ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of Chinese medicine injection (CMI) for treating heart failure (HF).MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMbase databases were electronically searched from inception to January 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CMI for treating HF. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by RevMan 5.2 software and Stata 16.0 software.ResultsA total of 47 studies were included involving 4 902 patients and 5 types of CMIs, including Shenmai, Shenfu, Yiqi Fumai (lyophilized), Shengmai, and Danhong injections. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of combined CMIs was superior to conventional Western medicine alone. For the main efficacy, Shenmai, Shengmai, and Shenfu injections had significant advantages in improving the total clinical effectiveness. Shengmai, Shenmai, and Yiqi Fumai (lyophilized) injections were significantly more effective for reducing NT pro-BNP levels than other injections. Shenfu and Shengmai injections were significantly more effective for reducing BNP levels than other injections. Shenmai, Danhong and Shengmai injections were significantly more effective for improving the left ventricular ejection fraction than the other injections. These CMIs showed similar advantages for secondary efficacy indicators as for main efficacy indicators.ConclusionsThe combined 5 types of CMIs for treating HF can improve the clinical efficacy when compared with conventional Western medicine treatment. Shenmai injection, Yiqi Fumai injection (lyophilized), and Shengmai injection, which is part of Sheng Mai San, have clear advantages in terms of the overall curative effect or on individual indices.
Heart failure is a disease that seriously threatens human health and has become a global public health problem. Diagnostic and prognostic analysis of heart failure based on medical imaging and clinical data can reveal the progression of heart failure and reduce the risk of death of patients, which has important research value. The traditional analysis methods based on statistics and machine learning have some problems, such as insufficient model capability, poor accuracy due to prior dependence, and poor model adaptability. In recent years, with the development of artificial intelligence technology, deep learning has been gradually applied to clinical data analysis in the field of heart failure, showing a new perspective. This paper reviews the main progress, application methods and major achievements of deep learning in heart failure diagnosis, heart failure mortality and heart failure readmission, summarizes the existing problems and presents the prospects of related research to promote the clinical application of deep learning in heart failure clinical research.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) -2 inhibitors is a new type of oral sugar-lowering drug. Instead of relying on insulin, it lowers blood sugar by inhibiting the reabsorption of near-curvy tube glucose, which is drained from the urine. SGLT-2 inhibitors not only have a sugar-lowering effect, but also benefit significantly in cardiovascular disease, and this drug has the advantages of permeable diuretic, reducing capacity load, and improving ventricular remodeling. SGLT-2 inhibitors can improve the diastolic function of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. SGLT-2 inhibitors can benefit patients with HFpEF. Therefore, this article will discuss the progress of SGLT-2 inhibitors in HFpEF.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect and safety of western medicine plus Shenmai Injection versus western medicine alone for heart failure (HF) patients. Methods We searched CNKI (January 1979 to April 2009), VIP (January 1989 to April 2009), CBM (1978 to 2009), PubMed (1978 to April 2009), The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2009), and other relevant databases and journals to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about western medicine plus Shenmai Injection versus western medicine alone for HF patients. The methodological quality was assessed and the data was extralted according to the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook and related methods. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0.2 software.Results Fifteen eligible studies involving 1174 HF patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that western medicine plus Shenmai Injection therapy could precisely improve the general therapeutic effects (RR=1.27, 95%CI 1.19 to 1.35, Plt;0.000 01), increase left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD=7.17, 95%CI 4.65 to 9.70, Plt;0.000 01), and make ventricular diastolic function better (minor weight literature: WMD=0.38, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.45, Plt;0.000 01; major weight literature: WMD=0.38, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.45). Meanwhile, only one study indicated that western medicine plus Shenmai Injection could increase 6-minute walking distance, reduce BNP, IL-6, and TNF-α levels, respectively. Conclusion By comparison with western medicine alone, western medicine plus Shenmai Injection can improve the therapeutic effect on HF patients.
Heart failure is a global problem that occurs in 38 million patients worldwide, and the number is dramatically increasing in elderly society. Meanwhile, heart dysfunction is also the most common disease among hospitalized patients more than 65 years, especially in high-income countries. Approximately, one million patients are hospitalized because of heart failure in the world every year. Drug therapy is currently the most popular treatment for heart failure in clinic, however, the effects are limited. Therefore, exploring novel treatment strategies gradually becomes a focus not only in basic but also in clinical research.
Objective To evaluate the cardiac protection function of high thoracic epidural anesthesia (HTEA) for patients with acute coronary syndrome or heart failure. Methods A literature search was conducted with computerized database on PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, and CNKI from 1990 to May 2010. Further searches for articles were conducted by checking all references describing cardiac protection studies with HTEA. All included articles were assessed and data were extracted according to the standard of Cochrane review. The homogeneous studies were pooled using RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results A total of 28 articles involving 1 041 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that, a) cardiac function: HTEA could significantly improve ejection fraction of left ventricle (WMD= – 10.28, 95%CI – 14.14 to – 6.43) and cardiac output (WMD= – 1.26, 95%CI – 1.63 to – 0.89), contract left ventricular diastolic dimension (WMD= 5.02, 95%CI 3.72 to 6.32), increase E peak (WMD= – 17.50, 95%CI – 29.40 to – 5.59) and decrease A peak (WMD= 27.36, 95%CI 24.46 to 30.26); b) ischemic degree for patients with heart failure: the change of NST-T (WMD= 1.45, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.78) and ∑ST-T (WMD= 1.02, 95%CI 0.78 to 1.26) got significantly decreased after HTEA; c) ischemic degree for patients with acute coronary syndrome: HTEA could obviously lessen the times (WMD= 4.24, 95%CI 0.48 to 8.00) and duration (WMD= 23.29, 95%CI 4.66 to 42.11) of myocardial ischemia, decrease the times of heart attack (WMD= 3.44, 95%CI 0.92 to 5.97), and decrease the change of NST-T (WMD= 1.10, 95%CI 0.84 to 1.36) and ∑ST-T (WMD= 1.33, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.65); d) hemodynamic change for patients with acute coronary syndrome: HTEA could obviously decrease heart beat (WMD= 8.44, 95%CI 3.81 to 13.07) and systolic arterial pressure (WMD= 2.07, 95%CI 0.81 to 3.34), but not decrease the diastolic blood pressure (WMD= 2.06, 95%CI – 0.52 to 4.64) so as to avoid influencing the infusion of coronary artery; and e) influence on Q-T interval dispersion: HTEA could significantly decrease Q-Td (WMD= 9.51, 95%CI 4.74 to 14.27), Q-Tcd (WMD= 11.82, 95%CI 5.55 to 18.09), and J-Td (WMD= 9.04, 95%CI 2.30 to 15.79). Conclusions High thoracic epidural anesthesia can obviously improve the systolic and diastolic function of left ventricle, decrease the heart beat and stabilize hemodynamic change, lessen the times and duration for myocardial ischemia, reserve the ST segment change, contract Q-T interval dispersion, which has to be further proved with more high quality studies.
Objective The purpose of the current research was to analyze the relevant risk factors for short-term death in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF), and to build a predictive nomogram. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 1 323 COPD and HF comorbidity patients who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2018 to January 2022. Samples were divided into survival and death groups based on whether they died during the follow-up. General data and tested index of both groups were analyzed, and the discrepant index was analyzed by single factor and multiple factor Logistic regression analysis. R software was applied to create the nomogram by visualizing the results of the regression analysis. The accuracy of the results was verified by C index, calibration curve, and ROC curve. Results The results from the multiple factor Logistic regression analysis indicated that age (OR=1.085, 95%CI 1.048 to 1.125), duration of smoking (OR=1.247, 95%CI 1.114 to 1.400), duration of COPD (OR=1.078, 95%CI 1.042 to 1.116), comorbidity with respiratory failure (OR=5.564, 95%CI 3.372 to 9.329), level of NT-proBNP (OR=1.000, 95%CI 1.000 to 1.000), level of PCT (OR=1.153, 95%CI 1.083 to 1.237), and level of D-dimer (OR=1.205, 95%CI 1.099 to 1.336) were risk factors for short-term death of COPD and HF comorbidity patients. The level of ALB (OR=0.892, 95%CI 0.843 to 0.942) was a protective factor that was used to build the predictive nomogram with the C index of 0.874, the square under the working characteristics curve of the samples of 0.874, the specify of 82.5%, and the sensitivity of 75.0%. The calibration curve indicated good predictive ability of the model. Conclusion The nomogram diagram built by the current research indicated good predictability of short-term death in COPD and HF comorbidity patients.
The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure". The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with heart failure. Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to manage patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients’ interests. New recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses. This article summarized and interpreted the new concept of heart failure in 2022 guidelines, especially the new evidence and suggestions related to cardiac surgery.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of MitraClip therapy in heart failure patients with mitral insufficiency. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2014), EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from October 2005 to October 2015 to collect before-after controlled studies about the efficacy of MitraClip therapy in heart failure patients with mitral insufficiency. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 9 studies involving 782 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with their conditions before treatment, patients after the MitraClip implantation had a declined NYHA class Ⅲ-Ⅳ ratio (RD=0.72, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.85, P<0.000 01), increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD=-2.97，95%CI -5.06 to -0.89，P<0.005) and improved performance in 6 min walk-test (6-MWT) (MD=-88.73, 95%CI -157.16 to -20.31, P=0.01). ConclusionMitraClip therapy can, to a certain extent, improve the cardiac function of patients with heart failure and mitral insufficiency. However, further studies are needed to confirm its effects on improving the long-term survival of patients.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of different SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of heart failure. Methods The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed and EMbase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure from inception to July 2, 2021. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 16.0 software. Results A total of 16 randomized controlled trials, including 15 312 patients, involving 5 interventions, namely dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, canagliflozin, sotagliflozin and ertugliflozin were included. Results of network meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the compound outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, all-cause mortality, risk of cardiovascular mortality and serious adverse reactions among patients with heart failure among 5 different SGLT2 inhibitors (P>0.05). Compared with placebo, both selective and non-selective SGLT2 inhibitors improved the risk of hospitalization for heart failure, hospitalization for heart failure, or compound cardiovascular mortality (P<0.05), while only selective SGLT2 inhibitors improved the risk of cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and serious adverse events (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between them (P>0.05). The area under the cumulative ordering probability curve of selective and non-selective SGLT2 inhibitors ranked first and second, except for the combined outcome of heart failure or cardiovascular death. Conclusion The current evidence indicates that there is no significant difference in the efficacy and safety of the 5 different SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of heart failure, and there is no significant difference between selective SGLT2 inhibitors and non-selective SGLT2 inhibitors. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.