Objective To observe the retinal toxicity of intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in albino rabbit eyes at different doses. Methods Sixteen New Zealand albino rabbits，thirty-two eyes were divided into four groups at random. Three groups were prepared for Avastin experiment, named A, B, C. Each group received intravitreal injection of Avastin at dose 1.25 mg/0.05ml，2.5 mg/0.1ml and 6.25 mg/0.25 ml respectively. The other group named D served as a control, and accepted intravitreal injection of 0.9% normal saline 0.1 ml. Then test it by electroretinagram (ERG) after 1, 2 and 4 weeks. In addition, each group was removing two rabbitprime;s eyes to observe the retinal morphology and ultra structure by light microscope and transmission electron microscopy after intravitreal injection avastin 1, 2 and 4 weeks. Results The ERG pattern and amplitude of each group were normal after intravitreal injection Avastin 1, 2 and 4 weeks. （P＞0.05）Between study and control groups, there was no significant difference in retinal morphology which was observed by light microscope at any stage of the study. By electron microscopic observation, retinal ultramicrostructure was no evident retinal toxicity being tested both at group A and B (1.25 mg/0.05 ml and 2.5 mg/0.1 ml). But at group C (6.25 mg/0.25 ml), significant mitochondrial swelling and hydropic changes were seen in the inner segments of photoreceptors. And there was no improvement of the pathological changes in four weeks. Conclusion It is safe that intravitreal injection of Avastin in rabbitprime;s eyes at dose 1.25 mg or 2.5 mg at single time. （Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2008，24：193-196）
ObjectiveTo observe the effects of personalized clinical therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). MethodsEighty-six eyes of 79 patients with PCV were enrolled in this study. There were 60 males (65 eyes) and 19 females (21 eyes). The average age was (64.48±13.15) years old. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit lamp ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and/or indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) were measured. The average BCVA was 0.19±0..20. There were three groups in this study including photodynamic therapy (PDT) group (group A, 45 eyes), PDT and intravitreal ranibizumab injection group (group B, 31 eyes), and PDT combined with sub-Tenon's capsule triamcinolone acetonide injection group (group C, 10 eyes). Follow up begun at 1 month after the treatment. 40 eyes in group A were followed up for 1 to 12 months with the average 3.27 months.28 eyes in group B were followed up for 1 to 36 months with the average 6.68 months. 9 eyes in group C were followed up for 1 to 12 months with the average 5.67 months. Patients with recurrent or worsen lesions were followed by FFA or ICGA. Pre- and post-treatment BCVA and retinal thickness of the fovea were comparatively analyzed. ResultsAll eyes (100.0%) in group A, 20 eyes (64.52%) in group B and 9 eyes (90.00%) in group C received treatment only once. The mean BCVA at 1 month after treatment was significantly increased than the pre-treatment BCVA in all 3 groups (t=2.061, 3.262, 3.258; P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between the 3 groups (t=1.345, 0.683, 0.168; P>0.05). Compared to pre-treatment measures, the mean retinal thickness of the fovea was significantly decreased in group A and group B (t=2.239, 4.334; P<0.05), but not changed in group C (t=2.286, P>0.05) at 1 month after treatment. Thirteen eyes in group A were followed by FFA and (or) ICGA, which showed that there were 3 eyes with complete closed PCV and alleviated pigment epithelial detachment (PED), 4 eyes with partial closed PCV, 3 eyes with stable PCV and 3 eyes with worsen PCV. Ten eyes in group B were followed by FFA and (or) ICGA, which showed that there were 3 eyes with complete closed PCV, 3 eyes with partial closed PCV, 4 eyes with recurrence PCV. Five eyes in group C were followed by FFA and (or) ICGA, which showed that there were 4 eyes with complete closed PCV, 1 eyes with recurrence PCV. ConclusionAll 3 therapy strategies can stop or reduce PCV leakage and improve the visual acuity in some degree.
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs, including monoclonal antibodies (such as bevacizumab and ranibizumab) and fusion protein agents (such as aflibercept and conbercept) have been clinically proven to be effective to treat exudative age-related macular degeneration AMD). However, there are still some patients do not or poorly respond to the initial anti-VEGF agents, usually after several injections, ophthalmologists may switch to another anti-VEGF agent. In general, switching of anti-VEGF agent is considered for recurrent AMD, AMD resistance to anti-VEGF treatments. Current switching protocols include the replacement of monoclonal antibodies with fusion protein agents, the replacement of fusion protein agents with monoclonal antibodies, the substitution of one monoclonal antibody with another one, and the replacement of monoclonal antibodies with fusion protein agents and switching back with monoclonal antibodies. However, current researches on the switching of anti-VEGF drugs for exudative AMD are mostly retrospective and single-arm studies, and there are some differences in the results of different studies. Therefore, for patients with exudative AMD who do not respond to or respond poorly to anti-VEGF drugs, the efficacy of switching of anti-VEGF drugs is uncertain right now. Switching of anti-VEGF agents may improve the retinal anatomical outcome of the affected eye but may not necessarily improve visual acuity. Thus it is an option in the clinical practice to treat AMD. To determine the benefits of above mentioned switching regimens, randomized controlled clinical trials with large sample number and long study period will be needed.
ObjectiveTo compare the visual outcomes of treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab alone or in combination with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). MethodsIn this retrospective and comparative study, 36 eyes of 36 patients with PCV were enrolled. Eighteen eyes received 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) ranibizumab injection only (simple injection group) and the other 18 eyes underwent combination therapy of ranibizumab injection and PDT (combination treatment group). Intravitreal ranibizumab was given at the third day after PDT. Re-treatment was considered in clinic examination. The minimum re-treatment interval was 3 months for combination therapy and 1 month for ranibizumab. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at baseline and each follow-up visit at 1, 3, 6, 12 month was measured as a primary outcome, and complications also observed in every follow-up. ResultsNo complications occurred in these 36 patients during the treatment or follow-up, such as retinal detachment, sustained high intraocular pressure, retinal holes, intraocular inflammation, and systemic adverse reactions. The average times of ranibizumab injections of simple injection group and combined treatment group were (3.00±0.84) and (1.89±0.68) times respective, and the difference was significant (t=4.370, P=0.000). The logMAR BCVA of the first and third month after initial treatment between two groups were significant different (t=0.668, 0.940; P>0.05). However, there was no significant difference between them at the 6th and 12th month (t=2.188, 2.547; P<0.05). In the last follow-up, the logMAR BCVA were improved in simple injection group and combination treatment group compared to the pre-treatment values (t=3.351, 9.408; P=0.012, 0.000). In simple injection group, visual acuity was improved in 3 eyes (16.7%), stable in 13 eyes (72.2%) and decreased in 2 eyes (11.1%). In combination treatment group, visual acuity was improved in 4 eyes (22.2%), stable in 13 eyes (72.2%) and decreased in 1 eyes (5.6%). ConclusionsIntravitreal ranibizumab injection and combined with PDT are both effective to improve vision in patients with PCV. Visual acuity was the same between the two treatments in 3 months after initial treatment; however 6 to 12 months after first treatment, patients received PDT combined with intravitreal ranibizumab injection had better visual acuity than those received the intravitreal ranibizumab injection only.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common ocular complication of diabetes patients. It mainly involve macular which is closely related with visual function, thus DME is one of the major reasons causing visual impairment or blindness for diabetes patients. How to reduce the visual damage of DME is always a big challenge in the ophthalmic practice. In the past three decades, there are tremendous developments in DME treatments, from laser photocoagulation, antiinflammation drugs to antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. However, the mechanism of DME development is not yet completely clear; every existing treatment has its own advantages and weaknesses. Therefore DME treatment still challenges us to explore further to reduce the DME damages.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical efficacy of intravitreal Conbercept on idiopathic choroidal neovascularization (ICNV). MethodsThis is an open and prospective study without control trial. Twelve eyes from 11 patients (7 females and 4 males) with ICNV diagnosed by best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), non-contact tonometer, ophthalmoscope, fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were enrolled in this study. All affected eyes were treated with intravitreal Conbercept 0.05 ml (10 mg/ml) and received an average of (1.91±1.04) injections. The initial average letters of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart acuity were 61.73±14.58, range from 25 to 77. The patients were followed up for 6 to 9 months.The initial average central retinal thickness (CRT) was (330.73±47.79)μm, range from 290 to 467 μm. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), OCT and ophthalmoscope examination were assessed monthly. ResultsDuring the 1, 3, 6 months after treatment, themean BCVA were all improved with statistically significant difference (t=2.68, 3.80, 3.65; P < 0.05). At 1 month later after treatment, the mean BCVA was obviously improved in 1 eye (9.09%), improved in 8 eyes (72.73%), stable in 1 eye (9.09%), decreased in 1 eye (9.09%). At 6 month later after treatment, the mean BCVA was obviously improved in 3 eyes (27.27%), improved in 6 eyes (54.55%), stable in 1 eye (9.09%), decreased in 1 eye (9.09%).During the 1, 3, 6 months after treatment, the mean CRT were all decreased with statistically significant difference(t=2.44, 3.78, 4.12; P < 0.05).At latest follow up, the leakage in macula lutea disappeared in 6 eyes(58.33%), decreased in 11 eyes (25%)and increased in 3 eyes (16.67%). There were no systemic or ocular serious side effects during the follow up. ConclusionIntravitreal Conbercept for ICNV showed CNV regression, retinal thickness reduction, visual acuity improvement and safety.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP). MethodsA total of 57 eyes of 29 premature infants with diagnosis of high-risk pre-threshold, threshold ROP, or aggressive posterior ROP were reviewed and analyzed in the study. The lesions of 18 eyes were located in zoneⅠ, 39 eyes were located in zoneⅡ. All infants in the study received IVR (10 mg/ml, 0.025 ml) as the initial treatment within 24 hours after diagnosis. Follow-up examinations were performed after treatment, every week at the first month, every 2 weeks at the second and third month, every month afterward, until vascularization of zoneⅢwas observed. Follow-up ranged from 16 weeks to 52 weeks, and the average follow-up time was (28.1±11.7) weeks. If the infants didn't respond positively to the treatment or the disease recurred, the additional treatments were applied. 36 eyes (63.2%) received a single injection, whereas 21 eyes (36.8%) received additional treatments. The follow-up examinations included the development of retinal vessels, the ocular or systemic adverse events. ResultsAmong the eyes, the development of peripheral retinal vessels could be observed in 36 eyes (63.2%) which received a single injection; clinical improvement in 11 eye (19.3%) which received repeat injection; stable disease in 10 eyes (17.5%) which received laser therapy. Among the eyes, 18 eyes (31.6%) recurred, including ggressive posterior ROP (14 eyes), threshold ROP (2 eyes) and high-risk pre-threshold ROP (2 eyes). The mean time of recurrence was (5.7±2.1) weeks (range 2.0-8.0 weeks). Three eyes (5.3%) of high-risk pre-threshold, threshold ROP lacked a positive response to the treatment. The lesions were controlled after additional laser given in these eyes. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events associated with the drug or the injection was observed during the follow-up period. ConclusionIVR is safe and effective for most ROP infants. In cases of recurrence or no response, conventional laser treatment or an additional IVR injection were needed.
Anti-vascular dndothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs have open up a new treatment channel for ocular neovascular diseases. A lots of clinical data has proved that anti-VEGF drugs are effective and safe. But we should also notice that long-term and excessive usage of anti-VEGF drugs brings some new problems and complications, and even affect the normal ocular physiological process of the angiogenesis and retinal blood flow. So, it is necessary to pay attention to the problems and potential risks of excessive usage of anti-VEGF therapies for ocular neovascular disease.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of repeated intravitreal conbercept injection in patients with macular edema (ME) of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), guided by optic coherence tomography (OCT). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Forty patients (40 eyes) diagnosed as ME secondary to RVO were enrolled in this study. There were 19 males (19 eyes) and 21 females (21 eyes), with the mean age of (53.58±13.19) years and the mean course of 1.5 months. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and OCT were performed. The mean baseline of BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT) were 0.25±0.18 and (509.48±170.13) μm respectively. All the patients were treated with 10.00 mg/ml conbercept 0.05 ml (including conbercept 0.5 mg). Follow-up of these patients was 1 to 6 months after treatments, the BCVA, fundus manifestations, OCT were retrospectively observed by every month, the FFA was retrospectively observed by every 3 months. When there was retinal edema or CMT ≥50 μm by OCT during follow-up, those patients were retreated with intravitreal conbercept injection. The changes of the BCVA, CMT were evaluated before and after treatment. Meanwhile, complications in eyes related to medicine and treatment methods were evaluated too. Results At the 6 months, the BCVA was improved (increase≥2 lines) in 25 eyes (62.50%), stabilized (±1 line) in 13 eyes (32.50%) and decreased 2 lines in 2 eyes (5.00%). Retinal hemorrhage and exudates were absorbed in most patients. FFA showed no fluorescein leakage in 11 eyes (27.50%), minor fluorescein leakage in 26 eyes (65.00%), and retinal capillary non-perfusion in 3 eyes (7.50%). OCT showed absorption of the subretinal fluid. The mean CMT were (235.20±100.44) μm at 6 months. Intravitreal injection of conbercept was applied for 4 times in 8 eyes (20.00%), 3 times for 18 eyes (45.00%), and 2 times for 14 eyes (35.00%). The mean number of intravitreal injection was 2.85 times. There were no ocular or systemic adverse events observed in all patients. Conclusion Intravitreal conbercept injection is an efficacy and safe treatment for the patients with ME of RVO guided by OCT. It can stabilize and improve the visual acuity.
In the expert consensus published by the Pediatrics in 2013, it was first proposed that anti-VEGF drugs can be considered for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with stage 3, zone Ⅰ with plus disease. However, there are many problems worth the attention of ophthalmologists, including the advantages and disadvantages of anti-VEGF therapy compared with traditional laser therapy, systemic and ocular complications after anti-VEGF therapy, and what indicators are the end points of anti-VEGF therapy. Combined with this consensus and numerous research findings, we recommend that the first treatment for anti-VEGF or laser therapy should be considered from disease control effects. For the threshold and pre-threshold lesions, the effect of anti-VEGF therapy for zoneⅡ lesions is better than that for zone Ⅰ lesions and the single-time effective rate is high. So, it is suggested that anti-VEGF therapy should be preferred for the first treatment. The choice of repeat treatment should be considered from the final retinal structure and functional prognosis. Laser therapy is advisable for the abnormal vascular regression slower and abnormalities in the posterior pole. It can reduce the number of reexaminations and prolong the interval between re-examinations. However, the premature use of laser has an inevitable effect on peripheral vision field. Excluding the above problems, supplemental therapy can still choose anti-VEGF therapy again. Most of the children with twice anti-VEGF therapy are sufficient to control the disease. Anti-VEGF therapy should be terminated when there are signs such as plus regression, threshold or pre-threshold lesions controlled without recurrence, peripheral vascularization, etc.