Drugs may induce hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBV-R). Here we have reviewed the definition and harm of HBV-R, the risk drugs and their underlying mechanism, the influence factors, as well as the early intervention measures. It is shown that multiple drugs, including chemotherapy drugs, immunotherapy drugs, directly acting antivirals, cell therapy, etc., can induce HBV-R by affecting host immunity or directly activating HBV transcription factors. HBV-R could cause severe liver damage, even interruption of treatment of original diseases, affecting the prognosis of patients. Through precisely identifying risk drugs, monitoring the influence factors, and prescribing preventive anti-HBV regimen if necessary, the incidence of HBV-R can be significantly reduced. It is also suggested that clinical physicians should not only pay attention to the early identification and intervention of HBV-R, but also further study the mechanism of HBV-R in depth, especially the underlying mechanism between host, HBV and risk factors. This will help to promote the discovery of more valuable markers for risk prediction and targets for early intervention, and to further reduce the risk of HBV-R and improve the prognosis of patients.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of different nucleosides (acids) in preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation after chemotherapy in cancer patients. MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different nucleosides (acids) to prevent HBV reactivation after chemotherapy in cancer patients from inception to June 7th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 43 RCTs involving 3 269 patients were included. There were 7 interventions, namely entecavir (ETV), lamivudine (LAM), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), telbivudine (LdT), tenofovir dipivoxil (TDF), lamivudine combined with entecavir (LAM+ETV), and lamivudine combined with adefovir dipivoxil (LAM+ADV). The results of network meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of reducing the reactivation rate of ETV, LAM, ADV, LdT, TDF, LAM+ETV, LAM+ADV were superior than the control group. The ETV, LAM and ADV were not as effective as LAM+ETV. The leading drug combinations were LAM+ETV (94.8%), LdT (81.5%) and LA+ADV (58.0%). ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that LAM+ETV, LdT, and LA+ADV are more effective in preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation after chemotherapy in cancer patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of paternal serum HBV-DNA load levels and pregnant women's HBsAb on vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from HBsAg positive fathers to infants in order to provide effective methods for paternal-fetal ventrical transmission of HBV prevention. MethodsUsing HBsAg and HBV-DNA as indicators to screen pregnant women and their husbands after gained consent, 121 families with HBVM negative or only HBsAb positive and HBV-DNA negative pregnant women, HBsAg positive husbands and their newborns were selected. In this case-control study, according to neonatal cord blood HBV-DNA detection, 23 newborns with cord blood HBV-DNA positive were selected as cases, 98 newborns as controls. ResultsThe positive rate of neonatal cord blood HBV-DNA was 19.0% (23/121); and there was dose-response relationship between paternal serum HBV-DNA load levels and neonatal cord blood HBV-DNA positive (trend χ2=60.108, P=0.000). The analysis of ROC curve showed that paternal serum HBV-DNA load level (106 copies/mL) is a better demarcation point to forecast the occurrence of vertical transmission of HBV from HBsAg positive fathers to infants, because there was a better sensitivity and specificity during forecast; and HBsAb negative pregnant women's were statistically significant (χ2=12.399, P=0.000). There was no significant difference at the positive rate of neonatal cord blood HBV-DNA between the case group and control group when paternal serum HBV-DNA load levels exceed 107 copies/mL (P > 0.05). ConclusionPaternal serum HBV-DNA load levels and HBsAb negative pregnant women are the risk factors of vertical transmission of HBV from HBsAg positive father to infants. Paternal serum HBV-DNA load level (106 copies/mL) is an appropriate index of the occurrence of vertical transmission.
Objective To compare adefovir monotherapy with adefovir-thymosin alpha-1 combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases up to February 2010 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adefovir plus thymosin alpha-1 versus adefovir alone for chronic hepatitis B. We also scanned references of all included studies and pertinent reviews. The methodological quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently according to the Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 5.0.2 . Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Eleven trials involving 895 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses shoued: the HBeAg seroconversion rate of the combination therapy group was higher than that of the monotherapy group, both at the sixth month and the twelfth month (RR=1.77, 95%CI 1.38 to 2.27; RR=1.74, 95%CI 1.44 to 2.10); and there were also significant differences between the two groups for secondary outcomes including HBV-DNA negative, ALT normalization, etc.Conclusion Adefovir-thymosin alpha-1 combination therapy might be more effective than adefovir monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B. Significant differences are even observed at the sixth month. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the low quality of the included studies. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to further prove the results.
Objective To review the efficacy and safety of Kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil for Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB). Method Randomized controlled trails of Kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil for CHB were gathered from PubMed, CBMdisc (1978 to 2009), and CSJD (1989 to 2009), while other relative researches were searched manually; every research was evaluated, and then analyzed with RevMan 5.0.0 software. Result Ten randomized controlled trials were included; among total 855 patients, 436 were in trial group and the other 419 were in control group. As the Meta-analysis showed, the therapeutic effect of kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil was better than that of Adefovir Dipivoxil in aspects of improving the negative rate of serum ALT (RR=1.28, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.40), the negative rate of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.27, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.42), the negative rate of serum HBeAg (RR=1.80, 95%CI 1.32 to 2.44), and the conversion rate of HBeAg and anti-HBe (RR2.06, 95%CI 1.43 to 2.95). Conclusion Kushenin combined with Adefovir Dipivoxil in treating CHB can improve the conversion rate of HBeAg and anti-HBe and further take better therapeutic effect.
ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between liver transplantation procedure with or without preservation of retrohepatic vena cava and postoperative reinfection of hepatitis B virus.MethodsHepatitis B virus makers of 15 retrohepatic vena cava samples from hepatitis B virus active replicating recipients was detected using immunohistochemistry stain LSAB and HBV DNA hybridization in situ. Hepatitis B virus reinfection rate and survival rate after transplantation in classic group (20 cases) and piggyback group (7 cases) was analyzed retrospectively. ResultsHepatitis B virus makers including HBsAg and HBcAg and HBV DNA of all 15 retrohepatic vena cava samples, 10 from classic group and 5 from piggyback group, was negative. In classic group, 20 recipients were followedup 6-30 months, mean 18 months, only one case of hepatitis B recurrence was confirmed 22 months after operation; In piggyback group,7 recipients were followedup 5-12 months, mean 8 months, none of hepatitis B virus reinfection was encountered. Recurrence rate in classic group and piggyback group was 5.0%(1/20) and 0(0/7), respectively.ConclusionThis preliminary study indicated that the retrohepatic vena cava of hepatitis B virus active replicating recipients don’t have the residence and replication of hepatitis B virus particle. Orthotopic liver transplantation procedure with preservation of retrohepatic vena cava appears not to increase the hepatitis B virus reinfection rate in hepatitis B virus active replicating recipients after transplantation.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of adefovir monotherapy (ADF) versus adefovir-Matrine combination therapy (ADF+M) for chronic hepatitis B. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, CBM, CNKI, WanFang and VIP Database were searched from the date of their establishment to July 2010, and the references of all included studies were also traced so as to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADF versus ADF+M. Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2 by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 24 RCTs involving 2 092 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that at the end of the treatment for both six months and 12 months, respectively, the ADF+M group was superior to ADF group with a significant difference in both the HBeAg seroconversion rate as the primary outcome (six months: RR=2.05, 95%CI 1.53 to 2.74; 12 months: RR=2.13 95%CI 1.74 to 2.60) and the secondary outcome such as HBV-DNA negative conversion, HBeAg negative conversion, ALT normalization, HBV-DNA variation, complete response and HBsAg negative conversion, etc. Conclusion As the current evidence shows, ADF+M therapy is superior to ADF therapy for chronic hepatitis B. The significant difference can even be observed at the end of the treatment for six months. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the low quality of the included studies. High-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to further prove the results.
Objective To assess the efficacy of lamivudine in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B.Methods MEDLINE, SCI, Current Content Connect, The Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Database were searched from the beginning to September 2005, and the references of eligible studies were manually screened. R.andomized controlled trials comparing lamivudine with non-antiviral interventions （ placebo, no treatment and standard care ） in patients with chronic hepatitis B were eligible for inclusion. Two investigators independently assessed the quality and extracted the data. Heterogeneity was examined by Chi-square test. Fixed and random effect meta-analysis were used to pool the data. Subgroup analyses were used in treatment course. Results Eleven R.CTs were included （ n = 1 237 ）. All reported the effect of lamivudine （100 mg/d） , and one of them included lamivudine （25 mg/d）. The treatment duration of 52 weeks and less than 26 weeks were reported in eight and three RCTs, respectively. Six RCTs adequately applied randomization, while other five RCTs were not reported in detail. Four RCTs adequately enforced allocation concealment, five RCTs enforced blinding bitterly. The others were not reported in detail. It was found by meta-analysis that, compared with the control, lamivudine （100 mg/d, 52 W） could significantly clear HBeAg [42.6% vs. 13% , RR 3.20, 95% CI （2.33, 4. 38）] and clearHBVDNA [71.78% vs. 20, 36%, RR3.42, 95%CI （2.80,4.19）], normalize ALT [65% vs. 34.9%, RR1.91, 95%CI （1.64,2.21）], achieve HBeAgseroconversion [16.1% vs. 7.29% , RR2.12, 95%CI （1.24,3.80） ] and histology response [57. 9% vs. 26.2%, RR 2. 17, 95% CI （ 1.67,2.81 ） ] ; Lanfivudine （100 mg/ d, 12 W） could effectively clear HBV DNA [ 50.7% vs 3.92% , RR 8.68, 95% CI （1.72,43.74 ） ] , but was not effective in loss of HBeAg, HBeAg seroconversion and normalization of ALT, Lamivudine （25 mg/d） could effectively clear HBV DNA [97.7% vs. 22.2% , RR 4.41, 95% CI （2.86,6.79） ] and improve histology response [59.3% vs. 30% , RR1.98, 95% CI （1.31,2.99 ） ], but was not effective in HBeAg seroconversion. Conclusions Lamivudine （100 mg/ d） is effective in clearing HBV DNA and HBeAg, normalizing ALT and achieving HBeAg seroconversion.
ObjectiveTo analyze hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype distribution and drug-resistant mutations in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, providing basis for hepatitis B individualized treatment.MethodsA total of 786 chronic hepatitis B patients admitted to West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2016 to December 2018 were enrolled in the study. Genotype and drug-resistant mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing, and statistical analysis was conducted by χ2 test.ResultsThree genotypes (B, C and D) were identified in 786 samples, 489 (62.2%) in genotype B, 291 (37.0%) in genotype C , and 6 (0.8%) in genotype D. The distribution differences of B and C genotypes in age and ethnic groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Among them, 627 cases had drug-resistant mutations, with a drug-resistant mutation rate of 79.8%. A total of 262 cases (33.3%) were resistant to lamivudine and tibivudine, 102 cases (13.0%) were resistant to lamivudine, tibivudine and entecavir; 83 cases (10.6%) were resistant to adefovir dipivoxil. No tenofovir resistant strains were detected in 786 samples. There were statistically significant differences in drug resistance between B and C genotypes (χ2=14.356, P<0.01). The most common single mutation was M204I [179 cases (22.8%)], followed by 46 cases (5.9%) of A181V/T associated with adefovir dipivoxil resistance. The most common mixed mutation was L180M+M204V/I in 83 cases (10.6%), and another 102 cases (13.0%) showed M250V and/or V173L and/or T184A/G/S/I and/or S202G/I with L180M+M204V/I.ConclusionsHBV genotypes in West China Hospital of Sichuan University are mainly B and C, and the situation of drug resistance is severe and the mutation pattern is complex. Therefore, detecting HBV genotype and drug resistance mutation is necessary, which may develop better clinical treatments.
Objective To explore the relationship between the HBsAg positive patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and HBV DNA genotype. Methods By using PCR type-specific primers combined with sequencing of genotype, we analyzed the genotype of HBV DNA in the serum of 500 patients with positive HBsAg in our hospital. Among them, 150 cases suffered from HCC. Results Genotype B and C were both predominant genotypes in HBsAg positive patients. But in HCC group, the rate of genotype C was 65.33% （98/150）, which was significantly higher than that in non-HCC group (88/350, 25.14%), while genotype B, in contrast, was 28.67% （43/150） and 68.86% （241/350）， χ2=75.45， Plt;0.05. The distribution of HBV DNA genotype B or genotype C in different gender or different age groups were not statistically significantly different in cases of HCC (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Genotype C of HBV DNA is more common in patients with HCC, and maybe there is relationship between genotype C and the occurrence of HCC.