The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in adults of China has reached 12.8%. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) accounts for approximately 1/4-1/3 of the diabetic population. Several millions of people are estimated suffering the advanced stage of DR, including severe non-proliferative DR (NPDR), proliferative DR (PDR) and diabetic macular edema (DME), which seriously threat to the patients’ vision. On the basis of systematic prevention and control of diabetes and its complications, prevention of the moderate and high-risk NPDR from progressing to the advanced stage is the final efforts to avoid diabetic blindness. The implementation of the DR severity scale is helpful to assess the severity, risk factors for its progression, treatment efficacy and prognosis. In the eyes with vision-threatening DR, early application of biotherapy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor can improve DR with regression of retinal neovascularization, but whether it is possible to induce capillary re-canalization in the non-perfusion area needs more investigation. Laser photocoagulation remains the mainstay treatment for non-center-involved DME and PDR.
Objective To explore the influencing factors of visual prognosis of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO-ME) after treatment with ranibizumab, and construct and verify the nomogram model. MethodsA retrospective study. A total of 130 patients with BRVO-ME diagnosed by ophthalmology examination in the Department of Ophthalmology, Liuzhou Red Cross Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected in this study. All patients received intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. According to the random number table method, the patients were divided into the training set and the test set with a ratio of 3:1, which were 98 patients (98 eyes) and 32 patients (32 eyes), respectively. According to the difference of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months after treatment and logMAR BCVA before treatment, 98 patients (98 eyes) in the training set were divided into good prognosis group (difference ≤－0.3) and poor prognosis group (difference ＞－0.3), which were 58 patients (58 eyes) and 40 patients (40 eyes), respectively. The clinical data of patients in the two groups were analyzed, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were carried out for the different indicators, and the visualization regression analysis results were obtained by using R software. The consistency index (C-index), convolutional neural network (CNN), calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to verify the accuracy of the nomogram model. ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that age, disease course, outer membrane (ELM) integrity, elliptical zone (EZ) integrity, BCVA, center macular thickness (CMT), outer hyperreflective retinal foci (HRF), inner retina HRF, and the blood flow density of retinal deep capillary plexus (DCP) were risk factors affecting the visual prognosis after treatment with ranibizumab in BRVO-ME patients (P＜0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that course of disease, ELM integrity, BCVA and outer HRF were independent risk factors for visual prognosis after ranibizumab treatment for BRVO-ME patients (P＜0.05). The ROC area under the curve of the training set and the test set were 0.846[95% confidence interval (CI) 0.789-0.887) and 0.852 (95%CI 0.794 -0.873)], respectively; C-index were 0.836 (95%CI 0.793-0.865) and 0.845 (95%CI 0.780-0.872), respectively. CNN showed that the error rate gradually stabilized after 300 cycles, with good model accuracy and strong prediction ability. ConclusionsCourse of disease, ELM integrity, BCVA and outer HRF were independent risk factors of visual prognosis after ranibizumab treatment in BRVO-ME patients. The nomogram model based on risk factors has good differentiation and accuracy.
ObjectiveTo seek the evidencebased medicine (EBM) evidences of curative effects of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for macular edema.MethodsAll articles of intravitreous injection TA for macular edema published in English or Chinese were picked up from databases of MEDLINE and CNKI and then evaluated according to EBM standard. The data in accord with research standard were selected by using excluding and including criteria, and classified according to the appraisal standard of clinical therapeutic documents. ResultsIn the selected papers, none in gradeⅠevidence; 1 in gradeⅡevidence; 7 in grade Ⅲ evidence; 24 in grade Ⅳ evidence; and 19 in gradeⅤevidence. Forty-two papers reported that intravitreous injection with TA had significant effect for macular edema within 3 months, and the improvement of visual acuity was recorded in these papers. Regression of macular edema was recorded in 23 papers. Among 20 papers, side-effect was found in 93 eyes (31.41%) and the serious sideeffect in 4 eyes (1.35%).ConclusionsIntravitreous injection with TA has some curative effects for macular edema in short term, but the quality of current study has not been encouraging. There are no grade I document and lack of the study of validity in long term and essentiality and validity of retreatment. The special attention should be payed on the increasing persistency of efficacy and preventing the serious side-effects in the future investigation.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:220-223)
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common ocular complication of diabetes patients. It mainly involve macular which is closely related with visual function, thus DME is one of the major reasons causing visual impairment or blindness for diabetes patients. How to reduce the visual damage of DME is always a big challenge in the ophthalmic practice. In the past three decades, there are tremendous developments in DME treatments, from laser photocoagulation, antiinflammation drugs to antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. However, the mechanism of DME development is not yet completely clear; every existing treatment has its own advantages and weaknesses. Therefore DME treatment still challenges us to explore further to reduce the DME damages.
Objective To observe the short-term effect of changing the sequence of PRP and MLP on the pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients with clinical significant macular edema (CSEM). Methods Sixty-three consecutive pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy outpatients (103 eyes) with clinical significant macular edema were selected and divided into two groups: 54 eyes in patients of group A accepted MLP one month prior to PRP and 49 eyes in patients of group B accepted the photocoagulative therapies in a contrary sequence. All the patients were followed up for 3 to 13 months and visual acuity. Light sensitivity of 5deg;macular threshold, and FFA were performed pre- and post-photocoagution. Results The improvement of visual acuity was found to be better in group A than that of group B (Plt;0.01) 2 months after the therapy, since then, there was no significant defference (Pgt;0.05) in both groups. Three and 4 months after the treatment, there was no significant difference in change of light sensitivity of 5deg;macular threshold in both groups. The macular leakages of 59 eyes, 32 ingroup A and 27 in group B, were well controlled. Conclusion Among the pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients with CSEM, visual acuity of those who accept MLP prior to PRP more rapidly than those who accept contrary sequence of photocoagulation, but the changing of therapeutic sequence might have no dramatic influence on light sensilivity of 5deg;macular threshold. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis,2000,16:150-152)
ObjectiveTo observe the expression of inflammatory cytokines in diabetic rats received posterior sub-Tenon capsule injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) and pan-retinal photocoagulation. MethodsA total of 48 Brown Norway rats received intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin to establish the diabetic model. Diabetic rats were randomly divided into experimental group (20 rats), control group (20 rats) and blank group (8 rats). 50 μl TA or saline was injected into the posterior sub-Tenon capsule immediately after the photocoagulation in the experimental group and the control group, respectively. The blank group received no treatment. The mRNA and protein expression level of retinal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis fator-α (TNF-α) were measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at 1, 3, 7 days after laser photocoagulation. ResultsThe mRNA and protein expression of VEGF, IL-6, TNF-α of the experimental group and control group were significantly higher than the blank group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mRNA and protein expression of VEGF, IL-6 and TNF-α of the experimental group were significantly lower than that of the control group. On day 1 after laser photocoagulation, the mRNA expression of VEGF was not statistically significant in the experimental group and control group (P > 0.05), the mRNA and protein expression of VEGF, IL-6, TNF-α of the two groups were statistically significant in the remaining observing time (P < 0.05). ConclusionPosterior sub-Tenon capsule injection of TA can effectively reduce retinal photocoagulation induced VEGF, IL-6, TNF-α expression.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of repeated intravitreal conbercept injection in patients with macular edema (ME) of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), guided by optic coherence tomography (OCT). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Forty patients (40 eyes) diagnosed as ME secondary to RVO were enrolled in this study. There were 19 males (19 eyes) and 21 females (21 eyes), with the mean age of (53.58±13.19) years and the mean course of 1.5 months. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and OCT were performed. The mean baseline of BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT) were 0.25±0.18 and (509.48±170.13) μm respectively. All the patients were treated with 10.00 mg/ml conbercept 0.05 ml (including conbercept 0.5 mg). Follow-up of these patients was 1 to 6 months after treatments, the BCVA, fundus manifestations, OCT were retrospectively observed by every month, the FFA was retrospectively observed by every 3 months. When there was retinal edema or CMT ≥50 μm by OCT during follow-up, those patients were retreated with intravitreal conbercept injection. The changes of the BCVA, CMT were evaluated before and after treatment. Meanwhile, complications in eyes related to medicine and treatment methods were evaluated too. Results At the 6 months, the BCVA was improved (increase≥2 lines) in 25 eyes (62.50%), stabilized (±1 line) in 13 eyes (32.50%) and decreased 2 lines in 2 eyes (5.00%). Retinal hemorrhage and exudates were absorbed in most patients. FFA showed no fluorescein leakage in 11 eyes (27.50%), minor fluorescein leakage in 26 eyes (65.00%), and retinal capillary non-perfusion in 3 eyes (7.50%). OCT showed absorption of the subretinal fluid. The mean CMT were (235.20±100.44) μm at 6 months. Intravitreal injection of conbercept was applied for 4 times in 8 eyes (20.00%), 3 times for 18 eyes (45.00%), and 2 times for 14 eyes (35.00%). The mean number of intravitreal injection was 2.85 times. There were no ocular or systemic adverse events observed in all patients. Conclusion Intravitreal conbercept injection is an efficacy and safe treatment for the patients with ME of RVO guided by OCT. It can stabilize and improve the visual acuity.
Objective The present study focus on the macular branch retinal vein occlusion (MBRVO) with and without laser treatment,and evaluate prospectively whether laser treatment is useful in improving the visual acuity and reducing the macular edema. At the same time to learn the difference of macular light sensitivity before and after laser treatment.Methods Forty-five eyes of forty-five patients with MBRVO and macular edema were randomized to laser treatment and no laser treatment. Follow up examinations were performed every 3 months. We compared the difference of visual improvement, resolution of macular edema between the two groups. The central 30°visual field of 20 patients with MBRVO were examined at pretreatment and 3 months after laser treatment. A comparison of light sensitivity at fovea ，central 10°and 11~30°eccentricity were done between before and after laser treatment. Results Comparison of visual improvement and resolution of macular edema showed a statistical difference between laser treatment and no laser treatment. The mean reduction of macular light sensitivity at the fovea and 11~30°3 months after the treatment has no statistical difference between before and after treatment (Pgt;0.05). But the mean light sensitivity at central 10°eccentricity were significantly decreased 3 months after photocoagulation (Plt;0.05).Conclusion The laser treatment might promote or accelerate visual acuity recovery and reduce the macular edema. There is no significant difference about the efficiency on macular function after laser treatment.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2003，19：201-268)
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of intravitreous injection with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) on macular edema.MothodHaving been examined by ophthalmoscopy, optic coherent tomography (OCT), retinal thickness analyzer (RTA), and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), 33 patients (37 eyes) with diffused and (or) cystoid macular edema caused by diabetes and retinal venous occlusion were intravitreously injected with 0.1 ml triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/ml). During 1-9 month followup period, the visual acuity, intraocular pressure, inflammatory extent, manifestation of lens and fundus were observed, the retinal thickness was examined by OCT and RTA, and vascular leakage were detected by FFA.ResultsMacular thickness was (244.07±118.80), (195.53±57.70), and (181.42±54.79) μm respectively 1, 2, 3 months after treatment; while macular thickness was (724.35±227.41) μm before the treatment. The difference was statistically significant （t =10.72, 12.84, 13.90; P lt;0.001）. The visual acuity was 0.39±0.19, 0.45±0.24, and 0.43±0.21 respectively, comparing with the visual acuity before the treatment (0.20±0.16), the difference was statistically significant （t =4.445, 4.349, 3.474; P lt;0.001, lt;0.001, 0.03）；The result of FFA showed less leakage of fluorescein and proliferative lesion. Four pateints had the ocular pressure ≥25 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) in 9 who had ≥20 mm Hg. Recurrence of macular edema was found in 4 eyes of 3 patients 4 and 6 months after the treatment, respectively. No infection or aggravation of lenticular turbidness occurred.ConclusionIntravitreous injection with TA can be used to treat macular edema due to diabetes and retinal venous occlusion, and recurrence of macular edema or increase of intraocular pressure may occur in some patients.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2005,21:205-208)
ObjectiveTo probe the classification of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the different grade of diabetic and type of macular edema according to fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA). MethodsFFA was performed on 1 058 patients (2 097 eyes) to classify DR and macular edema with the analysis of duration of DM, visual acuity, manifestation of FFA images and results of ophthalmoscopic examination.ResultsIn 2 097 eyes, there were 124 (5.9%) without DR, 396 (18.9%) with DR I, 430 (20.5%) with DR II, 563 (26.8%) with DR III, 262 (125%) with preproliferative diabetic retinopathy (PPDR), 254 (12.%) with DR IV, 60 (2.9%) with DR V, and 8 (0.4%) with DR VI. In 2 097 eyes there were 819 (39.1%) with macular edema, including 311 (38%) with focal macular edema, 322 (39.3%) with diffused macular edema, 112 (13.7%) with cystoid macular edema, 25 (3.1%) with ischemia macular edema, and 49 (6.0%) with proliferative macular edema.ConclusionWith the analysis of the results of FFA of 2 097 eyes, we classify DR in stage Ⅰ (primary stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ), Ⅱ (primary stage Ⅲ), Ⅲ (preproliferative diabetic retinopathy), Ⅳ,Ⅴ, and Ⅵ; classify macular edema of DR in focal, diffused, cystoid, ischemic, and proliferating ones.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2003,19:333-337)