Objective Sedation and/or analgesia is often applied during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) to make patients comfortable, and thus improve the synchronization between patients and ventilator. Nevertheless, the effect of sedation and/or analgesia on the clinical outcome of the patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) after extubation remains controversial. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients with AECOPD who received NIPPV after extubation in seven intensive care units in West China Hospital, Sichuan University between December 2013 and December 2017 . A logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between the use of sedation and/or analgesia and clinical outcomes including rate of NIPPV failure (defined as the need for reintubation and mechanical ventilation), hospital mortality, and length of intensive care unit stay after extubation. Results A total of 193 patients were included in the analysis, and 62 cases of these patients received sedation and/or analgesia during NIPPV. The usage of sedation and/or analgesia could result in failure of NIPPV (adjusted odd ratio [OR] 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02 - 0.52, P=0.006) and death (adjusted OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.04 - 0.42, P=0.001). Additionally, intensive care unit stay after extubation was longer in the patients who did not receive sedation and/or analgesia than those who did (11.02 d vs. 6.10 d, P< 0.01). Conclusion The usage of sedation and/or analgesia during NIPPV can decrease both the rate of NIPPV failure and hospital mortality in AECOPD patients after extubation.
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (HNPPV) on patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China. Methods Systematic literature search was performed in Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, WanFang Data, VIP Database, Chinese National knowledge Infrastructure databases from inception to January 2018. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported comparison of the efficacy of HNPPV on patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were included. All related data were extracted. Meta-analysis was conducted using the statistical software RevMan 5.3 on the basis of strict quality evaluation. Results A total of 767 patients from 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The combined results showed that, compared with the control group, HNPPV could significantly reduce the mortality (relative risk 0.51, 95%CI 0.33 – 0.78, P=0.002) and PaCO2 ［weighted mean difference (MD) –10.78, 95%CI –13.17 – –8.39, P<0.000 01］ of patients, improve the levels of PaO2 (MD 7.84, 95%CI 5.81 – 9.87, P<0.000 01), FEV1 (MD 0.13, 95%CI 0.08 – 0.18, P<0.000 01), and the quality of life (MD –6.27, 95% CI –9.04 – –3.51, P<0.000 01). Conclusion HNPPV can reduce the mortality of patients, improve the gas exchange, pulmonary function and the quality of life, but more large sample, high-quality, and multicenter RCT studies are needed.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) on the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) combined with lung injury [acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)] in emergency treatment. MethodsFifty-six patients with SAP combined with ALI/ARDS treated between January 2013 and March 2015 were included in our study. Twenty-eight patients who underwent NPPV were designated as the treatment group, while the other 28 patients who did not undergo NPPV were regarded as the control group. Then, we observed patients' blood gas indexes before and three days after treatment. The hospital stay and mortality rate of the two groups were also compared. ResultsBefore treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pH value and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) (P>0.05). Three days after treatment, blood pH value of the treatment group and the control group was 7.41±0.07 and 7.34±0.04, respectively, with a significant difference (P＜0.05); the PaO2 value was respectively (60.60±5.11) and (48.40±3.57) mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa), also with a significant difference (P＜0.05). The hospital stay of the treatment group and the control group was (18.22±3.07) and (23.47±3.55) days with a significant difference (P＜0.05); and the six-month mortality was 17% and 32% in the two groups without any significant difference (P>0.05). ConclusionIt is effective to treat patients with severe acute pancreatitis combined with acute lung injury in emergency by noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
Objective To determine the efficacy and prognosis of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Trials were located through electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Springer, and Foreign Journals Integration System (from the start date to March 2008). We also checked the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Statistical analysis was performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2.10. Results A total of 19 trials involving 1 236 patients were included. Results showed that: (1) NPPV vs. conventional therapy: NPPV was superior to conventional therapy in terms of intubation rate (RR 0.36, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.49), failure rate (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.90), and mortality (RR 0.49, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.69). The length of hospital stay was shorter in the NPPV group compared with the conventional group (WMD – 3.83, 95%CI – 5.78 to – 1.89), but the length of ICU stay was similar. The changes of PaO2, PaCO2, and pH were much more obvious in the NPPV group compared with the conventional group. The change of respiratory rate was more significant in the NPPV group compared with the conventional group (WMD – 3.75, 95%CI – 5.48 to – 2.03). At discharge and follow-up, there were no significant differences in FEV1, pH, PaCO2, PaO2, and vital capacity between the two groups. (2) NPPV vs. invasive ventilation: the mortality was similar between the two groups. The incidence of complications was lower in the NPPV group compared with the invasive group (RR 0.38, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.73). The length of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and weaning time were shorter in the NPPV group than those of the invasive group. At discharge and follow-up, clinical conditions were similar between the two groups. Conclusion The limited current evidence showed that NPPV was superior to conventional therapy in improving intubation rate, mortality, short term of blood-gas change, the change of respiratory rate; and superior to invasive ventilation in the length of hospital stay and the incidence of complication. There were no difference among them in discharge and follow-up.
ObjectiveTo explore the reason of failure in noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) for treatment of postoperative hypoxemia, in order to better guide use of NPPV after cardiac surgery. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 64 patients after heart surgery with undergoing NPPV treatment due to hypoxemia in our hospital between January 2012 and December 2013 year.There were 49 males and 15 females at age of 28 to 87 years. There were 17 patients with NPPV failure. The related factors for failure of NPPV were analyzed. ResultsFactors associated with failure of NPPV included smoking history, preoperative pulmonary function abnormalities, blood transfusion amount > 1 000 ml, simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ(SAPS Ⅱ) before NPPV > 35 points, oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) < 100 mm Hg before NPPV, PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mm Hg after NPPV treatment for 1 h, mechanical ventilation time > 72 h at the first time, and pneumonia (P < 0.05). The SAPS Ⅱ > 35 points before NPPV and pneumonia were the independent risk factors for NPPV treatment failure for postoperative hypoxemia. ConclusionPostoperative NPPV for heart disease should be according to the cause of low oxygen and severity. For patients with SAPS less than 35 points before NPPV or patients with pneumonia, NPPV should not be used. In the process of NPPV, if clinical effect is not satisfied, it should be converted to invasive ventilation immediately.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of goal directed analgesia on patients with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsThis was a retrospective study. Two hundred sixty-four patients requiring non-invasive positive pressure ventilation were enrolled in the ICU of this hospital, including 118 patients in the empirical analgesia group and 146 in the goal directed analgesia group. The empirical analgesia group was treated with remifentanil to analgesia and propofol, midazolam or dexmedetomidine to sedation. The sedative depth maintained <1 measured by the score of the Richmond restless sedative scale (RASS). The same analgesic and sedative drug were first used in the goal directed analgesia group to maintain the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool score <2, and the RASS score <1 was maintained after the analgesia depth were achieved. Whether the patients occurred delirium was assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. The dosage of analgesic and sedative drugs, the dependability (based on the total ventilation time in the first 24 hours after ventilation), the incidence of delirium, the rate of invasive ventilation, the total time of NPPV and the length of stay of ICU were observed in the two groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences in age, sex, APACHEⅡ score, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, SpO2, arterial blood gas and the reason of NPPV between the two groups. The dosage of analgesic and sedative drugs in the goal directed analgesia group were less than the empirical analgesia group, and the dependability was higher than that of the empirical analgesia group ［(12.6±5.8)h vs. (10.9±4.8)h, P<0.05), and the incidence of delirium and the rate of invasive ventilation were also lower than those of the empirical analgesia group (15.8% vs. 25.4%, P<0.05; 32.9% vs. 44.9%, P<0.05). The total time of NPPV in the goal directed analgesia group was shorter than that of the empirical analgesia group ［(28.6±8.8)h vs. (37.3±10.7)h, P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the length of stay in ICU.ConclusionGoal directed analgesia can improve the dependability of NPPV patients, reduce the use of sedative drugs, and decrease the incidence of delirium and rate of invasive ventilation.
Objective To investigate the feasibility of dexmedetomidine hydrochloride in sedation practices during NPPV for patients with acute exacerbation of COPD ( AECOPD) and respiratory failure. Methods 50 patients with AECOPD and respiratory failure, admitted in ICU between January 2011 and April 2012, were divide into an observation group and a control group. All patients received conventional treatment and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation ( NPPV) . Meanwhile in the observation group, dexmedetomidine hydrochloride ( 1 μg/kg) was intravenously injected within 10 minutes, then maintained using a micropump by 0.1 ～0. 6 μg·kg- 1 ·h- 1 to maintaining Ramsay Sedation Scale ( RSS) score ranged from 2 to 4. The patients’compliance to NPPV treatment ( conversion rate to invasive ventilation) and ICU stay were compared between two groups. Heart rate,mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, and arterial blood gas ( pH, PaO2 , PaCO2 ) before and 24 hours after treatment were also compared. Results After 24 hours treatment, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, and arterial blood gas were all improved in two groups, while the improvements were more remarkable in the observation group. The conversion rate to invasive ventilation ( 4% vs. 16% ) and ICUstay [ ( 5.47 ±3.19) d vs. ( 8.78 ±3.45) d] were lower in the observation group than those in the control group. ( P lt;0.05) . Conclusion Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride may serve as a safe and effective sedative drug during NPPV in patients with AECOPD and respiratory failure.
Objective To investigate the effects of different inspiratory rise time during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation ( NPPV) on work of breathing in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD) . Methods Eleven patients with acute exacerbation of COPD received different inspiratory rise time ( 0. 1sec, 0. 3sec, 0. 5sec) during NPPV. The changes of inspiratory muscle effort and breathing pattern of the patients were observed. Results The average respiratory rate,minute ventilation, and tidal volume were higher during NPPV compared with spontaneous breathing. But the changes of average minute ventilation and tidal volume were not significant ( P gt; 0. 05) . The pressure time product ( PTP) , transdiaphragmatic pressure ( Pdi) , and work of breathing of inspiratory muscle reduced significantly during different inspiratory rise time as compared with spontaneous breathing ( P lt;0. 01) . PTP,Pdi, and work of breathing reduced 59. 2% , 62. 7% , and 49% respectively when inspiratory rise time was 0. 1sec. They reduced more significantly during inspiratory rise time of 0. 1sec. Conclusions The present study confirms NPPV can unload inspiratory muscles in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. It is more effective to reduce inspiratory load when inspiratory rise time is set at 0. 1sec while the patients feel most comfortable.
Objective To study the effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with hypercapnic coma secondary to respiratory failure.Methods COPD patients with or without coma secondary to respiratory failure were both treated by bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation on base of routine therapy.There were 32 cases in coma group and 42 cases in non-coma group.Such parameters as arterial blood gas (ABG)，Glasgow coma scale (GCS)，time of NPPV therapy，achievement ratio，and adverse effects were investigated.Results 30 patients in the coma group were improved after NPPV treatment (26 cases recovered consciousness treated by BiPAP in 2 hours，3 cases recovered between 3~8 hours，1 case recovered after 24 hours).The parameters of ABG，the tidal volume and the minute ventilation volume were improved after BiPAP.The time of effective therapy was (9±4) days in the coma group and (7±3) days in the non-coma group with no significant difference (Pgt;0.05).The achievement ratio was similar in two groups (93.75% vs 97.62%，Pgt;0.05).But the incidence of gastrointestinal tympanites reached to a higher level in the coma group (80.5%) than the non-coma group (10.6%).Conclusion COPD patients with hypercapnic coma secondary to respiratory failure isn’t the absolute contraindication of NPPV treatment.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV) in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( AECOPD) complicated with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure.Methods 37 patients who were admitted fromJanuary 2008 to June 2009 due to AECOPD complicated with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure and had received NPPV therapy were enrolled as a NPPV group. Another similar 42 cases who had not received NPPV therapy served as control. All subjects received standard medication therapy according to the guideline. Arterial blood gases before and after treatment, the duration of hospitalization and intubation rate were observed. Results The arterial pH, PaO2 ,and PaCO2 improved significantly after treatment as compared with baseline in both groups ( P lt; 0. 05) .Compared with the control group, the average duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter ( 10 ±5 vs.19 ±4 days, P lt;0. 05) and the intubation rate was significantly lower ( 2. 7% vs. 16. 7% , P lt;0. 05) in the NPPV group. Conclusion The use of NPPV in AECOPD patients complicated with severe type Ⅱ respiratory failure is effective in improving arterial blood gases, reducing the duration of hospitalization and intubation rate.