The most important difference between systematic review and traditional narrative review lies in their respective quality, namely the degree of bias control. Generally speaking, the sources of bias include the process of literature searching, study selection, data extraction and original studies. A systematic review may greatly reduce bias, as it takes effective steps such as developing search strategies, undertaking funnel plot analysis, using established criteria for study selection, and assessment of the methodology quality of studies. All these help to control, identify and, describe the possible bias.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of Zhibitai vs. atorvastatin in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about Zhibitai vs. atorvastatin for hyperlipidemia were electronically retrieved in databases of PubMed, CENTRAL (Issue 7, 2010), CBM,CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to July, 2012. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 519 cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed, Zhibitai was superior to atorvastatin in reducing TG levels after 8-week treatment (MD= −0.12, 95%CI −0.23 to −0.01, P=0.03) and increasing HDL-C levels after 8-week treatment (MD= −0.16, 95%CI −0.22 to −0.11, P=0.000 01). But there was no significant difference in decreasing TC levels and LDL-C levels after 4-week treatment and 8-week treatment as well as decreasing TG levels after 4-week treatment between the two groups. No obvious adverse reaction occurred in the two groups, but atorvastatin may impair liver function. Conclusion Current evidence with weak strength shows that, Zhibitai is superior to atorvastatin in reducing TG levels, and increasing HDL-C levels after 8 weeks. However, they are alike in other blood-fat index and safety. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Methods We searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, CNKI, CBMdisc, conference articles, and Ongoing Controlled Trial for Random Controlled Trials and quasi-Random Controlled Trials up to October 2009. For homogeneous studies, we performed meta-analysis. Results Fifteen studies involving 1 331 participants with advanced cervical cancer were included. Twelve studies showed that the efficacy of the NIC group was 6.72 times than that of the traditional group. Several studies showed that the survival rate of the NIC group was better than that of the traditional group. Meanwhile, the adverse events of the NIC group were fewer than those of the traditional group. Conclusions The results of this system review show that, NIC which is more effective than conventional treatments with less adverse reactions provides a new adjunct for clinical treatment of advanced cervical cancer . However, due to the current clinical treatment for the disease is the coexistence of multiple chemotherapy program status, the higher quality and more focused clinical research which will compare NIC with a variety of conventional chemotherapy are needed in the further.
Objective To investigate the effects of two formulations of artesunate, and to provide evidence for the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (2006, Issue 4), MEDLINE ( 1966 to 2007), EMbase (1988 to 2007), CBM (1978 to 2007), VIP (1989 to 2007) and CNKI (1994 to 2007). Randomised trials comparing the two formulations of artesunate with other drugs were eligible for inclusion. We applied the methods of The Cochrane Collaboration to assess the effects of artesunate, compared to placebo and active controls. Results Eleven trials were included, of which 6 compared intravenous artesunate with intravenous quinine. The quality of each study was high, 6 out of the 11 studies were graded A according to the criteria of The Cochrane Collaboration. The other 5 were graded B. The meta-analysis suggested that the mortality rate was lower in the intravenous artesunate group than in the intravenous quinine group [RR 0.65, 95%CI (0.52, 0.80), Plt;0.0001]. Three trials compared intravenous artesunate with artemisinin suppositories. These trials generated similar estimates and confidence intervals for mortality rates, showing no significant difference between the two treatments [0.94 (0.35 to 2.56), 0.58 (0.19 to 1.74) and 2.00 (0.39 to 10.26)]. Two trials compared intravenous artesunate and intramuscular artesunate, and no significant difference in mortality rate was identified between the two treatment groups [RR 1.50, 95%CI 0.52 to 4.31]. Mortality rates were not statistically significantly different for intravenous artesunate compared to alternative drugs. No significant adverse drug reactions were observed. Conclusions Artesunate is effective and safe in the treatment of severe malaria.
Objective To evaluate the effect and safety of Yinzhihuang injection for icteric viral hepatitis. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to 2005), The Cochrane Library (Issue1, 2005), CBMdisk (1978 to 2004), CMCC (1994 to 2005), CMAC (1994 to 2005), CNKI (1994 to 2005), VIP (1989 to 2004). Data were extracted by two reviewers using a designed extraction form. The quality of included trials was critically assessed. RevMan 4.2.7 was used for data analysis. Results Four randomized controlled trials were included. It showed that Yinzhihuang injection could abate jaundice better than or the same as controlled western medicine in patients with hepatitis (WMD 19.70, 95%CI 32.69 to 6.71 and WMD 1.27, 95%CI 3.08 to 0.54, respectively), but less than S-adeanosyl methionine in patients with chronic hepatitis (WMD 106.00, 95%CI 189.05 to 22.95). There may be a dose-effect relationship in Yinzhihuang injection, higher doses had better effect (WMD 11.50, 95%CI 16.53 to 6.47). No fatal side effects were reported.Conclusions It is noted that Yinzhihuang injection can abate jaundice of icteric viral hepatitis. Due to low statistical power and high risk of selection bias, performance bias and measurement bias of the included trials, these conclusions need to be treated cautiously.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the health-related quality of life (QOL) based on EQ-5D instrument for disease population in China. MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2015), EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to August 2015, to identify studies involving healthrelated QOL about different diseases in China. A descriptive analysis was used to analyze health utility by disease and the proportion of patients who having problem in five dimensions, as well as comparing health-related QOL in different diseases. ResultsA total of 26 studies were included, involving 15 kinds of diseases. The health utility in different studies about the same disease was different. Diabetes ranged from 0.79 to 0.94, liver disease infected by HBV was from 0 to 0.80, hypertension was from 0.78 to 0.93, coronary heart disease was from 0.75 to 0.90, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was from 0.64 to 0.73. After ranking the health utility of fifteen kinds of diseases, the utility of kashin-beck disease and rheumatoid arthritis were 0.45 and 0.56, respectively, and the utility of children cerebral palsy was 0.44, which was the lowest. "Pain/discomfort" was the dimension with highest proportion of patients who having problem for most diseases while atrial fibrillation and children cerebral palsy were the "Self-care" and "Usual Activities". ConclusionEQ-5D is widely used in health-related QOL studies among different diseases in China. Many factors including sample source, severity of disease, complication and value set have influence on the measurement results of health utility.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different injection sites for collagenase chemonucleolysis for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion (LIDP). Methods We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in the following electronic databases: Pubmed (1966 to May 2006), EMBASE(1966 to May 2006), The Cochrane library (Issue 2, 2006), CRD(Center for Reviews and Dissemination),York University, CBM (1978 to May 2006 ), CNKI(1994-2006)and VIP(1989-2006). Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Disagreement was resolved through discussion. Results Eight studies involving a total of 1035 participants met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was not carried out because of apparent heterogeneity. Four studies made comparisons among intradisc, extradisc, and combined intra- and extra-disc injection. One study (62 participants) showed that intradisc injection was superior to extradisc injection (RR 3.71, 95% CI 1.19 to 11.58, Plt;0.05). Another study (240 participants) showed that intradisc injection was superior to combined intra- and extra-disc injection after 3 months and 6 months of follow-up (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.98, Plt;0.05). The other two studies showed no significant difference among intradisc, extradisc, and combined intra- and extra-disc injection. Four studies (436 participants in total) showed that amongst three extradisc injections, both anterior epidural space injection and lateral epidural space injection were superior to posterior epidural space injection (Plt;0.05). Although one study indicated that anterior epidural space injection was superior to lateral epidural space injection (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.51, Plt;0.05), no statistical significance was found between anterior epidural space injection and lateral epidural space injection in two other studies (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to identify which injection site for collagenase is the most effective for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. The included studies showed that both anterior and lateral epidural space injection were superior to posterior epidural space injection. However, these studies are too small and poor quality, and have different diagnostic criteria, follow-up time points, outcome measures and efficacy parameters. Thus, more high quality and large-scale RCTs are needed.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of glucose-insul in-potassium (GIK) in patients with acute myocardialinfarction (AMI). Methods Both foreign language databases including The Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2007), PubMed, EMBASE and Chinese databases involving CBM, VIP and CJFD were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the effect of GIK on the heart function (left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF, ST changes, left ventricular remodel ing) of patients with AMI. Two reviewers assessed the qual ity of each trial and extracted data independently. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Five RCTs were included, all of which came from abroad. The methodological qual ity of the included studies was good. The basel ine data of each trial were comparable. Meta-analyses showed that no significant difference was observed in the improvement of LVEF between the GIK group and the control group (WMD=1.87, 95%CI -0.32 to 4.06, P =0.09), whereas GIK was more beneficial in decreasing ST (OR=1.92, 95%CI 1.25 to 2.96,P =0.003) and preventing left ventricular remodel ing (OR=0.08, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.68, P=0.02). Conclusion Based on the above evidence, although GIK may, to some extent, be beneficial for both ST decreasing and long-term prognoses in patients with AMI, it can not yet be concluded that GIK can improve the heart function of those patients. Therefore, it is imperative to design and implement further stricter, large-scale RCTs, so as to accurately identify the therapeutic effect of GIK solution in patients with myocardial infarction.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscope lithtripsy (fURL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in treating renal calculus. Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and WanFang Data from January, 1990 to August, 2012 were searched to comprehensively collect the clinical trials that compared fURL and PCNL in treating renal calculus. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results Eight non-randomized controlled trials involving 536 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, PCNL was better than fURL in stone clearance (OR=0.26, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.46), but fURL was better than PCNL in postoperative pyrexia (OR=0.1, 95%CI 0.42 to 3.35), the incidence of blood transfusion (OR=0.17, 95%CI 0.03 to 1.00), and the duration of hospitalization (P=0.45, I2=0%). Conclusion Current evidence has proved that PCNL is better than fURL in decreasing stone clearance, fURL is better than PCNL in complication, the duration of hospitalization, and medical costs.
Objective To systematically review the methodological quality of guidelines concerning infertility, so as to provide references for clinical practice. Methods Guidelines concerning infertility were electronically retrieved (from inception to Feb. 2013) in PubMed, EMbase, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI, GIN guideline database guideline development websites (including NGC, NICE, SIGN, NZGG, SOGC, etc.), and medical associtation websites (including IFFS, FIGO, ESHRE, NFOG, RCOG, ASRM, ACOG, etc.). We also searched Chinese guideline websites including the website of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of People’s Republic of China, CGC (China Guideline Clearinghouse), and CPGN (Clinical Practice Guideline Net). Two reviews independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and assessed the quality of guideline development and reporting using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). Results a) A total of 16 guidelines concerning infertility were included, with development time ranging from 1998 to 2012. Among 16 guidelines, 10 guidelines were made by the USA, 3 by Britan, 1 by the Europe, and 1 by America and Europe. b) The scores of guidelines according to the domains of AGREE II decreased from “Clarity of presentations, scope and purpose”, “Participants”, “Applicability”, “Rigour of development”, and “Editorial independence”. 16 guidelines were generally low in quality. The levels of recommendations were Level A (5 guidelines), Level B (8 guidelines), and Level C (3 guidelines). c) Four evidence-based guidelines scored the top three in the domain of “Rigour of development”. d) The recommendations of different guidelines were fairly the same. e) No guidelines on infertility have been developed in China. Conclusion a) The guidelines on infertility should be improved in “Rigour of development” and “Applicability” in future. Conficts of interest should be addressed. b) Guidelines are recommended to be developed on the basis of the methods of evidence-based medicine, and best evidence is recommended. c) National organizations such as ASRM should be established in China, so as to develop biomedicine and TCM guidelines based on evidence and regulate the treatment. d) For the general assessment of guidelines, AGREE II should offer threshold criteria of suggestion.