Objective To give an individualized treatment to a young woman with primary dysmenorrhea. Methods According to the basic principle and methods of evidence-base medicine, we searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (PubMed, January 1950 to May 2009), ACP Journal Club (OVID, January 1991 to May 2007) for systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to acquire the best clinical evidence on the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. Results A total of 11 systematic reviews and 1 RCT were identified. A reasonable treatment plan was made through combining the patient’s will with her family members’. Conclusion The treatment effect on primary dysmenorrhea of the young woman is improved by an individualized treatment plan based on an evidence-based method.
Although anaphylaxis induced by vitamin K1 seldom happens, 4 allergic cases were observed in the patients we treated recently who were given intramuscular injection of vitamin K1 before renal biopsy. To provide the best clinical evidence, we searched MEDLINE （-May 2005） and evaluated the studies. The studies were only case reports and retrospective reviews which showed the anaphylaxis were mainly allergic dermatitis with different manifestation and reaction time. The serious reactions such as allergic shock was very rare. We conclude that although vitamin K1 anaphylaxis is rare, strict indications should be followed and the drug surveillance on adverse events should be strengthened.
①供体授精:我们发现,在供体授精的效果方面,尚缺乏高质量证据.②胞浆内精子注射+体外授精:1篇系统评价发现,尚无足够的证据说明胞浆内精子注射+体外授精与单独使用体外授精何者效果更好.③宫腔内人工授精:两篇系统评价发现,宫腔内人工授精较宫颈内授精或自然性交,能明显增加每个周期的妊娠率.④体外授精与配子输卵管内移植:1个RCT显示,尚无足够证据证明体外授精与配子输卵管内移植何者效果更好.
Objective To investigate an evaluation method of medical literature applicability to clinical work， and provide a convenient way for physicians to search for the best evidence. Methods Delphi method was used to choose appropriate evaluating indexes， analytic hierarchy process was performed to determine the weighing of each index， and the formula to calculate medical literature applicability was formed. The practicability of this formula was evaluated by consistency checking between the formula’s results and experts’ opinions on literature applicability. Results Five evaluating indexes were determined， including literature’s publishing year （X1）， whether the target questions were covered （X2）, sample size （X3）， trial category （X4）， and journal level （X5）. The formula to calculate medical literature applicability was Y=3.93 X1＋11.78 X2＋14.83 X3＋44.53 X4＋24.93 X5. The result of consistency checking showed that the formula’s results were highly consistent with experts’ opinions （Kappa=0.75， P＜0.001）. Conclusion The applicability formula is a valuable tool to evaluate medical literature applicability.
We searched The Cochrane Library（Issue 3, 2005）, MEDLINE（1996-2005） ,CMCC（1996-2005）, VIP（1996-2005） ,CNKI（1996-2005） to summarize the available evidence of topiramate for an intractable epilepsy. After scanning all these articles, we identified 11 articles including meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews to evaluate. Topiramate offered an alternative in the treament for intractable epilepsy, especially for partial epilepsy, and its efficacy was proven. Patients had good tolerance. And no intercross effects with the traditional anti-epileptic drugs were found. So topiramate had broad clinical value. The primary dosage of topiramate was 200mg/d. The sustaining dosage was 400-600mg/d. And we didn＇t recommend the dosage of more than 600mg/d.
Perineal care is a classic topic for obstetrics. After thousands of years of practice, we have accumulated some experience and meanwhile, we are also taking some attempts. The effectiveness and reliability of these methods need evaluation. Nowadays, the best evidence comes from randomized controlled trials (RCT) and systematic reviews (SR). We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2007), MEDLINE (Jan. 1980 to May 2007) databases and CBM-disc (Jan. 1980 to May 2007) to obtain current best evidence for perineal care.
Objective To evaluate the effect of vitamin A (Vit A) supplementation on the morbidity and mortality in children with infectious diseases. Methods We searched Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966-2004.3) and The PedsCCM Evidence-Based Journal Club (1992-2002). Relevant systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Vit A supplementation on morbidity and mortality in children with infectious diseases were obtained. Results We collected 107 studies and identified 13 systematic reviews or RCTs. The evidence showed that the effect of Vit A supplementation on morbidity and mortality was affected by the nutritional status of the children. Vit A supplementation given to Vit A deficient children could reduce the morbidity of diarrhea and mortality of measles. However, Vit A supplementation would increase the morbidity of diarrhoea and respiratory infections in children with sufficient nutrition. Conclusions The nutritional status of children correlates with morbidity and mortality of some infectious diseases, and the nutritional status and serum Vit A level should be evaluated before Vit A supplementation applied.
Evidence-based dentistry has been established for more than a decade, and described as ‘the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients＇. However, Orthodontic clinicians in China still tend to base their treatment protocols on the ‘it works in my hands＇evidence provided by their peers, mainly due to their weak experience in searching and applying clinical evidences. In this article, authors are willing to share their experience with their Chinese peers, and to promote the dissemination and application of evidence-based orthodontics in clinical practice.