In recent years, the computer science represented by artificial intelligence and high-throughput sequencing technology represented by omics play a significant role in the medical field. This paper reviews the research progress of the application of artificial intelligence combined with omics data analysis in the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), aiming to provide ideas for the development of a more effective artificial intelligence algorithm, and improve the diagnosis rate and prognosis of patients with early NSCLC through a non-invasive way.
ObjectiveTo explore the association of pretreatment hyponatremia with clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, VIP, CNKI and WanFang databases were searched from the inception to July 12, 2021 for relevant literatures. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) score. The relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were combined to assess the relationship between pretreatment hyponatremia and clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics. The prognostic indicators included the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). All statistical analysis was conducted by the STATA 15.0 software. ResultsA total of 10 high-quality studies (NOS score≥6 points) involving 10 045 patients were enrolled and all participants were from Asian or European regions. The pooled results demonstrated that male [RR=1.18, 95%CI (1.02, 1.36), P=0.026], non-adenocarcinoma [RR=0.86, 95%CI (0.81, 0.91), P＜0.001] and TNM Ⅲ-Ⅳ stage [RR=1.17, 95%CI (1.12, 1.21), P＜0.001] patients were more likely to experience hyponatremia. Besides, pretreatment hyponatremia was significantly related to worse OS [HR=1.83, 95%CI (1.53, 2.19), P＜0.001] and PFS [HR=1.54, 95%CI (1.02, 2.34), P=0.040]. Pretreatment hyponatremia was a risk factor for poor prognosis of NSCLC patients. ConclusionMale, non-adenocarcinoma and advance stage NSCLC patients are more likely to experience hyponatremia. Meanwhile, the pretreatment sodium level can be applied as one of the prognostic evaluation indicators in NSCLC and patients with hyponatremia are more likely to have poor survival. However, more researches are still needed to verify above findings.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodWe electronically searched databases including the Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2017), PubMed, Embase, China Biology Medicine Database, China National Knowledge Internet Database, VIP Database and Wangfang Data from the establishment to May 2017. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, case series and case reports on crizotinib for NSCLC were included. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, assessed the methodological quality of included studies, then make Meta-analysis and descriptive analysis.ResultA total of 15 studies were included, including 4 RCTs, 1 non-RCT, 4 case series and 6 case reports. The results indicated that the progression-free survival time of crizotinib group was 8 months, which was better than chemotherapy group (4.6 months). The results of Meta-analysis showed that the response rate in the crizotinib group was higher than that in the chemotherapy group [RR=2.35, 95%CI (1.59, 3.46), P<0.000 1]. The one year survival rate in the crizotinib group was 74.5%-78.6%. The incidences of adverse reactions including dysopsia, dysgeusia, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, transaminase lifts, upper respiratory tract infection, edema and dizziness in the crizotinib group were higher than those in the chemotherapy group (P<0.05), while the incidences of adverse reactions including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, alopecia and fatigue in crizotinib group were lower than those in the chemotherapy group (P<0.05). Subgroup analysis under precision treatment showed the progression-free survival time of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive group was 8 months, and it was longer than ALK-negative group of 4 months.ConclusionsBased on current evidence, crizotinib is better than chemotherapy for NSCLC. Due to limited quality of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be verifed by more high quality studies.
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the significance of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C （VEGF-C） and cytokeratin 19 （CK19） in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Methods A total of 269 patients with NSCLC who underwent standard lobectomy and lymph node dissection by the same surgical team in our hospital from January 2004 to June 2005 were included in this study. All the clinical data and follow-up results were complete, and all the pathological specimens were well kept. No preoperative or postoperative adjuvant therapy such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy was administered to those patients. Expressions of VEGF-C in cancer tissues was detected by immunohistochemical streptavidin-peroxidase （S-P） method, and CK19 was marked to examine micrometastasis in hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Clinical outcomes, pathological results and follow-up data were analyzed in combination with VEGF-C and CK19 expression. Results VEGF-C expression was not statistically different between different category in sex（Hc=1.722，P=0.084）, age （Hc=0.914，P=0.360）, smoking （Hc=2.440，P=0.295）, pathology type （Hc=5.668，P=0.058）or tumor size （Hc=0.165，P=0.920） . VEGF-C expression was statistically different between different groups of pathological differentiation （Hc=29.178，P=0.000). CK19 expression was not statistically different between different category in sex（χ2=0.000，P=0.999）, age （χ2=0.005，P=0.999）, smoking （χ2=2.294，P=0.317）, pathology type （χ2=0.573，P=0.289）, tumor size（χ2=0.006，P=0.999）, and pathological differentiation （χ2=2.927，P=0.231）. Five-year survival rate was statistically different between different grade of VEGF-C expression （χ2=37.318，P=0.000), and was also statistically different between positive group and negative group of CK19 （χ2=39.987，P=0.000). There was statistical difference between different grade of VEGF-C expression and positive rate of CK19 （χ2=25.954，P=0.000). Conclusion Expression of VEGF-C and CK19 is closely related to postoperative 5-year survival of patients with stage I NSCLC. Detection of VEGF-C and CK19 is of great clinical significance as it is helpful to predict patient prognosis and choose proper postoperative adjuvant therapy.
In recent years, many scholars have explored the clinical application value of a number of peripheral hematology indexes in tumor patients. The significant correlation of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio with the prognosis in various tumors has also been confirmed. At present, more peripheral blood indexes have been gradually applied to the evaluation of the prognosis in patients with malignant tumors. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a type of highly malignant tumor and most patients are in advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. The evaluation value of tumor stage for survival is extremely limited. Therefore, this review intends to explain the relationship between various peripheral hematology indexes and the prognosis of SCLC patients, so as to provide some academic evidence for the clinical assessment of the survival of SCLC patients and formulation of appropriate treatment strategy, which may contribute to the improvement of the prognosis.
ObjectiveTo analyze the correlation between folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells (FR+CTC) and the benign or malignant lesions of the lung, and to establish a malignant prediction model for pulmonary neoplasm based on clinical data, imaging and FR+CTC tests.MethodsA retrospective analysis was done on 1 277 patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from September 2018 to December 2019, including 518 males and 759 females, with a median age of 57 (29-85) years. They underwent CTC examination of peripheral blood and had pathological results of pulmonary nodules and lung tumors. The patients were randomly divided into a trial group and a validation group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the data of the two groups. Then the nomogram prediction model was established and verified internally and externally. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to test the differentiation of the model and calibration curve was used to test the consistency of the model.ResultsTotally 925 patients suffered non-small cell lung cancer and 113 patients had benign diseases in the trial group; 219 patients suffered non-small cell lung cancer and 20 patients had benign diseases in the verification group. The FR+CTC in the peripheral blood of non-small cell lung cancer patients was higher than that found in the lungs of the patients who were in favorite conditions (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age≥60 years, female, FR+CTC value>8.7 FU/3 mL, positive pleural indenlation sign, nodule diameter, positive burr sign, consolidation/tumor ratio<1 were independent risk factors for benign and malignant lung tumors with a lesion diameter of ≤4 cm. Thereby, the nomogram prediction model was established. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the trial group was 0.918, the sensitivity was 86.36%, and the specificity was 83.19%. The AUC value of the verification group was 0.903, the sensitivity of the model was 79.45%, and the specificity was 90.00%, indicating nomogram model discrimination was efficient. The calibration curve also showed that the nomogram model calibration worked well.ConclusionFR+CTC in the peripheral blood of non-small cell lung cancer patients is higher than that found in the lungs of the patients who carry benign pulmonary diseases. The diagnostic model of clinical stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer established in this study owns good accuracy and can provide a basis for clinical diagnosis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the changes in pulmonary function after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) segmentectomy.MethodsA total of 59 patients (30 males and 29 females) who underwent segmentectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from July to October 2017 were included. There were 33 patients (18 males and 15 females) in the VATS group and 26 patients (12 males and 14 females) in the RATS group. Lung function tests were performed before surgery, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Intra- and inter-group comparisons of lung function retention values were performed between the two groups of patients to analyze differences in lung function retention after VATS and RATS segmentectomy.ResultsThe forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) in the VATS group and the RATS group were significantly lower than those before surgery (P<0.05), and they increased significantly within 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). The recovery was not obvious after 6 months (P>0.05), and they were still lower than those before surgery. In addition, the retentions of FEV1 and FVC in the VATS group and the RATS group were similar in 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after operation with no statistical difference(P>0.05). ConclusionPulmonary function decreases significantly in 1 month after minimally invasive segmentectomy, and the recovery is obvious in 6 months after the operation, then the pulmonary function recovery gradually stabilizes 12 months after surgery. FEV1 of the patients in the two groups recovers to 93% and 94%, respectively. There is no statistical difference in pulmonary function retention after VATS and RATS segmentectomy.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The efficacy of TKIs and prognosis of EGFR-mutated patients with compound EGFR mutation, oncogene mutation, suppresser gene mutation or other diver gene mutation are worse than those of patients with a single EGFR mutation. This article makes a review of related clinical researches aiming to provide references for clinical scenarios. To sum up, molecular alterations and clinical features should be correlated as accurately and dynamically as possible in the diagnostic and therapeutic process, and combined therapeutic strategies should be chosen flexibly and reasonably to improve patients’ survival and prognosis.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gefitinib in comparison with platinum-based doublets chemotherapy as a first-line precision treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and find the benefit population of gefitinib. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet, VIP database and China Biology Medicine database were searched to collect the randomized contolled trials (RCTs) of gefitinib vs. platinum-based doublets chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC from inception to November, 2017. The data in the included RCTs were extracted, and the qualities were assessed in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration, and a Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 software. Results Four trials were included, including 968 subjects in the gefitinib group and 968 subjects in the chemotherapy group, and a majority of the subjects were diagnosed advanced adenocarcinoma, and all of the subjects were East Asians. The results of Meta-analysis showed that in all population or patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive, gefitinib was better than chemotherapy in progression-free survival (PFS) [in all population: hazard ratio (HR)=0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.67, 0.85), P<0.000 01; in patients withEGFR mutation-positive: HR=0.42, 95%CI (0.35, 0.50), P<0.000 01] and objective response rate (ORR) [in all population: risk ratio (RR)=1.30, 95%CI (1.15, 1.47), P<0.000 1; in patients withEGFR mutation-positive: RR=1.92, 95%CI (1.46, 2.52), P<0.000 01], and there was no significant difference between the two groups in overall survival (OS) (P>0.05); but inEGFR mutation-negative, chemotherapy was better than gefitinib in PFS [HR=2.09, 95%CI (1.05, 4.13), P=0.03]. Subgroup analysis showed that in female patients, for patients with Performance Status (PS) score 0 or 1, and the ones who never smoked, gefitinib was better than chemotherapy in PFS (P<0.05); but there was no significant difference between the two groups in OS (P>0.05). The incidences of rash, itching, dry skin, paronychia, diarrhea, aminotransferase abnormality were higher in the gefitinib group (P<0.05), while the incidences of hair loss, vomiting, nausea, constipation, anorexia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, nerve toxicity reaction were higher in the chemotherapy group (P<0.05). Conclutions Based on the current evidence, in patients with adenocarcinoma of East Asians, the benefit population are those with the characteristics of EGFR mutation-positive, female, never smoking, and PS 0 or 1. In the aspect of safety, the common adverse drug events in subjects treated with gefitinib are the damage of skin mucous membrane, but the incidences of digestive system diseases and the blood system diseases are less in patients treated with gefitinib than those with chemotherapy.
Objective To study the short-term outcome and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with recombinant human endostatin (endostar) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods Between December 2013 and December 2014, 80 consecutive patients (50 males, 30 females) with biopsy-proved NSCLC were divided into two groups: a RFA combined treatment group (RFA combined with endostar, 60 patients, 38 males, 22 females, mean age at 67.77±10.43 years) and a RFA alone group (20 patients, 12 males, 8 females, mean age at 67.35±9.82 years). The RFA combined treatment group was divided into three groups according to vascular normalization window of endostar and 20 patients in each group: a combined treatment group 1 (transfusion of endostar after RFA), a combined treatment group 2 (transfusion of endostar for 1 to 3 d before RFA) and a combined treatment group 3 (transfusion of endostar for 4 to 7 d before RFA). The CT scan of the chest was followed up after the treatment, local recurrence and safety was observed. Results There was a statistical difference in local recurrence time among groups (χ2 = 11.05, P = 0.011). The effect of the combined treatment group is better than that of the radiofrequency ablation therapy alone group. And in the recombinant human endostatin of tumor vascular normalization time best combination therapy was observed in the near future effect compared with the radiofrequency ablation therapy alone. In this study common complications were associated with radiofrequency ablation. No recombinant human endostatin related complication was found. There was no satistical difference in safety between the combined treatment group and the radiofrequency ablation therapy group (χ2= 0.889, P > 0.05). Conclusion RFA combined with endostar is safe and effective for non-small cell lung cancer.