Lung cancer is one of the most malignant common tumor worldwidely and it's the most popular cancer in China. Both the prevalence and mortality of it are higher than other cancers. And its 5-year survival rate is 15%. Non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) accounts for about 85% lung cancer and its pathogenesis has not been elucidated. Therefore, early prediction and detection are very important for improving the effect of treatment and prognosis. Recently, dysregulation and excessive activity of the C4.4A as a member of the LY6/uPAR family of membrane proteins has been shown to associate with multiple cancer types. And previous studies suggest that the C4.4A participates in the invasion and metastasis of NSCLC. At the same time, circumstantial evidence proves that C4.4A and liver kinase B1(LKB1) tumor suppressor gene have a negative regulatory relationship. This article will briefly summarize the recent research progresses of C4.4A in NSCLC.
Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of combined induction therapy of interferon (IFN) with chemotherapy for survival of the patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by meta-analysis. Methods All clinical trials of addition of IFN plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for induction therapy to advanced NSCLC patients in MEDLINE (1966-2006), EMBASE (1984-2006.1) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 1,2006) were identified. The references of related studies and Education Books of ASCO and ESMO meeting were handsearched. The quality of included trials was evaluated. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently with a designed extraction form. RevMan 4.2.7 software was used for data analysis. Results Five randomized controlled trials involving 360 patients were included. The pooled result of 3 studies showed that IFN plus chemotherapy induction treatment did not improve 1-year survival rate with RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.46 to 1.26. The pooled result of 5 studies showed that IFN plus chemotherapy induction treatment did not improve response rate with RR 1.40, (0.83 2.34). The pooled result showed that IFN plus chemotherapy induction treatment might significantly increase leukopenia and thrombocytopenia with RR 2.61,95%CI1.70 to 3.99) and RR 4.78,95%CI 1.87 to 12.19 respectively . Conclusion Insufficient data exists to state whether IFN plus chemotherapy induction treatment can improve 1-year survival rate and response rate. IFN plus chemotherapy may increase occurrence of leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. Further studies are warranted.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of erlotinib for the elderly with Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data were electronically searched for relevant randomized controlled trails (RCTs). Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Totally 5 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the objective response rate and stable disease rate was similar between the erlotinib group and the control group with no significant difference (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.34 to 2.93, P=0.99; RR=1.17, 95%CI 0.95 to 1.43, P=0.14). The incidences of Grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were lower in the erlotinib group than those in the control group (OR=0.12, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.52, P=0.005; OR=0.19, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.91, P=0.04); and the incidences of nausea and vomiting as wel as liver impairments were alike between the two groups (OR=0.93, 95%CI 0.12 to 7.08, P=0.95; OR=0.80, 95%CI 0.24 to 2.68, P=0.71); the incidences of diarrhea and skin rashes in the erlotinib group were higher (OR=5.96, 95%CI 1.28 to 27.88, P=0.02; OR=6.77, 95%CI 1.52 to 30.10, P=0.01). Conclusion Current evidence shows that, erlotinib is effective and safe in treating the elderly with NSCLC with better effects and no serious adverse reaction. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies with large sample size and long-term follow-up are still needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and complications of cryoablation for T1N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods The clinical data of 38 patients with T1N0M0 NSCLC who underwent CT guided percutaneous cryoablation between October 2019 and March 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. The study outcomes included technical success, the local control rate, 1-year and 2-year progression free survival rate and complications.Results All patients obtained satisfactory iceball coverage and the rate of technical success was 100%. The median follow-up was 14.9 (6.3 - 25.5) months. During the follow-up, 11 patients achieved completed remission, four cases suffered local progression, the local control rate was 89.5%. 1-year progression free survival rate was 96.7%, and 2-year progression free survival rate was 87.9%. The comparison of progression free survival between the T1a-b and T1c was conducted, but no significant difference was detected (P=0.35). There was no death happened during follow-up. The intraoperative complications were pneumothorax and alveolar hemorrhage, and the postoperative complications were exacerbation of cough and pneumothorax. All complications were mild and controllable.Conclusion CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation is clinically feasible, effective and safe therapeutic method for inoperable T1N0M0 NSCLC.
ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the effects of second-generation ALK-inhibitors: Ceritinib and Alectinib on ALK+ NSCLC patients.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, ClinicalTrials.gov and VIP databases were systematically searched for clinical trials containing treatment of two principal second-generation ALK-inhibitors for ALK (+) NSCLC patients from inception to December 31st, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias included in the studies. Stata 12.0 software was used for meta-analysis.ResultsEleven studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that the ORR of all was 57% (95%CI 0.48 to 0.66, P<0.001). The ORR of patients with Crizotinib-resistance was 51% (95%CI 0.44 to 0.57,P<0.001). The IDCR of patients who had brain metastases was 78% (95%CI 0.71 to 0.86,P<0.001).ConclusionsThe second-generation ALK-inhibitors has effect on ALK (+) NSCLC. Due to limitation of the included studies, more larger sample studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To Evaluation of Accuracy and Quality of Diagnostic Test of CEA for the Diagnosis of NSCLC in Chinese Patients. Methods We searched Chinese Biological Medicine Database (CBM, 1978 to 2009) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1994 to 2009). Diagnostic tests of CEA for the diagnosis of NSCLC were included. Data were extracted, and the quality of included studies was evaluated according to the six criteria of diagnostic tests. The heterogeneity test and The Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve and meta-analyses were performed by MetaDisc. Results A total of 84 relevant articles were retrieved and 11 were included in our review. Eleven studies involving 925 patients (861 NSCLC patients, all diagnosed by the gold standard) were included. Meta-analyses showed that the heterogeneity among studies was high (P=0.000 2, I2=69.1%), the pooled sensitivity was 0.542 and the pooled specificity was 0.869. Subgroup analyses indicated that 5 of the studies which used the ECLIA (P=0.376, I2=5.4%, AUC= 0.748 3) and 4 of the studies which lung adenocarcinoma (P=0.186, I2=37.6%, AUC=0.900 2) and 4 of the studies which lung squamous cell carcinoma (P=0.955，I2=0.00%, AUC=0.762 0) had no heterogeneity. serum CEA is low sensitive and high specific on the diagnosis of NSCLC. The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy rate of CEA were higher in adenocarcionoma than squamous cell cance. Conclusion CEA could be regarded as one of the reference tests in patients with NSCLC, Serum CEA is more sensitive and specific than lung squamous cell carcinoma on lung adenocarcinoma. but more high quality trials are required.
Objective To systematically evaluate the benefits and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody versus conventional-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC were searched in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2016), Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, and VIP databases from inception to September 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of eligible studies, then meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of five RCTs involving 2 580 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the objective response rate (ORR) and one year overall survival rate (OSR1y) in anti PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody group were higher than that of the conventional chemotherapy group (RR=1.86, 95%CI 1.37 to 2.52,P<0.001; RR=1.37, 95%CI 1.23 to 1.52,P<0.001, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between two groups in one-year progression-free survival rate (PFSR1y) (RR=1.85, 95%CI 0.61 to 5.59,P=0.28) and disease control rate (DCR) (RR=1.13, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.68,P=0.55). With regard to untoward effect, rate of adverse effects (AEs) and AEs of 3-5 grade in anti PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody group were higher than those of the conventional chemotherapy group (RR=0.85, 95%CI 0.76 to 0.95,P=0.004; RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.43,P<0.001), the difference was statistically significant. But there was no significant difference in AEs to discontinuation between the two groups (RR=0.60, 95%CI 0.26 to 1.39,P=0.23). Conclusion Compared with conventional-dose chemotherapy, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody has considerable current effect and safety in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, safety and economy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to provide an evidence-based basis for clinical dosing and decision-making. MethodsComputerized searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and official websites of domestic and international health technology assessment (HTA) organizations were conducted to collect HTA reports, safety and economic data on the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nabulizumab, pembrolizumab, cimeplizumab, atilizumab, and duvarizumab) for NSCLC HTA reports, systematic reviews (SR)/Meta-analyses, and pharmacoeconomic studies, all with a search timeframe of March 2024 from the time of library construction. After data extraction and quality assessment, the results of the included studies were analyzed descriptively. ResultsA total of 16 papers were included, including 16 SR/Meta analyses and 2 pharmacoeconomic studies. Compared with first-line chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors increased the efficiency and disease control rate, prolonged the survival time, improved the quality of survival, and reduced grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse effects (including fatigue, dyspnea, anemia, pneumonia, severe skin reactions, nausea, diarrhea, decreased appetite, and leukopenia) in NSCLC patients. Cemiplizumab was cost-effective when the WTP threshold was $100 000/QALY, and pembrolizumab was cost-effective when the WTP threshold was $150 000/QALY. ConclusionPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nabulizumab, pabolizumab, cimiplizumab, atilizumab, and duvarizumab) are efficacious, safe, and cost-effective for use in NSCLC; however, given the small number of pharmacoeconomic studies included, economic conclusions drawn need to be interpreted with caution.
Background: In the Phase III LUX-Lung 3/6 (LL3/LL6) trials in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients, we evaluated feasibility of EGFR mutation detection using circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and prognostic and predictive utility of cfDNA positivity (cfDNA+). Methods: Paired tumour and blood samples were prospectively collected from randomised patients. Mutations were detected using cfDNA from serum (LL3) or plasma (LL6) by a validated allele-specific quantitative real-time PCR kit. Results: EGFR mutation detection rates in cfDNA were 28.6% (serum) and 60.5% (plasma). Mutation detection in blood was associated with advanced disease characteristics, including higher performance score, number of metastatic sites and bone/liver metastases, and poorer prognosis. In patients with common EGFR mutations, afatinib improved progression-free survival vs chemotherapy in cfDNA+ (LL3: HR, 0.35; P = 0.0009; LL6: HR, 0.25; P < 0.0001) and cfDNA- (LL3: HR, 0.46; P < 0.0001; LL6: HR, 0.12; P < 0.0001) cohorts. A trend towards overall survival benefit with afatinib was observed in cfDNA+ patients. Conclusions: Plasma cfDNA is a promising alternative to biopsy for EGFR testing. Detectable mutation in blood was associated with more advanced disease and poorer prognosis. Afatinib improved outcomes in EGFR mutation-positive patients regardless of blood mutation status.
ObjectiveTo systemically evaluate the efficacy and safety of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) signal pathway inhibition in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsA systematic literature search in PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, ASCO databases, CNKI and Wanfang database was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the time of database establishment to June 2015. RCTs of COX-2 inhibitors treating advanced NSCLC were included. We assessed the methodology quality of the included studies by using Jadad's scale, and performed this meta-analysis by using stata12.0 software. ResultsTwelve RCTs involving three different COX-2 inhibitors with a total of 1 828 patients were identified including 8 studies of high quality and 4 studies of low quality. We found that COX-2 signal pathway inhibition could significantly increase overall response rate at RR=1.27 with 95%CI1.10 to 1.46 (P=0.001). While our present data could not confirm the efficacy of COX-2 inhibitors in improving progression-free survival (PFS) at HR=0.93 with 95%CI0.81 to 1.08 (P=0.334), overall survival (OS) at HR=0.95 with 95%CI0.84 to 1.08 (P=0.461), or one-year survival rate at RR=1.08 with 95%CI0.90 to 1.24 (P=0.29). As for toxicities, only increased risk of thrombocytopenia at RR=1.28 with 95%CI 1.03 to 1.85 (P=0.03) was observed in the patients treated with COX-2 inhibitors. ConclusionCOX-2 signal pathway inhibition is effective in improving the overall response rate of the patients with advanced NSCLC, and is well tolerated. Whether COX-2 signal pathway inhibition is effective in improving long-term survival of the patients with advanced NSCLC still needs to be confirmed via further clinical trials.