The application of complex interventions in the area of public health, clinical research and education is becoming increasingly widespread. The effectiveness of complex interventions may be affected by numerous factors due to the complexity of interventions, intervention pathways or the context of implementation. Therefore, it is significantly important to evaluate the process of complex interventions, which will provide information to understand the implementation of interventions. The British Medical Research Council’s process evaluation guidelines provide a framework for implementing and reporting on process evaluation research. This paper aims to interpret the guide in detail on complex intervention and process evaluation for the references of domestic researchers.
Objective To explore the effect of multimodal interventions in improving the compliance rate of core infection control measures on reducing the incidence rate of vessel catheter associated infection (VCAI). Methods Inpatients with intravascular catheters in 5 departments with high rates of vascular catheterization and infection of Dongguan People’s Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were selected. According to the hospital stay, patients were divided into a pre-intervention group (January to December 2021) and a post-intervention group (January to December 2022). The core infection control measures assessment pass rates of medical staff between the two periods and the differences in the incidence rate of VCAI, average catheterization days, and catheterization rate before and after intervention in both groups were compared. Results A total of 8174 patients were included. Among them, there were 3915 patients in the pre-intervention group and 4259 patients in the post-intervention group. In the pre-intervention group, the total length of hospital stay was 122885 days, the total number of catheterization days was 48028 days, and 28 cases of VCAI occurred. In the post-intervention group, the total length of hospital stay was 126966 days, the total number of catheterization days was 51253 days, and 12 cases of VCAI occurred. After intervention, the compliance rate of VCAI core infection control measures was improved [69.21% (2907/4200) vs. 91.24% (3832/4200); χ2=642.090, P＜0.001], the pass rate of medical staff’s core infection control measures assessment was improved [53.33% (128/240) vs. 91.67% (220/240); χ2=88.443, P＜0.001], the catheterization rate was increased [39.08% (48028/122885) vs. 40.37% (51253/126966); χ2=42.979, P<0.001], and the incidence rate of VCAI was reduced [0.58‰ (28/48028) vs. 0.23‰ (12/51253); incidence-rate ratios =0.40, 95% confidence interval (0.20, 0.79), P=0.008]. Conclusions Improving the compliance rate of VCAI core infection control measures through multimodal interventions can significantly improve the passing rates of core infection control measures of medical staffs. This will help to reduce the incidence of VCAI and ensuring patient safety, provide evidence-based support for the prevention and control of VCAI.
ObjectiveTo introduce a Bayesian meta-analysis method for quantitatively integrating evidence from both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs), using concrete examples and R code, thereby supporting the combined utilization of both study types in empirical research. MethodsUsing a meta-analysis on the association between low-dose methotrexate exposure and melanoma as an example, we employed the jarbes package in R to conduct both a traditional Bayesian meta-analysis and a Bayesian nonparametric bias-correction meta-analysis model for quantitative integration. The differences between the two pooled results were then compared. ResultsThe traditional Bayesian meta-analysis indicated a posterior probability of 99% that low-dose methotrexate exposure increases melanoma risk. The Bayesian nonparametric bias-correction meta-analysis model showed a posterior probability of 92% that low-dose methotrexate exposure increases melanoma risk. ConclusionCompared to the traditional Bayesian meta-analysis model, the nonparametric bias-correction meta-analysis model is more suitable for quantitatively integrating evidence from RCTs and NRSIs, demonstrating potential for broader application. However, the comparability between the two evidence bodies should be carefully assessed prior to quantitative integration.
针刺平行随机对照试验通常没有准确报告试验组和对照组的干预方法.为促进标准化,国际上有经验的针刺医师和研究者组成的小组制定了一些原则,即针刺临床对照试验中干预措施报告的标准(缩写为STRICTA).在征求意见过程中,一些期刊编辑协助对此标准进行了修改,使之与随机对照试验报告的标准(CON-SORT)格式一致,作为该指南对针剌研究报告的延伸.参与此事的杂志编辑已确定要发表该标准,建议其作者群按照此标准准备论文,并将邀请更多杂志采用该标准.目的是使针剌对照试验的干预措施充分报告,从而有利于对这些研究的严格评价、分析及这些措施的推广.
ObjectiveTo study the effect of new bundle interventions on medical staff’s cognition of occupational exposure protection and exposure rate, and provide evidence for reducing medical staff’s occupational exposure.MethodsThe 1 435 medical practitioners in 37 clinical/technical departments of Nanchong Central Hospital were selected as the research objects. Bundle intervention strategies about occupational exposure for whole population and high risk population were implemented, and the medical staff’s cognition of occupational exposure, occurrence of occupational exposure, and post-exposure reporting in 2017 (before intervention) and 2018 (after intervention) were investigated and compared to evaluate the intervention effects.ResultsThe numbers of valid survey forms collected before intervention and after intervention were 1 160 and 1 421, respectively. The total awareness rate increased from 91.10% before intervention to 96.10% after intervention (P<0.001). The exposure rate and average rank of exposure frequency after intervention were lower than those before intervention (10.98% vs. 17.50%, 1 250.74 vs. 1 340.32), the reporting rate of initial exposure after intervention (69.23%) was higher than that before intervention (57.64%), and the differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionThrough gradually implementing the new bundle interventions, medical staff can improve the cognition of occupational exposure, reduce the occurrence of occupational exposure, improve the enthusiasm of reporting, and create a safe atmosphere.
Objectives About 12.9-50% patients of SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), require brief mechanical ventilation (MV) to save life. All the reported principles and guidelines for therapy SARS were based on experiences from clinical treatments and facts of inadequacy. Neither prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) nor other high quality evidences were in dealing with SARS. Our objective is to seek safe and rational non-drugs interventions for patients with severe SARS by retrospectively reviewing clinical studies about MV all over the world, which include clinical guidelines, systematic reviews (SR), Meta-analysis, economic researches and adverse events. Methods To search MEDLINE and Cochrane Library with computer. According to the standards of inclucion or exclusion, the quality of the article which as assessed, and relevant data which were extracted double checked. The Meta-analysis was conducted if the studies had no heterogeneity. Results 14 papers were eligible. Due to the significant heterogeneity between these studies, further Meta-analysis could not be conducted, and the authors’ conclusions were described only. Conclusions The outcome of PPV is better than that of VPV. Patients who underwent PPV had a significantly lower mortality than that of VPV. Of course, the volutrauma should be watched. With low tidal volume and proper PEEP, or decreased FiO2, even permissive hypercapnia, the mortality and length of stay were cut down. Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) was effective in treating haemodynamical stable patients, minimizing complications and reducing medical staff infection. Patients with serious dyspnea with PaO2/FiO2lt;200, no profit of NIMV, or couldn’t tolerance hypoxaemia were unlikely to benefit from this technique and needed ventilation with endotracheal intubation. Prone position could improve PaO2/FiO2, NO maybe increased pulmonary perfusion, improved V/Q, and raised oxygenation. Furthermore, Inhaled NO sequentially (SQA) was better than Inhaled NO continuouly (CTA). Some studies implied that practice of protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation implemented by nurses excelled that of traditional physician-directed weaning.
Post operational recovery from cardiac surgery can be affected by many factors, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. Prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) , one of the major complications, has been widely accepted as a measure to evaluate the performance and outcomes of cardiac surgeries. Great progress has been made in the studies of risk factors contributing to PMV following cardiac surgeries in recent years. However, no clear and effective measures and approaches are available yet to prevent PMV. In this review, the authors try to summarize the risk factors that are associated with PMV throughout the perioperative period of cardiac surgery, as well as possible interventions when applicable.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of seven types of cognitive interventions for older adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD).MethodsWe searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases to collect randomized controlled trials on cognitive interventions for mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) from inception to January 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. STATA 14.0 software was then used to perform a meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 49 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The results of network meta-analysis revealed that each cognitive intervention had significantly improved the cognitive ability of AD patients. Specifically, nursing intervention (NI) (MD=3.01, 95%CI 1.70 to 4.50, P<0.005) was the most effective enhancer of cognitive ability, followed by music therapy (MT) (MD=2.60, 95%CI 0.96 to 4.30, P<0.001), physical exercise (PE) (MD=2.4, 95%CI 1.0 to 3.9, P<0.001), cognitive rehabilitation (CR) (MD=2.3, 95% CI 0.92 to 3.7, P=0.013), cognitive simulation (CS) (MD=1.7, 95%CI 1.2 to 2.3, P=0.037), computerized cognitive training (CCT) (MD=1.6, 95%CI 0.42 to 2.8, P<0.001), and pharmacological therapies (PT) (MD=1.5, 95%CI 0.24 to 2.8, P=0.041).ConclusionsThe seven types of cognitive interventions are helpful in improving the cognitive ability of Alzheimer's patients, and nursing intervention is the most effective cognitive intervention. Moreover, non-pharmacological therapies may be better than pharmacological therapies.
Objectives To systematically review the efficacy of multimodal nonpharmacological interventions in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods An electronically search was conducted in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, VIP, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI databases from inception to November 2017 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on multimodal nonpharmacological interventions for MCI. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 12 RCTs involving 1 359 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no statistical differences between two groups in MMSE scores (SMD=0.33, 95%CI–0.13 to 0.78, P=0.16). However, the MoCA scores (SMD=0.52, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.67, P<0.000 01) and ADAS-Cog scores (SMD=1.13, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.51, P<0.000 01) in the multimodal nonpharmacological interventions group were better than those in the control group. Additionally, multimodal nonpharmacological interventions produced significant effects on ADL (SMD=–0.64, 95%CI –0.83 to–0.45, P<0.000 01), QOL-AD (MD=3.65, 95%CI 1.03 to 6.27, P=0.006) and depression (SMD=–0.83, 95%CI –1.41 to–0.26, P=0.005). There were no statistical differences between two groups on conversion rate to Alzheimer's disease (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.06 to 1.26, P=0.10). Conclusions The current evidence shows that multimodal nonpharmacological interventions are feasible for patients with MCI as they have positive effects on overall cognitive abilities, daily living skills, and quality of life and depression. Nevertheless, due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the conclusion.