Objective To assess safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy in the elderly with gastric cancer. Methods From January 2010 to September 2014, 146 elderly (age ≥65 years old) patients with gastric cancer underwent radical operations in the Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences and Guangdong General Hospital were collected, then were divided into a laparoscopy-assisted radical gastrectomy (LAG group, n=40) and an open radical gastrectomy (OG group, n=106) according to the operative mode. The differences of intraoperative and postoperative situation, and the postoperative complications were analyzed between the LAG group and the OG group. Results ① The age, gender, body mass index, albumin, ASA grade, tumor location, differentiation degree, TNM stage, radical gastrectomy, and digestive tract anastomosis had no significant differences between the LAG group and the OG group (P>0.05). ② None of the patients died during the operative period and there was no significant difference in the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes between these two groups (P>0.05). In the aspects of the intraoperative blood loss, the first flatus time or the first feeding time, and the postoperative hospitalization stay in the LAG group were significantly less than those in the OG group (P<0.05). For the operative time, the OG group showed a distinctive advantage with a significantdifference than the LAG group (P<0.05). ③ The rate of postoperative complication in the LAG group and OG group was 10.0% (4/40) and 15.1% (16/106) respectively, and the difference was not significant (χ2=0.64, P=0.591), the grade of the Clavien-Dindo complications had no significant difference (χ2=0.63, P=0.592). ④ None of the patients died following operation in the LAG group and one case died in the OG group because of the respiratory and circulatory failure caused by the pulmonary embolism. Conclusion Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that LAG in the elderly patients with gastric cancer could reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten the first flatus time or the first feeding time, and postoperative hospitalization stay, could obtain same radical effect without increasing incidence of postoperative complications as compared with OG, so it is safety and feasible.
ObjectiveTo summarize the diagnosis and treatment process of a patient who underwent laparoscopic local excision of duodenal papillary tumor, and to explore the safety and feasibility of this surgery. MethodThe clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical procedure of the patient with duodenal papillary neuroendocrine tumor admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University in June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe patient underwent the laparoscopic local excision of duodenal papillary tumor + in situ cholangiojejunostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy. The operation lasted about 3 hours, the blood loss was about 20 mL, and the patient exhausted on the 3rd day after the operation. On the 7th postoperative day, the gastric tube was pulled out and oral feeding was started. On the 8th day, the plasma drainage tube was pulled out and the patient was discharged smoothly. There was no duodenal fistula, bleeding, wound infection, and other complications. After 6 months of follow-up, the general condition of this patient was good, and no tumor recurrence or metastasis was found. ConclusionLaparoscopic local excision is an appropriate option for benign or low-grade malignancies involving the duodenal papillary tumor.
ObjectiveTo summarize the application status and prospect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).MethodThe relevant literatures about studies of LPD at home and abroad were reviewed.ResultsLPD was a difficult operation, mainly suitable for pancreatic head and periampullary benign and malignant tumors. With the development of laparoscopic techniques in recent years, LPD combined the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein resection and reconstruction, or combined multi-visceral resection was feasible, but the survival benefit of LPD with arterial resection and reconstruction and extended lymph node dissection remained to be discussed. At present, there was no clear requirement on the way to reconstruct the pancreatic fluid outflow tract, but the pancreaticojejunostomy for digestive tract reconstruction was chose by the most surgeons. The most studies had confirmed that LPD was minimally invasive and had a short-term prognosis that was not inferior to that of open pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the results of large sample analysis about long-term survival rate and oncology results were lacking, so it was difficult to judge the advantages and disadvantages of long-term prognosis of the two methods.ConclusionsLPD is a safe, feasible, reasonable, and effective surgical method. With improvement of laparoscopic technology, LPD is expected to become a standard operation method for treatment of pancreatic head cancer and periampullary carcinoma, and oncology benefits of LPD will be further confirmed in future by large-sample clinical randomized control trials and studies of long-term prognosis follow-up.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of totally transanal endorectal pull-through and laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through in the treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease (HD).MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP Database were searched to screen out the comparative studies published between January 1998 and May 2020 on the treatment of HD with totally transanal endorectal pull-through and laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through. Then two reviewers independently completed the literatures screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation. The Review Manager 5.3 software was used to combine the effect size of the postoperative effect indicators included in the literatures. Stata 14.0 software was used to perform Begg’s and Egger’s tests on the publication bias of the included literatures.ResultsA total of 8 clinical studies conforming to the standards were included and 702 cases of children undergoing HD radical resection were recorded, including 335 cases in the totally transanal endorectal pull-through group and 367 cases in the laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through group. Compared with the laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through group, the totally transanal endorectal pull-through group had an advantage in the incidence of postoperative faecal incontinence/soiling [OR=0.20, 95%CI was (0.07, 0.54), P=0.001], and the postoperative constipation recurrence rate was higher than the laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through group [OR=2.39, 95%CI was (1.05, 5.42), P=0.04]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative enterocolitis [OR=1.01, 95%CI was (0.59, 1.75), P=0.96], postoperative adhesion intestinal obstruction [OR=0.74, 95%CI was (0.28, 1.95), P=0.54], and postoperative anastomotic stenosis [OR=1.14, 95%CI was (0.51, 2.56), P=0.74].ConclusionsCompared with laparoscopic assistance endorectal pull-through, the totally transanal endorectal pull-through can reduce the incidence of postoperative faecal incontinence/soiling, but the rate of recurrence of postoperative constipation is higher. The two surgical procedures for HD have similar incidences of postoperative enterocolitis, anastomotic stenosis, and adhesive intestinal obstruction.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic hernia repair by same-day surgery mode for patients with inguinal hernia. MethodsThe patients who underwent TAPP laparoscopic hernia repair were retrospectively collected in the Day Surgery Center of West China Tianfu Hospital from July 2022 to June 2023. All patients in this study were admitted according to the same-day surgery plan, and those who were admitted to the hospital on the same day, operated on the same day, and returned to their homes on the same day, i.e., those who did not stay in the hospital overnight (the same-day surgery plan of the West China Tianfu Hospital of Sichuan University is now basically in the range of 8∶00–20∶00, and the latest discharge is at 21∶00) were classified as the same-day surgery group; however, the patients whose special cases needed to be postponed due to the condition of their illnesses, or those who were discharged from the hospital after 21∶00 due to safety considerations because of other reasons such as postoperative observation of patients with general anesthesia for a period of less than 2–4 h, or those who had a strong desire to be admitted to the hospital overnight, and whose hospital stay was not more than 24 h, were classified as the non-same-day surgery group. The age, gender, marital status, body mass index, hernia type, surgical site, home address, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, total hospitalization cost, pain score at discharge, unplanned revisit rate within 30 d after surgery, discharge satisfaction were compared between the patients of two groups. ResultsA total of 167 patients underwent TAPP laparoscopic hernia repair were enrolled in this study, including 97 in the same-day surgery group and 70 in the non-same-day surgery group. There were no statistically significant differences in the age, gender, marital status, body mass index, hernia type, surgical site, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, and total hospitalization cost between the two groups (P>0.05). However, it was found that the patients in the non-same-day surgery group had a higher pain score at discharge and a higher proportion of home address outside Chengdu city as compared with the same-day surgery group (P=0.042, P<0.001, respectively); The satisfaction rate of all patients in this group was 100% on the 28th day after discharge, and the unplanned revisit rate within 30 d after surgery was 3.6% (6/167), although which in the same-day surgery group was slightly higher than the non-same-day surgery group, the difference was not statistically significant by Fisher test [4.1% (4/97) versus 2.9% (2/70), P=0.226]. ConclusionFrom the analysis results of this study, TAPP laparoscopic hernia repair for patients with inguinal hernia by the same-day surgery mode is safe, and it can further shorten the hospitalization time as compared with the non-same-day surgery.
Objective To summarize preliminary experience of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma. Method The clinical data of patients with periampullary carcinoma underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy from July 2016 to September 2016 in the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were analyzed retrospectively. Results Two patients underwent complete laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, 2 patients underwent laparoscopic resection and anastomosis assisted with small incision open. The R0 resection and duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis were performed in all the patients. The operative time was 510–600 min, intraoperative blood loss was 400–600 mL, postoperative hospitalization time was 15–21d, postoperative ambulation time was 6–7 d. Three cases of pancreatic fistula were grade A and all were cured by conservation. No postoperative bleeding, delayed gastric emptying, intra-abdominal infection, and bile leakage occurred. The postoperative pathological results showed that there was 1 case of pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma, 1 case of cyst adenocarcinoma of pancreas uncinate process, 1 case of papillary carcinoma of duodenum, and 1 case of terminal bile duct carcinoma. Conclusion The preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been proven to be a safe procedure, it could reduce perioperative cardiopulmonary complications, its exhaust time, feeding time, and postoperative ambulation time are shorter, but its operative complications could not be reduced.
ObjectiveTo compare and analyze the therapeutic effect of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer for obese patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. MethodsThe retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathologic data of 217 obese patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2017 to January 2020 were collected, 104 patients received radical resection of rectal cancer assisted by Da Vinci robotic surgical system and were assigned to the robot group, 113 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer and were assigned to the laparoscope group. The perioperative indexes, pathological examination, and postoperative recovery of urogenital function were compared. ResultsThere were no significant differences between the two groups in the gender, age, body mass index, distance from lower edge of tumor to anal edge, tumor diameter, American Association of Anesthesiologists classification, preoperative complications, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, tumor differentiation, and TNM stage (P>0.05). The operations were successfully completed in all patients and there was no conversion to laparotomy and perioperative death. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the operation time, first exhaust time, first eating liquid food time, first getting out of bed activity time, drainage tube placement time, prophylactic stoma rate, and postoperative complications (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss and total hospital stay in the robot group were less than those of the laparoscope group (P<0.05). The International Prostate Symptom Score of the robot group was lower than that of the laparoscope group at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). The International Index of Erectile Function-15 score of male patients and Female Sexual Function Index-19 score of female patients in the robot group were higher than those in the laparoscope group at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). ConclusionsRobotic surgery is safe and effective in treatment of obese patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Compared with laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery could benefit patients more in protecting postoperative genitourinary function.
Objectives To analyze risk factors associated with conversion to open surgery of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Methods From January 2009 to December 2014, 235 patients underwent laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer in the Chengdu 5th Hospital, were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into laparoscopic repair group (n=207) and conversion to open surgery group (n=28). The characteristics, clinical outcomes, and prognosis factors were compared between these two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the critical cutoff value for diameter and duration of perforation for predicting conversion to open surgery. Results There were no significant differences of the age, gender, body mass index, comorbidity, history of ulcer, smoking history, history of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or steroids use, history of alcohol use, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification on admission, white blood cell count on admission, C reaction protein on admission, surgeons, suture method, and location of perforation between these two groups (P>0.05). The patients in the conversion to open surgery group had a higher procalcitonin (PCT) level on admission (P=0.040), longer duration of peroration (P<0.001), larger diameter of peroration (P<0.001), longer hospital stay (P=0.002), higher proportion of patients with Clavien-Dindo classification Ⅰ and Ⅱ (P<0.001), longer gastrointestinal function recovery time (P=0.003), longer analgesics use time (P<0.001), and longer off-bed time (P=0.001) as compared with the laparoscopic repair group. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that the peroration duration on admission〔OR: 2.104, 95%CI (1.124, 3.012),P=0.020〕and peroration diameter on admission〔OR: 2.475, 95%CI (1.341, 6.396),P=0.013〕were two predictors of conversion to open surgery. For the diameter of perforation, 8.0 mm was the critical cutoff value for predicting conversion to open surgery by ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity was 76%, the specificity was 93%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.912. For the duration of perforation, 14 h was the critical cutoff value to predict conversion to open surgery, the sensitivity was 86%, the specificity was 71%, and theAUC was 0.909. Conclusions The preliminary results in this study show that diameter of perforation of 8 mm and duration of perforation of 14 h are two reliable risk factors associated with conversion to open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. Also, PCT level would mightbe considered as a helpful risk factor for it.
ObjectiveTo explore the application value of “enfolded pancreatic duct”pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients underwent LPD and “enfolded pancreatic duct” PJ from May 2020 to March 2022 were collected retrospectively. The time of PJ was recorded. And the pancreatic leakage, biliary leakage, chyle leakage, bleeding and infection, and death within 30 d after the operation were observed. ResultsA total of 132 patients were collected, including 60 males and 72 females. The age of patients was (58.6±10.9) years old. There were 38 cases of pancreatic head cancer, 17 cases of duodenum carcinoma, 17 cases of inferior segment cholangiocarcinoma, and 23 cases of duodenal papilla carcinoma, 7 cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, 11 cases of pancreatic intraductal papilloma, 5 cases of duodenal stromal tumor, 5 cases of duodenal papillary adenoma, 6 cases of pancreatic cyst adenoma, and 3 cases of pancreatic head stone. None of the patients was converted to open surgery. The diameter of pancreatic duct before operation was (3.43±2.11) mm, which were <3 mm in 31 cases. The time of PJ was (20.61±3.16) min. The pancreatic leakage occurred in 17 cases, including 11 cases of grade A leakage, 6 cases of grade B leakage, and none of grade C leakage. There was 1 case of bile leakage, 6 cases of chyle leakage, 5 cases of postoperative bleeding (2 cases of intraabdominal bleeding and 3 cases of gastrointestinal anastomotic bleeding), 3 cases of intraabdominal infection, and no death. None of the patients was readmission due to complications after 90 d of follow-up. ConclusionsFrom summary results of this group of cases, compared with the traditional PJ method, “enfolded pancreatic duct” PJ is less difficult and simpler to operate, which can obviously shorten the PJ time during LPD and reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage. It is especially suitable for laparoscopic application.
With the upgrading of minimally invasive surgical concepts and laparoscopic equipment for gastric cancer, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) had emerged as a new focus of research in gastric cancer surgery. SILS offered advantages such as reduced damage, superior cosmetic outcomes, decreased postoperative pain, and faster recovery as compared with traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, its level of difficulty limited its further promotion and application. Although numerous studies supported the safety and feasibility of SILS, more high-level evidence-based medical research was required to endorse its widespread use. The author reviewed the development history, current status, and prospects of SILS laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.