Objective To make an individualized therapeutic regimen for a patient with stage III relapsed ovarian cancer guided by evidence-based medicine.Methods According to the clinical problems this patient showed and the PICO (patient, intervention, comparison and outcome) principle, the best clinical evidence associated with relapsed ovarian cancer was retrieved and evaluated. Results The current evidence showed that the relapsed ovarian cancer with platinum resistance tended to be treated by pharmacotherapy. Consequently, on the basis of combining the recommended guidelines, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews or meta-analyses on RCTs, clinical experience from doctors and willingness of patient, the regimen of Irinotecan plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for interventional chemotherapy was recommended for this patient. After three courses of the treatment, the disease got some relieved; the medical team would like to keep conducting the same regimen for another six to eight courses, and the follow-up visit was undergoing. Conclusion For patients with relapsed ovarian cancer with platinum resistance, an individualized therapeutic regimen under the guidance of evidence-based methods can not only improve the therapeutic efficacy but also guide both doctors and patients to take the indeterminate risk of medicine.
Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin for ovarian cancer. Methods The databases such as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and CBM were searched to collect all randomized control trials (RCTs) about the clinical effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin for ovarian cancer. Literatures were screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, the data were extracted, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed in line with Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1, and Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.0.24 software. Results Three RCTs involving 214 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the paclitaxel plus carboplatin group, the paclitaxel liposomes plus carboplatin group didn’t show significant differences in the total effective rate (P=0.62), while it was obviously superior in reducing the adverse events, such as muscle and joint pain (Plt;0.000 01), peripheral neurotoxicity (P=0.04), nausea or vomiting (P=0.000 2), facial blushing (P=0.03) and rashes (P=0.003). But there were no significant differences between the two groups in trichomadesis, dyspnea, diarrhea, bellyache and blood system abnormalities. Conclusion As current clinical evidences shows, the paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin in treating ovarian cancer is as effective as the paclitaxel and carboplatin, and it can reduce some of the adverse reactions. Therefore, the paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin is available for ovarian cancer as a new, safe and effective treatment. Due to small scale and low quality of the included studies, this conclusion has to be further proved with more high-quality, large-scale, and double-blind RCTs.
Ovarian cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of female genital organs. In gynecological tumors, the incidence rate of ovarian cancer ranks the third after cervical cancer and uterine body cancer, but the death rate of ovarian cancer ranks the first, posing a serious threat to women’s life and health. In recent years, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines for ovarian cancer has become an important basis for diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. In this paper, we interpret the latest version (version 4. 2017) of NCCN clinical practice guidelines for ovarian cancer for its better clinical application.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the prognostic efficacy and safety of patients with ovarian cancer treated with systemic lymphadenectomy (SL). MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on the prognostic outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer treated with SL from inception to December 16th, 2020. Six reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 5 RCTs and 23 cohort studies involving 6 166 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the 3-year survival rate, 5-year survival rate, 3-year progression-free survival rate, and 5-year progression-free survival rate between SL group and the no systemic lymphadenectomy (NSL) group. The results of the subgroup analysis showed that pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection combined with large omentum resection had a better prognosis for patients. ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that SL has no significant efficacy on survival and progression-free survival in patients with ovarian cancer. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
The mortality rate of ovarian cancer is the highest among female reproductive tract malignancies. Although most patients have undergone recurrent treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, the recurrence rate is still high. The exploration of scholars in this field has never stopped. In recent years, remarkable achievements have been made in the medical treatment of ovarian cancer. The research of poly adenosinediphosphate-ribose polymerase, immunotherapy (immunocheckpoint inhibitor monotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with other drugs) and anti-angiogenic drugs have provided new methods for the treatment of this disease, and throughout the whole process of ovarian cancer treatment. This paper summarizes this, and aims to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of ovarian cancer.
ObjectiveTo systematiclly review the correlation between physical activity and the risk of ovarian cancer. MethodsSuch databases as CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2013), PubMed, EMbase were searched from database establishment to October 2013 to collect prospective cohort studies about physical activities and the risk of ovarian cancer. Relevant magazines and references of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 8 cohort studies involving 580 581 subjects, of which there were 2 444 cases of patients with ovarian cancer. The results of meta-analysis showed that, women who participated in moderate level physical activities tended to have a lower incidence of ovarian cancer, compared with those who participated in low level physical activities (age-adjusted:RR=0.87, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.01, P=0.06; multivariate-adjusted:RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.14, P=0.71) but with no significant difference; while women who participated in high level physical activities tended to have a higher incidence of ovarian cancer with a significant difference found in the multivariate-adjusted results (age-adjusted:RR=1.19, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.56, P=0.21; multivariate-adjusted:RR=1.35, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.67, P=0.008). Along with the increase of sedentariness, the incidence of ovarian cancer rose, but with no significant difference. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with low level physical activities, high level ones increase the risk of ovarian caner; while the effects of moderate level ones and sedentariness on the risk of ovarian caner still remain uncertain. However, more high-quality studies are required to verify the conclusion of this study because of the limited quantity of the included studies as well as many confounding factors.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (IHPC) for ovarian cancer, so as to provide references for clinical practice and studies. MethodsWe electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2013), Web of Science, WanFang Data, CBM, VIP and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about IHPC vs. intravenous chemotherapy (IC) for ovarian cancer from the inception of the databases to June 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 723 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the IHPC group was superior to the IC group in clinical efficiency (OR=4.02, 95%CI 2.85 to 5.68, P < 0.000 01), clinical benefit response (OR=3.41, 95%CI 2.13 to 5.45, P < 0.000 01), recurrence and metastasis rates (OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.42, P < 0.000 1), and overall survival rates (OR=3.30, 95%CI 1.82 to 5.99, P < 0.000 1). In the aspect of safety, no significant difference was found in bone marrow suppression, hemoglobin reduction, nausea and vomiting between two groups. ConclusionIHPC for ovarian cancer can improve clinical efficiency, clinical benefit response and overall survival rates, and reduce recurrence and metastasis rates; and it is also safe for patients.
ObjectiveTo analyze the reasons for misdiagnosis of gastrointestinal metastatic ovarian cancer, in order to increase the rate of correct diagnosis and treatment, and to investigate the prognostic factors. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, pathological features and prognostic factors of 43 cases of metastatic ovarian carcinoma from gastrointestinal tract treated between 2004 and 2014. ResultsGastrointestinal metastatic ovarian cancer was characterized by the diversity of clinical manifestations and lack of specific symptoms. The common initial symptom was pelvic mass, frequently accompanied with gastrointestinal symptoms of ascites, anemia or weight loss, abdominal pain, bloating, gastrointestinal obstruction and bleeding. Signs and symptoms of primary and secondary tumor sites often coexisted with each other, leading to misdiagnosis. Univariate analysis showed that primary site, histological type, surgical treatment, the residual tumor debulking size, lymph node metastasis, tumor invasion and standard chemotherapy had significant impacts on the prognosis (P < 0.05). ConclusionsGastrointestinal metastatic ovarian cancer occurs in premenopausal women, often with ascites, abdominal pelvic masses as the first symptom. Primary tumor site is often ignored, and the initial correct diagnosis rate is low. Metastasis from stomach cancer is the most common, followed by colorectal cancer and esophageal cancer. Prognosis is correlated with the primary site, histological type, degree of differentiation, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and other factors. Radical surgery and chemotherapy can improve survival.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and the adverse reactions of intensive therapy compared with conventional therapy. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (January 1980 to June 2008), EMbase (1984 to June 2008), CBM-disc (January 1980 to June 2008) and CNKI (1994 to June 2008) to get all the randomized control trials (RCTs) about paclitaxel intensive versus conventional therapy for ovarian cancer. We used RevMan 5 to perform meta-analysis. Results Six RCTs involving 572 patients were included. Metaanalysis showed the efficacy of intensive therapy and conventional therapy was similar. There were no significant differences in response rate (RR 1.06, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.20), median survival time, survival rate, median progression free survival and median time to progression between the two groups. When taking safety into consideration, intensive therapy significantly reduced the occurrence of grade Ⅲ or higher neutropenia (RR 0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.69, Plt;0.000 1) and Grade Ⅲ or higher neuropathy (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.78, P=0.006). But there were no significant differences between intensive therapy and conventional therapy in flush, grade Ⅲ or higher vomiting, anemia, leucopenia, grade Ⅲ or higher thrombocytopenia and alopecia. Conclusion Paclitaxel intensive therapy has similar efficacy and adverse reactions compared with conventional therapy in ovarian cancer. Above all, intensive therapy can reduce the incidence of grade Ⅲ or higher neutropenia and neuropathy. It is a good substitution for the conventional therapy.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) combined with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.MethodsCNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and PubMed databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on the CHM combined with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer from inception to March 31st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsThirteen studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that, CHM combined with chemotherapy group was superior to the chemotherapy alone group in effective rate of TCM syndrome (RR=1.72, 95%CI 1.46 to 2.03, P<0.00.000 1), effective rate of tumor change (RR=1.40, 95%CI 1.21 to 1.63,P<0.000 01), physical condition score (MD=9.19, 95%CI 5.89 to 12.48,P<0.000 01), tumor markers (MD=–18.00, 95%CI –20.62 to –1.538,P<0.000 01), leukocyte reduction (RR=0.67, 95%CI 0.58 to 0.77,P<0.000 01), granulocy tedepletion (RR=0.67, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.81,P<0.000 1), thrombocytopenia (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.69,P<0.000 01), and digestive tract reaction (RR=0.66, 95%CI 0.50 to 0.87,P=0.004).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that CHM combined with chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, the above conclusions are required to be verified by more high-quality studies.