Objective To study the effect of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy and T tube drainage. Metheods Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with choledochoscopy via choledochotomy was performed in 105 patients, T tube was placed in all patients with laparoscopic suturing technique.Results Except negative exploration in 2 cases, duct clearance was achieved in 99 per cent (102/103) of patients. Conclusion Laparoscopic exploratoin of common bile duct via choledochotomy and T tube drainage is one of the safe and effective management options for common bile duct calculi.
ObjectiveTo summarize experience of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy common bile duct exploration for patients with schistosomiasis liver cirrhosis with common bile duct stones. MethodThe clinical data of 45 patients with schistosomiasis liver cirrhosis combined with common bile duct stones (liver function Child-Pugh grade A and B) admitted in this hospital from September 2012 to September 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsTwenty cases were successfully treated by laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy (laparoscope group), 25 cases were treated by conventional open common bile duct exploration (laparotomy group). Two cases were converted to laparotomy due to bleeding during laparoscopic operation. The mean operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postopera-tive hospitalization time, and postoperative total complications rate had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). There were 2 cases of pulmonary infection and 1 case of incision infection in the laparoscope group, and 1 case of grade A bile leakage and 1 case of pulmonary infection in the laparotomy group, there was no common bile duct stone residual in these two groups. ConclusionAlthough laparoscopic surgery is more difficult for schistosomiasis liver cirrhosis combined with common bile duct stones patients, it is safe and feasible. Appropriate perioperative management and precise laparoscopic and choledochoscopic operation are key to success of operation.
Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy on common bile duct (CBD) stones with primary suture of the CBD. Methods Totally 523 patients of gallbladder stone companied with CBD stones or choledochectasia (diameter ≥0.8 cm) from September 1998 to December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The primary suture of the CBD incision was successfully performed in 487 patients. The CBD stones were completely removed during the operation in 400 patients. Nothing was found in 87 cases. In 10 cases conversion to open surgery were performed and in 26 cases the T tube drainage was put into the CBD in choledocholithotomy. Average operative time was 90 min and average bleeding volume was 50 ml. All patients took food at 24 h, returned general activity on 2-3 d and discharged on 5 d after operation. Postoperative biliary leakage occurred in 29 cases with drainage average volume of 35 ml/d and continued 1-6 d, which were cured by non-operation therapy. Conclusions The primary suture of the CBD during the laparosocopy combined with choledochosopy in choledocholithotomy is a safe and effective operation with less invasion, less pain and quicker recovery. CBD incision suture without T tube drainage can be done when CBD stones are cleared completely and no stenosis is found in extrahepatic bile duct.
Objective To prevent bile duct injury, a new anatomy marker, named “common bile duct window” is created. Methods From November 2005 to March 2006, 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were researched in this hospital. All data were collected, including: age, gender, course of disease, body mass index (BMI), blood lipid level (triglyceride and cholesterol), the thickness of gallbladder wall and the degree of cholecystitis. The frequency, location and mean size of “common bile duct window” were recorded and calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of “common bile duct window”, and the diference of data between two groups was analyzed by using χ2 test or t test. Results “Common bile duct window” was found at the end of hepatoduoduenal ligament with oval-shaped, the mean longitude of “common bile duct window” was (1.20±0.60) cm, and mean width was (0.45±0.30) cm. “Common bile duct window” were found in 81.6% (49/60) of patients. Age, gender, course of disease, BMI, triglyceride and cholesterol were proved to have no relationship with the presence of “common bile duct window” （Pgt;0.05）, but the thickness of gallbladder wall and the degree of cholecystitis affected the presence （P＜0.05）. Conclusion An oval-shaped “common bile duct window” can be found in almost all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. During the operation, the common bile duct can be located easily by the surgeon through “common bile duct window”, thereby to avoid common bile duct injury when the cyst duct was dissected. It is believed that during laparoscopic cholecystectomy the chances of bile duct injuries can be effectively decreased by the presence of “common bile duct window”.
ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness between endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) treatment and laparotomy treatment for simple common bile duct stone or common bile duct stone combined with gallbladder benign lesions. MethodsA total of 596 patients with common bile stone received ERCP (ERCP group) and 173 received open choledocholithotomy (surgical group) in our hospital between January 2009 and December 2012. Their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The curing rate, postoperative complications, hospital stay, preoperational preparation and total cost were compared between the two groups of patients. Meanwhile, for common bile stone combined with gallbladder benign lesion, 29 patients received ERCP combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) (ERCP+LC group), 38 received pure laparoscopy treatment (laparoscopy group) and 129 received open choledocholithotomy combined with cholecystectomy (surgery group). ResultsFor simple common bile stone patients, no significant difference was found in cure rate and post-operative complication between endoscopic and surgical treatment groups (P>0.05). However, total hospitalization expenses[(13.1±6.3) thousand yuan, (20.6±7.5) thousand yuan)], hospital stay[(8.91±4.95), (12.14±5.15) days] and preoperative preparation time[(3.77±3.09), (5.13±3.99) days] were significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). For patients with common bile stone combined with gallbladder benign lesion, no significant discrepancy was detected among the three groups in curing rate and post-operative complications (P>0.05). Significant differences were detected between ERCP+LC group and surgical group in terms of total hospitalization expense[(18.9±4.6) thousand yuan, (23.2±8.9) thousand yuan] hospital stay[(9.00±3.74), (12.47±4.50) days] and preoperative preparation time[(3.24±1.83), (5.15±2.98) days]. No significant difference was found in total hospitalization expense and hospital stay, while significant difference was detected in preoperative preparation time between ERCP+LC group and simple LC group. ConclusionFor patients with simple common bile stone, ERCP is equivalent to surgery in the curing rate, and has more advantages such as less cost, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower preoperative preparation time. For the treatment of common bile duct stone with gallbladder benign disease, ERCP combined with LC also has more advantages than traditional surgery.
Objective To assess the benefits and harms of routine primary suture (LBEPS) versus T-tube drainage (LCHTD) following laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were electronically searched from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2010), PubMed (1978 to 2010), EMbase (1966 to 2010), CBMdisc (1978 to 2010), and CNKI (1979 to 2010); and the relevant published and unpublished data and their references were also searched by hand. The data were extracted and the quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently, and the RevMan 5.0 software was used for data analysis. Results Four studies including 3 RCTs and 1 quasi-RCT involving 274 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that compared with LCHTD, LBEPS was better in shortening operation time (WMD= –17.11, 95%CI –25.86 to –8.36), abdominal drainage time (WMD= –0.74, 95%CI –1.39 to –0.10) and post-operative hospitalization time (WMD= –3.30, 95%CI –3.67 to –2.92), in lowering hospital expenses (WMD= –2 998.75, 95%CI –4 396.24 to –1 601.26) and in reducing the complications due to T-tube such as tube detaching, bile leakage after tube drawing, and choleperitonitis (RR=0.56, 95%CI 0.29 to 1.09). Conclusion LBEPS is superior to LCHTD in total effectiveness for common bile duct stone with the precondition of strictly abiding by operation indication. Due to the low quality of the included studies which decreases the reliability of this conclusion, more reasonably-designed and strictly-performed multi-centered RCTs with large scale and longer follow up time are required to further assess and verify the efficacy and safety of this treatment.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ERCP/S+LC and LC+LCBDE in cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Methods A fully recursive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in any language. By using a defined search strategy, both the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials on comparing ERCP/ S+LC with LC+LCBDE in cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were identified. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The quality of the included trials was evaluated. Meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0.2 software. Results Fourteen controlled clinical trials (1 544 patients) were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) There were no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups (RR=0.96, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.01, P=0.14); b) There were no significant difference in the residual stone rate between the two groups (OR=1.05, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.72, P=0.83); c) There were no significant difference in the complications morbidity between the two groups (OR=1.12, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.55, P=0.48); d) There were no significant difference in the mortality during follow-up visit between the two groups (RD= 0.00, 95%CI –0.03 to 0.03, P=0.84); e) The length of hospital stay in the LC+LCBDE group was shorter than that of the ERCP/S+LC group with significant difference (WMD= 1.78, 95%CI 0.94 to 2.62, Plt;0.000 1); and f) The LC+LCBDE group was superior to the ERCP/S+LC group in the aspects of procedure time and total hospital charges. Conclusion Although there aren’t differences in the effectiveness and safety between the ERCP/S+LC group and the LC+LCBDE group, the latter is superior to the former in procedure time, length of hospital stay and total hospital charges. For the influencing factors of lower quality and astable statistical outcomes of the included studies, this conclusion has to be verified with more strictly designed large scale RCTs.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience on primary suture after common bile duct exploration and to investigate its clinical indications and curative effects. MethodsThe clinical data of 137 patients underwent primary closure of common bile duct between February 2006 and June 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsAll operations were successful. The operative time ranged from 65-213 min (mean 129 min) and the blood loss ranged from 50-350 ml with an average of 148 ml. One hundred and twenty-four patients (90.5%) were discharged from hospital without complications within 7 d after operation. Postoperative bile leakage occurred in 13 patients (9.5%) consisted of 10 early stage cases (18.5%, 10/54) and 3 later stage cases (3.6%, 3/83), which were discharged with improvement by conservative treatment within 3 weeks after operation. Totally 113 patients (82.5%) were followed up for 2-54 months with a median time of 14 months, no residual or retained stone and biliary duct stricture occurred. ConclusionOnly with the strict indication and proficient surgical technology, primary suture after common bile duct exploration is a safe and effective way to choledocholithiasis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical significance of abnormal confluence of common bile duct (CBD) and pancreatic duct. MethodsFortyfive cases of biliary pancreatic confluence portion of cadavers were dissected and observed with microscope. ResultsThe lower end of CBD inserted normally into the medial posterior portion of descending duodenum with oblique angle (41.4±5.3)° and safeguarded by the sidelong wrinkle formed by mucous membrane of duodenum. In common, pancreatic duct ampulla inserted into CBD with oblique angle (28.5±7.9)° and jointed CBD in the medial wall of dudenum. The length ampulla of Vater was about 0.5-1.5 cm. The Vater’s ampulla was dilated obviously. ConclusionThe result indicates that pancreatic duct and CBD joint with a sharp angle. A number of abnormal anatomic factors may change the relation of oblique angle, and lead to the pancreatitis.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and patient selection of T-tube free laparoscopic common bileduct exploration through mini-incision in confluence of common bile duct （CBD） and cystic duct. Methods The clinical data of 52 patients who underwent CBD exploration from January 2009 to December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. A 3-4mm longitudinal incision of anterior wall of CBD was made along the confluence of CBD and cystic duct， and then the choledochoscope was inserted into CBD through this mini-incision for the exploration and treatment by laparoscopy and choledochoscopy， the incision was sewed up by T-tube free primary suture. Results All 52 cases were cured and stone clearance rate was 100% as revealed by choledochoscopy and cholangiography. The time of operation， intraoperativecholangiography， removal of stones with help of choledochoscope， and removal drainage tube after operation was from 90 to 200 min with an average of 100min， 3 to 10min with an average of 6min， 5 to 15 min with an average of 8 min，and 3-5d with an average of 3.5d ， respectively. The drainage flow was 20-60mL/d with an average of 30mL/d. No biliary leakage， abdominal pain， and choloplania or infection of incision was observed following operation. The hospital stay was 5 to 12d with an average of 6.5d after operation. No calculus regeneration or bile duct stricture occurred during following-up of 3 to 40 months with an average of 20 months. Conclusion With proper patient selection， T-tube free laparoscopic CBD exploration through mini-incision in confluence of CBD and cystic duct is safe and feasible by proficient surgeons in laparoscopy and choledochoscopy.