Plantar pressure distribution can reflect the force of several key points on foot while standing and walking. A comprehensive understanding of the plantar pressure distribution makes great sense in the following aspects:the understanding of the normal foot biomechanics and function, clinical diagnosis, measurement of disease extent, postoperative efficacy evaluation, and rehabilitation research. A simple plantar pressure measurement device was designed in this study. This paper uses FlexiForce flexible sensor to pickup plantar pressure signal and USB A/D board to do data acquisition. The data are transferred into a laptop and processed by a VB-based software which can display, remember and replay the data. We chose patients with hallux valgus and normal people to measure the pressure distribution and make contrast analysis of plantar pressure with this device. It can be concluded that people with hallux valgus have higher pressure on the second metatarsophalangeal joint and the distribution move outward. The plantar pressure of patients postoperative could be greatly improved compared to the preoperative. The function of this device has been confirmed.
0bjective To evaluate the efficacy of FEV6 and FEV1／FEV6 as surrogates for FVC and FEV1／FVC in the spirometric diagnosis of airway obstruction，and to determine the fixed cut-off point of FEV1／FEV6 which can be used as an alternative for FEV1／FVC lt; 70％.Methods Spirometry measurements were perform ed in 128 participants．FEV1，FEV6，FVC，FEV1％pred，FVC％pred，FEV1／FVC and FEV1／FEV6 were measured and analyzed.FEV1／FVClt;70％ was used as the“gold standard”。Severity of obstruction was based on FEV ％ pred．From ROC curve analysis，the FEV1／FEV6 ratio，which corresponded to optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity，was determined．Correlation between FEV1／FVC and FEV1／FEV6 was studied．Results Of 128 participants，there were 65(51％)with FEV1／FVC ≥70％ ．Of the 63 participants with FEV1／FVC lt;70％ ，there were 5 with FEV1／FEV6 between 70.09％ to 71％。There was no significant difference between the mean value of FVC and that of FEV ．Lifear correlation was revealed between FEV1／FVC and FEV1／FEV6 with the value close to 1(r=0.9979，Plt;0.0001)．From ROC curve analysis，the FEV1／FEV6lt;71.14％ was the best cut-off point coresponding to FEV1／FVC lt;70％ ．Conclusion These results suggest that FEV1／FEV6 is a valid alternative to FEV1／FVC for spirometric diagnosis of airw ay obstruction．There is a b corelation between FEV1／FEV6 and FEV1／FVC．
Objective To determine the efficacy of forced expiratory volume in six seconds( FEV6 ) as an alternative for forced vital capacity( FVC) in the diagnosis for mild-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease( COPD) .Methods A total of 402 mild-moderate COPD and 217 non-COPD patients’ spirometric examinations were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between FEV6 and FVC, FEV1 /FVC and FEV1 /FEV6 was evaluated by the Spearman test. Considering FEV1 /FVC lt;70% as being the ‘golden standard’ for airway obstruction, a ROC curve was used to determine the best cut-off point for the FEV1 /FEV6 ratio in the diagnosis for COPD. Results The Spearman correlation test revealed the FEV1 and FEV6 , FEV1 /FEV6 and FEV1 /FVC ratios were highly correlated ( r = 0. 992, 0. 980, respectively, P = 0. 000) . Using FEV1 /FEV6 lt; 70% as the diagnosis standard, 12. 69% of the 402 patients could not be diagnosed as COPD. The FEV1 /FVC ratio of these patients was very close to 70% . The best cut-off point for the FEV1 /FEV6 ratio in the diagnosis of mild-moderate COPD was 72% while the sensitivity and specificity were 94. 7% and 92. 2% , respectively. Conclusions There is a b correlation between FEV1 /FVC and FEV1 /FEV6 . The FEV6 can be a valid alternative for FVC in the diagnosis for mild-moderate COPD, although it may result in false negative. The best cut-off point for the FEV1 /FEV6 ratio is 72% .
Objective To observe the changes of force bearing area and pressures of the rabbit tibiofemoral contact area and the biomechanical reconstruction level of joint after meniscal allograft. Methods A total of 28 Japanese rabbits were involved, weighing 3.0-3.5 kg, male or female. Of 28 rabbits, 7 were selected as meniscus donors, the remaining 21 rabbits were randomized into group A (n=7), group B (n=7), and group C (n=7). Group A underwent single knee opening and suturing, group B underwent medial meniscus excision and suturing, and group C underwent medial meniscus allograft after medial meniscus excision and suturing. The rabbits were sacrified at 12 weeks after operation for biomechanical observation through biomechanical machine and color imaging system. The meniscus tissue specimens were harvested from groups A and C to perform histological and immunohistochemical staining. Results After operation, all rabbits in 3 groups survived to the end of experiment. There were significant differences in the force bearing area and pressures at 0-90° flexion between group B and groups A, C (P lt; 0.05) at 12 weeks, showing no significant difference between group A and group C (P gt; 0.05); and there were significant differences in the force bearing area and pressures at 120° flexion among 3 groups (P lt; 0.05). The histological observation showed that the number of cartilage cells and collagen fibers returned to normal in group C, and the immunohistochemical staining showed that transplanted meniscus of group C contained large amounts of collagen fibers consisting of collagen type I and collagen type II. After 12 weeks of operation, the collagen type I contents were 0.612 5 ± 0.059 8 in group A and 0.587 2 ± 0.063 9 in group C, showing no significant difference (t=0.765, P=0.465); the collagen type II contents were 0.772 4 ± 0.081 5 and 0.814 3 ± 0.051 7, respectively, showing no significant difference (t= —0.136, P=0.894). Conclusion The allograft of rabbit meniscus can significantly increase the force bearing area of the tibiofemoral contact area and reduce the average pressure. Therefore, biomechanically speaking, the meniscus allograft can protect the articular cartilage and reconstruct the biomechanical balance.
Objective To establish amedical reference for adult pulmonary function parameters and a normal FEV1 /FVC% pred in population of Shanghai. Methods Subjects who underwent routine physical examination were initially screened and those who met enrollment criteria with age over 18 years old were required to underwent pulmonary function tests in Zhongshan Hospital from June 2009 to February 2010. After screening of 450 subjects, a total of 240 subjects with normal pulmonary function and 120 subjects with mild small airway abnormalities were enrolled in this study according to the prediction equations established in1988. All subjects were assigned into 6 groups according to their age with30 males amd 30 females in each group. Pulmonary function parameters including VC, FVC, FEV1 , FEV1 /FVC, PEF, FEF25% , FEF50% , FEF75% , RV, FRC, TLC, RV /TLC, DLCO, and KCO were collected for analysis. New prediction equations for the above 14 parameters were established by parameters of anthropometry. The medical reference ranges of 14 parameters were calculated according to the newprediction equations. The normal FEV1 /FVC%pred was also calculated. Results New prediction equations for normal adult pulmonary function parameters in Shanghai were established. DLCO =5.206 +4. 314 ×gender ( “male”= 1, “female”=0) - 0. 144 ×age( y) +0. 098 × height( cm) +0. 082 ×weight( kg) , KCO =9. 346 - 0. 026 ×age( y) - 0. 031 ×height( cm) +0. 025 ×weight( kg) .The LLN( P5) of VC, FVC, FEV1 , FEV1 /FVC, the LLN( P2. 5 ) and the upper limit of normal value ( P97. 5) of FRC, TLC, RV, RV/TLC were calculated. The LLN( P5) of FEV1 /FVC = 101. 924 - 0. 144 × age ( y) - 0. 118 ×high( cm) . The lower normal limit of FEV1 /FVC% pred was 92% . Conclusions This is the first time to have the medical reference of FEV1 /FVC% pred in China, and new prediction equations for DLCO in Shanghai. The LLN of FEV1 /FVC or FEV1 /FVC% pred lt;92% can be used as diagnostic criteria for obstructive ventilation disorder. Instead of using FEV1% pred lt; 80% , FEV1 lt; LLN can be used as diagnostic criteria for mild ventilation disorder.
Objective To observe the decline ratio of FEV1 after inhaling 0. 9% saline to the baseline, and to explore its relation to the result of bronchial provocation test ( BPT) with methacholine.Methods 115 patients with chronic cough or chest tightness were collected in Shougang Hospital, Peking University from March 2008 to September 2009. They were all performed pulmonary function test and the decline ratio of FEV1 after inhaling 0.9% saline to the baseline( ΔFEV1 ) was measured. Then they were allperformed BPT with methacholine. The predictive value of ΔFEV1 measurement for BPT results was evaluated. Results 49 cases yielded positive results in methacholine BPT, with ΔFEV1 gt; 3% in 35 cases and gt;5% in 20 cases. 66 casess yielded negative results in methacholine BPT, with ΔFEV1 gt; 3% in 6 cases. The sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 91% respectively when ΔFEV1 gt;3% was set as a cutoff,and which were 40. 8% and 100% respectively when ΔFEV1 gt;5% was set as a cut-off. All the patients didn’t show any serious adverse reaction. Conclusion ΔFEV1 gt;3% after inhaling 0. 9% saline is a good predictor for BPT results. More caution should be paid to these patients when performing BPT.
Respiratory oscillometry is a lung function test that measures the mechanical properties of respiratory system by the forced oscillation technique. Oscillometry can be used in those who cannot perform traditional lung function tests, including young children. It is also an important tool to assess small airways function in clinical and research fields. In 2020, the European Respiratory Society published a new technical standard for respiratory oscillometry, which offered updated technical recommendations on the hardware, software, testing protocols and quality control of oscillometry measurements. This paper interpreted the new technical standard, for providing technical suggestions regarding oscillometry measurements in clinical and research settings, and as a reference for developing technical statements and recommendations for oscillometry in China.
To address the challenges of capturing micro-strains in detecting esophageal motility disorders and the limitations of existing high-resolution manometry and functional intraluminal imaging probes in directly measuring esophageal tissue electrical impedance, this study proposes a novel flexible balloon sensor structure that integrates a piezoelectric film assembly with a distributed impedance electrode array. Using the electrical analysis module in the finite element analysis (FEA) software, simulations of the forward problem for esophageal impedance detection were conducted to optimize the excitation source parameters, and a physical prototype was fabricated. Under a relative excitation mode with a voltage sensitivity of 2.059%, the voltage output characteristics of the impedance electrode array were analyzed during linear changes in the balloon filling volume. Based on the performance variation of the piezoelectric film assembly, 80% was selected as the optimal filling volume. Force-electric coupling tests were conducted on the balloon sensor using a pressure testing platform, revealing that both the piezoelectric film assembly inside the balloon and the impedance electrodes outside the balloon exhibited significant load differentiation characteristics as the force application point shifted. In summary, this balloon sensor facilitates the localization of force application while simultaneously analyzing esophageal tissue properties, offering a novel diagnostic approach and objective tool for esophageal disease detection.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness of forced air warming for the maintenance of perioperative core temperature, so as to provide clinical evidence for an appropriate warming plan during the perioperative period. Methods We electronically searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM and CNKI from 2000 to 2012, so as to comprehensively collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the effectiveness of different warming methods for the maintenance of perioperative core temperature (including forced air warming, resistive-heating blanket/electric heating pad, circulating water mattress, and infrared ray radiant heating system) for maintenance of perioperative core temperature. References of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results Eleven RCTs involving 577 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, in the maintenance of core temperature during the perioperative period, forced air warming was superior to resistive-heating blanket/electric heating pad (SMD= –0.40, 95%CI –0.73 to –0.06), circulating water mattress (SMD= –1.10, 95%CI –1.55 to –0.66), and infrared ray radiant heating system (SMD= –0.69, 95%CI –1.06 to –0.32). In the incidence of hypothermia during the perioperative period, the group of forced air warming was lower than the group of blanket/electric heating pad (RR=1.76, 95%CI 1.15 to 2.69), but it was the same as the group of infrared ray radiant heating system (RR=1.37, 95%CI 0.83 to 2.27). In the incidence of shivering during the perioperative period, the group of forced air warming was the same as the group of blanket/electric heating pad (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.18 to 3.21) and the group of infrared ray radiant heating system (RR=0.8, 95%CI 0.19 to 3.36). Conclusion Compared with resistive-heating blanket/electric heating pad, circulating water mattress, and infrared ray radiant heating system, forced air warming maintains patients’ core temperature better during the perioperative period, with a lower incidences of hypothermia. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality RCTs with large sample size are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective Since 2009, assessment of asthma control in Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) includes current clinical control and future risk. " Current clinical control” is replaced by " symptom control” in GINA 2015, and lung function is excluded from assessment of current clinical control. This study was designed to investigate the agreement in current asthma control assessment between GINA 2009 and 2015, and to explore whether FEV1 monitoring plays an important role in this context. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with stable asthma (n=138). The levels of asthma control were graded by GINA 2009 and GINA 2015, respectively. Demographic data, spirometry, exacerbations in the past 12 months, peripheral blood cells, induced sputum were collected. Kappa coefficient was used to measure the agreement of the two asthma control tools. Association of the asthma control levels using the two tools with the exacerbations in the past 12 months was examined by Spearman correlations. Additionally, associations of lung function with the exacerbations in the past 12 months were analyzed. Results Agreement in assessing current asthma control between GINA 2009 and 2015 was moderate (Kappa=0.595, P<0.001). Compared with GINA 2009, the patients with well-controlled asthma assessed by GINA 2015 had worse FEV1%pred [(89.9±12.9)% vs. (79.9±18.2)%, P=0.013], the partly controlled subjects assessed by GINA 2015 had worse asthma control scores in ACQ-6 score (0.8±0.7 vs. 1.1±0.7, P=0.028) and ACT score (20.7±2.5 vs. 19.4±2.5, P=0.007). Furthermore, asthma control levels assessed by either GINA 2015 or 2009 were related to exacerbations in the past 12 months and stronger relationship was presented in GINA 2015 (r=–0.268 for GINA 2015 vs. r=–0.212 for GINA 2009, respectively). In addition, there were no differences in cell counts in induced sputum or peripheral blood or IgE level in peripheral blood in patients with different asthma control levels assessing by GINA 2009 and 2015. Conclusions Our study indicates that it has a moderate agreement of assessing current asthma control between GINA 2015 and 2009. Compared with GINA 2009, absence of FEV1 monitoring from GINA 2015 would result in worse lung function in well-controlled asthma and worse asthma control scores in partly controlled asthma. Addition of FEV1 monitoring to GINA 2015 would weaken the relationship between current asthma control and future asthma outcomes, although it didn't reach statistical significance. Our study supports that GINA 2015 lacking lung function monitoring in current asthma control assessment is applicable in clinical practice.