With the broad application of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) and high rates of early lung cancer screening, the number of patients diagnosed with synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) has been increasing. It becomes of great prominence to distinct sMPLC from intrapulmonary metastases in clinical practice. An increasing number of studies have developed high-throughput sequencing based genetic approaches to specify the molecular characteristics of sMPLC, which contributes to a better understanding of its tumorigenesis. The genetic profile of sMPLC also benefits its diagnosis, which mainly relies on its clinicopathological criteria. Here, we summarize the progresses on the diagnostic criteria for sMPLC, and also molecular features of sMPLC from the perspective of clonality analysis.
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a potentially fatal disease. Although pathological examination is the gold standard for the diagnosis of IE, only a small number of patients undergo this examination. The clinical diagnosis of IE still mainly relies on its clinical symptoms. However, the systemic manifestations of IE are diverse and often non-cardiac specific, which poses a great challenge to diagnosis. Based on the clinical presentations, imaging characteristics, and etiological data of IE, experts at home and abroad have developed a variety of diagnostic tools. Over the past thirty years, there have been significant changes in the microbiological and epidemiological characteristics of IE, and at the same time, the advancement of imaging and laboratory diagnostic technologies has also had an important impact on diagnostic methods, leading to the continuous evolution of diagnostic criteria and tools. This article reviews and interprets the main diagnostic criteria for IE, analyzes its development history, current changes, and efficacy, aiming to provide a perspective on the historical evolution of diagnostic tools and to offer prospects for future research directions.
Objective To investigate the knowledge level of Chinese cardiac surgeons regarding the management of infective endocarditis (IE), in order to identify the gap between clinical practices and the latest guidelines, and provide evidence-based support for improving the clinical management of IE. Methods A nationwide survey was conducted through an online questionnaire from December 5, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Descriptive analysis of the survey data was performed. Results A total of 67 valid responses were received from 18 provincial-level administrative divisions across China. While 56.7% (38/67) of respondents demonstrated familiarity with the modified Duke criteria, only 43.3% (29/67) comprehended the 2023 Duke- International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases criteria. Conversely, 43.3% (29/67) exhibited limited understanding of the former, and 56.7% (38/67) showed deficient knowledge of the latter diagnostic standards. Only 46.3% (31/67) reported proficiency in current IE management guidelines/consensus. Regarding surgical timing, 26.9% (18/67) advocated intervention within 7-14 days of antimicrobial therapy, 22.4% (15/67) during 14-28 days, and 10.5% (7/67) beyond 28 days. Notably, a significant proportion of respondents opted for delayed surgical intervention beyond guideline recommendations when managing patients with heart failure, uncontrolled infection, or neurological complications. Conclusion A knowledge gap and practice discrepancies exist among Chinese surgeons regarding the management of IE. There is an urgent need to promote updated concepts regarding surgical indications and timing for IE in order to optimize treatment strategies and improve patient prognosis.