Objective To review the feature, biomechanics, and cl inical appl ication of percutaneous 360 degree axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) technique. Methods Recent l iterature on investigation and appl ication of percutaneous360 degree AxiaLIF technique was reviewed. Results Percutaneous 360 degree AxiaLIF technique mainly contained operative approach, axial technique, and posterior fixation. It was obviously different from other lumbar interbody fusion techniques due to its capabil ity of maintaining the integrity of the bilateral facet joints, the anterior/posterior longitudinal l igament, and the annulus fibrosus. Three-dimensional AxiaLIF RodTM provided axial support and firmly fixation, thereby rel ieving stenosis of lumbar intervertebral foramen and restoring the intervertebral disc height and the whole height and physiological curvature of the lumbar spine. The recovery of the intervertebral disc height could restore the folded or crumpled flavum, the posterior longitudinal l igament, and the herniated annulus, resulting in the improvement of stenosis symptoms of nerve root canal or central vertebral canal. Conclusion Percutaneous 360 degree AxiaLIF technique achieves satisfying therapeutic effects, although it has fairly narrow indication and needs long-term follow-up observation.
Thoracolumbar injury is a common injury in clinic. Accurate diagnosis and classification is of great significance for guiding treatment. Although there are many typing systems, no typing system has been widely accepted and used to guide clinical practice. Denis classification, spinal load classification, thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score or thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score and AO classification have great influence in clinical practice, but they all have some shortcomings. In recent years, the classification of thoracolumbar injury has been updated, modified and supplemented constantly. When using these fracture types in clinical practice, different people often have some deviation. This paper reviews the widely used thoracolumbar injury classification system, discusses the main viewpoints, advantages and disadvantages of each classification system, and looks into the future research direction based on the current research progress.
Objective To investigate the cl inical characteristics and methods of diagnosis and treatment of multiple level thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Methods From March 2002 to March 2006, 17 patients with 35 thoracolumbar spinal fractures were treated, 13 males and 4 females, aged 21-52 years old (36.4 on average), among whom there were 10 cases of traffic accident injury and 7 of high fall ing injury. One fracture was located at T2, 1 at T3, 1 at T10, 4 at T11, 6 at T12, 5 at L1, 3 at L2, 7 at L3, 5 at L4, and 2 at L15, with a total of 35 segments including 26 segments with unstable fractures and 9 segments with stable compression fractures. According to the Frankel grade, there was 1 case of grade A, 1 of grade B, 2 of grade C, 5 of grade D and 8 of grade E. The preoperative height of the anterior border of the vertebral body was (20.8 ± 3.8) mm and the preoperative kyphosis angle was (16.2 ± 3.4)°. All the unstable fractures were performed operation. Sixteen injured vertebras were treated with long-segment pedicle screw internal fixation; 8 were treated with short-segment pedicle screw internal fixation, and 2 were treated with anterior fusion and fixation. Five injured vertebras with stable compression fractures were not treated and 4 were treated with pedicle screw implantation. Results The operation time was 1.8-4.2 hours and the amount of blood loss was 300-900 mL. The incisions obtained heal ing by first intention after the operation. All 17 patients were followed up for 13-41 months (18 months on average), and radiological evaluation showed no failure of the internal fixation. After the operation, the Frankel scale assessment showed that 1 patient of grade A improved to grade B, 1 of grade B improved to grade C, 1 of grade C improved to grade D, 1 of grade C improved to grade E, 5 of grade D improved to grade E, and 8 of grade E had no improvement. At the final postoperative follow-up, the height of the anterior border of the vertebral body was (31.9 ± 3.2) mm and the kyphosis angle was (6.8 ± 3.7)°, which were significantly different from those of preoperation (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion The treatment of multiple level thoracolumbar spinal fractures should be individual ized according to the patients’ actual conditions in order to obtain decompression and stabil ity of spines.
Objective To investigate the effect of the sequence of intermediate instrumentation with long screws and distraction-reduction on mild to moderate thoracolumbar fractures treated by posterior open and short-segmental fixation. MethodsThe clinical data of 68 patients with mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group ISDRF (intermediate screws then distraction-reduction fixation, 32 cases) and group DRISF (distraction-reduction then intermediate screws fixation, 36 cases) according to the different operation methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, fracture segment, cause of injury, and preoperative load-sharing classification score, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score, vertebral canal occupational rate, back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior height of fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The vertebral canal occupational rate, anterior height of fractured vertebra, kyphosis Cobb angle, and back pain VAS score before and after operation were used to evaluate the effectiveness. Results There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). No vascular or spinal nerve injury and deep infections or skin infections occurred in both groups. At 1 week after operation, the vertebral canal occupational rate in the two groups was significantly improved when compared with that before operation (P<0.05), no significant difference was found in the difference of vertebral canal occupational rate before and after operation and improvement between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up 18-24 months, with an average of 22.3 months. All vertebral fractures reached bone union at 6 months postoperatively. At last follow-up, there was no internal fixation failures such as broken screws, broken rods or loose screws, but there were 2 cases of mild back pain in the ISDRF group. The intra-group comparison showed that the back pain VAS score, the anterior height of fractured vertebra, and the Cobb angle of the two groups were significantly improved at each time point postoperatively (P<0.05); the VAS scores at 12 months postoperatively and last follow-up were also improved when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05). At last follow-up, the anterior height of fractured vertebra in the ISDRF group was significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively (P<0.05), the Cobb angle had a significant loss when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05); the anterior height of fractured vertebra and Cobb angle in DRISF group were not significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively (P>0.05). The comparison between groups showed that there was no significant difference in the remission rate of VAS score between the two groups at 1 week postoperatively (P>0.05), the recovery value of the anterior height of fractured vertebra in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group (P<0.05), the loss rate at last follow-up was also significantly higher (P<0.05); the correction rate of Cobb angle in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group at 1 week postoperatively (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the loss rate of Cobb angle between the two groups at last follow-up (P>0.05). ConclusionIn the treatment of mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior short-segment fixation, the instrumentation of long screws in the injured vertebrae does not affect the reduction of the fracture fragments in the spinal canal. DRISF can better maintain the restored anterior height of the fractured vertebra and reduce the loss of kyphosis Cobb angle during the follow-up, indicating a better long-term effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of vascular pedicled rib grafting in treatment of the pyogenic infection of the thoracolumbar intervertebral space. METHODS: From November 1993, 7 cases with pyogenic infection of the thoracolumbar intervertebral space were adopted in this study. Among them, there were 5 males and 2 females, aged from 29 to 58 years old. The position of pyogenic infection located at T10 to 11 in 3 cases, at T11 to 12 in 2 cases and at T12 to L1 in 2 cases. During operation, the pyogenic infection was cleared completely and the rib with vascular pedicle was grafted into the intervertebral space. RESULTS: Followed up for 10 to 60 months, the bone graft unioned in 3 months for 5 patients and unioned in 4 months for 2 patients. There was no recurrence and raised kyphosis. CONCLUSION: The technique of vascular pedicled rib graft is simple, it can shorten the bone union time and reconstruct the stability of spine.
Objective To study the effectiveness of long segment fixation combined with vertebroplasty (LSF-VP) for severe osteoporotic thoracolumbar compressive fractures with kyphosis deformity. Methods Between March 2006 and May 2012, a retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 48 cases of severe osteoporotic thoracolumbar compressive fractures with more than 50% collapse of the anterior vertebral body or more than 40 ° of sagittal angulation, which were treated by LSF-VP in 27 cases (LSF-VP group) or percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in 21 cases (PKP group). All patients suffered from single thoracolumbar vertebral compressive fracture at T11 to L2. There was no significant difference in gender, age, spinal segment, and T values of bone mineral density between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The effectiveness of the treatment was appraised by visual analogue scale (VAS), Cobb angle of thoracolumbar kyphosis, height of anterior/posterior vertebral body, and compressive ratio of vertebrae before and after operations. Results The LSF-VP group had longer operation time, hospitalization days, and more bone cement injection volume than the PKP group, showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss in LSF-VP group ranged from 220 to 1 050 mL (mean, 517 mL). No pulmonaryor cerebral embolism or cerebrospinal fluid leakage was found in both groups. Asymptomatic bone cement leakage was found in 3 cases of LSF-VP group and 2 cases of PKP group. The patients were followed up for 16-78 months (mean, 41.1 months) in LSF-VP group, and 12-71 months (mean, 42.1 months) in PKP group. No fixation failure such as loosened or broken pedicle screw was found in LSF-VP group during the follow-up, and no re-fracture or adjacent vertebral body fracture was found. Two cases in PKP group at 39 and 56 months after operation respectively were found to have poor maintenance of vertebral height and loss of rectification (Cobb angle was more than 40º) with recurrence of pain, which were treated by second surgery of LSF-VP; another case had compressive fracture of the adjacent segment and thoracolumbar kyphosis at 16 months after operation, which was treated by second surgery of LSF-VP. There were significant differences in the other indexes between each pair of the three time points (P lt; 0.05), except the Cobb angle of thoracolumbar kyphosis, and the height of posterior vertebral body between discharge and last follow-up in LSF-VP group, and except the Cobb angle of thoracolumbar kyphosis and compressive ratio of bertebrae between discharge and last follow-up in PKP group (P gt; 0.05). After operation, the other indexes of LSF-VP group were significantly better than those of PKP group at each time point (P lt; 0.05), except the VAS score and the height of posterior vertebral body at discharge (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The effectiveness of LSF-VP is satisfactory in treating severe osteoporotic thoracolumbar compressive fractures with kyphosis deformity. LSF-VP can acquire better rectification of kyphosis and recovery of vertebral body height than PKP.
Objective To compare the curative effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous il iac crest to that of interbody fusion cage for adult instabil ity of lower lumbar. Methods From February 2003 to October 2006,60 inpatients with lower lumbar instabil ity were treated. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: bone-graft group (n=28) was treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with two autologous il iac crests, while cage group (n=32) was treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with two quadrate cages. In the bone-graft group, 17 males and 11 females aged (52.78 ± 10.50) years with 3-16 months of disease course, there were 12 cases of degenerative instabil ity, 14 isthmus sl it ol isthe and 2 iatrogenic instabil ity, including 1 case of L3,4, 17 cases of L4,5 and 10 cases of L5, S1. Relative disc space height was (23.24 ± 6.62) mm, disc space activity was (10.50 ± 5.07)º, sagittal saw sl ippage distance was (4.50 ± 1.15) mm and the JOA score was 18.56 ± 2.68. In the cage group, 19 males and 13 females aged (51.75 ± 10.44) years with 3.5-14.0 months of disease course, there were 16 cases of degenerative instabil ity, 14 isthmus sl it ol isthe and 2 iatrogenic instabil ity, including 16 cases of L4,5 and 16 cases of L5, S1. Relative disc space height was (24.34 ± 7.22) mm, disc space activity was (11.12 ± 5.67)º, sagittal saw sl ippage distance was (4.38 ± 0.75) mm and the JOA score was 19.00 ± 4.12. There was no significant difference between the two groups in termsof age, gender, JOA score, disc space activity and relative disc space height preoperatively (P gt; 0.05). Results All patients received the follow-up at the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month postoperatively. There was no significant difference in operation time and hemorrhage amount between the two groups (P gt; 0.05), but significant difference in the cost of operation (P lt; 0.01). Two cases in the bone-graft group suffered donor site pain and received no treatment. Three cases in the bone-graft group and 2 cases in the cage group had symptom of nerve injury 1-2 days after surgery, which were cured after expectant treatment. There were no pseudoarticulation formation, intervertebral space infection and cage aversion in both groups. Significant difference of relative disc space height was found in each group pre- and post- operatively (P lt; 0.01) and significant differences were evident between the two groups at any of the time points (P lt; 0.01). One month after operation, there was significant difference between the two groups (P lt; 0.05). There was also significant difference at the 3rd, 6th and 12th month after operation (P lt; 0.01). No sign offusion was found in each group at the 1st and 3rd month after operation. In bone-graft group, there were 7 vertebral fusion cases 6 months after operation and 23 vertebral fusion cases 12 months after operation. In cage group, there were 8 vertebral fusion cases 6 months after operation and 29 vertebral fusion cases 12 months after operation. There was no significant difference in the rate of fusion at 6 and 12 months follow-up between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Significant difference of JOA scores was found in each group pre- and post- operatively (P lt; 0.05). And no significant difference in JOA scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up was evident between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference between the two groups in the fusion time, the fusion rate and the cl inical symptoms alleviation, indicating autologous il iac crest is appl icable to interbody fusion for the treatment of adult instabil ity of lower lumbar and good therapeutic effect can be achieved with no immunoreaction and lower cost.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of hydrogen peroxide on anti-infection and reducing postoperative drainage in multi-segmental lumbar surgery.MethodsA clinical data of 510 patients with multi-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases who were treated with surgery between January 2017 and January 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. In study group, the incisions of 230 cases were washed with hydrogen peroxide before suture. In control group, the incisions of 280 cases were washed with normal saline before suture. There was no significant difference in gender, age, lesion type, disease duration, operative segment, and other clinical data between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative incidence of infection were recorded and compared between the two groups. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) standard was used to evaluate infection, which was divided into superficial infection and deep infection.ResultsAll operations completed successfully. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative drainage volume in the study group was significantly less than that in the control group (t=−2.990, P=0.005). A total of 13 patients developed infection after operation, including 10 cases of superficial infection (2 cases in the study group and 8 cases in the control group) with the infection time of (7.3±1.5) days, and 3 cases of deep infection (all in the control group) with the infection time of (16.6±3.1) days. The incidences of superficial and deep infections in the study group were lower than those in the control group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=2.595, P=0.123; P=0.256). All the superficial infections were Staphylococcus aureus infection and recovered after active dressing change. Among the patients with deep infections, 2 cases were infected by Staphylococcus aureus and 1 case was infected by Escherichia coli; and the incisions healed after being washed and sutured thoroughly, and active dressing change.ConclusionThe incidence of postoperative infection and postoperative drainage volume can be reduced by washing the incision with hydrogen peroxide in multi-segmental lumbar surgery.
Objective To review the progress in the features, early cl inical outcomes, and cl inical appl ication of axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) for the minimally invasive treatment of lumbosacral degenerative diseases. Methods The l iterature about the features, early cl inical outcomes, and cl inical appl ication of AxiaLIF for the minimally invasive treatment of lumbosacral degenerative diseases in recent years was reviewed. Results Almost 9 000 procedures performed globally in recent years, AxiaLIF has shown its safety and effectiveness because of high fusion rates, short hospital ization days, and less iatrogenic compl ications in comparison with standard fusion procedures. ConclusionPostoperative long-term outcomes, biomechanics stabil ity, and extended appl ication of AxiaLIF still need a further study,though it suggests an original minimally invasive treatment of lumbosacral degenerative diseases.
Objective To discuss the effectiveness of anterolateral decompression and three column reconstruction through posterior approach for the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fracture. Methods Between March 2009 and October 2011, 39 patients with unstable burst thoracolumbar fracture were treated. Of them, there were 32 males and 7 females, with an average age of 43.8 years (range, 25-68 years). The injury causes included falling from height in 17 cases, bruise in 10 cases, traffic accident in 4 cases, and other in 8 cases. The fracture was located at the T10 level in 1 case, T11 in 9 cases, T12 in 6 cases, L1 in 14 cases, L2 in 7 cases, L3 in 1 case, and L4 in 1 case. According to Frankel classification before operation, 5 cases were classified as grade A, 5 as grade B, 9 as grade C, 14 as grade D, and 6 as grade E. Before operation, the vertebral kyphosis Cobb angle was (26.7 ± 7.1)°; vertebral height loss was 37.5% ± 9.5%; and the space occupying of vertebral canal was 73.7% ± 11.3%. The time between injury and operation was 1-4 days (mean, 2.5 days). All patients underwent anterolateral decompression of spinal canal by posterior approach and three column reconstruction. After operation, the vertebral height restoration, correction of kyphosis, decompression of the spinal canal, and the recovery of nerve function were evaluated. Results Increase of paraplegic level, urinary infection, and pressure sore occurred in 1 case, 1 case, and 2 cases, respectively; no incision infection or neurological complications was observed in the other cases, primary healing of incision was obtained. The patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 27 months). The patients had no aggravation of pain of low back after operation; no loosening and breaking of screws and rods occurred; no titanium alloys electrolysis and titanium cage subsidence or breakage was observed. The imaging examination showed that complete decompression of the spinal canal, satisfactory restoration of the vertebral height, and good physiological curvature of spine at 2 years after operation. At last follow-up, 1 case was classified as Frankel grade A, 2 as grade B, 2 as grade C, 10 as grade D, and 24 as grade E, which was significantly improved when compared with preoperative one (Plt; 0.05). At immediate after operation and last follow-up, the Cobb angle was (6.3 ± 2.1)° and (6.5 ± 2.4)° respectively; the vertebral height loss was 7.9% ± 2.7% and 8.2% ± 3.0% respectively; and the indexes were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The technique of anterolateral decompression and three column reconstruction through posterior approach is one perfect approach to treat unstable thoracolumbar fracture because of complete spinal cord canal decompression, three column reconstruction, and immediate recovery of the spinal stability after operation.