Objective To observe the short-term effect of changing the sequence of PRP and MLP on the pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients with clinical significant macular edema (CSEM). Methods Sixty-three consecutive pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy outpatients (103 eyes) with clinical significant macular edema were selected and divided into two groups: 54 eyes in patients of group A accepted MLP one month prior to PRP and 49 eyes in patients of group B accepted the photocoagulative therapies in a contrary sequence. All the patients were followed up for 3 to 13 months and visual acuity. Light sensitivity of 5deg;macular threshold, and FFA were performed pre- and post-photocoagution. Results The improvement of visual acuity was found to be better in group A than that of group B (Plt;0.01) 2 months after the therapy, since then, there was no significant defference (Pgt;0.05) in both groups. Three and 4 months after the treatment, there was no significant difference in change of light sensitivity of 5deg;macular threshold in both groups. The macular leakages of 59 eyes, 32 ingroup A and 27 in group B, were well controlled. Conclusion Among the pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients with CSEM, visual acuity of those who accept MLP prior to PRP more rapidly than those who accept contrary sequence of photocoagulation, but the changing of therapeutic sequence might have no dramatic influence on light sensilivity of 5deg;macular threshold. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2000,16:150-152)
ObjectiveTo evaluate the full thickness idiopathic macular hole (IMH) closure rates in patients positioning non-supine (NSP) compared with patients positioning face-down (FDP). MethodsA computerized search was conducted in the PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP database. All the included studies were divided into NSP and FDP group. A total of 9 papers were included in this meta analysis, including 285 eyes (145 eyes with small hole ≤400 μm, 104 eyes with large hole >400 μm) in NSP group and 303 eyes (141 eyes with small hole and 124 eyes with large hole ). RevMan 4.2 software was applied for investigating heterogeneity and meta-analysis, and the risk of publication bias was evaluated. ResultsMeta analysis indicated that there was statistical significance on closure rates betwen NSP and FDP group. The difference of closure rates in small macular hole eyes between NSP and FDP group was statistically significant (OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.13-1.51;P=0.20). The difference of closure rates in large macular hole eyes between NSP and FDP group was statistically significant (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.17-0.75;P=0.006). ConclusionNSP is equally effective as strict FDP in the repair of small macular hole. Post-operative FDP may improve the macular hole closure rates for holes larger than 400 μm.
Objective To investigate the risk factors associated with neovascular glaucoma (NVG) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods Retrospective study. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (137 eyes) with PDR who underwent PPV were recruited. There were 85 males and 52 females. The average age was (60.1±8.8) years old. The duration of diabetes was (10.2±3.6) years. There were 49 patients with ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis. Fifty-three eyes underwent intravitreal ranibizumab or conbercept injection before PPV. All eyes were treated with 23G standard three-port PPV. The average follow-up time after PPV was 11.5 months. Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) was conducted in postoperative 4-6 weeks to observe non-perfused retinal areas. Risk factors, such as ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis, the presence of non-perfusion in retina after PPV and the application of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs before PPV, were identified by logistic regression. Results Twenty of 137 patients (14.6%) developed postoperative NVG after PPV. Ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis [odds ratio (OR) =5.048, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.057-12.389,P=0.000] and the presence of non-perfusion in retina after PPV (OR=4.274, 95%CI 1.426-12.809,P=0.009) were significant risk factors for postoperative NVG, while the application of anti-VEGF drugs was not (OR=1.426, 95%CI 0.463-4.395,P=0.536). But the time from PPV to the onset of NVG varies significantly between the two groups of injection of anti-VEGF drugs or not (t=−4.370,P=0.000). Conclusions Risk factors associated with NVG after PPV in eyes with PDR included ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis and the presence of non-perfusion in retina after PPV. The application of anti-VEGF drugs before PPV can delay the onset of NVG in PDR eyes after vitrectomy.
Objective To evaluate improvement of visual acuity for advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy eyes with different complications after vitrectomy． Methods Four groups of advanced pr oliferative diabetic retinopathy (APDR) in 314 eyes with diabetes type Ⅱ and type Ⅰ were analyzed retrospectively: vitreous hemorrhage with limited traction retinal detachment (VH), extensive fibrovascular membranes with traction retinal detachment (TD), combined rhegmatogenous and traction retinal detachment (CRT) and cataract with vitreous hemorrhage or and traction retinal detachment (CHD)． Results 0．1 or better postoperative visual acuity was achieved in 59．5% of type Ⅱ and 66．7% of type Ⅰ in the VH group; 39．4% of type Ⅱ and 52．6% of type Ⅰ in the extensive TD group; 31．6% of the CRT grou p; 62．5% of the CHD group． The major intraoperative complication is iatrogenic retinal breaks． The causes of postoperative visual loss in present study included neovascular glaucoma (2．8% of type Ⅰ and 0．4% of type Ⅱ in aphakia, 25% of type Ⅱ in aphakia and 4．2% in pseudophakia), retinal detachment and CRAO． Conclusion The majority of APDR eyes obtained better visual improvement after vitrectomy and photocoagulation． (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2001,17:171-174)
ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage after minimal vitrectomy without endotamponade for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).MethodsFrom June 2015 to June 2017, 103 eyes of 103 patients with PDR diagnosed and underwent minimalvitrectomy in Henan Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled in the study. There were 58 males and 45 females, with the average age of 58.37±10.14 years and diabetes duration of 8.7±7.2 years. Baseline systemic parameters including sex, age, diabetes duration, hypertension, HbA1c, creatinine, whether received anticoagulants, ocular parameters including whether combined with vitreous hemorrhage, whether finished panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), whether received treatment of anti-VEGF, whether combined with iris neovascularization (NVI), lens status preoperatively, whether hypotony postoperatively and intraoperative parameters including whether disc neovascularization (NVD) bleeding, whether fibrovascular membrane (FVM) residual, laser points, whether combined with cataract phacoemulsification were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsTwenty-nine of 103 eyes (28.15%) developed PVH in 1 day to 6 months after surgery, with self absorption of 18 eyes and reoperation of 11 eyes. Univariate analysis showed there were significant differences in age (t=2.124, P=0.036), anti-VEGF(χ2=7.105, P=0.008), NVD bleeding (χ2=10.158, P=0.001) and FVM residual(χ2=8.445, P=0.004) between patients with and without postoperative vitreous hemorrhage. Sex (χ2=0.021, P=0.884), diabetes duration (t=0.87, P=0.386), hypertension (χ2=2.004, P=0.157), HbA1c (t=1.211, P=0.229), creatinine (t=0.851, P=0.397), preoperative oral anticoagulants (χ2=0.985, P=0.321), preoperative vitreous hemorrhage (χ2=0.369, P=0.544), PRP (χ2=1.122, P=0.727), NVI (χ2=2.635, P=0.105), lens status (χ2=0.172, P=0.679), hypotony postoperatively (χ2=1.503, P=0.220), laser points (χ2=1.391, P=0.238) and combined phacoemulsification surgery (χ2=0.458, P=0.499) were not associated with PVH. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the more PVH appeared in younger (OR=1.065, P=0.009) and NVD bleeding (OR=6.048, P=0.001) patients.ConclusionYounger age and NVD bleeding are the important risk factors for PVH after minimal vitrectomy without endotamponade in PDR.
ObjectiveTo compare the effects of intravitreal tamponade of C3F8 with silicon oil on postoperative vitreous hemorrhage and visual prognosis after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsThe clinical data of 121 patients (127 eyes) who underwent primary vitrectomy due to PDR were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were divided into two groups according to different intravitreal tamponade, including C3F8 tamponade group (53 patients with 56 eyes) and silicone oil tamponade group (68 patients with 71 eyes). There was no difference of gender (χ2=0.956), age (t=1.122), duratiion of diabetes (t=0.627), fasting blood glucose (t=1.049), systolic pressure (t=1.056), diastolic pressure (t=0.517), history of hypertension (χ2=0.356), nephropathy (χ2=1.242), preoperative laser photocoagulation (χ2=1.225) and All the patients underwent three port pars plana vitrectomy. The mean follow-up was 2 years ranging from 6 months to 4 years. And then the incidence and onset time of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage and postoperative BCVA of the two groups were compared. ResultsPostoperative vitreous hemorrhage occurred in 14 of 56 eyes (25.00%) in C3F8 tamponade group. The average onset time of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage were (64.64±59.09) days ranging from 7-225 days and mostly were within 30-60 days (35.71%, 5/14). Postoperative vitreous hemorrhage also occurred in 7 of 71 eyes (9.89%) of silicone oil tamponade group after silicone oil removal with an average onset time of (25.29±20.46) days ranging from 3-65 days and were mostly within 15-30 days (42.86%, 3/7). There was a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage between the two groups (χ2=5.200, P<0.05). BCVA of the two groups was improved significantly after operation (Z=2.472, 3.114; P<0.05). Postoperative BCVA of silicone oil tamponade group was poorer than C3F8 tamponade group (Z=1.968, P<0.05). ConclusionBoth C3F8 and silicone oil tamponade can improve the visual acuity after vitrectomy for PDR. Compared with C3F8, silicone oil tamponade had lower incidence and late onset of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage after vitrectomy for PDR.
Objective To observe the short-term intraocular pressure after 25G+ pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and analyze the possible influencing factors in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) eyes. Methods This is a retrospective case-control study. A total of 160 patients (163 eyes) of RRD and PDR who underwent 25G+ PPV were enrolled in this study. There were 88 males (89 eyes) and 72 females (74 eyes), with the mean age of (50.37±13.24) years. There were 90 patients (92 eyes) with RRD (the RRD group) and 70 patients (74 eyes) with PDR (the PDR group). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were performed on all the patients. The BCVA was ranged from hand motion to 0.6. The average IOP was (12.61±4.91) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). There were significant differences in crystalline state (χ2=9.285, P=0.009), IOP (χ2=58.45, P=0.000), history of PPV (χ2=4.915, P=0.027) and hypertension (χ2=24.018, P=0.000), but no significant difference in sex (χ2=0.314, P=0.635) and age (χ2=5.682, P=0.056) between the two groups. A non-contact tonometer has been used to measure IOP on postoperative day 1 and 3. The postoperative IOP distribution has been divided into five groups: severe ocular hypotension (≤5 mmHg), mild ocular hypotension (6 - 9 mmHg), normal (10 - 21 mmHg), mild ocular hypertension (22 - 29 mmHg), severe ocular hypertension (≥30 mmHg). Logistic regression analysis has been used to analyze the risk and protective factors. Results On the first day after surgery, there were 21 eyes (12.9%) in mild ocular hypotension, 96 eyes (58.9%) in normal, 22 eyes (13.4%) in mild ocular hypertension and 24 eyes (14.7%) in severe ocular hypertension. On the first day after surgery, there were 18 eyes (11.0%) in mild ocular hypotension, 117 eyes (71.7%) in normal, 23 eyes (14.1%) in mild ocular hypertension and 5 eyes (3.1%) in severe ocular hypertension. There was no significant difference of IOP distribution between the two groups (Z=−1.235, −1.642; P=0.217, 0.101). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that silicone tamponade was a risk factor for ocular hypertension in PDR eyes on the first day after surgery [odds ratio (OR)=15.400, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.670 - 64.590; P＜0.001], while intraocular lens was the risk factor for ocular hypotension in PDR eyes on third day after surgery (OR=19.000, 95%CI 1.450 - 248.2; P=0.025). As for RRD eyes, the ocular hypotension before surgery was a risk factor for ocular hypertension on the third day after surgery (OR=3.755, 95%CI 1.088 - 12.955; P=0.036). For all eyes, silicone tamponade (OR=0.236, 95%CI 0.070 - 0.797), air tamponade (OR=0.214, 95%CI 0.050 - 0.911) and inert gas tamponade (OR=0.092, 95%CI 0.010 - 0.877) were protective factors for ocular hypotension on the first day after surgery (P=0.020, 0.037, 0.038); silicone tamponade was protective factor for ocular hypotension on the third day after surgery (OR=0.249, 95% CI 0.066 - 0.94, P=0.040); while aphakic eyes was the risk factor for ocular hypotension on third day after surgery (OR=7.765, 95% CI 1.377 - 43.794, P=0.020). The ocular hypotension before surgery was a risk factor for ocular hypertension on the third day after surgery (OR=4.034, 95% CI 1.475 - 11.033, P=0.007). Conclusions The abnormal IOP is common after 25G+ PPV with a rate from 28.3% to 31.1%. Silicone tamponade, air tamponade and inert gases tamponade are protective factors for postoperative ocular hypotension, aphakic eye is risk factor for postoperative ocular hypotension. Ocular hypotension before surgery and silicone oil tamponade are risk factors for postoperative ocular hypertension.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of preoperative intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) on the operation duration of vitrectomy and postoperative vision for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). MethodsA prospective study was carried out with the 90 PDR patients (90 eyes) who underwent vitrectomy. The 90 patients(90 eyes)were assigned to the vitrectomy only group(43 eyes) and the IVR combined with vitrectomy group (47 eyes). The IVR was performed 5-13 days prior to vitrectomy in the IVR combined with vitrectomy group. There were 15 eyes with fibrous proliferation PDR (FPDR), 16 eyes with advanced PDR (APDR) without involving the macular and 16 eyes with APDR involving the macular in the vitrectomy only group. There were 14 eyes with FPDR, 15 eyes with APDR without involving the macular and 14 eyes with APDR involving the macular patients in the IVR combined with vitrectomy group. All the eyes in the two groups were regularly operated by the same doctor to complete the vitrectomy. The start and end time of vitrectomy were recorded. The average follow-up time was 10 months. The changes of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe duration of operation of the FPDR type (t=-8.300) and the APDR involving the macular type (t=-2.418) in the IVR combined with vitrectomy group was shorter than vitrectomy only group (P < 0.05). The comparison of duration of operation of the APDR without involving the macular type in the two groups has no statistically significant difference (t=-1.685, P > 0.05). At 1 month after surgery, the comparison of BCVA of the IVR combined vitrectomy group and the vitrectomy only group in APDR involving the macular type has no statistically significant difference (t=0.126, P > 0.05). At 3, 6 months after surgery, the BCVA of the IVR combined vitrectomy group in APDR involving the macular type was significantly better than the BCVA of the vitrectomy only group (t=8.014, 7.808; P < 0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, the BCVA of the IVR combined vitrectomy group in FPDR type (t=3.809, 1.831, 0.600) and APDR without involving the macular type (t=0.003, 1.092, 3.931) compared with pre-treatment, the difference were not statistically significant (P > 0.05); the BCVA in APDR without involving the macular type compared with pre-treatment, the difference was distinctly statistically significant (t=2.940, 4.162, 6.446; P < 0.05); the BCVA in APDR involving the macular type (t=0.953, 1.682, 1.835) compared with pre-treatment, the difference were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ConclusionPreoperative IVR of PDR can shorten the operation duration and improve the BCVA of APDR involving the macular type.
The occurrence of high intraocular pressure (IOP) after vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy (DR) is related to many factors, including the type and stage of DR, macular detachment, surgical methods, and the type of ocular tamponade. Early high IOP occurred mainly due to laser photocoagulation, inflammatory response, improper ocular tamponade, residual viscoelastic agents and ciliary body dysfunction. In addition to the above reasons, early-middle stage high IOP is also related to tamponade gas expansion peak, encircling scleral buckle and hyphema. The major reason for middle-stage high IOP is hyphema and silicon oil in anterior chamber. The reasons for late-stage high IOP are glaucoma, silicone oil emulsification, long-term use of glucocorticoid, and iris incision closure. Most high IOP can be controlled by proper treatment such as stopping use of glucocorticoid, anti-glaucoma eye drops and surgeries. But there are still a small number of patients with unexplained refractory high IOP, the mechanism need to be further explored.
Objective To observe and analyze the causes and prognosis of postoperative vitreous hemorrhage (PVH) after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods A total of 160 PDR patients (171 eyes) were enrolled in this retrospective study. There were 85 males and 75 females. The patients aged from 33 to 73 years, with the mean age of (56.40±8.97) years. All the patients were performed 25G pars plana vitrectomy by the same doctor. Fibrovascular membrane peeling and panretinal photocoagulation were performed during the operation. Combined phacoemulsification was performed in one hundred and five patients. Vitreous tamponade was used at the end of surgery, including silicone oil (43 eyes), C3F8 (63 eyes), air or fluid (65 eyes). The follow-up ranged from 6 to 22 months, with the mean follow-up of (9.34±6.97) months. The features of PVH were observed. The difference of age, HbA1c, creatinine level, the severity of the fundus lesions, whether received treatment of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), whether received combined cataract phacoemulsification were analyzed to find out the cause and prognosis of PVH. Results The corrected vision of all the patients after the primary PPV at the latest follow up was finger counting/1 meter. PVH occurred in 15 eyes of 15 patients, the incidence was 8.77%. The PVH occurred 2 weeks to 6 months after surgery. There were significant difference in age (t=2.551), proportion with tractional retinal detachment (χ2=7.431), progressive fibrovascular proliferation (χ2=4.987) and using anti-VEGF (χ2=9.742) between the patients with and without PVH (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in HbA1c (t=0.501), creatinine level (t=1.529), and the proportion of cataract phacoemulsification (χ2=0.452) between the patients with and without PVH (P＞0.05). During follow-up, neovascularization of iris (NVI) occurred in 1 eye and neovascular glaucoma (NVG) occurred in 4 eyes. Seven eyes underwent reoperation, 7 eyes were spontaneous recovered, 1 eye with NVG give up treatment. Fibrovascular membrane was the major cause of recurrent hemorrhage. At the end of follow-up, hemorrhage was absorbed in all the 14 eyes which were treated, 12 eyes had same visual acuity compared to that before postoperative hemorrhage, 2 eyes with NVG had decreased vision. There was significant difference in the corrected vision between the patients with and without NVI or NVG (P=0.022). Conclusions PVH after PPV for PDR is closely related to the severity of diabetic retinopathy, fibrovascular membrane is the major cause of recurrent hemorrhage. NVG is an important factor related to vision acuity prognosis.