Objective To investigate the effect of acid, basic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF, bFGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), andtheir combination on the proliferation of rabbit anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) in vitro. Methods Thecells of ACL and MCL were isolated and subcultured from the knee joints of tenweek-old New Zealand white rabbits. The cells were seeded into 96-well corning cluster plates. Three growth factors of different concentration alone or in combination were added into the culture medium respectively, which were 0, 1, 5, 10, 50 and 100 ng/ml for aFGF, bFGF and 0, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 ng/ml for EGF. The proliferation of the fibroblasts was measured for 48 h with XTT method. Results All of the three growth factors alone promoted the cell proliferation of ACL and MCL fibroblasts. The concentration of aFGF hada significant effect on the proliferation of both ACL and MCL fibroblasts. The concentration of 1 ng/ml bFGF and 5 ng/ml EGF was most effective in promoting the proliferation of ACL, and both bFGF and EGF had a significant effect on MCL. 5ng/ml aFGF with 50 ng/ml EGF had effect on ACL. 1 ng/ml aFGF with 3.13 ng/ml EGF had effect on MCL. Conclusion The three growth factors may promote the cell proliferation of ACL and MCL. These findings suggest that topical application of aFGF, either alone or in combination with EGF may have the potential to promote the proliferation of rabbit ACL and MCL,and aFGF of low concentration in combination with EGF is more effective than single growth factor.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress of location methods and the best femoral insertion position of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction of femoral tunnel, and provide reference for surgical treatment.MethodsThe literature about femoral insertion position of the MPFL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of MPFL, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of femoral tunnel positioning methods were summarized.ResultsThe accurate establishment of the femoral anatomical tunnel is crucial to the success of MPFL reconstruction. At present, there are mainly two kinds of methods for femoral insertion: radiographic landmark positioning method and anatomical landmark positioning method. Radiographic landmark positioning method has such advantages as small incision and simple operation, but it can not be accurately positioned for patients with severe femoral trochlear dysplasia. It is suggested to combine with the anatomical landmark positioning method. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified positioning standard. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional design software can accurately assist in the MPFL reconstruction, which has become a new trend.ConclusionFemoral tunnel positioning of the MPFL reconstruction is very important. The current positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Personalized positioning is a new trend and has not been widely used in clinic, its effectiveness needs further research and clinical practice and verification.
ObjectiveTo explore advantages and feasibility of a new prosthesis implantation method after breast cancer surgery by reacquaint breast anatomy. MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients with breast cancer were retrospectively collected. The patients underwent the breast cancer surgery and prosthesis implantation with cricoid breast ligament in the Xuzhou Cancer Hospital from January 1, 2021 to May 30, 2023. ResultsA total of 10 patients were collected, with age ranging from 31 to 59 years old. Three patients received postoperative analgesia, 2 patients occurred infection, 1 patient occurred fat liquefaction. All patients did not experience capsular contracture, flap necrosis, or removal of the prosthesis. Two patients had sentinel lymph node metastasis. All patients followed-up 3 to 24 months after surgery. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life and satisfaction after surgery, 3 patients were very satisfied, 5 were satisfied, and 2 were basically satisfied. ConclusionFrom the results of limited cases analysis in this study, it is safe and feasible to implant the prosthesis with cricoid breast ligament in selected patients after breast cancer surgery.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of anatomical single-bundle (ASB) and over-the-top singlebundle (OSB) reconstruction of the anterior cruciate l igament (ACL). Methods Between January 2008 and June 2008, 64 patients with ACL injury underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. ASB ACL reconstruction was performed in 28 cases (ASB group) and OSB ACL reconstruction in 36 cases (OSB group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, diseaseduration, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and side-to-side difference between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention; no infection or other compl ications occurred. All cases were followed up 20-24 months (mean, 21.5 months). There were significant differences in the IKDC score, Lysholm score, and the side-to-side difference between last follow-up and preoperation in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between 2 groups at last follow-up (P gt; 0.05). Significant differences were found in negative rate of the pivot shift test between last follow-up and preoperation in ASB group and between 2 groups at last follow-up (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between last follow-up and preoperation in OSB group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The effectiveness of arthroscopic ASB ACL reconstruction is better than that of arthroscopic OSB ACL reconstruction, especially in controll ing rotational stabil ity.
Fourteen patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries were treated with carbon fiber—superficial fascia complex and were followed up with an average of 25 months. The overall results in our series were excellent or good. The patients had stable knees and few had some subjective complaints. The influence on the knee function after injury of ACL was discussed.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation for repair of lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) in treatment of terrible triad of elbow (TTE).MethodsA clinical data of 50 patients with TTE between June 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The LCLC was repaired with transosseous tunnel fixation in 22 patients (transosseous tunnel fixation group) and with drilling fixation in 28 patients (drilling fixation group). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in gender, age, fracture side, time from injury to admission, coronoid process fracture classification, radial head fracture classification, and TTE classification. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications of the two groups were recorded. At last follow-up, the Mayo elbow performance system (MEPS) score, range of motion of elbow joint, and Broberg-Morrey classification were recorded.ResultsThe operation of two groups were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two group (P>0.05). The follow-up time was (24.43±6.84) months in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and (21.55±6.16) months in the drilling fixation group, and the difference was not significant (t=1.534, P=0.132). X-ray films showed that the coronoid process and radial head fractures in the two groups healed, and there was no significant difference in the healing time (P>0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the flexion-extension activity, rotation activity, MEPS score, and Broberg-Morrey grading (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no re-dislocation or instability of the elbow joint. The incidence of complication was 28.57% (8/28) in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and 27.27% (6/22) in the drilling fixation group, showing no significant difference (χ2=2.403, P=0.121).ConclusionBoth transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation can achieve good results in repair of LCLC for TTE.
Objective To evaluate of the valgus stability of the elbow after excision of the radial head, release of the medial collateral ligament (MCL), radial head replacement, and medial collateral ligament reconstruction.Methods Twelve fresh human cadaveric elbows were dissected to establish 7 kinds of specimens with elbow joint and ligaments as follow:①intact(n=12)； ②release of the medial collateral ligament(n=6)；③ excision of the radial head(n=6)；④excision of the radial head together with release of the medial collateral ligament(n=12)；⑤radial head replacement(n=6)；⑥medial collateral ligament reconstruction(n=6)；⑦radial head replacement together with medial collateral ligament reconstruction(n=12). Under two-newton-meter valgus torque, and at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 degrees of flexion with the forearm in supination, the valgus elbow laxity was quantified: All analysis was performed with SPSS 10.0 software.Results The least valgus laxity was seen in the intact state and its stability was the best. The laxity increased after resection of the radial head. The laxity was more after release of the medial collateral ligament than after resection of the radial head (Plt;0.01). The greatest laxity was observed after release of the medial collateral ligament together with resection of the radial head, so its stability was the worst. The laxity of the following implant of the radial head decreased. The laxity of the medial collateral ligament reconstruction was as much as that of the intact ligament (Pgt;0.05). The laxity of the radial head replacement together with medial collateral ligament reconstruction became less.Conclusion The results of this studyshow that the medial collateral ligament is the primary valgus stabilizer of the elbow and the radial head was a secondary constraint to resist valgus laxity.Both the medial collateral ligament reconstruction and the radial head replacement can restore the stability of elbow. If the radial head replacement can notbe carried out, the reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament is acceptable.
ObjectiveTo compare the strength difference between the interfacial screw and the interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology to fix the tibial end of ligament during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction through the biomechanical test.MethodsTwenty fresh frozen pig tibia were randomly divided into two groups (n=10) to prepare ACL reconstruction models. The graft tendons in the experimental group were fixed with interfacial screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology, and the graft tendons in the control group were fixed with interfacial screw. The two groups of specimens were fixed in the high-frequency dynamic mechanics test system M-3000, and the length change (displacement), ultimate load, and stiffness of graft tendons were measured through the reciprocating test and load-failure test.ResultsThe results of reciprocating test showed that the displacement of the experimental group was (3.06±0.58) mm, and that of the control group was (2.82±0.46) mm, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.641, P=0.529). The load-failure test results showed that the stiffness of the experimental group and the control group were (95.39±13.63) and (91.38±14.28) N/mm, respectively, with no significant difference (t=1.021, P=0.321). The ultimate load of the experimental group was (743.15±173.96) N, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (574.70±74.43) N (t=2.648, P=0.016).ConclusionIn ACL reconstruction, the fixation strength of tibial end with interface screw combined with bone tunnel crossing technology is obviously better than that of interface screw alone.
Objective To investigate the mechanism of p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway in regulating the hyperplasia and hypertrophy of human lumbar ligamentum flavum via transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1)/connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). Methods The lumbar ligamentum flavum tissue taken from patient with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation was isolated by collagenase-predigested explant cultures. The ligamentum flavum cells were treated with the extracellular regulated protein kinase pathway blocker PD98059, c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway blocker SP600125, and p38 pathway blocker SB203580, and then the mRNA expressions of CTGF, collagen type Ⅰ, and collagen type Ⅲ were detected by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). The ligamentum flavum cells were divided into 4 groups, and transfected with small interfering RNA (siRNA), p38 siRNA, siRNA+3 ng/mL TGF-β1, and p38 siRNA+3 ng/mL TGF-β1 in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. After 24 hours of transfection, immunofluorescence staining was performed to observe the expressions of p38 and phosphorylation p38 (p-p38); the relative mRNA expressions of CTGF, collagen type Ⅰ, and collagen type Ⅲ in each group were detected by qRT-PCR; the protein expression of CTGF in each group was detected by Western blot. Results p38 pathway blocker SB203580 could significantly reduce the relative mRNA expressions of CTGF, collagen type Ⅰ, and collagen type Ⅲ (P<0.05). After 24 hours of transfection, immunofluorescence staining showed positive staining with p38 and p-p38 expressions in groups A, C, and D and negative staining in group B. Compared with group A, the relative mRNA expressions of CTGF, collagen type Ⅰ, and collagen type Ⅲ and relative protein expression of CTGF in group B decreased significantly (P<0.05), while those in groups C and D increased significantly (P<0.05); and those indicators significantly increased in group C than in group D (P<0.05). Conclusion TGF-β1/CTGF based on the p38 MAPK signaling pathway play an important role in the occurance and development of hypertrophy of human lumbar ligamentum flavum.
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effect of the volar capsular l igament complex on stabil ity of the wrist jointand to provide basic biomechanical theoretical criteria for cl inic appl ication of the external fixator. Methods Nine upperl imbs specimens (left 6, right 3) were taken from fresh adult cadavers to make wrist joint-bone capsular l igament complex specimens. Firstly, soft tissues of forearms and hands were resected and capsular membranes and l igaments were reserved to make the bone-articular l igament complex (normal specimen). Secondly, the volar capsular l igament complex was cut off from radial malleolus to ulnar malleolus (impaired specimen). Thirdly, the impaired volar capsular l igament complex was interruptedly sutured by the use of 4# suture silk (repaired specimen). To simulate cl inical operation with external fixator, the biomechanical test was done according to the sequence (normal, impaired, repaired, repaired and fixed, impaired and fixed). Statistical significance was analyzed through selected loads at the three different shifts (1.5, 2.0, 2.5 cm). Results According to the sequence (normal, impaired, repaired, repaired and fixed, impaired and fixed), when the shift was 1.5 cm, the different respective loads were (60.74 ± 20.60), (35.23 ± 13.88), (44.36 ± 20.78), (168.40 ± 29.21) and (139.00 ± 33.18) N, respectively. When the shift was 2.0 cm, the different loads were (138.46 ± 12.93), (87.17 ± 24.22), (97.52 ± 23.29), (289.00 ± 54.29) and (257.98 ± 55.74) N, respectively. When the shift was 2.5 cm, the different loads were (312.87 ± 37.15), (198.16 ± 37.14), (225.66 ± 30.96), (543.15 ± 74.33) and (450.35 ± 29.38) N, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the impaired and repaired specimens (P gt; 0.05). Similarly, there was statistically significant difference among the rest specimens (P lt; 0.05). The same statistical results were obtained when the two different shifts were compared. There was statistically significant difference at the three different shifts for the same specimen (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Volar capsular l igament complex is an important anatomic structure to keep stabil ity of the wrist joint. The carpal instabil ity arises out of the injured complex. Repairing the injured complex only can not immediately restore stabil ity of the wrist joint. The external fixator can effectively help to diminish the relative shift of the impaired capsular l igament complex, to reduce the load of the repaired complex and to protect the complex accordingly. The device plays an important role in maintaining stabil ity of the wrist joint.