Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating dysfunction in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2010), MEDLINE, EMbase, CBMdisc, and CNKI from the date of the database establishment to April 2010. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS for patients with PD were collected. The quality of the included RCTs was critically appraised and data were extracted by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted for the eligible RCTs. Results Eight RCTs were included. The pooled results of the first 2 RCTs showed that, there was no significant difference compared with control group about treating PD patients with clinical motor dysfunction by high-frequency rTMS 10 days later (WMD= –4.75, 95%CI –13.73 to 4.23). The pooled analysis of another 3 studies showed that, no significant difference were found about improving symptoms with treatment of low-frequency rTMS for 1 month compared with control group (WDM= –8.51, 95%CI –18.48 to 1.46). The pooled analysis of last 3 studies showed that, patient with treatment of low-frequency rTMS for 3 months, had been significantly improved in clinical symptoms such as neurological, behavior and emotional state, clinical motor function, and activities of daily living (WDM= –5.79, 95%CI –8.44 to –1.13). The frontal or motor cortex rTMS manifested as low frequency (≤1Hz), high intensity (≥90% RMT), multi-frequency (≥3 times) and long time (≥3 months) had a positive effect on the clinical symptoms of patients with PD and also had a long-term effect. Conclusions rTMS can improve clinical symptoms and dysfunction of the patients with PD.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared with sham therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Methods The Cochrane Library, Medline, EMbase, CBMdisk, CNKI and VIP were searched through computer from 1985 to 2011. The review included RCTs comparing the treatment efficacy of low-frequency rTMS located on right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with sham stimulation in the patients suffering major depressive disorder. The quality of the included RCTs was strictly evaluated and the data were extracted by two reviewers independently. The extracted data were analyzed by RevMan 4.2. Results Among seven double-blinded RCTs involving 234 patients included, 1 was A level in quality, 5 were B level, and 1 was C level according to the outcomes of quality evaluation. The results of Meta-analysis indicated that low frequency rTMS was superior to sham stimulation in remission rates after two weeks’ treatment (RR=3.11, 95%CI 1.56 to 6.19). Additionally, low frequency rTMS was lower than the sham stimulation in the scores of HDRS and MADRS (WMD= –6.41, 95%CI –9.32 to –3.50, and WMD= –5.27, 95%CI –9.08 to –1.46, respectively). But no significant difference in response rates between the low prequency rTMS group and the sham group was found (RR=1.72, 95%CI 0.74 to 4.01). There were no severe and intolerable side effects reported in these seven studies. Conclusion The low frequency rTMS as a non-invasive and safe technique may appear to be effective for the treatment of major depressive disorder according to the positive results but the conclusion is not definite because of negative results. This review suggests that parameters could be sited as frequency: 1 Hz, intensity: 90%-110% motor threshold (MT), location: right DLPFC and duration: 2 weeks. Nevertheless, further multicenter and high quality studies are needed before it is used as a first-line treatment for major depressive disorder.
This paper is aimed to introduce the definition and application of Population Impact Measures (PIMs). The PIMs use Number Need to Treat (NNT) for reference and generalize the variables of clinical research to interest population, which then can be used to measure the effectiveness of interventions and the harmfulness of risk factors, so as to provide evidence for making public health policy. Of the PIMs, the variables used for measuring the effectiveness of interventions include Disease Impact Number (DIN), Population Impact Number (PIN) and Number of Events Prevented in your Population (NEPP); The variables used for measuring the harmfulness of risk factors include Exposure Impact Number (EIN), Exposed Cases Impact Number (ECIN), Population Impact Number (PIN), Case Impact Number (CIN) and Population Impact Number of Eliminating a Risk factor (PIN-ER-t).
Spasm is a common complication of stroke with high morbidity and a high disability rate. Spasticity continues to impair the patient’s motor function, and symptoms such as muscle shortening and joint deformity may occur, which seriously affects the patient’s physical and mental health. Systemic therapy is a key part to control spasticity clinically. However, systematic treatment is conducted on the basis of proper assessment. The tools for assessing spasticity are divided into two categories: subjective and objective, and the subjective assessment tools mainly include some scales, which are subjectively assessed and judged by the therapist. Objective methods mainly include electrophysiology testers, ultrasonic measurement techniques, robots, three-dimensional motion analysis systems, isokinetic muscle strength testers, etc. This paper analyzes and summarizes the methods of post-hemiplegic spasticity assessment through a literature review, reviews the advantages, disadvantages and practicability of various assessment methods, and puts forward prospects for future research directions.
ObjectiveTo explore the effects of rehabilitation therapy on postoperative pulmonary function and exercise capacity of patients with lung cancer during the hospitalization in the setting of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.MethodsA total of 110 lung cancer patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from September 2017 to December 2018 were randomly divided into the rehabilitation treatment group (the trial group, n=54) and the non-rehabilitation treatment group (the control group, n=56). The trial group got out of bed within 24 hours after surgery and performed respiratory rehabilitation training. The control group did not receive rehabilitation after surgery. Pulmonary function and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) were evaluated preoperatively and prior to discharge in both groups to compare the differences in pulmonary function and exercise capacity between the two groups.ResultsThe preoperative forced vital capacity (FVC) in the trial group and the control group were (2.45±0.57) and (2.47±0.61) L, respectively; the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) were (2.29±0.55) and (2.22±0.55) L, respectively; 6MWD were (592±51) and (576±57) m, respectively; the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Prior to discharge, the FVC in the trial group and the control group were (1.43±0.36) and (1.19±0.33) L, respectively; FEV1 were (1.28±0.32) and (1.06±0.61) L, respectively; 6MWD were (264±43) and (218±37) m, respectively. The results of pre-discharge evaluation were significantly lower than those of preoperative evaluation (P<0.01). The pre-discharge FVC, FEV1, and 6MWD in the trial group were significantly superior to those in the control group (P<0.01).ConclusionIn the setting of ERAS protocols, postoperative rehabilitation therapy during hospitalizations can improve pulmonary function and promote the recovery of exercise capacity in lung cancer patients more effectively.
Evidence is the core of Evidence-Based Medcine; the Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE System) is a milestone in the history of evidence development. This paper outlines the GRADE System and GRADEpro 3.2 software, and briefly explores the right and wrong application which was published in the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. The GRADEpro 3.2 software is easy to operate, but for evaluating the reasons of upgrade and downgrade, and the importance of the parameters of outcomes, it needs to comprehensively and systematically understand the knowledge of relevant background, and to construct a solid foundation in clinical epidemiology and systematic review. In view of this paper based on the current GRADE System, there may be some discrepancy to the later content with the GRADE System constant improvement. Therefore, it is bly recommended that readers should keep constant learning and improving.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of kinesio taping on post stroke shoulder pain.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PEDro, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of kinesio taping on shoulder pain after stroke from inception to November, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 RCTs involving 525 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, kinesio taping group for 4 weeks treatment significantly reduced shoulder pain (SMD=−0.81, 95%CI −0.58 to −0.04, P=0.04), increased range of motion of shoulder flexion (SMD=0.59, 95%CI 0.17 to 1.01, P=0.006) and abduction (SMD=0.67, 95%CI 0.24 to 1.09, P=0.002). It also improved Fugl-Meyer upper limb function (SMD=1.00, 95%CI 0.25 to 1.76, P=0.009).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the kinesio taping for 4 weeks duration can effectively reduce shoulder pain after stroke. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the risk factors for postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. MethodsWe searched the CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang data, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, The Cochrane Library database from inception to September 2022. Case-control studies, and cohort studies on risk factors for postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection were collected to identify studies about the risk factors for postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. Quality of the included studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 15.0 software. ResultsA total of 21 studies were included involving 3385 patients. The NOS score was 7-8 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that age (MD=2.58, 95%CI 1.44 to 3.72, P＜0.000 01), male (OR=1.33, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.59, P=0.001), drinking history (OR=1.45, 95%CI 1.04 to 2.04, P=0.03), diabetes history (OR=1.44, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.85, P=0.005), preoperative leukocytes (MD=1.17, 95%CI 0.57 to 1.77), P=0.000 1), operation time (MD=21.82, 95%CI 5.84 to 37.80, P=0.007), deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) time (MD=3.02, 95%CI 1.04 to 5.01, P=0.003), aortic occlusion time (MD=8.94, 95%CI 2.91 to 14.97, P=0.004), cardiopulmonary bypass time (MD=13.92, 95%CI 5.92 to 21.91, P=0.0006), ICU stay (MD=2.77, 95%CI 1.55 to 3.99, P＜0.000 01), hospital stay (MD=3.46, 95%CI 2.03 to 4.89, P＜0.0001), APACHEⅡ score (MD=2.76, 95%CI 1.59 to 3.93, P＜0.000 01), ventilation support time (MD=6.10, 95%CI 3.48 to 8.72, P＜0.000 01), hypoxemia (OR=2.32, 95%CI 1.40 to 3.82, P=0.001), the minimum postoperative oxygenation index (MD=−79.52, 95%CI −125.80 to −33.24, P=0.000 8), blood oxygen saturation (MD=−3.50, 95%CI −4.49 to −2.51, P＜0.000 01), postoperative hemoglobin (MD=−6.35, 95%CI −9.21 to −3.50, P＜0.000 1), postoperative blood lactate (MD=0.45, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.75, P=0.004), postoperative electrolyte abnormalities (OR=5.94, 95%CI 3.50 to 10.09, P＜0.000 01), acute kidney injury (OR=1.92, 95%CI 1.34 to 2.75, P=0.000 4) and postoperative body temperature (MD=0.79, 95%CI 0.69 to 0.88, P＜0.000 01) were associated with postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. ConclusionThe current evidence shows that age, male, drinking history, diabetes history, operation time, DHCA time, aortic occlusion time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, ICU stay, hospital stay, APACHEⅡ score, ventilation support time, hypoxemia and postoperative body temperature are risk factors for the postoperative delirium after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. Oxygenation index, oxygen saturation, and hemoglobin number are protective factors for delirium after Stanford type A aortic dissection.
Objective To systematically review respiratory muscle training (RMT) on respiratory functions of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about RMT on pulmonary functions in patients with SCI from inception to April, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 11 RCTs involving 263 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with conventional rehabilitation group, RMT effectively improved vital capacity (MD=0.41, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.69, P=0.005), inspiratory capacity (MD=0.35, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.65, P=0.02), maximal inspiratory pressure (MD=7.75, 95%CI 0.11 to 15.39, P=0.05) and maximal voluntary ventilation (MD=17.52, 95%CI 8.11 to 26.93, P=0.000 3). There were significant differences between two groups. Conclusion Current evidence shows that RMT can effectively improve the respiratory function of patients with SCI. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on rehabilitation of unilateral neglect in stroke patients.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, PEDro, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched online for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS on rehabilitation of unilateral neglect in stroke patients from inception to March 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs involving 303 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the stimulate group was superior to the control group in line bisection test (MD=–5.54, 95%CI –6.79 to –4.29, P<0.000 01), line cancellation test (MD=–3.75, 95%CI –4.60 to –2.90,P<0.000 1) and star cancellation test (MD=–22.94, 95%CI –26.52 to –19.35,P<0.000 01). However, there was no significant difference in the score of the modified Barthel index between two groups (MD=3.91, 95%CI–9.52 to 17.34,P=0.57).ConclusionsrTMS appears to improve the symptoms of unilateral neglect in stroke patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.