Due to optimizing medical service resources and improving service efficiency, day surgery has attracted the attention of medical and management experts worldwide. In 2019, day surgery was included as one of the performance assessment indicators of tertiary public hospitals. In recent years, hospital-based day surgery centers have begun to plan and build. Although the basic facilities have been perfectly improved, but how to efficiently and safely operate and manage the centralized day surgery has become the primary problem to clinicians and managers. The purpose of this paper is to introduce how the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University uses scientific management tools and establishes a professional multidisciplinary team, so as to carry out efficient operation management and control of medical quality and safety risks of the Day Surgery Center. And then provide practical experience guidance and suggestions with strong feasibility and operability for peers.
ObjectiveTo explore the application of clinical pathway in patients undergoing orthopedic day surgery.MethodsPatients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2020 were selected as the clinical pathway group, and all of them were managed by clinical pathway. Patients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2019 were selected as the routine group, and all of them were managed by conventional clinical methods. The general conditions of patients, physicians’ work efficiency, medical costs and medical quality were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe clinical pathway group included 246 patients, and the routine group included 391 patients. There was no significant difference in gender, age or disease distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the routine group, the clinical pathway group had obvious advantages in terms of average time spent by a physician in issuing a medical order each time [(5.64±3.29) vs. (2.12±1.05) min], average number of revisions per physician’s order (1.40±0.24 vs. 0.38±0.19), rate of filing medical records within 3 days (90.28% vs. 97.97%), hospital costs [(7462.10±1035.01) vs. (6252.52±1189.05) yuan], drug costs [(652.21±88.53) vs. (437.17±108.20) yuan], length of stay [(1.23±1.04) vs. (1.02±0.18) d] and delayed discharge rate (7.93% vs. 2.03%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of unplanned reoperation rate, unplanned rehospitalization rate, or patient satisfaction (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with routine clinical management, clinical pathway management can improve work efficiency, reduce medical cost and improve medical quality more effectively in the implementation of orthopedic day surgery, which has very positive effects and is worthy of promotion and application.
The two factors that affect enrollment of participants and the process of intervention in randomizedcontrolled pragmatic trials are similar to the situation of clinical practice, thus its effects are similar to the situation ofclinical practice. Therefore, when one estimates an intervention’s effect on a patient, it will be more similar to a real clinicalsituation than results taken from an explanatory trial. Due to the introduction of interventions and process variables usedin a pragmatic trial that conform to traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture practices, more and more interest isgrowing among researchers in the traditional Chinese medicine field. This article introduces the principles and conceptsof the pragmatic trial, and the key points of design via some samples.
Objective To evaluate the effect of clinical pathway (CP) teaching methods versus traditional methods in nursing clinical teaching. Methods The following electronic databases as PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CBM and CNKI were retrieved on computer from their establishment to April 2011 to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of comparing CP with traditional methods in nursing clinical teaching. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed by two reviewers independently according to the scale of criteria for methodological quality developed by Smits PB, and the meta-analysis was conducted by using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan5.1 software. Results A total of 12 RCTs involving 1 269 participants were included, and nine of them were of high quality. The meta-analyses showed that compared with the traditional teaching method, the CP teaching tended to be superior (Plt;0.05) in improving nursing students’ objective knowledge, nursing operating skills, professional ability and satisfaction with teaching methods, and in improving patients’ satisfaction as well. Conclusion The clinical pathway teaching method is a scientific teaching model in nursing clinical teaching; it standardizes the teaching procedure, promotes students’ active learning and further enhances the teaching effect. But it is necessary to unify the method of assessment with more researches. In addition, researchers should pay more attention to improving the comprehensive quality of nursing students.
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical manifestations and pathological patterns of renal diseases requiring percutaneous renopuncture, evaluate the clinical significance of renal biopsy and the value of clinical pathway for renal biopsy. MethodsWe retrospectively summarized and analyzed the clinical and pathological data, and the clinical pathway implementation of 224 patients who underwent renal biopsy between October 2009 and September 2014. ResultsIn the 224 patients, there were 62 cases of IgA nephropathy (27.68%), 50 cases of minimal change nephropathy (22.32%), 28 cases of lupus nephritis (12.5%), 26 cases of membrane nephropathy (11.6%), 26 cases of mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (11.6%), 6 cases of purpura nephritis (2.68%), 4 cases of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (1.79%), 4 cases of hepatitis B virus-associated membrane nephropathy (1.79%), 4 cases of nodular diabetic glomerulosclerosis (1.79%), 4 cases of acute tubulointerstitial nephropathy (1.79%), 2 cases of hypertensive renal damage (0.89%), 2 cases of membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis (0.89%), 1 case of lipoprotein kidney disease (0.45%), and 1 case of fibrillary glomerulopathy (0.45%). A total of 220 specimens in the 224 cases were qualified, accounting for 98.21%. Diagnosis of 70 patients in the qualified 220 cases were re-corrected according to their renal pathology reports, accounting for 31.81%. In the 224 cases, there were 16 cases of gross hematuria (7.14%) and 24 of peri-renal hematoma (10.71%) after renal biopsy. Patients who met the requirement of clinical pathway were divided into clinical pathway group and control group randomly. Average hospitalization time of the clinical pathway group was (7.6±1.2) days, and the average cost was (5 860±237) yuan, both lower than the control group [(11.8±2.3) days, (7 658±360) yuan)]. The difference was statistically significant. ConclusionsIgA nephropathy is the most common pathological type of primary glomerular diseases, and minimal change nephropathy the second. Lupus nephritis, membranous nephropathy, mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis are still the most common types of glomerular diseases. Lupus nephritis becomes the first secondary glomerular disease. Ultrasound guided percutaneous renal biopsy is safe and has high success rate and high clinical application value. The implementation of clinical pathway can shorten the average length of hospital stay and reduce the average hospital cost.
Objective To explore a scientific disease cost accounting. Method Disease cost accounting = disease cost accounting of clinic pathway + disease basis cost accounting. Conclusions It is the tendency with the medical reform for the social security department to pay by disease for the hospitals, as a result, both social security department and hospitals have to resort to the scientific way in terms of cost accounting of disease. And it is practical and effective by means of cost accounting for clinic pathway.
Objective To analyze and evaluate the present status of application of clinical pathway evaluation indexes in China, in order to provide references to establish an evaluation system on clinical pathway. Methods Such databases as CBM (2004-2009), VIP (2004-2009), CNKI (2004-2009) and WanFang Data (2004-2009), and some relevant websites were searched systematically for collecting Chinese literature about domestic clinical pathway evaluation indexes. Results Among the 1 175 articles included, 135 (11%) were published in the core periodicals, 19 (2%) were masterate theses, and 1 021 were other kinds of articles. As to 135 core periodical literature and 19 masterate theses, most of which were graded into the second level of evidence, accounting for 96%. The analysis on the appearance of indexes showed that 87% of inconsistency could be identified between the contents and terms of indexes. Common indexes were summarized as the following four aspects: cost index, clinical index, serving index and quality evaluation index. There were 78% of all the 1 175 articles focusing on the application of nursing and medical education, in which only one masterate thesis used social research methods such as Delphi, focus group, experts scoring (percentile), etc. Conclusion Currently, there are some issues existing in the evaluation indexes of clinical pathway in China, such as low methodological quality of literature, irregularly and randomly using statistical terms, and lack of studies on system construction of clinical pathway evaluation indexes.
Based on the practice of large tertiary hospitals in clinical pathway (CP) entrance management, we implemented a fine CP management model with standardized clinical diagnosis and treatment, and encouraged the department to continuously optimize the path form, expand CP coverage and improve the entry rate in a flexible path. Combining PDCA cycles with CP management, it can promote the realization of management goals and achieve continuous improvement, while providing operable (repeatable) methods to the practice of hospital CP management.
ObjectiveTo acquaint the development process and item composition of the appraisal tools and reporting standards of clinical pathways worldwide, in order to improve the development and evaluation of clinical pathways. MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data for articles about the appraisal tools and reporting standards of clinical pathways from inception to Jan, 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and compared the difference in development process and item composition among included appraisal tools and reporting standards of clinical pathways. ResultsA total of 7 appraisal tools and reporting standards were included. Among them, 3 were from UK, 1 from China, 1 from Australia, 1 from Belgium, and 1 from Saudi Arabia. All included appraisal tools contained 4 to 15 domains and 14 to 99 items. Based on the comparison of different domains and items of included appraisal tools, "Clinical Pathway Management Guidelines" published by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China and the research of Vannhaecht, we identified 17 key elements of clinical pathway as follows:organizational commitment, pathway project management, format of doc, content of pathway, multidisciplinary involvement, variance management, EBM/guidelines, maintenance of pathway, accountability, patient involvement, development of pathway, additional support systems & documents, operational arrangement, implementation, outcome management, safety and organization of the care process. ConclusionCurrently, the appraisal tools and reporting standards of clinical pathways are rudimentary, so we desperately needs to establish mature appraisal tool and reporting standard of clinical pathways to guide the development and implementation of clinical pathway, so as to improve their application effects in clinical practice and medical quality.
Exercise prescription is an effective tool for the prevention and control of hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia. However, a full set of exercise prescription is difficult to be implemented in China's primary medical institutions and community public health service centers. Therefore, under the support of the theoretical system of exercise prescription and the standard development norms, this clinical pathway of exercise prescription is developed according to the characteristics of national physical fitness and the status quo of primary healthcare institutions in China, aiming at simplifying the process of exercise prescription development, reducing the professional threshold, empowering primary healthcare, and providing a scientific and feasible solution for the promotion of exercise prescription in primary healthcare institutions.