Objectives To systematically review the efficacy and safety of carbetocinversusoxytocin on the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) for women undergoing vaginal delivery. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on carbetocinversusoxytocin on the prevention of PPH for women undergoing vaginal delivery from inception to January 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. Results A total of 16 RCTs including 2 537 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared to oxytocin, carbetocin could reduce the amount of blood loss within 24h (MD=–107.68, 95%CI–130.21 to –85.15, P<0.000 01) and 2h (MD=–85.98, 95%CI–93.37 to –78.59,P<0.000 01), hemoglobin (Hb) within 24h after delivery (MD=–5.63, 95%CI–6.82 to –4.43,P<0.000 01), the occurrence of PPH (RR=0.46, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.66,P<0.000 01) and the requirement for additional uterotonic agents (RR=0.63, 95%CI 0.48 to 0.84,P=0.002). There was no significant difference in the risk of adverse effects between two groups. Conclusions Current evidence shows that carbetocin is superior to oxytocin in the prevention of PPH for women undergoing vaginal delivery, without increasing the adverse effects. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above the conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in the treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). MethodsWe searched databases including MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2015), Web of Science, CBM and WanFang Data to collect relevant clinical studies comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for ADPKD from inception to Jan, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk bias of included studies. Then, RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of six retrospective cohort studies involving 182 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that:compared with the open nephrectomy group, the average hospitalization time was shorter (MD=-4.38 days, 95%CI -5.93 to -2.83, P=0.000 01) and the blood transfusion risk was lower (OR=0.25, 95%CI 0.10 to 0.62, P=0.003) in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group. However, there was no significant difference between two groups in the incidence of overall complications (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.24 to 1.06, P=0.07). ConclusionThe application of laparoscopic nephrectomy for ADPKD can reduce the hospitalization time and blood transfusion risk when compared with the open nephrectomy, but the two operations have similar overall complication rate. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the correlation between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the risk of kidney cancer. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, VIP and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect cohort studies on the association between T2DM and kidney cancer from inception to August 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis then performed by using Stata 15.0 software. ResultsA total of 17 cohort studies involving 2 003 165 T2DM patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that patients with T2DM had a higher kidney cancer risk than controls (RR=1.51, 95%CI 1.39 to 1.64, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of kidney cancer in T2DM patients was higher in different gender, region, population, follow-up time, diabetes assessment method and other subgroups. ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that T2DM is a risk factor for kidney cancer.
Individual patient data meta-analyses are conducted through development of collaboration with trial investigators, central collection and checking of individual patient data of all eligible trials, and pooling of patient data to produce the best estimate of effects of health care interventions. They ensure study data to be update, accessible, reliable and complete so as to minimize the risk of bias, and are the gold standard of systematic reviews addressing effects of health care interventions. Meta-analyses using individual patient data enable higher flexibility of data analyses and more completeness and balance of results interpretation. The study conduct differs between individual patient data versus conventional meta-analyses. This article discussed the steps of conducting individual patient data meta-analyses.
Objective To review the current state of lung rehabilitation in China and explore the effect of lung rehabilitation on chronic respiratory diseases. Methods Database of CNKI ( 1979-2009) , VIP Chinese Periodical Database ( 1989-2009 ) , and Wanfang Data ( 1982-2009) resources were searched. Studies of lung rehabilitation were collected, and randomized and controlled trials were included. Data were extracted on study population, interfering and evaluating methods. The meta-analyses were performed by using RevMan 4. 2 software. The heterogeneity was analyzed by X2 and P value. Results A total of 3 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. The study population were all severe and very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases ( COPD) patients. Lung rehabilitation could improve daily activity( WMD:1. 29, 95% CI: 1. 05-1. 54) and dyspnea level ( SMD: - 1. 27, 95% CI: - 1. 67 to - 0. 86) of COPD patients. Conclusion The general level of studies on lung rehabilitation is not satisfied. Meta-analysis comfirmes that lung rehabilitation is beneficial in improving daily activity and dyspnea level of COPD patients.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of ulinastatin in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of ulinastatin for acute pancreatitis was performed. Trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Library (issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE, EMBASE (1984-2004) and Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978-2004), handsearching, and personal contact with pharmaceutical companies. All RCTs comparing ulinastatin with other interventions were included. Two reviewers assessed the quality of each studiy, and extracted data independently. Statisticsal analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2. Results Seventeen trials involving 1 199 patients were included. Most included trials were of poor quality. Only two trials reported death at the end of follow-up. Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs showed that the clinical effective rate of Ulinastatin plus basic treatment group was 93.12% (176/189), and was 73.33% in basic treatment group. A statistic significant difference was found between the two groups (Peto OR 4.29, 95%CI 2.49 to 7.37, P＜0.000 01). Compared with basic treatment group, Ulinastatin plus basic treatment group significantly reduced the mean hospitalization (WMD -4.93, 95%CI -7.76 to -2.09, P＜0.000 7). Meta-analysis of 2 RCTs showed that the clinical effective rate of Ulinastatin plus basic treatment group was 86.75% (131/151), and was 80.49% (99/123) in other drugs plus basic treatment group. No statistic significant difference was found between the two groups (Peto OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.76 to 2.80, P＜0.26). One trial found that comparing with control group (23.5±7.5 days), Ulinastatin group (34.0±6.4 days) significantly reduced the mean hospitalization (P＜0.05).The reported severe adverse events of ulinastatin appeared to be rare (7/488, 1.43%). Conclusion Ulinastatin appears to be a modality of safe and effective treatment with a favorable trend, but there is no enough evidence to support this conclusion at present as the published trials with poor quality. More trials with enough sample size and scientifically sound methodology are required.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in treating patients with coronary artery disease compared with bare metal stents. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBMdisc and other databases of clinical trials were searched for meta-analysis and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) both in Chinese and English language. Conference abstracts, personal reference lists, reference lists of retrieved studies and some websites were also searched. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 4.2 software. Results Meta-analysis was performed on the results of 25 RCTs with 5 different drug-eluting stents. Seven trials evaluated efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stent, the results of meta-analysis indicated that SES decreased rates in stent restenosis compared with bare metal stent, and therefore the target lesion revascularization and adverse cardiac event rates, no “catch up” were found. Eight trials compared a paclitaxel-eluting stent with bare metal stent, similar results were found, i.e. decreased stent restenosis rate, target lesion revascularization and adverse cardiac event rates in patients receiving paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare metal stent. Three trials compared CYPHERTM and TAXUS stents head to head, and the combined analysis showed a superiority of CYPHERTM to TAXUS. But available data can not draw a conclusion with regard to the effect of drug-eluting stents on mortality, occurrence of MI or stent thrombosis. Everolimus-eluting stent had the same performance as these two drug-eluting stents above, but because of a small sample size, no further conclusion can be made. Actinomycin D eluting stents and 7-hexanoyltaxol-eluting stents increased restenosis rate and stent thrombosis rate respectively. Poor performance limited further clinical trials of these two stents. Conclusions Sirolimus-eluting stent and polymetric paclitaxel-eluting stent are efficient and safe in patients with coronary artery atherosclerosis. Sirolimus eluting stent CYPHERTM seems better than paclitaxel eluting stent TAXUS.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the correlation between the expression of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CJFD, CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2015) were electronically searched from inception to January 1st 2015 to collect case-control studies about the correlation between CK19 expression and clinical pathogenic features in OSCC. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 11 studies were included, involving 612 OSCC cases and 564 normal controls. The results of meta-analysis showed that:The expression levels of CK19 were significantly different between the OSCC group and the control group, between OSCC groups with and without lymph node metastasis, between the high differentiation group and the middle/poor differentiation group, and between the clinical stage I group and the clinical stages Ⅱ to Ⅲ group (all P values≤0.05). However, there were no significant differences in expression levels of CK19 between the male OSCC group and the female OSCC group, and between the carcinoma size T1/T2 group and the T3/T4 group (all P values >0.05). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, CK19 expression may be associated with the occurrence, development and transfer of OSCC, and may be positively corrected with tumor malignance. It may be an indicator of poor prognosis and can be considered as a molecular marker of OSCC.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effects of magnesium sulfate on postoperative pain and complications after general anesthesia. Methods A literature search was conducted in following databases as The Cochrane Library, EMbase, PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, CNKI and CBM from the date of establishment to September 2011 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate during general anesthesia. All included RCTs were assessed and the data were extracted according to the standard of Cochrane systematic review. The homogenous studies were pooled using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 11 RCTs involving 905 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with the control group, intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate during general anesthesia significantly reduced the visual analog scale (VAS) scores at the time-points of 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, and 24 hours, respectively, after surgery, the postoperative 24 hours morphine requirements, and the incidents of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.91, P=0.02) and chilling (RR=0.29, 95%CI 0.14 to 0.59, P=0.000 7). Although the incidents of bradycardia (RR=1.93, 95%CI 1.05 to 3.53, P=0.03) increased, there were no adverse events or significant differences in the incidents of hypotension and serum concentration changes of magnesium. Conclusion Intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate during general anesthesia may obviously decrease the pain intensity, and the incidents of nausea and vomiting and chilling after surgery, without increasing cardiovascular adverse events and risk of hypermagnesemia. The results still need to be confirmed by more high-quality and large-sample RCTs.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of controlled hypotension for total hip or knee replacement.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on controlled hypotension for total hip or knee replacement from inception to September 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 15 RCTs involving 854 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with no controlled hypotension during surgery, controlled hypotension could reduce intraoperative blood loss (MD=−267.35, 95%CI −314.54 to −220.16, P<0.000 01), allogeneic blood transfusion (MD=−292.84, 95%CI −384.95 to −200.73, P<0.000 01), and 24 h postoperative mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score (MD=−1.08, 95%CI −1.82 to −0.34, P=0.004). However, there were no significant differences in 96 h postoperative MMSE score (MD=−0.11, 95%CI −0.50 to 0.28, P= 0.57) and intraoperative urine volume (MD=57.93, 95%CI −152.57 to 268.44, P=0.59).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that controlled hypotension during total hip or knee replacement can reduce intraoperative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion. Furthermore, there is no obvious effect on the maintenance of blood perfusion in important organs, despite certain effects on the postoperative cognitive function, which can be recovered in short term. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.