Objective To determine the efficacy and complication rate of intramedullary nailing versus compression plate in the treatment of adult humeral shaft fracture. Methods We searched the specialized trials register of The Cochrane Collaboration’s Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group, The Cochrane Library (including CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to 2006), EMbase (1980 to 2006), PubMed (1966 to 2006), NRR , CCT and CBMdisc (1979 to July 2006). We also handsearched some Chinese orthopedic journals. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. Randomize controlled trials comparing intramedullary nailing versus compression plate for humeral shaft fracture in adults were included and the quality of these trials was critically assessed. Data analyses were done using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8. Results Three randomize controlled trials involving 215 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that intramedullary nailing may increase the re-operation rate (OR=2.68, 95%CI 1.19 to 6.04, P=0.02), pain in the shoulder (OR=13.02, 95%CI 2.23 to 75.95, P=0.004), and the rate of decreased range of motion of the shoulder (OR=18.60, 95%CI 1.01 to 341.83, P=0.05). The rates of no union, infection and iatrogenic radial nerve injury were comparable between intramedullary nailing and compression plate. Meta-analysis was not conducted for the time of union, because the relevant data were not available for the included trials. Conclusions Further well-designed and large-scale randomize controlled trials are required to determine the effects of intramedullary nailing and compression plate on these outcomes, because the trials available for this systematic review are too few and too small.
ObjectiveTo design an auto-compressive and anti-circumrotate intramedullary nail( ACACIN) and to evaluate the preliminary clinical efficacy on fixing adult femur fracture. Methods From January 1998 to June 2001, 23 patientswith femur fracture were stabilized with auto-compressive and anti-circumrotateintramedullary nail. 2-4 elastic blocks were installed into the proximal and distal different distance of quincunx nail to defend circumrotate and axis compress. Results Fracture healing were obtained in all 23 patients treated with auto-compresseiveand anti-circumrotate intramedullary nail, the time of fracture healing was 6-13 weeks in 21 cases and 15-22 weeks in 2 cases of old fracture. There was no complication related to infection, nail break, abnormal union and joint ankylosis. The results were excellent in 19 cases, good in 3 cases, and moderate in 1 case according Kolmert’s criterion for function ; the effective rate was 95.7%. Conclusion Auto-compressive and anti-circumrotate intramedullary nail has a suitable radian for adult femur, can afford stable fixation, anti-circumrotate andaxis compress.
Objective To compare the efficacy of plating versus intramedullary nailing in the treatment of adult humeral shaft fracture. Methods We identified eligible studies in PubMed (1950 to September 2007), MEDLINE (1950 to September 2007), OVID CINAHL (1950 to September 2007), OVID EBM (3rd Quarter 2007), CBMdisk (1978 to June 2007) and CNKI (1981 to June 2007). We also handsearched several Chinese orthopedic journals. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing plating versus intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fracture in adults were included and the quality of these trials was critically assessed. Data analyses were conducted with Stata 10.0. Results Six RCTs involving 425 patients were included, among which the statistical heterogeneity was not significant (Pgt;0.1). Cumulative meta-analyses showed that intramedullary nailing might increase the re-operation rate in studies conducted before the year of 2000 (OR=0.39, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.90, P=0.03), but the difference was not significant in studies conducted after 2000 (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.27 to 1.08, P=0.08). Intramedullary nailing might increase the incidence of shoulder impingement compared with plating (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.65, P=0.01). The rates of non-union, deep infection, iatrogenic radial nerve injury and internal fixation failure were similar between plating and intramedullary nailing. Meta-analyses were not conducted for union time, operation time and bleeding (transfusion) volume, because the relevant data were not available from the included trials. Conclusion Intramedullary nailing may increase the incidence of shoulder impingement. The rates of re-operation, non-union, deep infection, iatrogenic radial nerve injury and internal fixation failure are similar between plating and intramedullary nailing. Further well-designed and large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to determine the effects of plating and intramedullary nailing on these outcomes.
【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the techniques and advantages of closed reduction and intramedullary nail ing intreating femoral shaft fracture without cannulated femoral reamer. Methods From January 2006 to June 2007, 24 cases offemoral shaft fracture were treated with closed reduction and intramedullary nail ing. Among them, there were 14 males and 10 females, with the average age of 38.3 years (ranging from 18 years to 63 years), with 7 left legs and 17 right legs. The average course of the disease was 7.6 days (ranging from 3 days to 20 days). According to the AO typing, there were 5 cases of type A, 6 of type B, 7 of type C1, 2 of type C2 and 4 of type C3. Closed reduction was achieved with manipulation and reaming of femoral canal was instructed by fluoroscopy. Results The operation time lasted from 100 minutes to 170 minutes, with the average time of 128.3 minutes. One patient was given a transfusion of 400 mL, and others were not. Twenty cases were followed up with the average time of 13.1 months (ranging from 6 months to 24 months). A mild to large amount of bony callus was showed on X-ray films 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively. Walking without crutches began at the average week of 22.2 (ranging from 15 to 30) postoperatively. Range of motion of the knee was 0° to 145.5°. No infection or break of the internal fixator occurred. Myositis ossificans with pain and insufficient flexion of hip (120°) happened in 1 case and the pain disappeared after non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs were taken. Nonsymptomatic myositis ossificans occurred in 2 cases and no treatment was needed. Conclusion Closed reductionand intramedullary nail ing can help to protect the blood supply of fracture fragments and provide central fixation. The operation process will be more compl icated if cannulated femoral reamer is not available.
Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of external fixation versus intramedulllary nailing in the treatment of adult tibial shaft fracture. Methods We searched the specialized trials register of The Cochrane Collaboration’s Bone, Joint and Muscule Trauma Group, The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006), EMBASE (1980 to March 2006) and PUBMED (1966 to March 2006). We also handsearched some Chinese orthopedic journals. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials (quasi-RCTs) comparing external fixation versus intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults were included. The quality of these trials was critically assessed. We used the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8 for data analyses. Result Three RCTs and two quasi-RCTs involving a total of 279 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that external fixation for tibial shaft fractures in adults may increase the infection rate [RR 2.45, 95%CI (1.31,4.61), P=0.005], and the malunion rate [RR 2.85, 95%CI (1.20,6.79), P=0.02] but may reduce the duration of hospitalization [RR –5.50, 95%CI (–6.99,–4.01)]. The nonunion rate, delayed healing rate, and healing time, were comparable between external fixation and intramedulllary nailing. Conclusion The trials available for this systematic review are too few and small for reliable estimates of the relative effects of external fixation and intramedulllary nailing. Further studies are needed to determine these effects , especially for patients who have GustiloШ C fractures.
Because of the complexity of proximal humeral fractures, the treatment of proximal humeral fractures has always been a challenge for clinicians. The MultiLoc intramedullary nail is a new type of internal fixation device which has been gradually used in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in recent years. At present, it is mainly used in the Neer two- and three-part fractures, especially surgical neck fractures. Its flexible design can provide personalized and multi-plane fixation for fracture patients, “screw-in-screw” and medial supporting screw can effectively reduce the axial displacement and varus angle of humeral head, and minimally invasive surgical incision can reduce the injury of rotator cuff. This review focuses on the research status and related evidence of the design, operation, prognosis, and postoperative complications of MultiLoc intramedullary nail, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the application of MultiLoc intramedullary nail in fracture treatment, and enhance clinicians’ understanding of MultiLoc intramedullary nail as a new type of internal fixation device.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of bone transportation by ring type extenal fixator combined with locked intramedullary nail for tibial non-infectious defect. MethodsBetween June 2008 and October 2012, 22 cases of tibial large segment defect were treated. There were 15 males and 7 females, aged 24-58 years (mean, 36.8 years), including 17 cases of postoperative nonunion or malunion healing, and 5 cases of large defect. After debridement, bone defect size was 5.0-12.5 cm (mean, 8.05 cm). Bone transportation was performed by ring type external fixator combined with locked intramedullary nail, the mean indwelling duration of external fixation was 10.2 months (range, 2-26 months); the external fixation index was 1.57 months/cm (range, 0.3-3.2 months/cm); and the mean length increase was 8.05 cm (range, 5.0-12.5 cm). ResultsAll patients were followed up 19-58 months (mean, 32 months). No infection occurred after operation and all patients obtained bony union, and the union time was 4.7-19.4 months (mean, 11.9 months). Complications included refracture (1 case), skin crease (1 case), lengthening failure (1 case), foot drop (2 cases), retractions of the transport segment (1 case), delay of mineralization (1 case), which were cured after corresponding treatment. According to Hohl knee evaluation system to assess knee joint function after removal of external fixator and intramedullary nail, the results were excellent in 15 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 90.9%; according to Baird-Jackson ankle evaluation system to evaluate ankle joint function, the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 3 cases, fair in 7 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 59.1%. ConclusionBone transportation by ring type external fixator combined with locked intramedullary nail could increase stability of extremities, allow early removal of external fixator and avoid axis shift of extremities, so it has good effect in treating tibial noninfectious defect.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress in the lower limb lengthening by intramedullary nail. MethodsThe domestic and foreign related literature about the lower limb lengthening by intramedullary nail was reviewed, summarized, and analyzed. ResultsThe intramedullary nail lengthening systems can be divided into 3 types:distraction by mechanical strength, by motorized electronic power, or by motorized magnetic force. The new technology has obvious advantages in complication incidence, limb function, bone healing rate, comfortable and cosmetic degree of the patients, and hospitalization days compared with the external fixation, but it also has the disadvantages including lengthening failure of system breakdown, intramedullary infection, injuries of vessel and nerve, limited distraction length, and expensive price of the apparatus. And the method also has several contraindications:narrow medulla, multiple curves of medulla, osteomyelitis, skin infection, and unclosed epiphyseal plate. ConclusionThe lower limb lengthening by intramedullary nail is a major improvement of Ilizarov technology. Although the method has been used in limited cases, the preliminary clinical results are excellent, and it can be regarded as a new trend of the limb lengthening, bone reconstruction, and deformity correction.
Objective To study the effect of internal fixation with absorbable intramedullary nail on the treatment of phalange fractures in replantation of severed finger. Methods From September 2001 to October 2003, 28 cases with industrial severed finger (21 males and 7 females, with the age of 18-35 years) were replanted within 1-6 hours. The severed locations were index fingers in 11 cases, middle fingers in 8 cases, ring fingers in 6 cases, little fingers in 3 cases. All cases of phalange fractures were fixed by absorbable intramedullary nails of poly-DL-lactic acid(PDLLA) that combined with chitosan. Out of the 28 cases, 15 cases were with proximal phalange, 11 cases were with middle phalange, 2 cases were with distal phalange. The bone marrow cavity of the phalanges were dilated, then the intramedullary nail was inserted with suitable diameter and length to fix the fracture. Postoperatively resin bandage was applied for 3-4 weeks.Results All the 28 patients survived the performance and postoperative follow-up ranged from 3 to 10 months(4 months in average). Rejection was observed in one case 3 weeks after operation, bone unions were obtained in other cases. According to the Chinese Medical Association’s evaluation standard for replantation of amputated finger, 18 fingers resulted in excellence, 9 fingers in good function and 1 with unsatisfactory function. The excellent and good rate was 96.4%. Conclusion Internal fixation with absorbable intramedullary nail of PDLLA combined with chitosan proves to be effective in the replantation of severed finger.
【Abstract】 Objective To explore the biomechanical properties of a new intramedullary controlled dynamicnail ing (ICDN). Methods Ten pairs of specimens of adult femurs, with the age of 18 to 55 years, were divided into twogroups (groups A1 and B2, n=10). The length of the specimens was (438 ± 10) mm , and the external diameter was (26.4 ± 1.5) mm. The specimens of the two groups were osteotomized transversely after the biomechanical test. ICDNs and GK nails were randomly implanted into the femurs, respectively (groups A2 and B2). Torsional, bending and axial compressive tests were made in each group, and the effect of dynamic compression between the fracture fragments was tested. Results The resistance to compression of groups A1, B1, A2 and B2 were (0.19 ± 0.18) × 106, (0.22 ± 0.12) × 106, (1.67 ± 0.68) × 106 and (0.86 ± 0.32) × 106 N/mm, respectively. There was statistically significant difference between groups A2 and B2 (P lt; 0.01). The bending stiffnesses of coronal section of groups A1, B1, A2 and B2 were (0.94 ± 0.25) × 103, (1.10 ± 0.21) × 103, (0.70 ± 0.22) × 103, (0.64 ± 0.21) × 103 N/mm, respectively. The bending stiffness of sagittal plane of groups A1, B1, A2 and B2 were (1.06 ± 0.26) × 103, (0.96 ± 0.25) × 103, (0.67 ± 0.25) × 103, (0.61 ± 0.18) × 103 N/mm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between groups A1 and B1 or between groups A2 and B2 (P gt; 0.05). When the torque was 5 Nm, the torsional stiffness of groups A1, B1, A2 and B2 were (4.00 ± 2.54), (4.76 ± 1.93), (0.50 ± 0.63), (0.35 ± 0.31) Nm/°, respectively. When the torque was8 Nm, the torsional stiffness of groups A1, B1, A2 and B2 were (4.30 ± 3.27), (3.94 ± 2.01), (0.42 ± 0.52), (0.36 ± 0.18) Nm/°, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between groups A1 and A2 or between groups B1 and B2 (P lt; 0.05), and no statistically significant difference between between groups A2 and B2 (P gt; 0.05). The average maximal pressure generated between the fracture fragments which were fixed with ICDN was 21.6 N, and the pressure between the fracture fragments which were fixed with GK nail ing could not be tested. Conclusion The design of ICDN conforms to the special anatomical structure of the femur. ICDN could provide a completely different structure, a different fixation principal and a more balancedfixation than GK nail. ICDN incorporates the flexible and rigid fixation, which is l ikely to be the trend of the fracture fixation.