Objective To compare the differences in evaluating readiness for hospital discharge between nurses and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patient-reported Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) and nurse-reported RHDS were delivered to 130 CRC patients and 40 nurses respectively. All patients were followed ERAS pathway during perioperative periods. The differences were compared in evaluating readiness for hospital discharge between nurses and CRC patients. Results This study investigated 130 CRC patients and 40 responsible nurses. The scores of RHDS from nurses and patients were 162.86±27.95 and 149.86±33.65 respectively. When evaluating whether patients were ready to go home after discharge, the consistency between nurses’ results and patients’ results was weak（κ=0.365, P<0.001）. Items in patients’ RHDS scoring ranking from high to low were expected support, coping ability, knowledge, and personal status. Items in nurses’ RHDS scoring ranking from high to low were expected support, knowledge, coping ability, and personal status. Besides the " social support” dimension, the scores of other 3 dimensions from nurses were significantly higher than those from patients (P<0.05). Conclusion There is a gap between the assessment of RHDS from nurses and patients, nurses overestimated patients’ discharge readiness level.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on intestinal flora in patients with colorectal cancer.MethodsBy convenient sampling method, 60 patients with colorectal cancer were selected from August 2018 to December 2019 in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University and randomly divided into ERAS group and traditional treatment group (traditional group). Among them, the perioperative clinical management was carried out according to the ERAS management and traditional treatment process in the the ERAS group and in the traditional group, respectively. The fresh fecal samples were collected within 24 h after admission and the first natural defecation after operation. The bacterial 16 Sr DNA V3–V4 region was sequenced by Illumina MiSeq sequencer, and the results were analyzed by bioinformatics.ResultsA total of 60 patients with colorectal cancer were included, 30 cases in the traditional group and 27 cases in the ERAS group (3 people temporarily withdrew from the study). There were no significant differences in the basic informations between the two groups (P>0.05). ① Before or after operation, there were no significant differences in Shannon index and Simpson index between the two groups. The difference between preoperative and postoperative comparison in the same group was also not statistically significant (P>0.05). ② Beta diversity analysis showed that there was no significant difference in community composition between the traditional group and the ERAS group before operation, and there was a clear boundary between the traditional group and the ERAS group after operation. ③ At the phylum level, compared with the preoperative abundance, the postoperative abundance Firmicutes decreased by 26.5% and 5.5% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively; Bacteroidetes increased by 21.6% and 4.7% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively; Proteobacteria increased by 7.2% and 2.2% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively. At the genus level, compared with the preoperative abundance, the postoperative abundance of Bacteroides in the traditional group increased by 17.6% and in the ERAS group decreased by 1.6%; Bifidobacterium decreased by 1.8% and 1.3% in the traditional group and in the ERAS group, respectively.ConclusionsERAS does not affect species diversity of intestinal flora. Although ERAS has some damage to structure of intestinal flora, it is weaker than traditional process, so it is more conducive to reconstruction and restoration of intestinal microecological environment.
Objective To summarize contents of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and understand it’s status and prospect in application of patients with hepatolithiasis. Methods The descriptions of ERAS in recent years and applications in hepatolithiasis were reviewed. Results The ERAS programme mainly included the preoperative managements, such as the education, nutrition management, and gastrointestinal tract management; the intraoperative managements, such as the minimally invasive surgery, reasonable choice of anesthesia, infusion volume management, and maintenance of body temperature, analgesia, and preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting medication selection; the postoperative early feeding, early exercise, early extubation, multimodal analgesia, T tube management, reasonable discharge standard and follow-up management. Although the ERAS was rarely reported in patients with hepatolithiasis, it had some advantages of promoting recovery and improving patient satisfaction, and it was still effective and safe. Conclusions Application of ERAS concept in patients with hepatolithiasis has achieved precision management and individualized treatment during perioperative period. It could achieve a good short-term therapeutic effect and optimize medical management model. However, there are still some problems at the present stage in implementation and promotion of patients with hepatolithiasis, such as lacks of criteria and specifications, evidence-based medicine. It is needed to further strengthen communication and collaboration among multiple disciplinary teams so as to further improve ERAS programme and popularize it.
Objective To explore effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on maintaining homeostasis of patient body and role of ERAS in alleviating stress response of physiological and psychological of patient and promoting recovery of patient from operative trauma as soon as possible. Method The related literatures published at home and abroad about the ERAS and its influence on the perioperative stress degree of patient were reviewed and analyzed. Results The ERAS was a new perioperative management mode established under the guidance of evidence-based medicine, whose core was to reduce the perioperative physiological and psychological stress level of the patient through a series of optimized measures, and to promote the postoperative rehabilitation. At the same time, the ERAS had been more and more widely accepted by the surgeons and patients because of its unique advantages, especially in shortening the hospital stay and reducing the operating costs. Conclusions Although concept of ERAS is not yet accepted by most clinicians, ERAS does provide a more optimal perioperative management strategy for patient, could obviously reduce perioperative stress level, improve patient outcome, accelerate postoperative recovery of patient, and provide benefit for patient underwent surgery.
With the widespread promotion and application of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept in the surgical fields, the implementation of the ERAS concept in the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was explored in the vascular surgery. The “Six-Step” comprehensive treatment protocol and the establishment of the ERAS system for lower extremity DVT developed by the Department of Vascular Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were elaborated. The protocol includes steps such as filter placement, thrombus clearance, relief of venous outflow obstruction, dissolution of residual thrombus, filter retrieval, and standardized post-discharge anticoagulation management, along with their respective advantages. Additionally, the training and dissemination efforts undertaken to promote the “Six-Step” comprehensive treatment protocol were described. A comparison was made between ERAS and traditional recovery surgery, highlighting the comprehensive clinical benefits of the former. The aim is to promote the standardized implementation of the ERAS system in lower extremity DVT treatment and to bring greater benefits to patients.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors for chronic cough after minimally invasive resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and explore the possible prevention measures.MethodsA total of 128 NSCLC patients who received minimally invasive resection in 2018 in our hospital were enrolled, including 63 males and 65 females with an average age of 60.82±9.89 years. The patients were allocated into two groups: a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) group (56 patients) and a video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) group (72 patients). Chronic cough was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), meanwhile, other perioperative indicators were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative chronic cough and explore the prevention strategies.ResultsOverall, 61 (47.7%) patients were diagnosed with chronic cough after surgery, including 25 (44.6%) patients in the RATS group and 36 (50.0%) patients in the VATS group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group got shorter endotracheal intubation time (P=0.009) and less blood loss (P<0.001). The univariate analysis showed that age (P=0.014), range of surgery (P=0.021), number of dissected lymph nodes (P=0.015), preoperative cough (P=0.006), endotracheal intubation time (P=0.004) were the influencing factors for postoperative chronic cough. The multivariate analysis showed that age <57 years (OR=3.006, 95%CI 1.294-6.986, P=0.011), preoperative cough (OR=3.944, 95%CI 4.548-10.048, P=0.004), endotracheal intubation time ≥172 min (OR=2.316, 95%CI 1.027-5.219, P=0.043), lobectomy (OR=2.651, 95%CI 1.052-6.681, P=0.039) were the independent risk factors for chronic cough.ConclusionThere is no statistical difference in postoperative chronic cough between the RATS and VATS groups. The RATS group gets less blood loss and shorter endotracheal intubation time. Patients with younger age (<57 years), preoperative cough, lobectomy, and longer duration of endotracheal intubation (≥172 min) are more likely to have chronic cough after surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of totally no tube three-port thoracoscopic surgery (TNTT) for thymic tumor via lateral thoracic approach. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with thymoma admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from November 2021 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a TNTT group and a single utility port video-assisted thoracic surgery (SVATS) group according to different surgical methods. The clinical data were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 111 patients were collected. There were 44 patients in the TNTT group, including 20 males and 24 females, with an average age of 60.11±8.64 years, and 67 patients in the SVATS group, including 30 males and 37 females, with an average age of 62.40±7.92 years. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the baseline data (P>0.05). The postoperative hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss were shorter or less in the TNTT group (P<0.05), and the visual analogue scale score 48 hours after the operation was smaller in the SVATS group (P<0.05). ConclusionTNTT has a good surgical safety, and can shorten postoperative hospital stay, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and has significant advantages in enhanced recovery after surgery, but SVATS can reduce postoperative pain in patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic guided thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in resection of lung, and to provide strategies for enhanced recovery after surgery of lung surgery. MethodsA total of 180 patients with thoracoscopic surgery of lung (including sublobar resection and lobectomy) hospitalized between May 2021 and June 2023 were included. There were 108 females and 72 males with an average age of (62.15±7.36) years. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Patients received subcutaneous injection of ropivacaine (concentration: 0.375%, dose: 2 mg/kg) on peripheral incision at chest closing were allocated into a group A. Patients received ultrasound-guided injection of ropivacaine (concentration: 0.375%, dose: 2 mg/kg) at the TPVB point after chest closing into a group B. Patients received thoracoscopic guided injection of ropivacaine (concentration: 0.375%, dose: 2 mg/kg) before chest closing at the TPVB point into a group C. The baseline data of each group were compared, and the effectiveness outcomes included perioperative adverse drug reactions, pain scores, postoperative analgesic drug use and postoperative hospital stay were compared among the 3 groups. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in the baseline data of three groups, including age, weight, gender, incidence of previous underlying diseases, operation time, number of surgical incisions, number of drainage tubes inserted, and dosage of sufentanil or propofol used during surgery (P>0.05). There were no adverse anesthesia events in the 3 groups during the operation, the frequency of self-controlled intravenous analgesia pump, the VAS score, the incidence of adverse reactions, and the rate of postoperative analgesic drug use in group C was less or lower than the other two groups (P<0.05). The hospital stay in the group C and group B were lower than that in the group A (P<0.05). ConclusionThoracoscopic guided TPVB can reduce postoperative pain without increasing postoperative side effects, which had accelerated the enhanced recovery after surgery of lung.
Under the same-day surgery mode, anesthesiologists play an important role in ensuring patient safety, eliminating medical risks, practicing the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery, and realizing comfortable diagnosis and treatment, and a standardized anesthesia management process is the key to protect patients. Based on the principled suggestions in The Consensus of Chinese Experts on Anaesthesia for Day Surgery, combined with the advanced management experience of day surgery anesthesia at home and abroad, and repeatedly revised through practice, a comprehensive, rigorous, and standardized anesthesia management process for same-day surgery was gradually explored by the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University. This paper introduces the process from the aspects of procedure of anesthesia evaluation in same-day surgery, preoperative preparation, standardized intraoperative anesthesia management, postoperative pain management, and prevention and treatment of postoperative complications.
Objective To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on postoperative function and pain in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients with high comorbidity. Methods Patients with THA who were admitted between January 2020 and January 2022 were selected as the study objects, and a total of 223 patients with high comorbidity met the selection criteria. Patients were randomly divided into two groups using the random envelope method. During perioperative period, 112 cases in the ERAS group were treated according to the ERAS protocol and 111 cases in the control group with the traditional protocol. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative diagnosis, the type and number of the comorbidities, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the Harris score of ERAS group was significantly lower than that of control group before operation (P<0.05). Preoperative and postoperative hospital stays were recorded. The VAS score was used to evaluate the pain before operation, at 1 day after operation, at the leaving bed time, at the day after discharge, and at 2 weeks after operation. Harris score was used to evaluate hip function before operation and at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation. The incidence of complications, 30-day readmission rate, mortality rate, and patient’s satisfaction were recorded. Results The length of preoperative hospital stay in ERAS group was significantly shorter than that in control group (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in the length of postoperative hospital stay between groups (P>0.05). All patients in the two groups were followed up 12 months. The VAS score in the two groups after operation was lower than that before operation, and showed a gradually trend with the extension of time, with significant differences between different time points (P<0.05). VAS scores of ERAS group were significantly lower than those of control group at different time points after operation (P<0.05). The postoperative Harris scores in both groups were higher than those before operation, and showed a gradually increasing trend with the extension of time, with significant differences between different time points (P<0.05). Harris scores of ERAS group at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after operation were significantly higher than those of control group (P<0.05). Complications occurred in 2 cases (1.79%) of the ERAS group and 6 cases (5.41%) of the control group, with no significant difference in incidence (P>0.05). In the control group, 1 case was readmitted within 30 days after operation, and 1 case died of severe pneumonia within 1 year of follow-up. There was no readmission or death in ERAS group, and there was no significant difference in the above indexes between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the satisfaction rate of patients in ERAS group was slightly higher than that in control group, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For THA patients with high comorbidity, ERAS protocol can shorten preoperative waiting time, better reduce pain, and improve hip function.