Nowadays, one of the most challenging aspects of retinoblastoma (RB) therapy is how to control the resistant or recurrent viable vitreous seeds, for which intravenous chemotherapy appears to be ineffective. Recently, intravitreal chemotherapy offers another option to control advanced stage and vitreous seeds of RB, and may be a promising new approach to RB therapy. However, intravitreal injection for RB patients raises considerable controversy due to concerns of possible extraocular extension along the injection route, and should not replace the primary standard of care for bilateral RB or group E eyes of RB. Close follow-up and further studies are needed to determine appropriate indications, to determine the effective drugs and concentrations, to optimize RB therapy protocols and to investigate the relationship between long-term efficacy and toxicities.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodWe electronically searched databases including the Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2017), PubMed, Embase, China Biology Medicine Database, China National Knowledge Internet Database, VIP Database and Wangfang Data from the establishment to May 2017. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, case series and case reports on crizotinib for NSCLC were included. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed the methodological quality of included studies, then make Meta-analysis and descriptive analysis.ResultA total of 15 studies were included, including 4 RCTs, 1 non-RCT, 4 case series and 6 case reports. The results indicated that the progression-free survival time of crizotinib group was 8 months, which was better than chemotherapy group (4.6 months). The results of Meta-analysis showed that the response rate in the crizotinib group was higher than that in the chemotherapy group [RR=2.35, 95%CI (1.59, 3.46), P<0.000 1]. The one year survival rate in the crizotinib group was 74.5%-78.6%. The incidences of adverse reactions including dysopsia, dysgeusia, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, transaminase lifts, upper respiratory tract infection, edema and dizziness in the crizotinib group were higher than those in the chemotherapy group (P<0.05), while the incidences of adverse reactions including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, alopecia and fatigue in crizotinib group were lower than those in the chemotherapy group (P<0.05). Subgroup analysis under precision treatment showed the progression-free survival time of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive group was 8 months, and it was longer than ALK-negative group of 4 months.ConclusionsBased on current evidence, crizotinib is better than chemotherapy for NSCLC. Due to limited quality of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be verifed by more high quality studies.
Drugs may induce hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBV-R). Here we have reviewed the definition and harm of HBV-R, the risk drugs and their underlying mechanism, the influence factors, as well as the early intervention measures. It is shown that multiple drugs, including chemotherapy drugs, immunotherapy drugs, directly acting antivirals, cell therapy, etc., can induce HBV-R by affecting host immunity or directly activating HBV transcription factors. HBV-R could cause severe liver damage, even interruption of treatment of original diseases, affecting the prognosis of patients. Through precisely identifying risk drugs, monitoring the influence factors, and prescribing preventive anti-HBV regimen if necessary, the incidence of HBV-R can be significantly reduced. It is also suggested that clinical physicians should not only pay attention to the early identification and intervention of HBV-R, but also further study the mechanism of HBV-R in depth, especially the underlying mechanism between host, HBV and risk factors. This will help to promote the discovery of more valuable markers for risk prediction and targets for early intervention, and to further reduce the risk of HBV-R and improve the prognosis of patients.
Objective To review the research progress of the treatment of osteosarcoma, and to thoroughly understand its current state of research and prospect so as to lay a sol id foundation for the cl inical treatment. Methods The cl inical and experimental research l iteratures about treatment of osteosarcoma were extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results The present treatment of osteosarcoma is still need to comprehensive therapy which combine chemotherapy and surgical treatment. There are some progresses in gene therapy and molecular targeting therapy which can improve survival rate. Furthermore, well-designed studies and cl inical trials are needed to evaluate the potential therapeutic impact before they are used in cl inical. Conclusion Advancement in chemotherapeutic regimens has improved survival and l imb-sparing surgery in the treatment of osteosarcoma, but the progress of gene therapy and molecular targeting therapy gives new hope for osteosarcoma patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of ZnPP Ⅸ on the expressions of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and glutathione-Stransferase-π （GST-π） and the chemosensitivity of drug-resistant hepatic carcinoma cell line Bel/Fu, and explore it’s possibility to reverse drug-resistance and the relevant regulating mechanism. Methods①MTT assay was adopted to detect the drug sensitivity for adriamycin, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil of Bel/Fu cell after ZnPP Ⅸ being induced for 24 h. ②RTPCR was carried out to detect the expressions of HO-1 and GST-π mRNA after Bel/FU cells being treated with different concentrations ZnPP Ⅸ for 24 h. ResultsAfter Bel/Fu cells being treated with ZnPP Ⅸ for 24 h, the 50% inhibiting concentration (IC50) for drugs was decreased dramatically （Plt;0.05）. Meanwhile, the expressions of HO-1 and GST-π mRNA in the treated cells also decreased dose-dependently (Plt;0.01). ConclusionsZnPP Ⅸ can increase the chemosensitivity of Bel/FU cells by down-regulation of HO-1 and GST-π expression. ZnPP Ⅸ is a potential agent to reverse multidrug resistance of hepatic carcinoma cells.
Objective To comprehend the concept， pathology， molecular mechanisms， diagnosis， and treatmentof aggressive fibromatosis （AF）， and to find a novel way to cure aggressive fibromatosis. Method The literatures about the definition， molecular mechanisms， and clinical research of AF were reviewed and analized. Results AF is rare and benign fibromatous lesion that is the result of abnormal proliferation of myofibroblasts. The pathologic features of AF isa benign disease， but it has “malignant” biological behavior. The tumor often involved the surrounding organs and bloodvessels， and caused death of patients. For patients with clinical symptoms or complications， complete excision of thetumor is the treatment of choice. Even if the operation to ensure the negative margin also has a higher recurrence rate， soits treatment requires multidisciplinary treatment. Conclusions The mechanism of AF is very complex， and it’s mecha-nism is still unclear. Clinical management of patients with AF is difficult and controversial， at present， the most effective treatment for AF is operation resection. The effects of adjuvant radiotherapy， chemotherapy， and other treatment after operation for AF still need further study.
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) secondary to conservative therapy in retinoblastoma (RB) patients.MethodsA retrospective study. From July 2013 to May 2017, 20 RRD patients (20 eyes) of 456 RB patients (573 eyes) treated in Xinhua Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were included in the study. Eleven patients (11 eyes) were boy and 9 patients (9 eyes) were girls. Thirteen patients demonstrated bilateral RB and 7 patients had unilateral RB. Average age when diagnosed with RB was 25 months. International Classification of Retinoblastoma groups were C in 1 eye, D in 17 eyes, and E in 2 eyes. These patients received intra-arterial chemotherapy (17 eyes), intravenous chemotherapy (11 eyes), intravitreal chemotherapy (8 eyes), laser (14 eyes) and/or cryotherapy (5 eyes). Twelve patients (12 eyes) received vitreoretinal surgery including vitrectomy (6 eyes) and scleral buckling (7 eyes). The mean follow-up was 39 months. Fundus examination was performed under general anesthesia during comprehensive treatment and follow-up. The time interval of fundus examination varied from 1 to 6 months depending on the stability of the tumor.ResultsRRD was noted in 20 eyes (3.5%) with RB. Retinal hole was found in 15 eyes (75%). The cause of RRD was atrophic hole in calcified tumor (6 eyes, 30%), cryotherapy-related hole (5 eyes, 25%) and laser-related hole (9 eyes, 45%). Multiple atrophic hole in calcified tumor was noted in 3 eyes. Size of hole smaller than 2 DD was noted in 8 eyes (53%), and larger than 2 DD was noted in 7 eyes (47%). Holes were in posterior (3 eyes), equator (2 eyes) and periphery (10 eyes). Severe proliferated was noted in 1 eye. No tear was found. No bulbar retinal detachment and choroidal detachment was noted. Among 12 eyes who underwent vitreoretinal surgery, reattachment was achieved in 9 eyes (75%). No metastasis was noted.ConclusionsCalcified regression of tumor, cryotherapy and laser were main reasons of RRD. Most of the holes are small in diameter and located in the periphery.
Objective To introduce the research progress in the effect of chemotherapeutic resistance of metabolic enzymes of gemcitabine to pancreatic cancer.Methods Recent literatures about metabolic enzymes that played key roles in mediating gemcitabine chemotherapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer were collected and reviewed. Results The metabolic enzymes of gemcitabine, such as hENT1, dCK, RRM1 and CDA, were closely related to chemotherapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer. The relationship between the single nucleotide polymorphism of metabolic enzymes and the resistance to gemcitabine remained to be clarified. Conclusion Multiple factors are involved in the mechanism of chemotherapeutic resistance of pancreatic cancer to gemcitabine, which needs further research.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy (CHPPC) and intravenous chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer patients, and find better nursing methods. MethodsSixty advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy between June 2013 and June 2014 were divided into CHPPC group (group C, n=30) and intravenous chemotherapy group (group V, n=30). We recorded the nursing methods for both the two groups, patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment, peritoneal metastasis rate and quality of life during the chemotherapy. ResultsThe life quality in group V was lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The differences in patients' satisfaction rate, peritoneal metastasis rate, and one-year survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with advanced gastric cancer requiring chemotherapy, in spite of higher cost and more complicated operations, CHPPC is superior in lower adverse events rate, better quality of life during chemotherapy and doesn't decrease patients' satisfaction to the nursing and treatment.
Objective To assess effectiveness of chemotherapy versus non-chemotherapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to Dec. 2008), EMBASE (1984 to Dec. 2008), OVID (1980 to Dec. 2008), CBMdisc (1980 to Dec. 2008), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We also handsearched Journal of Chinese Oncology, Journal of Chinese Clinical Oncology, and Tumor (from inception to Dec. 2008). The quality of the included studies was evaluated by two reviewers independently and meta-analysis was performed for results of the homogenous studies. Results Six studies involving 836 participants related to primary, high grade, nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcoma were included. All included studies were unclear in reporting randomization and blinding; all studies reported the number and the reason of withdraw; and baseline conditions of all studies were compared. The results of meta-analyses showed that there were no significant differences in 5-year overal survival (RR=0.90, 95%CI0.76 to 1.06), local recurrence (OR=0.69, 95%CI 0.36 to 1.32), distant recurrence (OR=0.83, 95%CI 0.62 to 1.11), and overall recurrence (RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.78 to 1.06) between the chemotherapy group and the control group. But as to 5-year disease-free survival, the chemotherapy group was better than the control group (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.63 to 0.86). Conclusion There is no advantage for the chemotherapy group over the control group in 5-year overal survival, local recurrence, distant recurrence and overall recurrence. Due to the risk of selection bias, performance bias and published bias, the evidence is not b enough to judge whether chemotherapy is better than control in treating soft tissue sarcoma. Our conclusion suggests that larger-scale randomized trials should be performed in future.