Objective To evaluate the cost effectiveness of four different mechanisms clinical commonly used antidepressants, namely, amitriptyline, escitalopram, mirtazapine and venlafaxine in the treatment of moderate-severe depressive disorder in China and to provide clinicians with some advice. Methods We carried out the cost-effectiveness analysis of four antidepressants by establishing a decision tree model. The parameters uncertainty in the model was estimated through one-way sensitivity analysis. Results In terms of average cost-effectiveness ratio (CER), amitriptyline’s was 45.24 RMB, which was the lowest. And the CERs of mirtazapine, escitalopram and venlafaxine were 273.71 RMB, 332.00 RMB and 716.58 RMB, respectively. While in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), venlafaxine was excluded as the dominated strategy. When the threshold value of willingness to pay (WTP) was less than 3 420.92 RMB, amitriptyline was the most cost-effective; when the threshold value ranges between 3 420.92 RMB and 4 200 RMB, mirtazapine was the most cost-effective; and when the threshold value was over 4 200 RMB, escitalopram was the most cost-effective. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, when we changed the four kinds of drugs costs within a certain range, the results was not changed with the change of venlafaxine’s cost but changed with the other three drugs costs. Conclusion Clinicians may choose the most cost-effective therapy according to patients’ different WTP values. We suggests that health care institutions should encourage the use of escitalopram clinically and provide subsidies for patients so as to increase the overall society benefit.
ObjectiveTo investigate the accuracy of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) scan and image reconstruction technology for measuring morphological parameters of costal cartilages and to evaluate the volume of costal cartilages. MethodsBetween March and August 2013, 75 patients with congenital microtia and scheduled for auricle reconstruction were included in the study. Of 75 patients, there were 49 males and 26 females with a mean age of 8 years and 5 months (range, 5 years and 7 months to 32 years and 7 months) and a mean weight of 29.5 kg (range, 21-82 kg). A Philips Brilliance 64 MSCT machine was used to scan 1st-12th costal cartilages with the parameters based on the age and weight of the patients. All the data were transported to the workstation for reconstructing the image of the costal cartilages with the technique of maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume rendering technique (VRT). Then the morphologies of costal cartilages were observed through the images on VRT; the width of the costal cartilaginous ends close to ribs (W) and the length of the total cartilage (L) were measured and compared with their counterparts (W' and L') after the costal cartilages were harvested during the processes of auricle reconstructions to analyze consistency between these two sets of data. ResultsThe morphologies of ribs and costal cartilages shown on VRT image got fine sharpness, verisimilitude, and stereoscopic impressions. A total of 192 costal cartilages were examined. The results showed that the widths of the costal cartilaginous ends close to ribs (W) was (9.69±1.67) mm, and W' was (9.73±1.64) mm, showing no significant difference between W and W' (t=-1.800, P=0.073), and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test showed Cronbach's α=0.993. The length of the total cartilage (L) was (83.03±23.86) mm, and L' was (81.83±16.43) mm, showing no significant difference between L and L' (t=1.367, P=0.173), and ICC test showed Cronbach's α=0.904. Linear-regression analysis showed L=1.28×L'-21.93 (R2=0.780, F=673.427, P=0.000). The results suggested there was a good consistency between these two sets of data. ConclusionScanning costal cartilages with appropriate parameters and reconstructing the cartilaginous image with MIP is an effective method to measure the width and length of costal cartilage and to estimate costal cartilage volume, which can provide accurate reference for plastic surgery together with reading the morphology from the image on VRT.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the economics of nafamostat mesylate compared with unfractionated heparin for continuous renal replacement therapy anticoagulation. MethodsA decision tree model was constructed to calculate the cost difference between the two anticoagulation methods. Survival analysis data comes from retrospective literature in Asian countries. The cost data comes from procurement data and the prices of medical and health services in some regions. A 72-hour scenario analysis is performed and a sensitivity analysis is performed on key parameters. ResultsThe basic analysis results showed that compared with the unfractionated heparin group, the total cost difference of nafamostat in the 144-hour CRRT treatment was 5 350.34 yuan, and the unfractionated heparin was more economical. In the 72-hour scenario analysis, unfractionated heparin is also more economical. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of single-use hemodialysis filters and supporting pipelines and the cost of plasma antithrombin Ⅲ activity (AT-Ⅲ) measurement had a greater impact on the change of the cost difference. The results of probability sensitivity analysis show that the model structure is stable and robust. When the unit price of nafamostat is about 110.82 yuan/piece, the cost of nafamostat and unfractionated heparin in 144-hour CRRT treatment is both 19 185.37 yuan, and the cost difference is 0.ConclusionWhen the unit price of nafamostat mesylate drops to a sufficiently low level, it could have an advantageous health economy.
Objective To evaluate the ambulatory surgery mode by using health economical mothods and provide reference for optimization and decision of surgical operation mode. Methods The patients who underwent unilateral flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotriphy for ureteral calculi in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between January 1st to December 31th, 2015 were selected in this study, including 59 with ambulatory surgery mode (the ambulatory group) and 65 with special in-hospital surgery mode (the special group). The differences in average bed occupancy time, cost, therapeutic effect, and satisfaction between the two operation modes were compared. Results The average bed occupancy time in the ambulatory group and the special group was (1.03±0.18) and (6.35±0.74) days, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up for one month after the operation, and the incidence of complications was 6.8% (4/59) in the ambulatory group and 6.2% (4/65) in the special group, without significant difference (P>0.05). The satisfaction score in the ambulatory group and the special group was 96.48±0.23vs. 96.53±0.18 without significant difference (P>0.05). The differences in direct medical cost [(17 738.28±1 027.85)vs. (21 307.67±554.41) yuan], direct non-medical cost [(103.39±18.25) vs. (630.76±78.90) yuan], indirect cost[ (266.93±47.12) vs. (1 640.44±190.55) yuan], and total cost [(18 128.10±1 037.76) vs. (23 558.29±619.20) yuan] between the ambulatory group and the special group were all statistically significant (P<0.05). The treatment effect index in the ambulatory group and the special group was 0.96 and 1.05, respectively; the cost-effect ratio was 18 883.44 and 22 436.47, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that the adjusted cost-effect ratio in the ambulatory group (16 629.64) was still lower than that in the special group (20 534.91). Conclusions The cost-effect ratio of ambulatory surgery mode is superior than that of special in-hospital surgery mode, and there is no obvious difference in patients satisfaction between the two modes. Ambulatory surgery mode can be recommended to patients who meet the indications of day surgery.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical effects and health economics of lung volume reduction surgery（LVRS）, single lung transplantation（SLTx） and bilateral lung transplantation（BLTx） for patients with end-stage emphysema. Methods A total of 61 patients with end-stage emphysema, including 39 patients who underwent LVRS（LVRS group）, 14 patients who underwent SLTx（SLTx group）, and 8 patients who underwent BLTx（BLTx group） from September 2002 to August 2008 in Wuxi People’s Hospital, were analyzed retrospectively. Lung function, arterial blood gas analysis and 6-minute walk distance（6-MWD）were assessed before their surgery and 6 months, 1-year and 3-year after their surgery respectively. Their 1-year and 3-year survival rates were observed. Cost-effectiveness analyses were made from a health economics perspective. Results Compared with their preoperative results, their mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second（FEV1.0）in LVRS group increased by 75%, 83% and 49% at 6 months, 1-year and 3-year postoperatively, by 176%, 162% and 100% in SLTx group, and by 260%, 280% and 198% in BLTx group respectively. Their mean forced vital capacity（FVC）in LVRS group increased by 21%, 41% and 40% at 6 months, 1-year and 3-year postoperatively, by 68% , 73% and 55% in SLTx group, and by 82%, 79% and 89% in BLTx group respectively. Their exercise endurance as measured by 6-MWD increased by 75%, 136% and 111% in LVRS group at 6 months, 1-year and 3-year postoperatively, by 513%, 677% and 608% in SLTx group, and by 762%, 880% and 741% in BLTx group respectively. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates after operation were 74.40% and 58.90% in LVRS group, 85.80% and 64.30% in SLTxgroup, and 62.50% and 50.00% in BLTx group respectively. The three years’ cost utility of SLTx group was significantly higher than that of BLTx group（1 668.00 vs.1 168.55, P＜ 0.05）and LVRS group （1 668.00 vs. 549.46, P＜ 0.05）. Conclusion SLTx and BLTx are better than LVRS in improving patients’ lung function and exercise endurance for end-stage emphysema patients. LVRS is more cost-effective than SLTx and BLTx in the early postoperative period. With the development of medical technology and decreased expenses of lung transplantation and immunosuppressive agents, lung transplantation will become the first surgical choice for end-stage emphysema patients.
ObjectiveTo compare medical cost and utilization efficiency of medical resources between manual layered anastomosis with mechanical stapling technique in esophagectomy. MethodsClinical data of 132 patients who underwent surgical resection of esophageal carcinoma in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Tumor Hospital between January and October 2011 were respectively analyzed. According to different anastomotic techniques, all the patients were divided into a manual layered anastomosis group (including 40 males and 20 females with their age of 36-72 (49.3±7.6) years) and a mechanical stapling technique group (including 50 males and 22 females with their age of 30-79 (51.0±8.6) years). Demographic data, operation data, postoperative complications, direct and indirect medical cost, and constitution of direct medical cost were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsMedical cost of esophagectomy was 14 505.03± 1 523.37 yuan in the manual layered anastomosis group and 19 891.05±1 634.58 yuan in the mechanical stapling technique group respectively, which were statistically different (P < 0.05). Material cost was 2 242.00±751.08 yuan in the manual layered anastomosis group and 5 424.00±1 876.22 yuan in the mechanical stapling technique group respectively, which were statistically different (P < 0.05). Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that cost-effectiveness ratio in the manual layered anastomosis group was lower, thus this anastomotic technique was more reasonable. ConclusionMedical cost of manual layered anastomosis is lower than that of mechanical stapling technique in esophagectomy, as the utilization efficiency of medical resources of manual layered anastomosis is higher than that of mechanical stapling technique.
Onehealth, an evidence-based decision-making software, is based on the United Nations' epidemiological reference modules to predict the effect of health services. Onehealth is a large database. The software is using activitybased costing, simulating investment costs of health system and changes of mortality in different coverage levels. By the cost of inputs/avoid deaths, it could quantify the cost of health services effectiveness and provide an intuitive basis for the rational allocation of health resources. This study introduces the relevant concepts, model structures and applications of Onehealth. We took the study of child nutrition interventions in Sudan for example and to present Onehealth tool's operating. As a new auxiliary and evidence-based decision-making software with scientific and rigorous theoretical approach, Onehealth has practical significance on the national or regional macro decision-making.
Economic evaluation used alongside clinical trials has become a hot spot in the development of clinical studies. The definition and classification of the cost were introduced in this article. The ways to conduct cost analysis in clinical trials were introduced systematically, including the identification, collection and analysis of the data of costs, and the concern of the analysis.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, cost and optimal dosing regimen of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) used in the lumbar spine arthrodesis. Methods We formulated the clinical questions according to the PICO principle. We searched the ACP Journal Club (1991 to February 2008), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2007) and PubMed (1990 to February 2008) as well as other relevant databases. The evidence retrieved was critically appraised. Results Current evidence showed that BMP was a satisfactory and safe behavior in lumbar arthrodesis. Its cost was equal to that of autogenous iliac bone graft. The types of BMP currently used in clinical practice are BMP-2 and BMP-7. Finished product of fixed composition ratio was recommended in anterior lumbar inter-body fusion, while in posterolateral fusion, 20mg of BMP-2 or 3.5mg of BMP-7 for each side was recommended, with proper carrier according to the place where it was used. Conclusion BMP may be introduced to China for lumbar spine arthrodesis. Before it is applied extensively, further large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed. Meanwhile, more research is necessary to determine the proper dosage and preparation form for the dominant Chinese population.
Objective To retrospectively analyze the analgesic effect and cost-effectiveness of combined analgesia versus intermittent analgesia for patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. Methods We retrospectively collected clinical parameters and outcomes of analgesic effect from patients who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. Included patients were divided into two groups: local injection of ropivacaine combined with intermittent administration with analgesic via intravenous injection and intermittent administration with analgesic via intravenous injection only. Visual analogue scale (VAS) at different time points (2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h), usage of postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), adverse events, costs and other information were collected and assessed for further analysis of analgesic effect and cost-effectiveness. Results A total of 80 patients were enrolled in this study, each group consists of 40 patients. The results of this study found that VAS scores at 2 h and 4 h after operation in the combined analgesic group were significantly lower than that in the intermittent intravenous analgesia group (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences between the two groups in VAS scores at 6, 12 and 24 h after operation. The usage of NSAIDs were significantly lower in the combined group than intermittent group (P<0.05). The effective rate in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the intermittent group (P<0.05). The average cost of postoperative hospitalization and postoperative analgesic of the two groups were similar (allP values >0.05), and cost-effectiveness evaluation of the combined analgesia group was better than that of intermittent group. Conclusion Compared to intermittent administration with analgesic via intravenous injection, subcutaneous injection of ropivacaine hydrochloride combined with intermittent intravenous injection of parecoxib in patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery significantly could alleviate patients' painful complaints and reduce the postoperative usage of NSAIDs without increasing adverse events. Furthermore, the combination strategy has a lower cost-effectiveness ratio than intermittent group, which represents economic advantages.