ObjectiveTo investigate the significance of catheter thrombolysis combined with one-stage iliac vein percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (or stent implantation) in the treatment of acute left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis secondary to Cockett syndrome.MethodsForty-one cases of Cockett syndrome complicated with acute left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis were retrospectively analyzed and summarized in our hospital from January 2016 to June 2019. Catheter directed thrombolysis was performed under the protection of filter, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stent implantation was performed in the first stage of the iliac vein stenosis or occlusion after thrombolysis. Compared the circumference of upper and lower legs of 15 cm above and below patella of the healthy and affected limbs, before and after treatment, and analyzed the venous patency rate.ResultsThe average time of using thrombolytic catheter were (7±3) days, and the average dosage of urokinase was (358.32±69.38) ×104 U. A total of thirty-five Bard stents were implanted (35 cases), four cases underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and two cases gave up treatment. Before and after treatment, the circumference difference of the higher leg, the circumference difference of the lower leg, and the venous patency were significantly different before and after thrombolysis (P<0.01). The venous patency rate was 58%–75% in this group, and the average venous patency rate was (61±10)%. There was no severe bleeding complication occurred. Thirty-five patients were followed up for 3–26 months, the preservation rate of the valve was 82.86% (29/35), and the first patency rate of iliac vein was 100% (39/39). During the follow-up period, thrombosis recurred in one case of untreated iliac vein, and acute thrombosis in the right side of one case was caused by long iliac vein stent entering the inferior vena cava. No pulmonary embolism was found.ConclusionOn the basis of catheter thrombolysis, one stage removal of iliac vein obstruction in the treatment of acute left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis can relieve the clinical symptoms, reduce the recurrence rate of thrombosis, and reduce the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis syndrome after catheter thrombolysis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the main influence factors of microbubble-enhanced sono-thrombolysis by an orthogonal array experimental design (OAD) and to confirm the optimal parameters of microbubble-enhanced sono-thrombolysis in vitro. Methods The peripheral blood was collected from 50 female Sprague Dawley rats to prepare the standard plasma, and then 100 μL standard plasma and 25 μL thrombin (0.15 U/μL) were mixed and incubated in 37℃ water bath for 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours respectively to prepare corresponding standardized thrombus. The physical parameters for the designed experiments included transmit powers of ultrasound (factor A: 5%, 25%, 50%, and 100%), microbubble volume (factor B: 50, 100, 200, and 400 μL), urokinase (UK) concentration (factor C: 100, 200, 400, and 800 U/mL), and thrombolysis time (factor D: 10, 20, 30, and 40 minutes), respectively. Then an OAD based on four parameters and four levels [L16(45)] was employed to optimize the thrombolysis conditions. The ultrasound frequency was 1.82 MHz. HE staining and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to observe the clots before and after thrombolysis. The thrombolysis rate was measured. ResultsHE staining and SEM observation showed that the fibrin was dissolved after thrombolysis. According to the OAD, the optimal parameter combination was C4-D4-A1-B4, indicating UK concentration 800 U/mL, thrombolysis time 40 minutes, transmit power of ultrasound 5%, and microbubble volume 400 μL, respectively. The four factors above had significant influence on thrombolysis (P lt; 0.05), and UK concentration was the most significant. There were significant differences in thrombolysis between different thrombolysis time (P lt; 0.05). ConclusionUnder the condition of fixed ultrasound frequency, microbubble-enhanced sono-thrombolysis efficiency is better in lower transmit power of ultrasound, higher UK concentration, longer thrombolysis time, higher microbubble volume, and shorter thrombolysis time
ObjectiveTo compare the differences of incidence rate and severity of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) of patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) treated by catherter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) or via peripheral vein thrombolysis (PVT).MethodsThe patients with unilateral lower extremity DVT who had received anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy in the Nanchong Central Hospital from January 2012 to January 2015 were collected. These patients were divided into CDT group and PVT group according to the different thrombolysis methods, and then the thrombolytic rates, thrombolytic complications, and the incidence rate and severity of PTS of 5-year follow up results were calculated and compared.ResultsA total of 137 cases of DVT were collected, 79 in the CDT group and 58 in the PVT group. There were no significant differences in the gender, age, course of disease, thrombus type, and other baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). The thrombolytic rate of the CDT group was (78.6±16.3)% and PVT group was (27.3±12.1)%, the difference was significant (t=21.14, P<0.001). The rate of thrombolytic complications between the PVT group and CDT group had no statistical significance (32.8% versus 21.5%, χ2=2.18, P=0.134). The 5-year follow up was completed in 116 cases, 74 patients from the CDT group and 42 patients from the PVT group respectively, the result showed that the incidence rate of the PTS in the CDT group was lower than that in the PVT group (35.1% versus 88.1%, χ2=30.28, P<0.001), and theseverity of PTS in the CDT group was milder than that in the PVT group too (Z=16.52,P<0.001).ConclusionFrom the results of this study, CDT is able to increase thrombolytic rate and effectively reduce incidence rate and severity of PTS.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) combined with anticoagulation (AC) and AC in the treatment of acute proximal deep venous thrombosis (APDVT) of the lower extremities. MethodsThe clinical data of 184 APDVT patients treated in Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2017 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into CDT group (n=82, CDT combined with AC) and AC group (n=102, AC alone). The prognosis indicators such as the incidence of bleeding events, the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), Villalta score, venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and chronic lower limb venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) score were compared between the two groups. ResultsCompared with the AC group, the CDT group had a higher incidence of bleeding events [11.0% (9/82) vs. 2.9% (3/102)], a shorter time to detumescent [(2.8±1.2) d vs. (7.2±1.9) d], and lower VS score [3 (2,4) vs. 3 (2, 7)], VCSS score [2.0 (1.7, 4.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0, 5.2)] and postoperative venous patency score [1 (1, 2) vs. 2 (1, 3)], and higher CIVIQ score [80.0 (77.0, 86.0) vs. 71.5 (68.0, 78.0)], P<0.05. However, there were no significant differences in the incidence of PTS [28.2% (22/78) vs. 36.5% (35/96)] and thrombosis recurrence rate [9.0% (7/78) vs. 11.5% (11/96)] between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionCDT can relieve the symptoms and improve the quality of life of APDVT faster than AC, but it is necessary to strictly grasp the indications of thrombolysis to reduce the risk of bleeding.
ObjectiveTo compare vein valve function following pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) with simple catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for deep vein thrombosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of sixty patients who suffered acute lower extremity deep vein thrombsis in our hospital between October 2016 and March 2017. All patients underwent contralateral preprocedural duplex and bilateral postprocedure duplex to access patency and valve function. The patients were divided into three groups including a group A with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) alone (36 patients with 20 males and 16 females at average age of 56 years), a group B with PMT alone (15 patients with 8 males and 7 females at average age of 55 years), and a group C with PMT combined CDT (9 patients with 4 males and 5 females at average age of 56 years). The valve function was compared among the Group A, Group B and Group C.ResultsThere were 40.0% (24/60) patients with bilateral femoral vein valve reflux, 40.0% (24/60) patients with unilateral femoral vein valve reflux (all in the treated limbs), 20% (12/60) patients had no reflux in both limbs. Of the limbs treated with CDT alone, PMT alone and PMT combined CDT, the rate of valve reflux was 38.9% (14/36), 33.3% (5/15), and 55.6% (5/9) respectively (P=0.077).ConclusionIn the patients suffering acute DVT, PMT or PMT combined CDT does not hamper valve function compared with CDT alone.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) with AngioJet mechanical thrombus aspiration system for the acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities. MethodsThe clinical data of 72 patients (72 limbs) with acute DVT who underwent PMT with AngioJet system from December 2015 to June 2018 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsOf the 72 cases, 30 cases underwent PMT alone, while 42 cases underwent PMT combined with catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT). Thrombus clearance rate of grade Ⅲ was obtained in 49 cases (68.05%), grade Ⅱ in 20 cases (27.78%), and grade Ⅰ in 3 cases (4.17%). Thirty-five cases were found with May-Thurner syndrome, and 34 cases were treated with stenting while 1 case complicated with iliac bleeding. The rates of PTS were 1.41% (1/71), 3.57% (2/56), 4.55% (2/44), and 20.00% (3/15) at 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year after intervention, respectively. The deep vein patency rates were 86.36% (38/44) and 80.00% (12/15) at 1-year and 2-year after intervention, respectively. The iliac stent patency rates were 100% (23/23) and 87.50% (7/8) at 1-year and 2-year after intervention, respectively. ConclusionThe effect of PMT assisted with CDT for the acute DVT of lower extremities is satisfactory, but its long-term efficacy needs to be further observed.
ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic evaluation of catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular in the treatment of lower extremity atherosclerotic occlusive disease (ASO). MethodsClinical data of 64 ASO patients who were treated in our hospital from June 2011 to October 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups according to the therapies:33 patients were treated by catheter-directed thrombolysis combined with multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular (combination group), and the other 31 patients were only treated by multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular (intervention group). Comparison of the clinical indexes was performed between the 2 groups, including vascular patency rate, stent implantation rate, operation time, ankle-brachial index (ABI), saturation of blood oxygen (SO2) of toes, temperature of foot skin, amputation rate, and hospitalization expense. ResultsIn the same group (combination group and intervention group), compared with the time point of before operation, the clinical indexes of the ABI, SO2 of toes, and temperature of foot skin were higher after operation (P<0.05). At the same time point of before or after operation, there were no significant difference between the 2 groups in ABI, SO2 of toes, and temperature of foot skin (P>0.05). The vascular patency rate of combination group was higher than that of intervention group[97.0% (32/33) vs. 83.9% (26/31)], P<0.05. But the stent implantation rate[18.2% (6/33) vs. 64.5% (20/31)], amputation rate[3.0% (1/33) vs. 16.1% (5/31)], operative time[(2.0±0.5) h vs. (4.0±1.1) h], and hospitalization expense of patients who got successful limb salvage[(8 500±1 200) yuan vs. (34 000±2 100) yuan] of combination group were all lower or shorter than those of intervention group (P<0.05). After operation, there were no complication happened in the patients who got successful limb salvage of combination group (n=32) and intervention group (n=26). In postoperative 6 months, the lower extremity arteries in patients who got successful limb salvage of combination group and intervention group were all examined by color ultrasonography, and they were unblocked. The lower extremity arteries of the patients with stent implantation in the 2 groups suffered with no obvious stenosis or occlusion. ConclusionsCatheter-directed thrombolysis combined with multiple minimally invasive techniques of endovascular can become one of the surgical treatment methods for ASO, which characterized by minimally invasive operation, effective treatment, and low cost.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) in treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis (ADVT) in lower extremity. MethodsLimb circumference at 15 cm above and below the knee at affected side, as well as patency improvement score of 46 patients with ADVT in lower extremity, who received treatment in The Rocket Army General Hospital of PLA between January 2014 and October 2015, were colleted retrospectively, to analyze the effect of CDT in treatment of ADVT in lower extremity. ResultsAll patients were placed catheter successfully, 5 patients were placed catheter by 'contralateral mountain' technique retrograde, 40 patients were placed catheter through the limb popliteal vein at affected side anterograde, guiding by ultrasound, 1 patient was placed catheter through femoral vein at affected side. All of 46 patients got successful thrombolysis, and thrombolysis time was (4.7±1.8) d (3-12 d). There were 8 patients suffered from complications in different situation, and got treatment of drug withdrawal or tube drawing all ease, no one died. Compared with before CDT treatment in same group, the limb circumference at 15 cm above (P=0.028, P=0.017, P=0.031) and below (P=0.035, P=0.038, P=0.047) the knee at affected side, and patency improvement score (P=0.023, P=0.028, P=0.031) in all patients group, 22-45 years group, and 46-74 years group were all lower after CDT treatment. The limb circumference at 15 cm above (P=0.073, P=0.387, P=0.358) and below (P=0.416, P=0.625, P=0.253) the knee at affected side after CDT treatment were not differed with corresponding indexes of healthy side in the same group of all patients group, 22-45 years group, and 46-74 years group. Ultrasound after treatment showed that, blood vessel recanalization occurred in 15 patients (32.6%), partial blood vessel recanalization occurred in 28 patients (60.9%), but thrombus of 3 patients (6.5%) didn't removed, the total effective rate was 93.5% (43/46). Forty three patients were followed up for 1-24 months, the median is 18-month. During follow-up period, skin color obviously deepened after the activity occurred in 5 patients, obvious limb acid bilges occurred in 19 patients, vein thrombosis (DVT) recurred in 9 patients of 28 patients with partial blood vessel recanalization, in addition, thrombosis syndrome (PTS) occurred in 11 patients. ConclusionCDT is the most direct and effective way to treat ADVT.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) versus anti-coagulation (AC) for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data and CNKI databases to collect randomized clinical trials (RCTs) about CDT versus AC for DVT from inception to March 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 5 RCTs and 989 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two group in incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.49 to 1.09, P=0.13), iliofemoral venous patency rate (RR=2.57, 95%CI 0.59 to 11.24, P=0.21), bleeding (RR=2.03, 95%CI 0.50 to 8.28, P=0.32), severe bleeding (RR=1.77, 95%CI 0.91 to 3.42, P=0.09) and recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.42 to 2.36, P=0.99). However, the incidence of moderate-severe PTS decreased in CDT group was lower than that in the control group (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.92, P=0.01). ConclusionsCompared with the control group, catheter-directed thrombolysis does not reduce the incidence of PTS and VTE recurrence rate, cannot improve the long-term patency of the iliofemoral vein, yet can prevent the occurrence of moderate to severe PTS. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To analyze the influencing factors of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods AIS patients hospitalized in the Department of Neurology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between June 2017 and June 2020 and receiving rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis were selected. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had HT, HT group and non-HT group. General data such as patient’s age, sex, past history, score of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) before thrombolysis, and related biochemical examination indicators were collected, to analyze the difference between the patients with HT or not, and analyze the related factors affecting the HT of AIS patients after intravenous thrombolysis. Results A total of patients 323 were included. Among them, 46 cases (14.2%) had HT, and 277 cases (85.8%) had no-HT. Except for serum free triiodothyronine (FT3), atrial fibrillation, hypertension, cerebral infarction area, NIHSS score before thrombolysis, uric acid, blood glucose before thrombolysis, white blood cell count, albumin level, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase / alanine aminotransferase and C-reactive protein (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in other indexes between the two groups (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that NIHSS score≥13 before thrombolysis, aspartate aminotransferase / alanine aminotransferase, blood glucose before thrombolysis≥12.74 mmol/L, low FT3 level, massive cerebral infarction, and atrial fibrillation were independent risk factors for HT after thrombolysis in AIS. Conclusions FT3 and aspartate aminotransferase / alanine aminotransferase levels may be good biomarkers for predicting HT after intravenous thrombolysis. For patients with reduced albumin and uric acid levels, supplementation of exogenous uric acid and albumin may help reduce the risk of HT after AIS thrombolysis.