ObjectiveTo investigate the prognostic value and consistency of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) in perioperative nutritional status of patients with esophageal cancer.MethodsClinical data of 224 patients, including 186 males and 38 females with an average age of 63.08±8.42 years, who underwent esophageal cancer surgery in our hospital from November 2017 to August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The PNI was calculated according to the results of the first time blood and biochemical tests, and the PG-SGA assessment was also performed. According to the PNI value, the patients were divided into a good nutrition group (PNI≥45, 60 patients) and a malnutrition group (PNI<45, 164 patients). According to the PG-SGA score, the patients were divided into a good nutrition group (PG-SGA<4, 75 patients) and a malnutrition group (PG-SGA≥4, 149 patients). Nutrition-related haematological indexes and body mass index (BMI) were compared between the two groups, and the consistency of PNI and PG-SGA for nutritional assessment was analyzed.ResultsThe nutrition-related haematological indexes in different PNI groups were statistically different in the perioperative period (P<0.01). The longitudinal changes of prealbumin in patients of different PG-SGA groups were statistically different (P<0.05); the BMI of patients in different PG-SGA groups was statistically different in the perioperative period (P<0.01). The Kappa coefficient of the two indicators was 0.589 (P<0.001).ConclusionBoth PNI and PG-SGA can predict the nutritional risk of patients with esophageal cancer to some extent. PNI is an objective monitoring indicator, and PG-SGA is a subjective evaluation indicator, the combined use of which can more comprehensively reflect and predict the nutritional status of patients, and provide an important reference to the development of individualized nutrition support programs.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team on the perioperation management of geriatric patients with hip fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 489 geriatric patients with hip fractures (femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture) between January 1st 2016 and January 1st 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 279 patients were treated with the multidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration care (observation group) and 210 patients were treated with the conventional therapeutics and nursing care (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, type and classification of fracture, the interval between injury and admission, and Charlson index between the two groups (P>0.05). The surgery rates, time from hospitalization to operation, length of stay, and the incidences of perioperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe surgery rate was 90.32% (252/279) in observation group and 80.48% (169/210) in control group, showing significant difference between the two groups (χ2=9.703, P=0.002). The time from hospitalization to operation and length of stay in observation group [(5.39±2.47), (10.56±3.76) days] were significant shorter than those in control group [(6.13±2.79), (12.27±3.11) days] (t=−3.075, P=0.002; t=−5.330, P=0.000). The incidence of respiratory complications was 46.15% in control group and 30.56% in observation group; the incidence of cardiovascular system complications was 69.23% in control group and 51.19% in observation group; the incidence of cerebrovascular system complications was 20.12% in control group and 11.11% in observation group; the incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 40.24% in control group and 25.40% in observation group. The incidences of perioperative complications were significantly lower in observation group than in control group (P<0.05).ConclusionMultidisciplinary doctor-nurse collaboration team is conducive not only to improve the surgery rates, but also to reduce perioperative complications as well as shorten the length of stay and preoperative waiting time.
The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was firstly demonstrated in practice by the Danish scholar Henrik Kehlet in the early 2000s. At present, the ERAS concept has been widely used in a variety of surgical fields, but its application in esophageal cancer surgery is still limited. The new esophageal ERAS guidelines issued by ERAS Association bring new opportunities for the application and promotion of esophageal cancer surgery. Combined with the current situation of esophageal cancer surgery in China and related literature, in this paper we discuss the specific measures of ERAS concept in perioperative application of esophageal cancer in China.
ObjectiveThe clinical trial evidence and expert consensus in the airway management were systematically summarized in this guideline to provide clinical guidance for healthcare professionals.MethodsA total of 40 clinical questions were proposed by 32 experts, and 12 clinical questions were finally identified through the Delphi method and the PICO (patient, intervention, control, outcome) principle from 2019 to 2020. PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang database and CNKI were searched from establishment of each database up to November, 2020. The evidence of 160 articles was graded according to GRADE method, including 18 in class A, 36 in class B, 69 in class C, and 37 in class D. Four symposiums were organized for discussion of the recommendations. Finally, 23 recommendations were made for these 12 clinical questions, among which 10 were strongly recommended and 13 were weakly recommended.ResultsSmoking cessation for at least 4 weeks, pulmonary function assessment and pulmonary rehabilitation exercise were recommended in the perioperative period, especially at least 1 week of pulmonary rehabilitation exercise for the patients with high risk factors. Anesthesia was maintained by inhalation or intravenous anesthesia. It was recommended to choose short acting drugs, monitor the depth of anesthesia and muscle relaxation during operation, and use protective ventilation strategy. Postoperative use of drugs and mechanical measures to prevent venous thromboembolism, the appropriate application of drainage tube, preemptive analgesia and multimodal analgesia for pain management were recommended. Inhaled corticosteroids with bronchodilators could be used in perioperative period to reduce airway hyperresponsiveness and postoperative cough.ConclusionFor perioperative airway management, smoking cessation, pulmonary function assessment and pulmonary rehabilitation exercise are recommended in the perioperative period. The rational use of anesthetic drugs and protective ventilation strategy are emphasized during the operations. Postoperative pain management and cough treatment should be strengthened, and drainage tube should be used properly.
Objective To study the effect of perioperative nutritional support on protein metabolism and immunity in patients underwent liver transplantation. Methods A total of 80 patients who underwent liver transplantation in our hospital from March 2015 to March 2016 were collected retrospectively, and then the 80 patients were divided into control group (n=40) and observation group (n=40) according to the type of perioperative nutritional support. Patients of control group didn’t receive preoperatively nutritional support, and received total parenteral nutrition support before postoperative exhaust, then received enteral nutrition support after anal exhaust. Patients of observation group receive preoperatively nutritional support before surgery, and received parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition support before postoperative exhaust. The several parameters about nutritional status and immune function were observed on 7 days and 14 days after liver transplantation, and comparison of the 2 group in these parameters was performed. Results On the protein metabolism, the levels of serum transferrin, prealbumin, and nitrogen balance on 14 days after liver transplantation were higher than those of other time points (before liver transplantation and 7 days after liver transplantation),P<0.05, both in control group and observation group. There was no significant difference in the levels of serum transferrin, prealbumin, and value of nitrogen balance between the 2 groups before liver transplantation (P>0.05). But on 7 days and 14 days after liver transplantation, the levels of serum transferrin, prealbumin, and value of nitrogen balance of the observation group were higher than those of control group (P<0.05). On the immunity, the total number of lymphocytes, value of IgG and CD4/CD8 on 14 days after liver transplantation, were superior to other time points (before liver transplantation and 7 days after liver transplantation),P<0.05, both in control group and observation group. There was no significant difference in the total number of lymphocytes, value of IgG and CD4/CD8 between the 2 groups before liver transplantation (P>0.05). But on 7 days and 14 days after liver transplantation, the levels of the total number of lymphocytes, value of IgG and CD4/CD8 in the observation group were superior to those of control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Perioperative nutritional support can improve the nutritional status and immune function in patients underwent liver transplantation.
In tracheal resection and reconstruction, a technically demanding, complex, and high-risk procedure, management of the anastomotic site significantly impacts postoperative outcomes and long-term quality of life. However, comprehensive studies detailing perioperative anastomotic management strategies in tracheal reconstruction remain scarce. This review summarizes perioperative management strategies for tracheal reconstruction, covering preoperative assessment, surgical techniques, and other key aspects. It also highlights future research directions and challenges, aiming to provide clinicians with a systematic guide to perioperative management in tracheal reconstruction.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and feasibility of non-nasogastric tube throughout the perioperative period of classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 63 patients who underwent Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2020 to August 2023. According to whether nasogastric tube was placed throughout the perioperative period, the patients were divided into nasogastric tube group (NGT group, n=32) and no nasogastric tube group (no NGT group, n=31). The intraoperative indicators such as gastrointestinal anastomosis mode and outcome measures such as postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results① Preoperative baseline data: the proportion of benign diseases (P=0.005) and preoperative pancreatitis (P=0.003) of the no NGT group were higher than those of the NGT group, and other preoperative baseline data, such as age and sex, were not statistically significant (P>0.05). ② Intraoperative index: the proportion of circular stapler (P=0.009) was smaller and the operation time was shorter (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in the anastomosis, intraoperative blood transfusion and intraoperative bleeding (P>0.05). ③ Postoperative outcome measures: the postoperative length of hospital stay (P<0.001) and the incidence of delayed gastric emptying (P<0.001) of the no NGT group were lower than those in the NGT group, but the postoperative time of food intake, incidence of pancreatic fistula, incidence of postoperative bleeding, and Clavien-Dindo grade of complications were not significant (P>0.05), and on one died within 30 d after operation. ConclusionsThe results of this study preliminarily show that, it is safe and feasible not to place nasogastric tubes throughout the perioperativeperiod in patients undergoing classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. Compared with placing nasogastric tube, it can shorten the postoperative hospital stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of early enteral nutrition (EEN) support in the perioperative period of children with perforated appendicitis based on the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). MethodsThe children with perforated appendicitis were collected as an observation group, who underwent EEN support treatment based on the ERAS mode from January 2021 to December 2022 in the Xuzhou Children’s Hospital. At the same time, the children with perforated appendicitis received conventional nutrition support from January 2019 to December 2020 were matched as a control group according to the principle of balanced and comparable baseline data such as the gender, age, disease course, pathological type, and body mass index with the observation group. The time of first exhaust or defecation and the hospital stay after surgery were compared. Meanwhile, the nutritional indexes [prealbumin (PA), albumin (ALB), hemoglobin (Hb)], immune indexes [immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgM, IgG], serum inflammatory factors [C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)] before surgery, on day 1 and 7 after surgery were compared. And the adverse effects were observed. ResultsThere were 40 children with perforated appendicitis in the observation group and the control group, respectively. There were no statistical differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, course of disease, pathological type, and body mass index between the two groups (P>0.05). The time of first exhaust or defecation and the hospital stay after surgery in the observation group were shorter than in the control group (t=3.234, P=0.002; t=5.582, P<0.001). The levels of PA, ALB, Hb, IgA, IgM, and IgG in the observation group were higher than in the control group on day 7 after surgery (P<0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α in the observation group were lower than in the control group on day 7 after surgery (P<0.05）. The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group [5.0% (2/40) vs. 22.5% (9/40), χ2=5.165, P=0.023]. ConclusionsFrom on the results of this study, EEN support based on ERAS during perioperative period of children with perforated appendicitis contributes to recover gastrointestinal function, correct nutritional status, improve immune function, and reduce inflammation, and which has a higher safety for children with perforated appendicitis.
ObjectiveTo analyze the perioperative outcomes of cardiac valve surgery in patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. MethodsThe perioperative clinical data of patients receiving heart valve replacement in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from November 2022 to February 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the patients were infected with SARS-CoV-2, they were divided into a non-infected group and an asymptomatic group. The perioperative data of the patients were compared between the two groups, and the effect of asymptomatic infection on the result of heart valve replacement surgery was analyzed. ResultsA total of 66 patients were enrolled including 36 males and 30 females with a mean age of 58.0±11.1 years. There were 51 patients in the non-infected group and 15 patients in the asymtomatic group. There were 2 patients of mitral valve replacement, 20 patients of aortic valve replacement, 1 patient of double valve replacement, 3 patients of aortic valve replacement with tricuspid valvoplasty, 22 patients of mitral valve replacement and tricuspid valvoplasty, 18 patients of double valve replacement and tricuspid valvoplasty. Asymptomatic infected patients received more emergency surgery than uninfected patients (26.7% vs. 0.0%, P<0.01). There was no statistical difference in the duration of extracorporeal circulation, aortic occlusion, mechanical ventilation time after the surgery, ICU stay, postoperative drainage volume, or postoperative complications between the two groups. ConclusionPerioperative results of cardiac valve surgery in patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and non-infection are almost the same.
Objective To evaluate the effect of fast track surgery (FTS) after esophageal cancer surgery. Methods The randomized controlled trial (RCT) and observational studies about FTS for esophageal cancer in PubMed、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CBM、CNKI and WanFang databases were searched up to May 2017. Then the studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two researchers. Data were analyzed by Stata12.0 software. Results Totally 13 RCTs and 5 observational studies with 2 447 patients were eligible for analysis. Compared with the control group, incidence of postoperative complications (OR=0.53, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.71, P<0.05) significantly reduced in the FTS group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups in readmission rate (OR=1.21, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.76, P=0.313) and 30 d mortality rate (OR=0.72, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.20, P=0.207). Conclusion FTS can safely and effectively accelerate the recovery of patients with esophageal cancer and it owns important clinical values.