Decision-making is often a complex and hard-to-routinize process. Based on the decision-making experience of fighting COVID-19, policymakers have gradually realized that climate action, quality education, and other societal challenges, as well as the sustainable development goals (SDGs) need to be addressed with the best available evidence using an evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) approach. The Global Commission on Evidence was established in 2021. In addition, the Evidence Commission issued reports in 2022 and 2023. A systematic methodology to address societal challenges with EIDM has been constructed in the report. Five types of domestic evidence (data analytics, evaluation, modeling, qualitative insights, and behavioural/implementation research) and four steps in decision-making process (understanding a problem and its causes, selecting an option for addressing the problem, identifying implementation considerations, and monitoring implementation and evaluating impacts) were used to support four types of decision-makers (government policymakers, organizational leaders, professionals and citizens) in EIDM, as demonstrated by the reports. To further disseminate the concept and methodology of EIDM globally, the secretariat works with 25 Evidence Commissioners to write the report, and continues to cooperate with Country Leads Group from 12 countries to conduct rapid evidence-support system assessments (RESSAs), and collaborates with Evidence Commission Implementation Council to accelerate the implementation of 24 recommendations. The main history, core methodology, and latest developments of the Global Committee on Evidence were systematically reviewed in this paper. We aimed to show decision-makers a new version of how to scientifically address the societal challenges of EIDM.
Objective To compare and review worldwide journals titled “evidence-based” in order to provide an overview of these healthcare journals and suggestions for improving the quality of this type of journal in China and to introduce a quick way for healthcare professionals and patients to obtain high quality clinical evidence. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, Wanfang and some relevant websites to identify journals titled “evidence-based”. The last issues in 2006 of these kind of journals were analyzed by bibliometric method. Results Twenty-four journals were included. Covering 12 disciplines such as clinical, nursing, health care, etc. They were divided into the primary journals and the secondary journals, published in two languages in six countries. These journals had differences and similarities in their aims, columns and contents, etc. Conclusions Evidence-based medical journals provide the latest developments and the best evidence for healthcare professionals in their own fields, save their time in searching for and reading information, and provide ideas for improving the quality of similar journals in our country.
With the rapid development of evidence-based medicine during the past two decades, evidence andevidence-based methods were not only used in the field of health care, but also applied to other non-medical fields. Asystematic literature search and a comparative study were conducted to investigate the definition of evidence. We also putforward our own definition of evidence: Evidence is the information from the systematic review process. We also discussedthe development of evidence-based paradigm and hope this will act as a reference for other subjects and industries.
China Association of Chinese Medicine officially issued the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Common Internal Diseases in Chinese Medicine-Headache (T/CACM 1271-2019) on January 30th, 2019. The guideline provided 27 recommendations, including clinical diagnosis, treatment, prevention and care of headache. This paper introduces the background of this guideline and interprets its contents of clinical diagnosis, treatment and prevention.
David Eddy, one of the founders of evidence-based medicine, is a famous American expert in evidence-based medicine. He was first author on a key article in JAMA in 1990 and coined the term "evidence-based". He made great contributions in medical decision making, applied mathematics, health economics and devoted himself to the establishment and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines. In this article, the process of his striving and academic research is introduced and his unique insight into and new interpretion of evidence-based medicine are elaborated.
National Center for Medical Service Administration of National Health and Family Planning Commission of China was established at the beginning of 2015. It is mainly in charge of developing and managing standards of medical technology and organizing their implementation, and giving technical guidance and consulting for evaluation of medical institutions. The foundation of the center fills in the blank of lacking central administrative department of the guideline development and evaluation. This paper introduces the definition and the function of clinical practice guideline, and analyzes the current situation, problems and challenges of domestic guidelines, and proposes some potential suggestions on improving the quality of Chinese guidelines from national level for promoting the standardization, scientification and transparency of clinical practice guidelines in China.
As the global health crisis erupts, there is an unprecedented focus on evidence across all sectors, becoming a critical trigger for changing research plans, development, synthesis, implementation, and evidence-informed decision-making. The establishment of the Global Commission on Evidence and the publication of two reports further emphasize the significance of evidence-informed decision-making in addressing social challenges. With the dissemination and development of evidence-based social science, there is a need to continually improve the ecosystem from evidence to decision and provide rigorous methods and approaches for different decision-makers to address social challenges. This article aims to interpret the Evidence Commission Report and explain the demand and supply of evidence, global public goods, and eight most-important Evidence Commission recommendations that can be used to address most social challenges. It also presents the key issues and insights that the evidence-based social science ecosystem faces from evidence to decision-making, putting evidence at the center of everyday work and life.
若在已发表的报告中干预措施描述不完整，临床工作者和患者就无法可靠地实施有效的干预措施，其他研究人员也无法在此研究基础上重复或进一步开展研究。然而，已发表文章中干预措施的报告质量非常差。为提高报告的完整性并最终提高干预措施的可重复性，一个国际专家组和利益相关方共同制订了描述干预措施的清单和报告规范（Template for Intervention Description and Replication，TIDieR）。制订过程包括：相关清单和研究的文献综述，针对国际专家小组的德尔菲调查以指导选择清单条目及召开面对面的小组会议。最终确定的 12 条 TIDieR 清单条目（包括：干预措施简称、实施理由、实施资料、实施过程、干预措施实施者、实施方法、实施地点、实施时间及强度、个性化方案、方案更改、预期效果和实际效果）是对 CONSORT（The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials）2010 声明中条目 5 和 SPIRIT（Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials）2013 声明中条目 11 的扩展。虽然该清单强调的是试验中干预措施描述，但该指导仍适用于所有评价性研究设计。本文对 TIDieR 清单的每个条目进行了解释和说明并呈现了高质量报告的实例。TIDieR 清单和报告规范可提高干预措施的报告质量，并且使得作者对干预措施的描述、审稿人和编辑对有关干预措施描述的评估、读者对干预措施的使用更加容易。
Expert consensus, as an important supplement to clinical practice guidelines, supports clinical decision-making when evidence is lacking or controversial. Compared to clinical practice guidelines, the presentation of expert consensus is more diverse. Currently, there are no reporting guidelines for expert consensus in clinical and public health decision-making. The RIGHT (Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare) checklist is the most commonly used international guideline reporting standard, and is often referred to when writing expert consensus. However, the RIGHT checklist does not include a section on consensus formation methods; while the ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) checklist includes reporting requirements for consensus formation methods, but not for reporting recommendations. Therefore, this article integrates the RIGHT and ACCORD reporting checklists and proposes an integrated reporting framework (TIMER-DO) to help authors combine these two commonly used international reporting standards and complete the standardized reporting of expert consensus.
In order to develop the clinical practice guideline (CPG) of intra-articular injection for knee osteoarthritis, based on the definition of Institution of Medicine (IOM) about CPG, the WHO handbook, the GRADE instrument, the AGREE Ⅱinstrument, and the Right for Reporting CPG, Chinese Orthopaedic Association,Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, Arthritis Clinic and Research Center of Peking University People’s Hospital, Chinese GRADE Center established the guideline working groups and develop protocol of the guideline.