 3 weeks (MD=4.53, 95%CI 2.34 to 6.71, P<0.000 1) conventional exercise training rehabilitation effects were better than natural recovery under orthopedic routine care in promoting knee joint function recovery. The recovery effects of over 6 months neuromuscular training was significantly increased compared with conventional rehabilitation (MD=11.48, 95%CI 8.25 to 14.71, P<0.000 01). In addition, there was significant difference between open and closed chain exercise rehabilitation after more than 6 months rehabilitation training (MD=6.77, 95%CI 0.86 to 12.68, P=0.02).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that over 6 months neuromuscular training significantly enhance the recovery of motor function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. According to different reconstruction methods, individualized rehabilitation program is developed to maximize the recovery of knee joint function. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.