ObjectiveTo summarize and analyze the long-term clinical effect of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 102 patients who underwent DPPHR (n=35) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=67) from January 2014 to December 2019 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsThe operations of patients in the DPPHR group and the PD group were successfully complete, no one died during operation or perioperative period. The weight gain in one year after operation and incidences of exocrine dysfunction in the DPPHR group were all better than those of the PD group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference on the other complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain score, diarrhea score, and the overall health status score in one year after operation significantly improved in the DPPHR group than those in the PD group (P<0.05).ConclusionDPPHR is more beneficial to improve the quality of life after operation, and is a better surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant diseases of pancreatic head.
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) is a surgical approach indicated for benign or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head, pancreatic duct stones in the pancreatic head, chronic pancreatitis, and related pathologies. Compared to traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), its core principle lies in preserving the integrity of the stomach, duodenum, and biliary tract, thereby reducing postoperative digestive dysfunction and metabolic complications to improve patients’ quality of life. With the continuous advancement of laparoscopic techniques, laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR) has emerged as a significant refinement of conventional PD, achieving an optimal integration of minimally invasive laparoscopy and organ function preservation. This article synthesizes recent Chinese and English literature to provide a systematic review of surgical indications, technical nuances, complication management, and clinical outcomes of LDPPHR.
ObjectiveTo investigate the etiology of pediatric pancreatitis and the effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in it. MethodsPatients hospitalized for pancreatitis in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from Jan. 2008 to Jun. 2023 were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Totally, 241 cases (207 cases with acute pancreatitis and 34 with chronic pancreatitis) were included. Patients were divided into primary group (n=168) and recurrent group (n=73) according to their previous medical history. ResultsThe duration of hospitalization in the primary group was longer than that in the recurrent group [10.0 (7.0, 16.0) d vs. 7.5 (6.0, 11.8) d, P=0.012]. The proportion of acute pancreatitis in primary group (163/168, 97.0%) was higher than that in the recurrent group (44/73, 60.3%), P<0.001. There was no significant difference in the etiological component ratio between the primary and recurrent groups (χ2=7.504, P=0.347). However, in the primary group, the first etiology was biliary factors (38/163, 23.3%), and the second was biliary pancreatic anatomic abnormality (22/163, 13.5%). In the recurrence group, biliary pancreatic anatomic abnormality (13/44, 29.5%) was the first cause, and biliary factor (7/44, 15.9%) was the second cause. Among 207 cases with acute pancreatitis, there were 114 cases (55.1%) with clear etiology, including 45 cases (21.7%) of biliary factors, 35 cases (16.9%) of abnormal biliary pancreatic structure, 12 cases (5.8%) of traumatic factors, and 10 cases (4.8%) of drug-induced factors. In this study, 66 cases were treated with ERCP for pancreatitis, and a total of 103 ERCP operations were performed with cannulation success rate of 100%. Twenty-three cases (23/37, 62.2%) of acute pancreatitis resulted from biliary and biliary pancreatic structure abnormalities received ERCP. In biliary acute pancreatitis, the removal rate of choledocholithiasis in single ERCP operation was 80.0% (8/10). The clinical symptoms (abdominal pain, jaundice, and fever) of all cases were significantly improved after surgery, and no complications such as cholangitis, bleeding and perforation occurred. ConclusionsBiliary, congenital pancreatic anatomical abnormalities, drugs and trauma are the common causes of acute pancreatitis in children. ERCP is a safe and effective treatment for children with biliary pancreatitis, pancreatic anatomical abnormalities, and chronic pancreatitis.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in patients with pancreatitis-induced sinistral portal hypertension (SPH) and to explore its strategies of treatment.MethodsThe clinical data of patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2015 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The intraoperative massive hemorrhage was defined as the blood loss exceeding 30% blood volume. The factors closely associated with the intraoperative massive hemorrhage were analyzed by the forward logistic regression model.ResultsA total of 128 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH were enrolled in this study, including 104 males and 24 females, with an average age of 47 years old and a median intraoperative bleeding volume of 482 mL. Among them, 93 patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH caused by the pancreatic pseudocyst after acute pancreatitis and 35 caused by the chronic pancreatitis. There were 36 patients with history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 46 patients with hypersplenism. Thirty-six patients suffered from the massive hemorrhage. Among them, 30 patients underwent the distal pancreatectomy concomitant with splenectomy, 1 patient underwent the duodenum- preserving resection of pancreatic head, and 5 patients underwent the pseudocyst drainage. The univariate analysis showed that the occurrence of intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH was not associated with the gender, age, body mass index, albumin level, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hypersplenism, type of pancreatitis, course of pancreatitis, number of attacks of pancreatitis, size of spleen, maximum diameter of lesions in the splenic vein obstruction site, or number of operation (P>0.05), which was associated with the diameter of varicose vein more than 5.0 mm (χ2=19.83, P<0.01), the intraperitoneal varices regions (χ2=13.67, P<0.01), the location of splenic vein obstruction (χ2=5.17, P=0.03), the operation time (t=–3.10, P<0.01), or the splenectomy (χ2=17.46, P<0.01). Further the logistic regression analysis showed that the varicose vein diameter more than 5.0 mm (OR=6.356, P=0.002) and splenectomy (OR=4.297, P=0.005) were the independent risk factors for the intraoperative massive hemorrhage in the patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH.ConclusionsSplenectomy and having a collateral vein more than 5.0 mm in diameter are independent risk factors for intraoperative massive blood loss in surgeries taken on patients with pancreatitis-induced SPH. Attention should be paid to dilation of gastric varices and choice of splenectomy.
Objective To investigate clinicopathologic features, pathogenesis, and diagnosis and treatment of hereditary pancreatitis (HP). Method The relevant literatures on HP research in recent years were searched and reviewed. Results The HP was similar to the pancreatitis caused by the cholelithiasis, excessive alcohol consumption, hyperlipidemia, etc. in the histomorphology, function, and clinical manifestations and it was difficult to be distinguished. However, HP was different from the other types of chronic pancreatitis due to its early onset, familial, and high risk of pancreatic cancer. The HP was mainly caused by the PRSS1 mutations, and its mutation types mainly included the R122H, N29I, A16V, K23R, etc., among which the R122H and N29I were the two most common types of mutations. There was no specific treatment for the HP. The principles of treatment of HP were similar to the pancreatitist caused by other etiologies, including the nutritional support, blood sugar control, analgesia, etc.. In addition to the medical treatment, the surgical intervention was also the important means for the treatment of HP, including the pancreatic partial resection, total pancreatectomy or total pancreatectomy combined with islet cell autografting. Conclusions HP is an autosomal dominant hereditary disease characterized by recurrent attacks of pancreatitis. Relevant gene tests could be performed for patient with highly suspected HP. It faces great challenges in treatment of HP. Pathogenesis of HP needs to be constantly explored and experimental study of multicenter and large sample needs to be further studied in order to determine its best treatment strategy.
Objective To investigate the etiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of acute obstructive suppurative pancreatic ductitis (AOSPD). Method The literature reports on AOSPD at home and abroad were reviewed and analyzed comprehensively based on clinical experience. Results AOSPD was a rare clinically infectious disease of purulent pancreatic duct. Chronic pancreatitis and ampullary operations were the main pathogenesis factors. The clinical symptoms were non-specific, and the imaging manifestations were pancreatic duct dilatation and pancreatic duct calculi. The clinical diagnosis was mainly determined by epigastrium CT or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which was easy to be misdiagnosed and missed. Conclusion The clinical diagnosis of AOSPD is difficult, early pancreatic duct drainage is the key to the treatment, and attention should be paid to its diagnosis and treatment.
ObjectiveTo summarize of clinical application and progress of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR).MethodThe relevant literatures published recently at domestic and abroad about the clinical application and progress of DPPHR were collected and reviewed.ResultsFor the benign lesions, low-grade malignancies and borderline tumors of the head of pancreas, the DPPHR could achieve the same expected therapeutic effect as the classical pancreatoduodenectomy. The DPPHR could reserve the continuity of stomach and duodenum while resecting lesions and improve the symptoms of patients, reduce the reconstruction of digestive tract and the resection of pancreas and surrounding tissues as much as possible, and retain the pancreas-intestinal axis, which was more in line with the physiology of human beings.ConclusionsAt present, DPPHR is worthy of further development and promotion in department of pancreas surgery, but current studies only focus on occurrence of short-term complications after operation. Because patients with benign diseases of pancreatic head have better prognosis and longer survival time after operation, we should pay attention to the long-term complications such as diarrhea, anemia and reflux cholangitis. More clinical studies need in future to be demonstrated superiority of DPPHR in clinical efficacy and to evaluate occurrence of long-term complications and their impact on quality of life of patients with DPPHR by comprehensive analysis of multiple evaluation indicators.
ObjectiveTo explore the advantages and disadvantages of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) in the clinical application of pancreatic surgical diseases, and to summarize the progress of minimally invasive application of DPPHR combined with the current application of laparoscopy and robot surgery in pancreatic surgery. MethodThe related research literatures about DPPHR at home and abroad in recent years were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe effect of DPPHR compared with traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for treatment of benign pancreatic diseases was still controversial, and the postoperative remission effect, perioperative period, occurrence of long-term complications and improvement of quality of life were not very advantageous compared with PD, and the prognosis of minimally invasive surgery was poor. ConclusionDPPHR remains highly controversial for surgical intervention in benign pancreatic disease and has enormous scope for advances in minimally invasive surgical applications in pancreatic surgery, but more clinical studies are needed to verify its clinical efficacy.
Objective To study effects of Helicobacter pylori on oncogenesis and progression of pancreatic cancer. Method The current literatures on the relationship between the Helicobacter pylori and the pancreatic cancer were collected and reviewed. Results The Helicobacter pylori infection might play a role in the development of the pancreatic cancer. The infection rate of the Helicobacter pylori in the patients with pancreatic cancer is higher than that of the healthy controls; furthermore, in the patients with Helicobacter pylori antibody positive, the infection rate of the Helicobacter pylori in the cytotoxin-associated gene A-negative strains of Helicobacter pylori is significantly higher than that of the healthy controls. Conclusions Helicobacter pylori infection is related to occurrence and development of pancreatic cancer. Specific mechanism is still not clarified and further research is need to study.
Objective To explore changes and challenges on management of chronic pancreatitis. Methods The updated clinical guidelines and the latest research findings were collected and reviewed. Results The proposition of a new mechanistic definition and identification of an early stage give us a novel insight into chronic pancreatitis. The intraductal pancreatic calcifications has been regarded as the most reliable ultrasonography and CT features of chronic pancreatitis. In addition, the endoscopic ultrasonography is also of great value. The present surgical strategies are established on the concepts of step-up approach and damage control. The surgery perform better than the endoscopic treatment in the long-term outcome, but the timing course of surgery need to be further investigated. Conclusions Early diagnosis and treatment plays a critical role in cases of chronic pancreatitis. More patients of chronic pancreatitis should be treated in a multidisciplinary team as future perspectives.